The multidrug resistance protein-4 (MRP4), an ATP-binding cassette transporter, is involved in the efflux of several pharmacological and physiological compounds. MRP4 plays a role in modulating platelet function and influences platelet activation.1 It has been identified as a modulator of the action of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in platelets. A high on-ASA residual platelet reactivity (HARPR) has been found in patients with MRP4 overex-pression.2 Furthermore, MRP4 overexpression induced by drugs mediates a hyperreactive platelet phenotype.3 Recent studies have demonstrated that ASA also modulates various microRNA54 and gene expression, such as that of PPARα, resulting in platelet MRP4 overexpres-sion.6 MRP4 knockout mice have reduced platelet function, delayed arterial thrombosis and prolonged bleeding time.7 In patients who had undergone a surgical bypass procedure, MRP4 overexpression was found to have a role in reducing the effect of ASA and, at the same time, ASA induced platelet MRP4 upregulation.8 In most patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET), ASA has been reported to incompletely inhibit platelet thromboxane A2.9 Based on our experience, we suggested that the subtypes of primary thrombocythemia (PT) in children are different from those found in adults with ET: 40% had JAK2(V617F) or CALR-mutated ET, 36% had a MPL(S505A) mutation and received a diagnosis of hereditary thrombocytosis (HT), while 24% had JAK2, CALR and MPL wildtype ET.1110 Moreover, thrombotic events, frequent in adult ET and rare in pediatric PT, have been observed in HT children with the MPL(S505A) mutation during treatment with ASA.12 This study was designed to evaluate and correlate MRP4 expression and platelet function in children and adolescents aged <20 years at diagnosis with different subtypes of PT.
MRP4 protein and platelet aggregation were evaluated in 30 healthy volunteers (HV) and in 41 PT patients (males: 18; females 23; median age at diagnosis: 14.5 years; range: 3 months-20 years). Of the 41 PT patients, 10 had the JAK2(V617F) mutation, 6 harbored CALR mutations, 10 carried a MPL(S505A) mutation and 15 were JAK2, CALR and MPL wildtype. Patients were grouped as follows: patients with JAK2(V617F) and CALR mutations (n=16); patients who had JAK2, CALR and MPL wildtype genes, defined as having triple-negative ET(n=15); patients with a MPL(S505A) mutation, defined as having HT (n=10). Platelet preparations were processed as previously described.6 MRP4 platelet protein expression was evaluated by western blot according to Massimi et al.13 The densitometric analysis was carried out using the National Institutes of Health Image Ganalyzer program and the results are reported as the ratio between the samples and a standard sample obtained from MRP4-transfected cells (HEK293) (0.2 μg/μL of protein), as previously described.3 Platelet aggregation was evaluated in platelet-rich plasma in a four-channel aggregometer (AggRam, Helena Laboratories, Beaumont, TX, USA) according to Temperilli et al.14 The results are reported as the percentage of aggregation (%PA) observed after 4 min of stimulation with ADP (0.8 μM) and collagen (1 μg/mL) (Helena Laboratories, Beaumont, TX, USA). Platelet aggregation results are shown as a box plot graph. Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test, the Kruskal Wallis test, the c2 test, Wilcoxon test or Student t test, as appropriate. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. Informed written consent was obtained from each patient and/or parents and from the volunteers.
Hematologic features at diagnosis (platelets, white blood cells and hemoglobin concentration) were similar in the different groups of patients, whereas splenomegaly was more frequently found in JAK2(V617F)- and CALR-mutated patients (P=0.019). Moreover, JAK2(V617F)-mutated patients were significantly older than the other patients (P=0.005) (Figure 1).
MRP4 protein expression was significantly upregulated in HT patients (4.23±0.59) compared to that found in HV (P=0.03). This upregulation was more evident, but not significantly different, in triple-negative ET patients (3.43±0.64) than in HV (2.74±0.20). MRP4 protein expression was similar in JAK2(V617F)/CALR-mutated ET patients and in HV (2.86±0.54 and 2.74±0.20, respectively) (Figure 2A). Regarding platelet function, patients with HT showed a statistically significantly greater response to ADP 0.8 μM (median: 91 %PA; range: 0-98 %PA) compared to triple-negative patients (median: 86 %PA; range: 0-93 %PA) (P=0.023). The response to ADP was greater, albeit not significantly different, in HT than in JAK2(V617F)/CALR-mutated patients (median: 90 %PA; range: 0-98 %PA) (Figure 2B). All patients (triple-negative ET, JAK2(V617F)/CALR-mutated ET and HT) showed significantly greater aggregation compared to HV (P<0.0001). A significantly shorter lag-phase in response to collagen (1 μg/mL) was observed in HT (median: 36 s; range: 21-45) compared to triple-negative and JAK2(V617F)/CALR-mutated ET patients (median: 45 s; range: 33-82, P=0.011 and median: 43 s; range: 11-218, P=0.049, respectively). Compared to the lag-phase in response to collagen in HV (median: 66 s; range: 35-140), the lag-phase was significantly shorter in HT (P<0.001) triple-negative ET (P<0.001) and JAK2(V617F)/CALR-mutated ET (P=0.003) patients (Figure 2C). A significant enhancement of aggregation was evident when comparing HT patients (median: 92 %PA; range: 88-97 %PA) to HV (median: 89,5 %PA; range: 65-99 %PA) (P=0.018), and JAK2(V617F)/CALR-mutated patients (median: 93 %PA; range: 23-100 %PA) to HV (P=0.031). No significant differences were observed between HT, triple-negative ET (median: 92 %PA; range: 85-95 %PA) and JAK2(V617F)/CALR-mutated patients, probably due to the high variability and a lower number of patients analyzed (Figure 2D). To our knowledge, this is the first study providing evidence that both children and adolescents with MPL(S505A)-mutated HT show higher platelet reactivity compared to patients with ET. In addition, platelet reactivity correlates with MRP4 protein overexpression. This is in accordance with our previous study which demonstrated that platelets with MRP4 overexpression induced by drugs are more reactive to the agonist.2 A recent study showed that individuals positive for human immunodeficiency virus show a hyperreactive platelet phenotype due to increased levels of platelet MRP4 expression.15 Another study demonstrated that the abnormal megakaryopoiesis that characterizes ET accounts for a shorter-lasting antiplatelet effect of low-dose ASA through a faster renewal of platelet cyclooxy-genase-1. It has been suggested that the impaired platelet inhibition can be corrected by modulating the time interval of administration rather than the dose of ASA.9 We previously reported that an increased expression of MRP4 in platelets contributes to HARPR and that inhibition of MRP4-mediated transport reduces HARPR in patients on chronic ASA treatment.2 Based on the results of this study, we can hypothesize that MRP4 overexpression may also have a role in reducing ASA activity in PT. This evidence helps to shed light onto the thrombotic events observed in HT MPL(S505A) patients despite treatment with ASA.
In conclusion, this study shows that children and adolescents with MPL(S505A) HT have greater platelet reactivity compared to patients with ET. Analysis of MRP4 expression levels in human platelets may be a useful biomarker in order to identify patients less sensitive to ASA treatment. We hypothesize that the addition of MRP4 inhibitors could enhance the effects of ASA. Based on these data, a cooperative study testing the use of MRP4 inhibitors in combination with ASA will be planned, with the aim of confirming our results and hypothesis.
References
- Lien LM, Chen ZC, Chung CL. Multidrug resistance protein 4 (MRP4/ABCC4) regulates thrombus formation in vitro and in vivo. Eur J Pharmacol. 2014; 737:159-167. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.05.001Google Scholar
- Alemanno L, Massimi I, Klaus V. Impact of multidrug resistance protein-4 inhibitors on modulating platelet function and high on-aspirin treatment platelet reactivity. Thromb Haemost. 2018; 118(3):490-501. Google Scholar
- Temperilli F, Di Franco M, Massimi I. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in-vitro and in-vivo treatment and multidrug resistance protein 4 expression in human platelets. Vascul Pharmacol. 2016; 76:11-17. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.vph.2015.06.016Google Scholar
- Massimi I, Alemanno L, Guarino ML. MiR-21 role in aspirin-dependent PPARα and MRP4 up-regulation. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2018; 2(3):596-606. Google Scholar
- La Rosa G, Biasucci LM, Mandolini C. Platelet miRNA-26b down-regulates multidrug resistance protein 4 in patients on chronic aspirin treatment. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2018; 19(10):611-613. Google Scholar
- Massimi I, Guerriero R, Lotti LV. Aspirin influences megakaryocytic gene expression leading to upregulation of multidrug resistance protein-4 in human platelets. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014; 78(6):1343-1353. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.12432Google Scholar
- Decouture B, Dreano E, Belleville-Rolland T. Impaired platelet activation and cAMP homeostasis in MRP4-deficient mice. Blood. 2015; 126(15):1823-1830. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-02-631044Google Scholar
- Mattiello T, Guerriero R, Lotti LV. Aspirin extrusion from human platelets through multidrug resistance protein-4-mediated transport: evidence of a reduced drug action in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58(7):752-761. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.049Google Scholar
- Pascale S, Petrucci G, Dragani A. Aspirin-insensitive thromboxane biosynthesis in essential thrombocythemia is explained by accelerated renewal of the drug target. Blood. 2012; 119(15):3595-3603. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-06-359224Google Scholar
- Teofili L, Giona F, Martini M. The revised WHO diagnostic criteria for Ph-negative myeloproliferative diseases are not appropriate for the diagnostic screening of childhood polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia. Blood. 2007; 110(9):3384-3386. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-06-094276Google Scholar
- Giona F, Teofili L, Capodimonti S. CALR mutations in patients with essential thrombocythemia diagnosed in childhood and adolescence. Blood. 2014; 123(23):3677-3679. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2014-04-572040Google Scholar
- Giona F, Teofili L, Moleti ML. Thrombocythemia and polycythemia in patients younger than 20 years at diagnosis: clinical and biologic features, treatment, and long-term outcome. Blood. 2012; 119(10):2219-2227. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-08-371328Google Scholar
- Massimi I, Ciuffetta A, Temperilli F. Multidrug resistance protein-4 influences aspirin toxicity in human cell line. Mediators Inflamm. 2015; 2015:607957. Google Scholar
- Temperilli F, Rina A, Massimi I. Arachidonic acid-stimulated platelet tests: Identification of patients less sensitive to aspirin treatment. Platelets. 2015; 26(8):783-787. Google Scholar
- Marcantoni E, Allen N, Cambria MR. Platelet transcriptome profiling in HIV and ATP-binding cassette subfamily C member 4 (ABCC4) as a mediator of platelet activity. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2018; 3(1):9-22. Google Scholar