Osteoporosis and osteonecrosis are serious skeletal side effects during or following treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).1,2 Osteonecrosis results from impaired blood supply to the bone, which may be caused by intravascular emboli, increased marrow pressure, and/or direct blood vessel injury.2 This condition mainly affects the weight-bearing joints and can result in chronic pain, functional limitations, and articular collapse.3 The exact pathophysiology is not completely understood, but hypercoagulability following exposure to corticosteroids (especially concomitantly with asparaginase) has been shown to be related to the occurrence of osteonecrosis.2 Osteoporosis is induced by the leukemia itself as well as its treatment, and is co-determined by genetic susceptibility.1,4 In addition, it is associated with the occurrence of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in ALL patients.1
Bisphosphonates, potent antiresorptive agents, are widely used to treat osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and older men, and are increasingly being used used to treat bone fragility due to primary or secondary osteoporosis in children (including those with ALL).5 Although the working mechanism is not completely understood, small (case) studies have reported that bisphosphonates can also ameliorate pain symptoms, enhance musculoskeletal function, and consequently improve mobility in ALL patients with osteonecrosis.6 Furthermore, intermittent administration of recombinant human parathyroid hormone (rhPTH), an anabolic agent, has been shown to increase bone mineral density in postmenopausal women and in children with steroid-treated Duchenne muscular dystrophy.7 Nevertheless, rhPTH has only rarely been used in children and there are currently no studies of rhPTH being used in the pediatric cancer setting due to concerns regarding possible oncogenicity (osteosarcoma) in patients with open epiphyses.7
The influence of bisphosphonates or rhPTH administration on sensitivity to chemotherapy has not been elucidated, since the use of these agents has only been described in small (case) studies, in which no strong evidence for oncological safety has been reported. A recent preclinical study on the effect of zoledronic acid (ZA) on ALL treatment efficacy raises concerns about potential adverse effects of ZA on leukemic drug sensitivity.8 Therefore, we assessed whether in vitro administration of the bone-modifying agents ZA, pamidronic acid (PA), and rhPTH has an impact on the cytotoxic effects of several chemotherapeutic agents that are commonly used during ALL treatment.
In various T-cell and B-cell leukemia cell lines, methyl-thiazol-tetrazolium (MTT; 3-[4, 5-dimethylthiazoyl-2yl]-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; Life Technologies Europe BV, Bleiswijk, the Netherlands) assays were performed to assess leukemia cell viability in vitro. The T-ALL cell lines LOUCY, Jurkat, HBP-ALL, and SupT1 as well as the B-precursor ALL cell lines Reh, RCH-ACV, SUP-B15, RS4;11, and NALM-6 were used (Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen, Braunschweig, Germany). We obtained ZA and PA from Sigma-Aldrich (Schnelldorf, Germany) and Teriparatide (rhPTH [1-34]) from Forsteo®, Eli Lilly Nederland B.V. (Utrecht, the Netherlands). The chemotherapeutic agents vincristine, daunorubicin, dexamethasone, 6-mercaptopurine, pegylated asparaginase, and prednisone were included in the experiments.
Experiments were performed to determine potential effects of the single bone-modifying agents on leukemia cell viability. The applied concentration ranges of the bone-modifying agents were based on previous pharmacokinetics studies in adult patients9-11 (as these studies were not available in children), and we used the measured peak plasma concentrations after typically prescribed doses as a reference. Subsequently, to test potential effects of the bone-modifying agents on chemotherapeutic agent-induced cytotoxicity, leukemia cell suspensions with or without a fixed concentration of ZA, PA, or rhPTH were added to 96-well U-bottomed plates with a serial dilution of the chemotherapeutic agents. These fixed concentrations were 1.25 mg/mL (5-fold peak plasma concentration), 10 mg/mL (5-fold), and 0.002 mg/mL (15-fold) for ZA, PA, and rhPTH, respectively. In addition, experiments with 1-, 3-, or 5-fold peak plasma concentrations of ZA or PA were performed for dexamethasone as well as prednisone in a subset of the leukemia cell lines (SupT1, SUP-B15, RS4;11, and NALM-6). The 50th percentile of the maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of the chemotherapeutic agents, the bone-modifying agents, and the chemotherapeutic agents in combination with the bone-modifying agents were determined for each leukemia cell line. The combination index method as described by Chou12 was used to quantify the combined effects of the chemotherapeutic agents and bone-modifying agents on the chemotherapeutic agent-induced cytotoxicity. We considered a median combination index of <0.90 as synergism and >1.10 as antagonism. Calculations were conducted in R (Vienna, Austria).
We investigated potential effects of the bone-modifying agents ZA, PA, and rhPTH on leukemia cell viability as well as on cytotoxic responses to the chemotherapeutic agents in vitro. ZA, PA, and rhPTH, as single agents, showed no direct cytotoxic effects on leukemia cell viability in all T-ALL and B-precursor ALL cell lines within ranges of plasma concentrations achieved in patients during clinical application, nor at the intended fixed concentrations (Figure 1). In the dexamethasone-resistant leukemia cell lines (i.e., LOUCY, Jurkat, HPB-ALL, Reh, and RCH-ACV) as well as in the 6-mercaptopurine-resistant leukemia cell line (i.e., Reh) IC50 values were not reached. Therefore, potential synergistic or antagonistic effects of ZA, PA, or rhPTH on the cytotoxic responses to dexamethasone and 6-mercaptopurine could not be determined in these cell lines. Administration of ZA, PA, or rhPTH at the intended fixed concentrations in combination with daunorubicin, 6-mercaptopurine, or pegylated asparaginase showed median combination index values between 0.90-1.10, indicating no synergistic or antagonistic effect. However, dexamethasone in combination with ZA or PA at a 5-fold peak plasma concentration resulted in median combination index values of 1.153 and 1.343, which may point towards a slight antagonistic and moderate antagonistic effect, respectively. For rhPTH the effect in combination with dexamethasone was 0.9610 (Figure 2, Online Supplementary Table S1). Despite the fact that these fixed concentrations will not be readily attained in the plasma of patients, we performed additional experiments with 1-, 3-, and 5-fold peak plasma concentrations of ZA or PA in leukemia cells exposed to dexamethasone or prednisone to investigate whether this was a general effect of corticosteroids or a dexamethasone-specific effect. ZA and PA at 1- and 3-fold peak plasma concentrations did not seem to negatively influence either dexamethasone- or prednisone-induced cell death, with median combination index values between 0.90-1.10. However, dexamethasone-exposed leukemia cells in combination with a 5-fold peak plasma concentration of ZA or PA repeatedly showed median combination index values above 1.10 (1.150 and 1.336, respectively) (Figure 3, Online Supplementary Table S2). In addition, our results indicate that ZA, PA, and rhPTH in combination with vincristine treatment act antagonistically rather than synergistically, with median combination index values of 1.192, 1.926, and 2.719, respectively. However, due to pronounced variability across three independent experiments, it was not possible to obtain reproducible effects of the bone-modifying agents on sensitivity to vincristine (Online Supplementary Table S1, Online Supplementary Figure S1).
Our results support the concerns raised by Janke et al., who observed that ZA may reduce the antileukemic efficacy of dexamethasone and pegylated asparaginase in immunocompetent murine ALL models,8 although they were unable to identify the exact mechanism behind this effect. Bisphosphonates accumulate in bone, due to extensive uptake shortly after intravenous infusion, and once embedded, due to slow release (>120 days).13 We hypothesize that leukemia cells and chemotherapeutic agents may be in close contact with (high concentrations of) bisphosphonates in bone tissue, as the osteoblastic bone marrow niches, which are localized near the inner bone surface, are notorious for harboring leukemia cells as well as chemotherapeutic agents.14 This could potentially be the interphase where leukemia cells are exposed to higher levels of bisphosphonates, thereby influencing the drug sensitivity to a greater extent than measured in our experiments in which 1-, 3-, or 5-fold peak plasma concentrations were used. On the other hand, newly formed bone in the interface between bisphosphonate infusions is bisphosphonate-naïve during growth in the juvenile skeleton,15 because bisphosphonates that are not rapidly taken up by bone will be excreted by the kidneys rapidly after administration.9,10 This suggests that alternate administration of dexamethasone and bisphosphonates (ZA or PA) may be safe and that administration does not have adverse effects on the sensitivity of leukemia cells to chemotherapy. However, there is currently no definitive evidence to support the hypothesis that interference of high concentrations of accumulated bisphosphonates in bone tissue with leukemia therapy can be avoided. Hence, preclinical experiments that study the interactions in the bone microenvironment and clinical follow-up studies that assess the frequency of relapse in children with ALL who received bisphosphonates are necessary to provide further insight.
In conclusion, we showed that ZA, PA, and rhPTH, as single agents, did not have direct cytotoxic effects on leukemia cell viability at any dosage. Furthermore, in vitro administration of ZA, PA, and rhPTH did not seem to affect the leukemic drug sensitivity of daunorubicin, 6-mercaptopurine, and pegylated asparaginase. However, when using 5-fold peak plasma concentrations, we observed that ZA and PA had a slight and moderate antagonistic effect, respectively, on dexamethasone-induced cell death. Our results underscore the caution required when using these bone-modifying agents in children with ALL (especially for dexamethasone in combination with ZA or PA), and support the current clinical practice of administering them only in highly selected cases (preferably in clinical trial settings). Moreover, it is still questionable how effective these bone-modifying agents are in ALL patients with (severe) osteonecrosis, as no large studies with high quality evidence are available.
- Received March 10, 2022
- Accepted September 27, 2022
No conflicts of interest to disclose.
DTCdW, JEvA, JGCAMB-G, SJCMMN, JPPM, and MMvdH-E contributed to the design of the study. DTCdW and JGCAMB-G contributed to data acquisition. DTCdW, JEvA, JGCAMB-G, SJCMMN, JPPM, and MMvdH-E contributed to data analysis and interpretation. DTCdW, JEvA, JGCAMB-G, SJCMMN, JPPM, and MMvdH-E drafted the manuscript. DTCdW, JEvA, JGCAMB-G, RP, SJCMMN, JPPM, and MMvdH-E reviewed the manuscript and were involved in critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Original data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
- van der Sluis IM, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Hählen K, Krenning EP, de Muinck Keizer-Schrama SM. Altered bone mineral density and body composition, and increased fracture risk in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Pediatr. 2002; 141(2):204-210. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpd.2002.125728PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kunstreich M, Kummer S, Laws H-J, Borkhardt A, Kuhlen M.. Osteonecrosis in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica. 2016; 101(11):1295. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2016.147595PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- te Winkel ML, Pieters R, Hop WC. Prospective study on incidence, risk factors, and long-term outcome of osteonecrosis in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29(31):4143-4150. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.37.3217PubMedGoogle Scholar
- te Winkel ML, van Beek RD, de Muinck Keizer-Schrama SM. Pharmacogenetic risk factors for altered bone mineral density and body composition in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica. 2010; 95(5):752. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2009.016303PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bachrach LK, Ward LM. Clinical review: bisphosphonate use in childhood osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009; 94(2):400-409. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-1531PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Daneshdoost SM, El Abiad JM, Ruble KJ. Bisphosphonate therapy for treating osteonecrosis in pediatric leukemia patients: a systematic review. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2021; 43(3):e365. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPH.0000000000001793PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nasomyont N, Keefe C, Tian C. Safety and efficacy of teriparatide treatment for severe osteoporosis in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Osteoporos Int. 2020; 31(12):2449-2459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-020-05549-zPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Janke LJ, Kim J, Payton MA. Effects of zoledronic acid on osteonecrosis and acute lymphoblastic leukemia treatment efficacy in preclinical models. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021; 68(10):e29183. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.29183PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chen T, Berenson J, Vescio R. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of zoledronic acid in cancer patients with bone metastases. J Clin Pharmacol. 2002; 42(11):1228-1236. https://doi.org/10.1177/009127002762491316PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berenson JR, Rosen L, Vescio R. Pharmacokinetics of pamidronate disodium in patients with cancer with normal or impaired renal function. J Clin Pharmacol. 1997; 37(4):285-290. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1552-4604.1997.tb04304.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Daddona PE, Matriano JA, Mandema J, Maa Y-F. Parathyroid hormone (1-34)-coated microneedle patch system: clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for treatment of osteoporosis. Pharm Res. 2011; 28(1):159-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-010-0192-9PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chou T-C. Theoretical basis, experimental design, and computerized simulation of synergism and antagonism in drug combination studies. Pharm Rev. 2006; 58(3):621-681. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.58.3.10PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weiss HM, Pfaar U, Schweitzer A, Wiegand H, Skerjanec A, Schran H.. Biodistribution and plasma protein binding of zoledronic acid. Drug Metab Dispos. 2008; 36(10):2043-2049. https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.108.021071PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chiarini F, Lonetti A, Evangelisti C. Advances in understanding the acute lymphoblastic leukemia bone marrow microenvironment: from biology to therapeutic targeting. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016; 1863(3):449-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.08.015PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Land C, Rauch F, Glorieux FH. Cyclical intravenous pamidronate treatment affects metaphyseal modeling in growing patients with osteogenesis imperfecta. J Bone Miner Res. 2006; 21(3):374-379. https://doi.org/10.1359/JBMR.051207PubMedGoogle Scholar
Figures & Tables
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.