Reduced immunogenicity of a third COVID-19 vaccination among recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Previous allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a risk factor for severe COVID-19 with mortality rates that may exceed 20%.^1,2 The efficiency of two doses of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines is reportedly lower in allo-transplanted patients than in healthy controls with rates of seronegativity or failure to seroconvert in 15-31%.^3-6 In a study of allo-transplanted patients with insufficient responses to two doses of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioBTech) mRNA vaccine, only 48% of patients reached a putative threshold (4,160 arbitrary units [AU]/mL, corresponding to 590 World Health Organization [WHO] standard binding antibody units [BAU]/mL) of immunoglobulin G (IgG) against the receptor-binding domain of the spike 1 (S1) protein (anti-RBD) following a third vaccine dose.⁷

Forty recipients of allo-HSCT for hematological malignancies were identified in local transplant registries of the Region Western Götaland (population of approximately 1.7 million) and accepted participation in this sub-study within the DurIRVac study (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: Eu-draCT no. 2021-000349-42) at the Sahlgrenska University Hospital. All participants gave written informed consent before enrolment. The DurIRVac study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (permit no. 2020-03276, 2021-00374 and 2021-00539) and by the Swedish Medical Products Agency (permit no. 5.1-2021-11118). All patients fulfilled national criteria from the Public Health Agency of Sweden (www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se) for receiving a third dose namely: (i) having undergone transplantation within 3 years or (ii) having ongoing immunosuppressive treatment for graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD). The European Society for Blood and Marrow transplantation (EBMT) guidelines for COVID-19 vaccination were also followed (www.ebmt.org, version 6.0, May 31, 2021). Three patients were excluded based on previously confirmed COVID-19. All enrolled patients (n=37) had received two doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine ≥8 weeks prior to screening.

The median time from transplantation to the third vaccination was 23 months (min-max 6-191). Twenty-one (57%) of participants had chronic GvHD and 25 (68%) received immunosuppressive therapy (IST) at the time of vaccination (Table 1). Patients were given the same vaccine as in their initial two doses, i.e., either BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioB-Tech Comirnaty^®; n=24) or mRNA-1273 (Moderna Spikevax^®; n=13) at a median 127 days (min-max 56-174) after the second dose. Peripheral blood was collected immediately before and 4 weeks (median 24 days, range, 19-30) after the third vaccination. Patients completed a questionnaire 2 weeks after the third dose to assess side-effects, categorized according to the CTCAE (common terminology criteria for adverse events) standards. Severity of GvHD was additionally assessed from medical records.

Table 1.Patient and treatment characteristics by responders and non-responders to the third dose of mRNA vaccine.

Chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassays were performed on serum using the automated Alinity system for analysis of IgG antibodies against RBD (SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant, Abbott, Illinois, USA) with levels reported in the WHO international standard BAU/mL (quantitative detection range, 14-5,680 BAU/mL), which correlate well with neutralizing antibody levels.⁸ In order to assess T-cell responses 1 mL of peripheral blood, collected in heparinized tubes, was stimulated with peptides spanning the N-terminal spike 1 (S1) domain of the SARS-CoV-2 surface glycoprotein. After 2 days of incubation at 37°C plasma was recovered for analysis of interferon-g (IFN-g) by enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA). This assay captures SARS-CoV-2-specific reactivity of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells with high specificity and sensitivity.⁹ S1-induced IFN-g production is presented with levels in unstimulated samples subtracted using a limit of detection of 10 pg/mL. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software package (version 24) or GraphPad Prism software (version 9).

The majority (31/37, 84%) of allo-HSCT patients responded to the third dose vaccination by increased anti-RBD IgG levels (Figure 1A). A subgroup (12/37, 32%) achieved very high antibody levels (>5,680 BAU/mL). However, among the 14 patients seronegative prior to the third dose vaccination, six (42%) remained seronegative 4 weeks after the third vaccine dose (Figure 1A). All patients who were seropositive before the third dose (23/37, 62%) achieved antibody responses exceeding 100 BAU/mL, a level above which has been proposed to provide protection against COVID-19.¹⁰ The characteristics of responders and non-responders to the third vaccine dose are detailed in Table 1. No significant differences in serological responses were noted among patients with or without chronic GvHD or ongoing IST.

Regarding T-cell immune response, 18 of 37 (49%) were devoid of measurable responses 4 weeks after the third vaccination (Figure 1B). T-cell responses tended to be lower in patients with chronic GvHD and were significantly diminished in patients receiving IST, in particular among those receiving prednisone (Table 1). Seronegativity prior to the third dose predicted poor humoral and cellular responses after vaccination. Treatment with IST was associated with insufficient T-cell responses, more so than time from transplantation. Furthermore, four of five (80%) of patients on ruxolitinib showed no T-cell reactivity. Of note, among the 14 patients who were seronegative for anti-RBD IgG prior to the third dose, 11 (79%) also lacked a T-cell response after three vaccine doses, compared with seven of 23 (30%) among those seropositive prior to the third dose (P<0.01, chi-square test). Seronegativity prior to the third vaccination was non-significantly associated with ongoing GvHD (9/14 vs. 12/23 in seropositive patients) and IST (10/14 vs. 15/23). Additionally, a lower fraction of patients mounted SARS-CoV-2 specific T-cell responses than developed anti-RBD IgG after three vaccinations (P<0.01, chi-square test). Of six patients who remained seronegative after three vaccine doses, five (83%) were also devoid of specific T-cells. Vaccine-reported adverse events were observed in 15 (41%) patients after the third dose, with the majority of these categorized as mild local injection-related reactions. No exacerbations of GvHD were noted.

Figure 1.Serological and virus-specific T-cell responses to the spike 1 protein receptor region of SARS-CoV-2 before and afer the third dose of of COVID-19 vaccines in allo-transplanted patients. (A) Shows serum levels of immunoglobulin G (IgG) against the receptor-binding domain (RBD). (B) Shows interferon-g (IFN-γ) production in supernatant plasma following stimulation of whole blood with spike 1 peptides, reflecting reactivity of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells. The upper dotted line represents the cutoff value of 590 binding antibody units [BAU]/mL (i.e., corresponding to 4,160 Abbott Arbitrary Units [AU]/mL) while the middle dotted line corresponds to 100 BAU/ml and the lower dotted line represents the limit of detection (LOD) for respective assay. Statistical comparison by Wilcoxon matched pairs test (n=37). P-values are two-sided and are designated as follows: ^**P<0.01, ^****P<0.0001.

The main findings in this study were that a significant fraction of allo-transplanted patients failed to produce anti-RBD IgG (16%) and that 48% of patients did not mount measurable SARS-CoV-specific T cells despite three vaccinations. Our results confirm and extend a previous report of insufficient anti-RBD responses among allo-transplanted patients⁷ to imply that the inherent and treatment-induced T-cell deficiency associated with allo-transplantation may translate into lack of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine efficacy. The interval between dose 2 and 3 was longer among patients remaining seronegative following the third dose, implying that a shorter interval between vaccinations may improve responses.

Our results additionally suggest that the SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell response to vaccination is more affected than the humoral response among allo-transplanted patients, based on the finding that a significantly higher fraction of patients showed complete deficiency of T-cell responsiveness to SARS-CoV-2-derived peptides compared with those remaining seronegative. Using the same T-cell assay, we have previously shown that 13 of 13 (100%) of healthy donors developed detectable T-cell responses 4 weeks after the second SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dose.¹¹ Notably, 35% of allo-transplanted patients lacked T-cell reactivity against S1 peptides despite mounting anti-RBD IgG. The clinical relevance of the observed T-cell deficiency remains to be established.

In conclusion, the third dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine resulted in elevated antibody titres and measurable SARS-CoV-2-S1 T-cell responses in many allo-transplanted patients. However, a substantial proportion of patients did not respond by antibody formation and/or SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells, highlighting the need for additional preventive measures and continued vigilance in this cohort.

Footnotes

• Received December 9, 2021
• Accepted February 12, 2022

Correspondence

MARTIN LAGGING - martin.lagging@medfak.gu.se

Disclosures

No conflicts of interest to disclose.

Contributions

SE and ML were responsible for designing and writing the protocol, conducting the study, extracting and analysing data, interpreting results, writing the letter, updating reference lists and creating the table and figure; AM and KH were responsible for designing and writing the protocol, extracting and analyzing data, interpreting results, writing the letter, updating reference lists and creating the table and figure; MN participated in interpreting results, writing the letter, and creating the figure; HGW, MA, and AT performed the T-cell assays as well as participated in extracting and analyzing data and interpreting results; KV, JW, and JR participated in extracting and analysing data and interpreting results; TB, MB, and PL participated in designing and writing the protocol, interpreting results, writing the letter, and updating the reference list.

Data sharing statement

The original data and protocols may be made available to other investigators after contact with the corresponding author.

Clinical trial registration

EudraCT 2021-000349-42