Approximately 20% of patients receiving multiple platelet transfusions develop platelet alloantibodies, which can be directed against human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and, to a lesser extent, against human platelet antigens (HPA). These antibodies can lead to the rapid clearance of donor platelets, presumably through IgG-Fc receptor (FcγR)-mediated phagocytosis or via complement activation, resulting in platelet refractoriness. Strikingly, not all patients with anti-HLA or -HPA antibodies develop platelet refractoriness upon unmatched platelet transfusions. Previously, we found that IgG Fc glycosylation of anti-HLA antibodies was highly variable between patients with platelet refractoriness, especially with respect to galactosylation and sialylation of the Fc-bound sugar moiety. Here, we produced recombinant glycoengineered anti-HLA and anti- HPA-1a monoclonal antibodies with varying Fc galactosylation and sialylation levels and studied their ability to activate the classical complement pathway. We observed that anti-HLA monoclonal antibodies with different specificities, binding simultaneously to the same HLA-molecules, or anti-HLA in combination with anti-HPA-1a monoclonal antibodies interacted synergistically with C1q, the first component of the classical pathway. Elevated Fc galactosylation and, to a lesser extent, sialylation significantly increased the complement-activating properties of anti-HLA and anti-HPA-1a monoclonal antibodies. We propose that both the breadth of the polyclonal immune response, with recognition of different HLA epitopes and in some cases HPA antigens, and the type of Fc glycosylation can provide an optimal stoichiometry for C1q binding and subsequent complement activation. These factors can shift the effect of a platelet alloimmune response to a clinically relevant response, leading to complement-mediated clearance of donor platelets, as observed in platelet refractoriness.
Prophylactic and supportive platelet transfusions significantly reduce mortality and hemorrhagic complications in (onco-hematologic) patients with thrombocytopenia. However, in approximately 5-15% of patients receiving chronic platelet support rapid clearance of the transfused platelets is observed, known as platelet refractoriness (PR). PR can be caused by either non-immune or immune factors.1–5 Immune PR occurs in approximately 20% of the cases of PR and is mainly attributable to the formation of antibodies against human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and occasionally human platelet antigens (HPA).6,7 Additionally, anti-ABO and drug-induced antibodies have also been described as potential causes of immune PR.8–10
Currently, the transfusion of HLA- and HPA-matched platelets is the only treatment for alloimmunized patients,11–13 but finding compatible donors can be challenging. Unmatched platelet transfusions can trigger an immune response with a broad spectrum of HLA-epitope or HPA-recognizing antibodies and the binding of these antibodies to donor platelets may result in destruction of the platelets. It was originally assumed that this was mainly the result of IgG-Fc receptor (FcγR)-mediated phagocytosis but there is growing evidence that complement activation can also play a role.14 If platelet transfusions are followed by an insufficient increment in platelet count, bleeding may not be prevented adequately.15,16 For still unknown reasons, not all patients with anti-HLA or anti-HPA antibodies develop PR to unmatched platelet transfusions. As of yet, no clear differential FcγR- or complement-activating potential of the antibodies present in these patients has emerged which might explain differences in platelet clearance rates.
In the last decade, it has become clear that the initiation of the classical complement pathway by IgG antibodies, recognizing surface-bound antigens, requires a stepwise process. The first step, antigen-IgG binding, can precipitate the assembly of hexameric complexes of IgG facilitated by lateral movement and Fc-Fc interactions.17 This depends on the target antigen not being rigidly anchored in the membrane and/or cellular cytoskeleton, and most likely can occur more efficiently if the antibody response is polyclonal. This leads to binding of antibodies to many different epitopes, with the result of higher levels of sensitization and an increased likelihood of Fc-Fc interactions.18 The ensuing hexameric assembly can then be further stabilized by interactions with C1q, followed by activation of C1 and the classical complement pathway. The need for hexamerization might also explain our previous observation that only a combination of anti-HLA monoclonal antibodies activated complement on the surface of platelets.14
It has also become evident that complement activity of antigen-specific IgG can be controlled through IgG Fc glycosylation. All IgG subclasses contain a conserved Nlinked glycan at position N297 in the CH2 domain of the Fc-region of IgG antibodies which is highly variable. The glycan consists of a bi-antennary core structure composed of N-acetylglucosamines (GlcNAc) and mannose residues but can be further extended by a fucose, bisecting GlcNAc, galactose and sialic acid residues. Previously, we described the glycosylation profile of anti-HLA antibodies in patients with PR, which was highly variable with respect to galactose and sialic acid levels. Although Fc galactosylation was significantly increased in the majority of the patients, sialylation levels were more varied, with both decreased and increased sialylation being observed for anti-HLA IgG.19
The causal relation between the N-glycan structures and their influence on IgG effector functions is known; both at the level of FcγR- and complement-mediated effector functions.19–21 The different types of changes, primarily those of high levels of galactosylation, enhance complement activity through elevated C1q binding20,22 and can be found in patients with increased platelet clearance in fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia.19,23 High levels of galactosylation seem to have no effect on the intrinsic affinity of C1q to monomeric IgG, but stimulate hexamerization of IgG on IgG-opsonized surfaces, and enhance downstream complement activation of IgG.24,25
Here, we investigated the role of Fc glycosylation in anti-platelet alloantibodies and its effect on complement activation, as well as the potential synergy in inducing complement activation if anti-HLA and anti-HPA-1a antibodies are bound simultaneously.
Additional information on materials and methods used can be found in the Online Supplementary Data.
Peripheral blood was obtained from anonymous, healthy volunteers with informed written consent, after approval from the Sanquin Ethical Advisory Board, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Surface plasmon resonance
Anti-HLA antibodies (SN230G6, SN607D8 and W6/32) were spotted, via random coupling, using a Continuous Flow Microspotter (Wasatch Microfluidics) onto a SensEye Easy2Spot G-type sensor (Senss). Spotting was done in 10 mM acetate buffer phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) + 0.075%-Tween 80 (Amresco), pH 4.5 in duplicate at a two-fold dilution ranging from 60 nM to 7.5 nM for 15 min. The sensor was deactivated with 100 mM ethanolamine (Merck), pH 8.8 for 7 min. Binding measurements were carried out in an IBIS MX96 (IBIS Technologies). First, 100 nM HLA-A*02:01 was flowed over the sensor for 5 min, followed by a 5-min flow of 100 nM of each anti-HLA antibody separately. Regeneration was then performed with 10 mM Gly-HCl, pH 2.4. This was repeated for every possible antibody combination.
Citrated whole blood from healthy volunteers with known HLA and HPA-type, corresponding to the specificity of the anti-HLA antibodies (Online Supplementary Table S1), was centrifuged at 125 g for 20 min. The platelet-rich plasma was harvested and 10 vol% ACD (acid citrate dextrose, 85 mM Na3-citrate·2H2O, 71 mM citric acid·H2O and 111 mM D-glucose) was added. The platelet-rich plasma was centrifuged (850 g for 8 min) and washed twice with wash buffer (36 mM citric acid·H2O, 103 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 5 mM EDTA, 5.6 mM D-glucose, pH 6.5). The platelets were fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde and washed and stored in PBS + 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) at room temperature.
Flow cytometric complement assay
Platelets (5x106) were incubated with equal volumes of anti-platelet antibody (0.001-20 µg/mL) and pooled complement-rich human serum, for 30 min. at 37°C while shaking. For the antibody combinations, the dilution series started with 10 µg/mL of both antibodies, resulting in a total antibody concentration of 20 µg/mL. The platelets were washed four times with PBS + 0.5% BSA + 5 mM EDTA and stained for 20 min. for flow cytometry with Goat F(ab')2 Anti-Human IgG-PE (1/250, Southern Biotech), anti-complement C3b/iC3b-APC Antibody Clone: 3E7/C3b (1/250, Biolegend) and C1q Polyclonal Antibody-FITC (1/25, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The samples were split and anti-C1q-FITC was measured separately due to the high fluorescence intensity of the anti-IgG-PE. The flow cytometry data were analyzed using FlowJo vX for Windows (BD Biosciences). The platelets were gated based on the FSC-A/SSC-A and single cells were selected (FSC-H/FSC-A). The geometric-mean fluorescence intensities of all parameters were calculated.
Statistical analyses were conducted within Graphpad Prism 8.02(263) for Windows. Curve fitting was performed using nonlinear regression dose-response curves with log(agonist) versus response – variable slope (four parameters). Bar graphs were analyzed using ordinary one-way analysis of variance with the Tukey multi-comparison test. P values ≤0.05 were defined as statistically significant, with the levels of significance being indicated by asterisks (*P≤0.05, **P≤0.01, ***P≤0.001 and ****P≤0.0001).
IgG glycoengineering of anti-platelet monoclonal antibodies
Investigating the effect of Fc glycosylation of anti-platelet alloantibodies on complement activation is a difficult process. Various factors are known to affect complement activation, such as the binding epitope, affinity, iso/allo-type, titer and glycosylation profile of an antibody. In order to circumvent the large variety among PR patients and serum samples, caused by previous pregnancies, transfusions and transplants, a controlled experimental set-up is required. In this study, we produced unmodified and glycoengineered anti-HLA and anti-HPA-1a human IgG1 monoclonal antibodies with different specificities, and enhanced levels of galactosylation and sialylation (Figure 1A-C), as observed in patients with PR. Several specificities and epitopes have been described previously (SN230G6,26–28 SN607D8,26–28 W6/32,29 B2G130 and 26.431). Two novel human monoclonal antibodies with HPA-1a specificity (D204 and M204) and one with HLA specificity (L204) were cloned from an alloimmunized individual by manipulation of the RNA of B cells that had secreted anti-platelet or anti-HLA antibodies upon single-cell culture. All monoclonal antibodies were produced as human IgG1*03 kappa antibodies using a HEK-freestyle based production system.20,24 After production (Figure 1D), the different glycoengineered antibodies were subjected to glycoanalysis by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (Figure 1E, Online Supplementary Figure S1A, B). The glycosylation profiles of the unmodified antibodies showed nearly 100% fucosylation, ~25% galactosylation, 1% sialylation and 5% bisection. By overexpressing B4GALT1 with elevated substrate availability, Fc galactosylation of IgG1 was increased to 80%. As observed previously, this was accompanied by a minor increase in sialylation and a decrease in bisection.20,24 Increasing sialylation by over-expressing ST6GALT increased sialylation to approximately 30%. Fucosylation was not affected by any of these glycoengineering techniques.
Multiple anti-HLA monoclonal antibodies bind and stabilize each other on a single HLA-monomer
We then analyzed the recognition of HLA-A*02:01 monomers by the anti-HLA antibodies using surface plasmon resonance. We spotted an array of anti-HLA antibodies with different specificities (SN230G6, SN607D8 and W6/32) and their corresponding glycovariants in parallel and then probed their binding to HLA, followed by each of the antibodies in succession over time (Figure 2A). In our set-up, HLA-A*02:01 monomers were first flowed over the spotted antibodies on the sensor to visualize the initial binding of HLA-molecules by the spotted antibody. Thereafter, the same anti-HLA monoclonal antibodies were flowed in different orders over the sensor to visualize the subsequent binding of anti-HLA monoclonal antibodies to the same HLA molecules captured by the spotted antibody (Figure 2B-G). This allowed us to see potential overlap (blocking) in binding epitopes between the antibodies. SN230G6 showed the strongest capture of HLA from solution, followed by SN607D8 and then W6/32. After the initial binding of the HLA monomer to the spotted antibody, the remaining antibodies also bound successfully to the same molecule (e.g., purple line, Figure 2C). Although all antibodies were bound successfully, the signal strengths varied depending on the order in which the complex was built, with an apparent dissociation of the antibody/HLA complex over time, recognizable as a decreasing slope. This dissociation was especially notable for the SN230G6 antibody where the antibody in solution showed strong competition with surface-immobilized SN230G6 (e.g., green line, Figure 2B, C). Remarkably, this dissociation did not occur after the sequential binding of soluble SN230G6 to spotted SN607D8 HLA-A2 complexes (e.g., purple line, Figure 2B) and soluble SN607D8 to spotted SN230G6 HLA-A2 complexes (e.g., green line, Figure 2D), indicating the stabilizing interaction between the antibodies in the overall complex. This stabilizing interaction was not observed for combinations with the W6/32 antibody, probably because of low binding and rapid dissociation of the antibody. Furthermore, no differences were observed between the unmodified and high galactose variants.
Anti-platelet monoclonal antibodies only activate the complement system when incubated simultaneously
Next, we studied the possible synergistic effects of the anti-HLA and -HPA-1a monoclonal antibodies, for both antigen-binding and complement-activating properties on the surface of human platelets employing flow cytometry. The gating strategy is shown in Online Supplementary Figure S2. All individual antibodies were capable of binding to the surface of platelets, to either HLA molecules or glycoprotein IIIa (GPIIIa), but differed in their maximum binding (Figure 3A) due to differences in binding affinity27,32 and the surface expression of their targets. The monoclonal antibodies SN230G6, SN607D8 and L204 were only able to bind HLA-A2 molecules and therefore showed similar maximum binding. W6/32 binds all HLA class I molecules33 and showed a maximum binding capacity similar to that of the anti-HPA-1a antibodies. Despite significant binding of all antibodies, neither anti-HPA-1a nor anti-HLA antibodies provoked, by themselves, high levels of complement deposition on platelets, as determined by the amount of C3b deposition (Figure 3B), with the exception of W6/32. Nevertheless, the small amount of complement deposition correlated directly with IgG binding (Figure 3C). Again, W6/32 formed an exception, in line with its polymorphic HLA recognition.
Complement activation was strongly enhanced when antibodies with different specificities were combined. IgG binding was increased when multiple anti-HLA antibodies were incubated simultaneously (Figure 4A), to a similar degree as seen in the surface plasmon resonance data (Figure 2). The combinations of anti-HLA antibodies generally increased C3b deposition (Figure 4B), suggesting enhanced classical complement activation. No synergy was observed for the combination of SN607D8 and L204 as these compete for the same binding epitope. Significant synergistic effects were, however, seen for all other antibody combinations (Figure 4B, Online Supplementary Figure S3A), with C3b deposition surpassing a linear correlation (Figure 4C). As expected, when using different combinations of anti-HPA-1a antibodies (all with identical single amino-acid epitopes), no synergistic effects were observed (Figure 4D-F, Online Supplementary Figure S3B). The strongest IgG binding was observed when combining anti-HLA and anti-HPA-1a IgG (Figure 5A). Interestingly, however, no synergistic complement activation was observed between anti-HLA and anti-HPA-1a antibodies, except for the combinations including W6/32 (Figure 5B, C and Online Supplementary Figure S3C-F). An overview of the relative binding and complement deposition of all antibody combinations is depicted as heatmaps (Figure 5D, E), clearly illustrating the superior complement-activating potential of the anti-HLA antibodies, especially in combinations, and then particularly with the promiscuous W6/32, recognizing all HLA-I alleles.
Enhanced Fc galactosylation and sialyation of anti-platelet monoclonal antibodies enhance complement activation on platelets
We then investigated the IgG binding, C1q binding and C3b deposition of the same anti-HLA and anti-HPA-1a antibody combinations after glycoengineering, resulting in enhanced galactosylation and sialylation (Figures 6 and 7). As expected, no differences were observed for antigen-binding between IgG-glycovariants (Figure 6A, D, G and Figure 7A, D). C1q binding was particularly prominent for the combination of SN230G6+SN607D8 and not for the combinations with W6/32 (Figure 6B, E, H and Figure 7B, E). For the combination of SN230G6+SN607D8 a striking effect of elevated Fc galactosylation, and additionally of elevated sialylation, was observed, with a 4-fold increase in maximum C1q binding (Figure 6H, Online Supplementary Figure S4). Substantial effects of glycoengineering were also evident on C3b deposition for all antibody combinations (Figure 6C, F, I and Figure 7C, F). Elevated Fc galactosylation increased C3b deposition 1.3- to 2-fold, compared to the unmodified antibody combinations (Online Supplementary Figure S4F-J), and the deposition was slightly further increased, up to 2.5-fold, by elevated sialylation. These higher levels of complement deposition most likely translate into more complement-dependent lysis as more cell death was observed for these glycovariants, when performing the experiments with non-fixed platelets (Online Supplementary Figure S5). When comparing the maximum responses of C1q binding and C3b deposition of all antibody combinations, the differences between glycovariants were highly significant (Online Supplementary Figure S4).
These results led to the conclusion that multiple anti-HLA antibodies, with different epitopes, are capable of binding to a single HLA-Class I molecule on the surface of platelets in an allo-immune response (Figure 8A). The glycan composition of these antibodies, especially Fc galactosylation, affects Fc:Fc interactions (Figure 8B)24,25 and thereby promotes the formation of hetero-hexameric IgG complexes between different anti-HLA antibodies but also between anti-HLA and anti-HPA-1a antibodies. These hexamers are the optimal platform for C1q to bind (Figure 8C), which subsequently activates the classical complement pathway, leading to the formation of the MAC-complex and platelet lysis (Figure 8D).
Anti-HLA and anti-HPA antibodies formed after pregnancies or incompatible platelet transfusions can play a devastating role in immune PR. They are responsible for the rapid clearance of donor platelets, theoretically via several immunological pathways, such as complement-dependent cytotoxicity, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis. The role of FcγR-mediated phagocytosis, in which opsonized platelets are phagocytosed by macrophages in the spleen, has been studied in detail and is an important clearance pathway.34–38 However, the role of the complement system, capable of both direct complement-dependent cytotoxicity and stimulation of myeloid antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis through C3b opsonization,39 in immune PR by anti-HLA or anti-HPA antibodies has been implied but inadequately investigated in clinical studies.40 In contrast to solid organ transplantation, in which C1q-binding anti-HLA antibodies correlated with antibody-mediated rejection,41,42 Jackman et al. found no significant correlation between corrected platelet count increments and either C1q binding or low-level anti-HLA IgG antibodies.43,44 However, C1q-fixing solid-phase screening showed significantly better corrected count increments when compatible platelets were selected for transfusion.45 Importantly, a pilot trial with the complement inhibitor eculizumab showed that a single injection resolved PR in four out of ten patients.46 Platelet activation is also known to induce complement activation47–49 and prolonged storage of platelet concentrates could lead to increased levels of complement components (C4d, C3a, C5a and C5b-9), which can accelerate the complement cascade once they are transfused into patients.50 Furthermore, in vitro work has clearly shown the ability of anti-HLA and anti-HPA antibodies to activate the complement system on the surface of human platelets.14,51–54 Together, these results strongly implicate complement in the pathogenesis leading to platelet clearance by anti-HLA or anti-HPA antibodies in immune PR.
One of the factors that can affect the complement-activating properties of an antibody is its Fc glycosylation composition.20,22 We previously found that the Fc glycosylation profile of anti-HLA antibodies in patients with PR showed varying levels of galactosylation (~40-80%), bisection (~5-30%) and sialylation (~3-30%).19 Interestingly, fucosylation levels were comparable to those of the total IgG1 (~85-100%), whereas afucosylated IgG are specifically evoked in alloimmune responses, i.e., anti-HPA-1a alloantibodies in fetal neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia,19,23 and against enveloped viruses. Afucosylated IgG increases the binding affinity to FcγRIIIa and FcγRIIIb by approximately 20- to 40-fold and directly translates into increased associated effector functions.19– 21,23,55–57 Fc galactosylation and sialylation of antigen-specific IgG is often increased after recent or active immunization, as seen after COVID-19 infection,21 vaccination58,59 or alloimmunization.19,23 While bisection has been reported to have no effect on either complement or Fc-receptor binding or function, galactosylation has been found to enhance complement activity through increased C1q binding.20,22,25 The effect of Fc sialylation on complement activity is less clear. On the one hand, Quast et al. showed that Fc sialylation impaired complement-dependent cytotoxicity,60 whereas Dekkers et al. and Wada et al. found slightly increased C1q binding by sialylated IgG1.20,6
Here, we mimicked the Fc glycosylation profile of anti-HLA monoclonal antibodies as observed in patients with PR, using glycoengineering. We have observed that anti-HLA monoclonal antibodies with different epitopes are able to bind to the same HLA molecules and interact with each other to activate the complement system. This synergy was especially observed for anti-HLA antibodies and only between anti-HLA and anti-HPA-1a antibodies in combination with W6/32. Thus, despite significant IgG binding, not all antibody combinations were able to form hetero-hexamers and thereby initiate the classical complement pathway. Overall, the more antibodies with non-competing epitopes, the more antibodies will bind to the surface of platelets, resulting in more antibodies in close vicinity, enabling Fc:Fc interaction and hetero-hexamer formation, leading to complement activation. When only a single monoclonal antibody is present, either anti-HLA or anti-HPA-1a, the antibody density is too low or the distance between antibodies is too large to form hexamers. In this study, platelet donors were primarily selected on the basis of expression of HLA-A2, which was the only HLA class I (A, B or C) matching the antibody specificity of SN230G6, SN607D8 and L204. W6/32 binds all HLA class I,33 which possibly explains why it is the only anti-HLA monoclonal antibody for which synergy with anti-HPA-1a monoclonal antibodies was observed. We hypothesize that either its binding epitope or the overall antibody density is of importance.
We also found that measurement of C1q binding to alloantibody opsonized platelets was a less suitable biomarker for complement activation on platelets compared to measurement of C3b deposition, most likely due to the low affinity of C1q to IgG as opposed to covalent binding of activated C3b to targets.
Furthermore, elevated Fc galactosylation increased the complement-activating properties of anti-HLA and anti-HPA-1a monoclonal antibody combinations and a minor contributing effect was observed for elevated Fc sialylation. These results are in agreement with reports describing increased complement activation by elevated Fc galactosylation,20,22,25,60 which enhances the Fc:Fc interaction and hexamerization of IgG and thereby improves C1q binding and downstream complement activation.24,25 We also noted slightly increased complement deposition after opsonization of platelets with antibodies engineered to have elevated levels of sialylation, which is in line with our previous results using antibodies to model antigens (TNP and biotin).20,24
In conclusion, a single anti-HLA or anti-HPA-1a monoclonal antibody is an insufficient representation of the in vivo opsonization of donor platelets in a patient after a polyclonal alloantibody response, leading to immune PR. It is the interaction between antibodies that leads to efficient activation of the complement system, initiating complement-dependent lysis and/or opsonization for subsequent phagocytosis of platelets. Furthermore, the anti-HLA antibodies observed in PR patients are highly galactosylated and occasionally sialylated, which enhance the complement-activating properties of the antibodies even further. Our work provides more insight into the mechanisms of classical complement activation of anti-platelet antibodies, which can be formed as a consequence of alloimmunization in fetal-neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia and immune PR but also in auto-immune diseases, such as immune thrombocytopenia. It especially highlights the importance of pretransfusion HLA and HPA-matching between donor and recipient or functional matching based on the complement-activating potential of patients’ antibodies. Furthermore, our work also underscores the findings of the pilot trial by Vo et al.46 that inhibition of complement activation could improve the effectiveness of platelet transfusions in HLA or HPA immunized patients. However, larger randomized trials are required to investigate this further.
- Received December 13, 2021
- Accepted March 22, 2022
No conflicts of interest to disclose.
TLJvO, RK, LP, CEvS, MdH, MW, JV and GV designed and supervised the experimental work. TLJvO, JJO, AEHB, CAMK and JN performed experiments and collected data. DMG, JYM, WJEvE, AM and SH developed vital reagents. TLJvO and GV wrote the manuscript, which was edited by all authors. All authors analyzed and interpreted data and approved the manuscript.
Data can be requested by contacting Dr. Gestur Vidarsson
- Saris A, Pavenski K. Human leukocyte antigen alloimmunization and alloimmune platelet refractoriness. Transfus Med Rev. 2020; 34(4):250-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2020.09.010PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bub CB, Gonçalez AC, Barjas~Castro ML, Castro V. Prospective evaluation of platelet refractoriness in haematological patients in a single Brazilian institution. ISBT Sci Ser. 2021; 16(1):2-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/voxs.12560Google Scholar
- Hu X, Cai H, Zheng L. Clinical and immunological features of platelet transfusion refractoriness in young patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Med. 2020; 9(14):4941-4948. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3140PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hess JR, Trachtenberg FL, Assmann SF. Clinical and laboratory correlates of platelet alloimmunization and refractoriness in the PLADO trial. Vox Sang. 2016; 111(3):281-291. https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.12411PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Comont T, Tavitian S, Bardiaux L. Platelet transfusion refractoriness in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated by intensive chemotherapy. Leuk Res. 2017; 61:62-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2017.08.015PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pavenski K, Freedman J, Semple JW. HLA alloimmunization against platelet transfusions: Pathophysiology, significance, prevention and management. Tissue Antigens. 2012; 79(4):237-245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0039.2012.01852.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vassallo RR. Recognition and management of antibodies to human platelet antigens in platelet transfusion-refractory patients. Immunohematology. 2009; 25(3):119-124. https://doi.org/10.21307/immunohematology-2019-244Google Scholar
- Pavenski K, Warkentin TE, Shen H, Liu Y, Heddle NM. Posttransfusion platelet count increments after ABO~compatible versus ABO~incompatible platelet transfusions in noncancer patients: an observational study. Transfusion. 2010; 50(7):1552-1560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02602.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aster RH, Bougie DW. Drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(6):580-587. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra066469PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bougie DW, Wilker PR, Aster RH. Patients with quinine-induced immune thrombocytopenia have both “drug-dependent” and “drug-specific” antibodies. Blood. 2006; 108(3):922-927. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-01-009803PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kekomäki S, Volin L, Koistinen P. Successful treatment of platelet transfusion refractoriness: The use of platelet transfusions matched for both human leucocyte antigens (HLA) and human platelet alloantigens (HPA) in alloimmunized patients with leukaemia. Eur J Haematol. 1998; 60(2):112-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0609.1998.tb01007.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Garratty G, Heal JM, MacPherson BR. Selection of platelets for refractory patients by HLA matching and prospective crossmatching. Transfusion. 1992; 32(7):633-640. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.1992.32792391036.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rioux-Massé B, Cohn C, Lindgren B, Pulkrabek S, McCullough J. Utilization of cross-matched or HLA-matched platelets for patients refractory to platelet transfusion. Transfusion. 2014; 54(12):3080-3087. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.12739PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rijkers M, Schmidt D, Lu N. Anti-HLA antibodies with complementary and synergistic interaction geometries promote classical complement activation on platelets. Haematologica. 2018; 104(2):403-416. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2018.201665PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Toor AA, Choo SY, Little JA. Bleeding risk and platelet transfusion refractoriness in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia who undergo autologous stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000; 26(3):315-320. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1702490PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kerkhoffs JLH, Eikenboom JCJ, Van De Watering LMG, Van Wordragen-Vlaswinkel RJ, Wijermans PW, Brand A. The clinical impact of platelet refractoriness: correlation with bleeding and survival. Transfusion. 2008; 48(9):1959-1965. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01799.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Diebolder CA, Beurskens FJ, De Jong RN. Complement is activated by IgG hexamers assembled at the cell surface. Science. 2014; 343(6176):1260-1263. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1248943PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ugurlar D, Howes SC, de Kreuk B-J. Structures of C1-IgG1 provide insights into how danger pattern recognition activates complement. Science. 2018; 359(6377):794-797. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao4988PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kapur R, Kustiawan I, Vestrheim A. A prominent lack of IgG1-Fc fucosylation of platelet alloantibodies in pregnancy. Blood. 2014; 123(4):471-480. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-09-527978PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Dekkers G, Treffers L, Plomp R. Decoding the human immunoglobulin G-glycan repertoire reveals a spectrum of Fc-receptor- and complement-mediated-effector activities. Front Immunol. 2017; 8:877. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00877PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Larsen MD, de Graaf EL, Sonneveld ME. Afucosylated IgG characterizes enveloped viral responses and correlates with COVID-19 severity. Science. 2021; 371(6532):eabc8378. Google Scholar
- Peschke B, Keller CW, Weber P, Quast I, Lünemann JD. Fc-galactosylation of human immunoglobulin gamma isotypes improves C1q binding and enhances complement-dependent cytotoxicity. Front Immunol. 2017; 8:646. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00646PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sonneveld ME, Natunen S, Sainio S. Glycosylation pattern of anti-platelet IgG is stable during pregnancy and predicts clinical outcome in alloimmune thrombocytopenia. Br J Haematol. 2016; 174(2):310-320. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.14053PubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Osch TLJ, Nouta J, Derksen NIL. Fc galactosylation promotes hexamerization of human IgG1, leading to enhanced classical complement activation. J Immunol. 2021; 207(6):1545-1554. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.2100399PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wei B, Gao X, Cadang L. Fc galactosylation follows consecutive reaction kinetics and enhances immunoglobulin G hexamerization for complement activation. MAbs. 2021; 13(1):1893427. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2021.1893427PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mulder A, Eijsink C, Kester MGD. Impact of peptides on the recognition of HLA class I molecules by human HLA antibodies. J Immunol. 2005; 175(9):5950-5957. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.175.9.5950PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Daga S, Moyse H, Briggs D. Human immunology direct quantitative measurement of the kinetics of HLA-specific antibody interactions with isolated HLA proteins. Hum Immunol. 2017; 79(2):122-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humimm.2017.10.012PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duquesnoy RJ, Marrari M, Jelenik L, Zeevi A, Claas FHJ, Mulder A. Structural aspects of HLA class I epitopes reacting with human monoclonal antibodies in Ig-binding, C1q-binding and lymphocytotoxicity assays. Hum Immuno.l. 2013; 74(10):1271-1279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humimm.2013.05.016PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Congy-Jolivet N, Drocourt D, Portet S, Tiraby G, Blancher A. Production and characterization of chimeric anti-HLA monoclonal antibodies targeting public epitopes as tools for standardizations of the anti-HLA antibody detection. J Immunol Methods. 2013; 390(1-2):41-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2013.01.007PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Griffin HM, Ouwehand WH. A human monoclonal antibody specific for the leucine-33 (Ps(A1) HPA-1a) form of platelet glycoprotein IIIa from a V gene phage display library. Blood. 1995; 86(12):4430-4436. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V86.12.4430.bloodjournal86124430PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eksteen M, Tiller H, Averina M. Characterization of a human platelet antigen-1a–specific monoclonal antibody derived from a B cell from a woman alloimmunized in pregnancy. J Immunol. 2015; 194(12):5751-5760. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1401599PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Visentin J, Leu DL, Mulder A. Measuring anti-HLA antibody active concentration and affinity by surface plasmon resonance: comparison with the luminex single antigen flow beads and T-cell flow cytometry crossmatch results. Mol Immunol. 2019; 108:34-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2019.02.006PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barnstable CJ, Bodmer WF, Brown G. Production of monoclonal antibodies to group A erythrocytes, HLA and other human cell surface antigens-new tools for genetic analysis. Cell. 1978; 14(1):9-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(78)90296-9Google Scholar
- Badlou BA, Ya PW, Smid WM, Akkerman JWN. Platelet binding and phagocytosis by macrophages. Transfusion. 2006; 46(8):1432-1443. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00913.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grozovsky R, Hoffmeister KM, Falet H. Novel clearance mechanisms of platelets. Curr Opin Hematol. 2010; 17(6):585-589. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOH.0b013e32833e7561PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rijkers M, Saris A, Heidt S. A subset of anti-HLA antibodies induces FcγRIIa-dependent platelet activation. Haematologica. 2018; 103(10):1741-1752. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2018.189365PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Aslam R, Kapur R, Segel GB. The spleen dictates platelet destruction, anti-platelet antibody production, and lymphocyte distribution patterns in a murine model of immune thrombocytopenia. Exp Hematol. 2016; 44(10):924-930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exphem.2016.07.004PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Audia S, Santegoets K, Laarhoven AG. Fcγ receptor expression on splenic macrophages in adult immune thrombocytopenia. Clin Exp Immunol. 2017; 188(2):275-282. https://doi.org/10.1111/cei.12935PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Vidarsson G, Van De Winkel JGJ. Fc receptor and complement receptor-mediated phagocytosis in host defence. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 1998; 11(3):271-278. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001432-199806000-00002PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meinke S, Karlström C, Höglund P. Complement as an Immune Barrier in Platelet Transfusion Refractoriness. Transfus Med Rev. 2019; 33(4):231-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2019.09.003PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen G, Sequeira F, Tyan DB. Novel C1q assay reveals a clinically relevant subset of human leukocyte antigen antibodies independent of immunoglobulin G strength on single antigen beads. Hum Immunol. 2011; 72(10):849-858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humimm.2011.07.001PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cohn CS. Platelet transfusion refractoriness: how do I diagnose and manage?. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2020; 2020(1):527-532. https://doi.org/10.1182/hematology.2020000137PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Jackman RP, Lee JH, Pei R. C1q-binding anti-HLA antibodies do not predict platelet transfusion failure in Trial to Reduce Alloimmunization to Platelets study participants. Transfusion. 2016; 56(6):1442-1450. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.13598PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Jackman RP, Deng X, Bolgiano D. Low-level HLA antibodies do not predict platelet transfusion failure in TRAP study participants. Blood. 2013; 121(16):3261-3266. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-12-472779PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fontaine MJ, Kuo J, Chen G. Complement (C1q) fixing solid-phase screening for HLA antibodies increases the availability of compatible platelet components for refractory patients. Transfusion. 2011; 51(12):2611-2618. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03194.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vo P, Purev E, West KA. A pilot trial of complement inhibition using eculizumab to overcome platelet transfusion refractoriness in human leukocyte antigen allo-immunized patients. Br J Haematol. 2020; 189(3):551-558. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.16385PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hamad OA, Nilsson PH, Wouters D, Lambris JD, Ekdahl KN, Nilsson B. Complement component C3 binds to activated normal platelets without preceding proteolytic activation and promotes binding to complement receptor 1. J Immunol. 2010; 184(5):2686-2692. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0902810PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Del Conde I, Crúz MA, Zhang H, López JA, Afshar-Kharghan V. Platelet activation leads to activation and propagation of the complement system. J Exp Med. 2005; 201(6):871-879. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20041497PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Peerschke EIB, Yin W, Grigg SE, Ghebrehiwet B. Blood platelets activate the classical pathway of human complement. J Thromb Haemost. 2006; 4(9):2035-2042. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.02065.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen J, Losos M, Yang S, Li J, Wu H, Cataland S. Increased complement activation during platelet storage. Transfusion. 2017; 57(9):2182-2188. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.14215PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meinke S, Sandgren P, Mörtberg A. Platelets made HLA deficient by acid treatment aggregate normally and escape destruction by complement and phagocytes in the presence of HLA antibodies. Transfusion. 2016; 56(2):370-382. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.13350PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Najaoui A, Bakchoul T, Stoy J. Autoantibody-mediated complement activation on platelets is a common finding in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). Eur J Haematol. 2012; 88(2):167-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0609.2011.01718.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tsubakio T, Tani P, Curd JG, Mcmillan R. Complement activation in vitro by antiplatelet antibodies in chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Br J Haematol. 1986; 63(2):293-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.1986.tb05552.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peerschke EIB, Andemariam B, Yin W, Bussel JB. Complement activation on platelets correlates with a decrease in circulating immature platelets in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Br J Haematol. 2010; 148(4):638-645. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07995.xPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wuhrer M, Porcelijn L, Kapur R. Regulated glycosylation patterns of IgG during alloimmune responses against human platelet antigens. J Proteome Res. 2009; 8(2):450-456. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr800651jPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vidarsson G, Dekkers G, Rispens T. IgG subclasses and allotypes: from structure to effector functions. Front Immunol. 2014; 5:1-17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2014.00520PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Temming AR, de Taeye SW, de Graaf EL. Functional attributes of antibodies, effector cells, and target cells affecting NK cell–mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. J Immunol. 2019; 203(12):3126-3135. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1900985PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Selman MHJ, De Jong SE, Soonawala D. Changes in antigen-specific IgG1 Fc N-glycosylation upon influenza and tetanus vaccination. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012; 11(4):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M111.014563PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wang TT, Maamary J, Tan GS. Anti-HA glycoforms drive B cell affinity selection and determine influenza vaccine efficacy. Cell. 2015; 162(1):160-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.026PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Quast I, Keller CW, Maurer MA. Sialylation of IgG Fc domain impairs complement-dependent cytotoxicity. J Clin Invest. 2015; 125(11):4160-4170. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI82695PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wada R, Matsui M, Kawasaki N. Influence of N-glycosylation on effector functions and thermal stability of glycoengineered IgG1 monoclonal antibody with homogeneous glycoforms. MAbs. 2019; 11(2):350-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2018.1551044PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Figures & Tables
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.