The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogenous group of clonal myeloid neoplasms originating in hematopoietic stem cells. They are characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis resulting in dysplasia in hematopoietic cells, and are associated with peripheral blood cytopenias, especially anemia, and a propensity to leukemic transformation.1-4 The incidence of MDS increases with age and, in the general population, is approximately 5 cases per 100,000 people per year. The median age of onset is above the age of 70 years.1-5 Patients with MDS are classified using one of several scoring systems.6-9 Most patients are assigned to the lower-risk or higher-risk groups.
The recent revolution in malignant hematology has not skipped the field of MDS. Basic and clinical research over the last couple of decades has shed light on various aspects of these disorders. New genetic, digital and other tools have allowed a better understanding of the biology, leading to novel diagnostic and, most importantly, therapeutic approaches. In this issue of Haematologica, a series of major reviews summarizes the known information as well as the new developments.10-14
About three decades ago, it was hoped to find “the single MDS mutation”. However, life is more complex. Nevertheless, a lot has been gained since. We learnt to detect dozens of somatic and germline myeloid mutations.15,16 Almost every MDS patient has at least one mutation, many of which, although not specific, can be recognized as typical.4 The gene functions and interactions are becoming clear. Some mutation-based (SF3B1, TP53) disease entities have recently been defined.7-9 Finally, mutations have been introduced into the classifications and some of them serve as therapeutic targets. These exciting genetic developments are elegantly reported by Mario Cazzola and Luca Malcovati.10
We are becoming increasingly aware of the complexity of the pathogenesis of MDS. We know today that genetic mutations are common with normal/healthy aging,17 resulting in clonal hematopoiesis, which could potentially lead to myeloid neoplasms, including MDS.18 Clonal hematopoiesis in MDS has long been associated with systemic inflammatory conditions and disordered inflammatory signalling, and the term “inflammaging” has been coined to describe this phenomenon.19 The inter-relationships between clonal hematopoiesis, aging and inflammation in the pathogenesis of MDS are reviewed by Matthew Villaume and Michael Savona.11 Since MDS has been recognized as a separate entity,20 its diagnosis has been based on suspected clinical and laboratory features, exclusion of other entities, but mainly bone marrow morphology and blast count.21-23 Flow cytometry and genetics have served as additional tools. The current “standard” diagnostic approach when MDS is suspected is fully reviewed by Howard Oster, Arjan van de Loosdrecht and Moshe Mittelman. Novel information is provided suggesting that modern tools such as genetic and digital techniques, and using peripheral blood instead of bone marrow, might shift the paradigm towards more accurate and less invasive approaches.13
The management of MDS is based on traditional regimens together with newly developed strategies.21-23 For patients with lower-risk MDS and anemia, red blood cell transfusions with iron chelation and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents have been with us for three decades. Lenalidomide is effective in MDS-del(5q),24 but also in non-del(5q).25 Novel agents have recently been approved, such as luspatercept,26 and imetelstat.27 Others, such as roxadustat,28 Ker 050 and AG-946 are still under investigation, raising hopes for the future. Thrombomimetics can address thrombocytopenia,29 although their development has been suspended due to safety concerns, hopefully temporarily.30 This is all reviewed by Almuth Maria Anni Merz and Uwe Platzbecker.13
Patients with higher-risk MDS can be treated with standard therapy for acute myeloid leukemia, as well as supportive treatment.21-23 For more than a decade, hypomethylating agents have formed the basis of frontline treatment.31 Attempts to surpass the barrier of response rate of about 50%, lasting for about 2 years, are still ongoing and are reviewed by Nicolaus Kröger, who summarizes the state of the art on hematopoietic cell transplantation in MDS which, to date, is still the only curable strategy.14
The entire review series on MDS provides the readers of Haematologica a comprehensive educational summary of the current knowledge in the field, as well as information on novel, cutting-edge and future directions for interested specialists.
Footnotes
- Received September 24, 2024
- Accepted October 1, 2024
Correspondence
Disclosures
No conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
- Mittelman M. The myelodysplastic syndromes--1990. Isr J Med Sci. 1990; 26(8):468-478. Google Scholar
- Tefferi A, Vardiman JW. Myelodysplastic syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(19):1872-1885. Google Scholar
- Malcovati L, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Bowen D. Diagnosis and treatment of primary myelodysplastic syndromes in adults: recommendations from the European LeukemiaNet. Blood. 2013; 122(17):2943-2964. Google Scholar
- Cazzola M. Myelodysplastic Syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383(14):1358-1374. Google Scholar
- de Swart L, Smith A, Johnston TW. Validation of the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a report from the prospective European LeukaemiaNet MDS (EUMDS) registry. Br J Haematol. 2015; 170(3):372-383. Google Scholar
- Greenberg PL, Tuechler H, Schanz J. Revised International Prognostic Scoring System for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2012; 120(12):2454-2465. Google Scholar
- Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian RP. International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias: integrating morphologic, clinical, and genomic data. Blood. 2022; 140(11):1200-1228. Google Scholar
- Khoury JD, Solary E, Abla O. The 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification of haematolymphoid tumours: myeloid and histiocytic/dendritic neoplasms. Leukemia. 2022; 36(7):1703-1719. Google Scholar
- Bernard E, Tuechler H, Greenberg PL. Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System for myelodysplastic syndromes. NEJM Evid. 2022; 1(7):EVIDoa2200008. Google Scholar
- Cazzola M, Malcovati L. Genome sequencing in the management of myelodysplastic syndromes and related disorders. Haematologica. 2025; 110(2):319-329. Google Scholar
- Villaume MT, Savona MR. Pathogenesis and inflammaging in myelodysplastic syndromes. Haematologica. 2025; 110(2):283-299. Google Scholar
- Oster H, van de Loosdrecht AA, Mittelman M. Diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes: the classic and the novel. Haematologica. 2025; 110(2):300-311. Google Scholar
- Merz AMA, Platzbecker U. Treatment of lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Haematologica. 2025; 110(2):330-338. Google Scholar
- Kröger N. Treatment of high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Haematologica. 2025; 110(2):339-349. Google Scholar
- Bejar R, Stevenson K, Abdel-Wahab O. Clinical effect of point mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364(26):2496-2506. Google Scholar
- Haferlach T, Nagata Y, Grossmann V. Landscape of genetic lesions in 944 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia. 2014; 28(2):241-247. Google Scholar
- Jaiswal S, Fontanillas P, Flannick J. Age-related clonal hematopoiesis associated with adverse outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(26):2488-2498. Google Scholar
- Steensma DP, Bejar R, Jaiswal S. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential and its distinction from myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2015; 126(1):9-16. Google Scholar
- Weeks LD, Marinac CR, Redd R. Age-related diseases of inflammation in myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood. 2022; 139(8):1246-1250. Google Scholar
- Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT. Proposals for the classification of the myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol. 1982; 51(2):189-199. Google Scholar
- Garcia-Manero G, Chien KS, Montalban-Bravo G. Myelodysplastic syndromes: 2021 update on diagnosis, risk stratification and management. Am J Hematol. 2020; 95(11):1399-1420. Google Scholar
- Sekeres MA, Taylor J. Diagnosis and treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes: a review. JAMA. 2022; 328(9):872-880. Google Scholar
- Hellström-Lindberg E, Tobiasson M, Greenberg P. Myelodysplastic syndromes: moving towards personalized management. Haematologica. 2020; 105(7):1765-1779. Google Scholar
- Fenaux P, Giagounidis A, Selleslag D. MDS-004 Lenalidomide del5q Study Group: a randomized phase 3 study of lenalidomide versus placebo in RBC transfusion-dependent patients with low-/intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with del 5q. Blood. 2011; 118(14):3765-3776. Google Scholar
- Santini V, Almeida A, Giagounidis A. Randomized phase III study of lenalidomide versus placebo in RBC transfusiondependent patients with lower-risk non-del(5q) myelodysplastic syndromes and ineligible for or refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34(25):2988-2996. Google Scholar
- Platzbecker U, Della Porta MG, Santini V. Efficacy and safety of luspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesisstimulating agent-naive, transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS): interim analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2023; 402(10399):373-385. Google Scholar
- Platzbecker U, Santini V, Fenaux P. Imetelstat in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes who have relapsed or are refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (IMerge): a multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2024; 403(10423):249-260. Google Scholar
- Mittelman M, Henry DH, Glaspy JA. Roxadustat versus placebo for patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: MATTERHORN phase 3, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Am J Hematol. 2024; 99(9):1778-1789. Google Scholar
- Oliva EN, Alati C, Santini V. Eltrombopag versus placebo for low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with thrombocytopenia (EQoL-MDS): phase 1 results of a single-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 2 superiority trial. Lancet Haematol. 2017; 4(3):e127-e136. Google Scholar
- Mittelman M. Good news for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and thrombocytopenia. Lancet Haematol. 2018; 5(3):e100-e101. Google Scholar
- Fenaux P, Mufti GJ, Hellstrom-Lindberg E. Efficacy of azacitidine compared with that of conventional care regimens in the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomised, open-label, phase III study. Lancet Oncol. 2009; 10(3):223-232. Google Scholar
Figures & Tables
Article Information
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.