Children with Down syndrome (DS) have a 20-fold increased risk of B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) compared to children without DS.1 The mechanism underlying the increased risk is not well understood. Outcomes in DS-ALL are poorer than in children without DS, with increased risk of relapse and treatment-related mortality,2 making it imperative to identify new therapeutic targets to improve outcomes. DS-ALL is notable for harboring CRLF2/JAK2 alterations in 50% of cases,3,4 demonstrating hyperactive RAS signaling in up to 80% of cases,5 and exhibiting PAX5 and KRAS mutations in 25% and 15% of cases, respectively.6 Experimental systems are needed to better understand the pathogenesis of DS-ALL and test targeted therapies. Here, we report the generation of a de novo mouse model and cell lines recapitulating key features of DS-ALL, and demonstrate cytotoxicity of agents which may have efficacy in DS-ALL and other leukemias, including the NAMPT inhibitor FK866 as well as agents targeting DNA damage responses, HSP90, autophagy, and JAK signaling. We created novel mouse models of DS and non-DS ALL by introducing KrasG12D and Pax5 heterozygosity, both driven by CD19-Cre, in the Dp16 mouse model of DS7 and in littermate control wild-type (WT) mice. KrasG12D.Pax5+/- mice on both Dp16 and WT backgrounds developed highly penetrant B-ALL, with 8 out of 9 Dp16 and 23 out of 23 WT moribund leukemic mice demonstrating expansion of a B-progenitor population (typically B220+CD43+CD24+CD25+) (Figure 1A) in the bone marrow, spleen, and lymph nodes (Figure 1B). Notably, the Dp16 KrasG12D.Pax5+/- B-ALL mice had a significantly shorter latency to disease than WT KrasG12D.Pax5+/- B-ALL mice (80 vs. 114 days, P<0.0001). Dp16 mice with either KrasG12D or Pax5 heterozygosity alone also developed leukemias significantly earlier and at greater penetrance than WT mice with these alterations (P<0.05), but with a longer latency and less complete penetrance than mice bearing both alterations (Figure 1C). While Dp16 Pax5+/- mice developed B-ALL, Dp16 or WT KrasG12D mice typically developed myeloid or T-cell disease (Online Supplementary Figure S1A-C). We confirmed disease transplantability by injecting splenic blasts from leukemic Dp16 and WT KrasG12D.Pax5+/- mice into NSG mice. Most primary samples (7 out of 8 WT, 7 out of 8 Dp16) generated leukemia in one or more recipient mice, with marrow and splenic infiltration with blasts of the same B-progenitor immunophenotype as the primary cells. There was no difference in survival in NSG recipient mice of WT versus Dp16 B-ALL blasts (Online Supplementary Figure S1D, E). All animal experiments were performed with the approval of the Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Next, we generated immortal B-ALL cell lines from 5 Dp16 and 2 WT KrasG12D.Pax5+/- mice by incubating splenic blasts isolated from secondary NSG mouse xenografts with IL-7-supplemented medium for at least one month. These B-ALL lines displayed a B220+CD43+CD24+CD25+ B-progenitor immunophenotype, similar to that of primary mouse samples (Online Supplementary Figure S1F) and maintained the presence of the Dp16 transgene (data not shown).
Pax5+/- and WT KrasG12D.Pax5+/- mice developed B-ALL with high penetrance, with a significantly shorter median latency in Dp16 KrasG12D.Pax5+/- compared to WT KrasG12D.Pax5+/- mice (80 vs. 114 days, P<0.0001, log-rank test). Latency to disease was also shorter in Dp16 KrasG12D compared to WT KrasG12D mice (P=0.01), and Dp16 Pax5+/- compared to WT Pax5+/- mice (P<0.01). Mice were monitored for at least 500 days.
We performed whole transcriptome sequencing to characterize NSG-expanded Dp16 and WT KrasG12D.Pax5+/- B-ALL blasts compared to control early B-lineage (B220+) bone marrow (BM) cells from age-matched healthy Dp16 and WT mice. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) using Hallmark gene sets demonstrated increased expression of oncogenic Myc targets and oxidative phosphorylation associated genes in both B-ALL models (Figure 2A), as well as upregulation of common human B-ALL oncogenes (including Kras and Flt3) and downregulation of genes frequently inactivated in human B-ALL (including Ikzf1 and Pax5)6,8 (Online Supplementary Figure S2A). The Dp16 KrasG12D.Pax5+/- B-ALL model also displayed significant upregulation of DNA repair signaling compared to healthy Dp16 control B cells (Figure 2A). We also compared gene expression in Dp16 and WT control B cells. Genes upregulated in human DS versus non-DS lymphoid cells,9 including Dyrk1a, Runx1, Hmgn1, Rcan1, Ifnar1, Ifnar2, and Ifngr2, were among the top upregulated genes in Dp16 versus WT B cells (Online Supplementary Figure S2B).
We conducted whole exome sequencing to determine if Dp16 and WT KrasG12D.Pax5+/- B-ALL have secondary alterations common in human leukemia. We observed that 8 out of 8 leukemias arising independently in mice had an additional mutation in Pax5 and/or Ikzf1, and 6 out of 8 had alterations in epigenetic-associated genes, alterations also commonly observed in both DS and non-DS ALL.6,8 Interestingly, 5 out of 6 mice with additional Pax5 alterations had a To x mutation, alterations also observed to co-occur in human B-ALL (Figure 2B).10
Next, we performed drug screens in the Dp16 and WT KrasG12D. Pax5+/- B-ALL cell lines and in 4 DS-ALL patient samples to evaluate novel therapeutic agents. We performed a high-throughput screen with the Broad Institute Informer Set in 2 Dp16 and 2 WT KrasG12D.Pax5+/- B-ALL cell lines. Inhibitors of mitosis, DNA damage response, and kinases were effective in all 4 cell lines. Only the HSP90 inhibitor AT13387 was significantly more effective in the Dp16 versus WT KrasG12D.Pax5+/- B-ALL cell lines (34.01 vs. 47.5 nM, P=0.04) (Online Supplementary Figure S3A). We also performed cytotoxicity testing using a custom leukemia panel of 35 agents. We found that luminespib, bortezomib, inotuzumab, JQ1, palbociclib, vorinostat, and most kinase inhibitors reduced viability of at least 3 out of 4 B-ALL cell lines and 2 out of 4 DS-ALL patient samples at nanomolar-range concentrations. Many other compounds tested were effective in all mouse B-ALL cell lines, but only in one DS-ALL patient sample, potentially due to heterogeneity of these cases (Online Supplementary Figure S3B).
We chose the most effective drugs from the custom leukemia panel and the Broad Institute Informer Set high-throughput screen, and from among those identified from prior work,11 for testing in PDX-expanded DS and non-DS B-ALL patient samples. All patient samples were collected with informed consent under a protocol approved by the Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Review Board. We selected agents which had demonstrated cytotoxicity in the Dp16 KrasG12D. Pax5+/- B-ALL cell lines and DS-ALL patient samples, and have shown good bioavailability and safety profiles in prior mouse xenograft studies and/or potential clinical utility in phase I trials. Most tested agents significantly reduced the viability of both DS-ALL and non-DS ALL patient samples (Figure 3A). There were no significant differences in sensitivity based on DS versus non-DS or CRLF2-mutated versus CRLF2-wild-type status. DS-ALL and non-DS ALL samples were most sensitive to therapies targeting the DNA damage response (dinaciclib), autophagy (bafilomycin A1), JAK signaling (cucurbitacin I), and glycolysis (FK866). We confirmed the on-target mechanism of FK866 cytotoxicity via inhibition of the glycolytic enzyme NAMPT, by demonstrating that NAD+ supplementation in K187 cells prevented cytotoxicity of FK866 but not doxorubicin (Figure 3B). Finally, we tested 2 effective agents, FK866 and cucurbitacin I, in vivo in mice xenografted with CRLF2/JAK2-mutated DS-ALL patient samples 839 and K187. Cucurbitacin I modestly reduced peripheral blood (PB) disease burden of 839-xenografted mice and had no effect on PB or BM burden or spleen weights of K187-xenografted mice (Online Supplementary Figure S3C-E). FK866 significantly reduced PB burden of both 839 and K187-xenografted mice throughout treatment, and reduced spleen weight and BM burden of K187 mice (Figure 3C-E).
Other mouse models and cell lines recapitulating DS-ALL have been developed, but these require viral transduction and/or transplantation into WT mice.12,13 To generate our novel syngeneic DS-ALL mouse model, we chose the Dp16 mouse model because it contains a large complement of Hsa21 orthologues, including the Down syndrome critical region, and we induced KrasG12D, Pax5 heterozygosity, or both specifically in B cells via CD19-mediated Cre expression. The latency to disease for each genotype (KrasG12D.Pax5+/-, KrasG12D, and Pax5+/-) was significantly shorter for Dp16 than for WT mice, demonstrating the leukemogenic effect of the Dp16 genetic background. Importantly, this DS-ALL mouse model contains a fully native marrow microenvironment and immune system, providing a valuable opportunity to study interactions between native DS BM cell populations and developing B-ALL.
Triplication of specific Hsa21 genes likely directly contributes to the increased risk of DS-ALL, and Hsa21 genes DYRK1A and HMGN1 may be therapeutic targets in DS-ALL.12,13 We observed Dyrk1a, Hmgn1, and Runx1 were significantly upregulated in Dp16 BM B cells compared to WT, supporting utility of our model for studies of novel therapies. We also observed upregulation of Ifnar1, Ifnar2, and Ifngr2, paralleling a key feature of immune dysregulation observed in DS,14 which may contribute to features associated with DS-ALL.
Despite differences in latency to disease between the Dp16 and WT B-ALL mouse models, the GSEA analyses and mouse cell line drug screening revealed limited biological differences between the blasts in each model. Both the Dp16 and WT B-ALL cells demonstrated upregulation of pathways involving Myc signaling and oxidative phosphorylation, and both mouse and human DS and non-DS B-ALL cells were similarly sensitive to novel therapeutic agents. These results parallel another chemosensitivity study, which showed equal sensitivity of DS and non-DS ALL samples to several chemotherapies.15 Finally, NSG recipients of established Dp16 and WT KrasG12D. Pax5+/- leukemic blasts demonstrated the same latency to disease. Overall, our findings suggest the main difference between the Dp16 and WT KrasG12D.Pax5+/- models is in the timing of leukemia initiation, rather than features of the resulting leukemic blasts.
The Dp16 KrasG12D.Pax5+/- B-ALL mouse model presented here is a powerful tool for studies of DS-ALL. It constitutes a de novo ALL in a DS model organism with a native stromal microenvironment and immune system, and demonstrates a transcriptome profile and secondary alterations that recapitulate key features of DS-ALL. Our in vitro screen identified several new agents with potential utility in DS and non-DS ALL, and our in vivo DS-ALL PDX studies confirmed cytotoxicity of the NAMPT inhibitor FK866.
Footnotes
- Received November 27, 2023
- Accepted July 16, 2024
Correspondence
Disclosures
No conflicts of interest to disclose.
Funding
Acknowledgments
We thank Roger Reeves and Benjamin Devenney (Johns Hopkins University) for guidance with Dp16 mice. We thank Amos Gaikwad and Tatiana Goltsova of the Texas Children’s Cancer Center Flow Cytometry Core Laboratory.
References
- Hasle H, Clemmensen IH, Mikkelsen M. Risks of leukaemia and solid tumours in individuals with Down’s syndrome. Lancet. 2000; 355(9199):165-169. Google Scholar
- Buitenkamp TD, Izraeli S, Zimmermann M. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children with Down syndrome: a retrospective analysis from the Ponte di Legno study group. Blood. 2014; 123(1):70-77. Google Scholar
- Hertzberg L, Vendramini E, Ganmore I. Down syndrome acute lymphoblastic leukemia, a highly heterogeneous disease in which aberrant expression of CRLF2 is associated with mutated JAK2: a report from the International BFM Study Group. Blood. 2010; 115(5):1006-1017. Google Scholar
- Mullighan CG, Collins-Underwood JR, Phillips LA. Rearrangement of CRLF2 in B-progenitor- and Down syndromeassociated acute lymphoblastic leukemia. NatGenet. 2009; 41(11):1243-1246. Google Scholar
- Koschut D, Ray D, Li Z. RAS-protein activation but not mutation status is an outcome predictor and unifying therapeutic target for high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Oncogene. 2021; 40(4):746-762. Google Scholar
- Li Z, Chang TC, Junco JJ. Genomic landscape of Down syndrome-associated acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2023; 142(2):172-184. Google Scholar
- Li Z, Yu T, Morishima M. Duplication of the entire 22.9 Mb human chromosome 21 syntenic region on mouse chromosome 16 causes cardiovascular and gastrointestinal abnormalities. Hum Mol Genet. 2007; 16(11):1359-1366. Google Scholar
- Brady SW, Roberts KG, Gu Z. The genomic landscape of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Genet. 2022; 54(9):1376-1389. Google Scholar
- Sullivan KD, Lewis HC, Hill AA. Trisomy 21 consistently activates the interferon response. Elife. 2016; 5:e16220. Google Scholar
- Zaliova M, Stuchly J, Winkowska L. Genomic landscape of pediatric B-other acute lymphoblastic leukemia in a consecutive European cohort. Haematologica. 2019; 104(7):1396-1406. Google Scholar
- Schraw JM, Junco JJ, Brown AL, Scheurer ME, Rabin KR, Lupo PJ. Metabolomic profiling identifies pathways associated with minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. EBioMedicine. 2019; 48:49-57. Google Scholar
- Carey-Smith SL, Simad MH, Panchal K. Efficacy of DYRK1A inhibitors in novel models of Down syndrome acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica. 2024; 109(7):2309-2315. Google Scholar
- Lane AA, Chapuy B, Lin CY. Triplication of a 21q22 region contributes to B cell transformation through HMGN1 overexpression and loss of histone H3 Lys27 trimethylation. Nat Genet. 2014; 46(6):618-623. Google Scholar
- Galbraith MD, Rachubinski AL, Smith KP. Multidimensional definition of the interferonopathy of Down syndrome and its response to JAK inhibition. Sci Adv. 2023; 9(26)Google Scholar
- Zwaan CM, Kaspers GJ, Pieters R. Different drug sensitivity profiles of acute myeloid and lymphoblastic leukemia and normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells in children with and without Down syndrome. Blood. 2002; 99(1):245-251. Google Scholar
Data Supplements
Figures & Tables
Article Information
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.