Open access journal of the Ferrata-Storti Foundation, a non-profit organization
Review Articles

Respiratory syncytial virus in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients and patients with hematologic malignancies

Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, Division of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, Division of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
Vol. 104 No. 7 (2019): July, 2019 https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2018.215152

Abstract

In the USA and other western nations, respiratory syncytial virus is one of the most commonly encountered respiratory viruses among patients who have been diagnosed with a hematologic malignancy or who have undergone a stem cell transplant. Multiple studies have been performed to evaluate the complications associated with respiratory syncytial virus infections. Other studies have evaluated therapeutic agents and strategies in which these agents can be used. There have also been numerous reports of outbreaks in bone marrow transplant units and oncology wards, where infection control measures have been invaluable in controlling the spread of disease. However, despite these novel approaches, respiratory syncytial virus continues to be potentially fatal in immunocompromised populations. In this review, we discuss the incidence of respiratory syncytial viral infections, risk factors associated with progression from upper respiratory tract infection to lower respiratory tract infection, other complications and outcomes (including mortality), management strategies, and prevention strategies in patients with a hematologic malignancy and in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients.

Introduction

Community respiratory viruses are a common cause of respiratory infections.31 These viruses are perhaps best known for their seasonal variation. The outcomes of these infections vary on the basis of the patient population, with adverse outcomes having been described in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients and patients with a hematologic malignancy (HM).94 One of the most common community respiratory viruses that may lead to the death of HCT recipients and HM patients is respiratory syncytial virus (RSV),104 whose incidence is second only to that of influenza according to prior reports;1211854 other viruses include parainfluenza virus, metapneumovirus, adenovirus, rhinovirus, and bocavirus.

Different strategies have been used for the management of RSV infections in immunocompromised patients, and HCT recipients in particular, including ribavirin in its different formulations, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), RSV immunoglobulins, and RSV monoclonal antibodies.6 In addition, effective measures have been used to curtail outbreaks of RSV infection in numerous bone marrow transplantation units and oncology wards, with some success;1913 however, despite some advances over the past two decades in early detection and management of RSV infections in immunocompromised patients, the outcomes related to these infections remain poor.

In this review, we summarize the published data on RSV infections in adult HCT recipients and HM patients, focusing on recent findings. We highlight the incidence of RSV infections, risk factors associated with progression from upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) to lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI), other complications and outcomes (including mortality), management strategies including new agents under investigation, and prevention strategies.

Incidence of respiratory syncytial virus Infection

RSV has been considered a major cause of respiratory viral infection in HM and HCT patients since the 1980s. In the USA alone, RSV accounts for approximately 30% to 37% of respiratory viral infections in this population, with approximately 19% to 36% of these infections resulting in LRTI.204 Determination of the true incidence of RSV infection among HCT recipients has been challenging, with a reported wide range of 5% to 49%,28211885 as many studies included symptomatic patients diagnosed with different laboratory assays such as RSV antigen detection, identification of RSV by direct florescent antibody, viral cultures, and molecular assays in recent years (Table 1). In addition, the wide range of reported incidences of RSV infections could be due to the increased awareness of this virus over the years and its impact on immunocompromised patients. On the other hand, lower incidences of RSV infections were reported in studies in which molecular assays such as multiplex polymerase chain reaction were used to detect RSV, with the reported range in these cases being 8-30%.2998 This lower incidence could be explained by the increased rate of diagnosing other respiratory viruses, such as coronavirus, rhinovirus, and parainfluenza, with the use of molecular assays.

Table 1.Incidence rates of respiratory syncytial virus infections and lower respiratory tract infections among symptomatic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients.

The proportion of RSV infections causing LRTI in HCT recipients ranges from 30% to 60% with higher rates reported in earlier years (in the early 1990s),22215 whereas in more recent studies, since year 2000, lower rates of LRTI (24-44%) have been observed.30292523114 This could possibly be explained by the increased use of ribavirin at earlier stages of RSV infection to prevent the infection from progressing to the lower respiratory tract, as well as the use of molecular assays for the detection not only of RSV but also other respiratory viruses. Recent studies from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center on respiratory viral infections in HCT patients applied specific definitions to better delineate the types of LRTI associated with respiratory viral infections.31 Patients with proven or probable LRTI were defined as patients with microbiological detection of respiratory viruses in the lower respiratory tract with or without radiological evidence of disease in the lungs, respectively. Patients with possible LRTI were defined as patients with microbiological detection of respiratory viruses in the upper respiratory tract only and with radiological evidence of disease in the lungs.31 In one of the studies, the proportions of patients with proven/probable or possible RSV LRTI were 48% and 52%, respectively.31 Interestingly, the authors showed that patients with proven or probable LRTI had a higher need for supplemental oxygen use and for mechanical ventilation compared to those with possible LRTI. These definitions were also applied in studies on coronavirus,32 parainfluenza virus33 and rhinovirus.34

Data on RSV infections in HM patients are scarce. Some studies have reported the rate of RSV infections in these patients.373529284 In an early study, the incidence of RSV was 31% among all symptomatic HM patients, including HCT recipients. A large proportion of these infections were diagnosed as LRTI (36%).29 Similar studies reported a range of 3% to 37%, but the sample sizes were relatively small.363528 In a recent study, 181 HM patients with RSV infections were identified over 13 years.37 Of these, 65% and 35% presented with URTI and LRTI, respectively. Among the HM patients with URTI, 13% progressed to develop a LRTI (73% were patients with leukemia, 27% with multiple myeloma, and none with lymphoma).37 In a recent study from our institution focusing on RSV LRTI in HM patients who had or had not undergone HCT, we found that most HM patients who had not undergone HCT were defined as having possible RSV LRTI as bronchoscopy had not been performed in most of these patients at the time of diagnosis.38

Few data are available with regards to RSV infections in pediatric HCT recipients. The estimated incidence of RSV infections among this population is 3% to 7%,4039 with 22%-37%4139 developing LRTI.

Risk factors for the progression of upper to lower respiratory tract infection

The most significant complication of RSV infection in HM patients and HCT recipients is progression to LRTI, which is associated with a higher mortality rate.5142252422205 Many risk factors for progression have been identified in the hopes that target populations that could benefit from early therapy could be identified. These risk factors primarily consist of host factors, as previous studies on RSV serotypes A and B found no differences in outcomes.5235

To assist with the identification of HCT recipients who are at risk of progression to LRTI and a fatal outcome, an Immunodeficiency Scoring Index (ISI) for RSV was developed based on a combination of multiple host risk factors,53 which means it is applicable to other respiratory viruses. Six factors were included in the scoring index: neutropenia of less than 500 neutrophils/mL, lymphopenia of less than 200 lymphocytes/mL, age greater than 40 years, graft-versus-host disease, steroid use, myeloablative chemotherapy, and time from HCT.53 On the basis of the total score, the ISI stratifies HCT recipients with RSV URTI into low-risk (score of 0-2), medium-risk (score of 3-6), and high-risk (score of 7-12) categories.53 Other risk factors that were identified in other studies and were not included in the ISI were smoking status,54 hypoxia,28 nosocomial infection,3728 matched unrelated donor/mismatched donor status,554225 prior autologous HCT, and stem cell source2825 (Table 2). The ISI for RSV has been validated by other authors5612 (Table 3). Wang et al. found that allogenic HCT recipients with high ISI scores experienced progression to pneumonia after being diagnosed with RSV, influenza, coronavirus, or adenovirus.12

Table 2.Risk factors for progression to respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract infections among hematopoietic cell transplant recipients and patients with hematologic malignancies.

Table 3.Outcome data stratified by respiratory syncytial virus-Immunodeficiency Scoring Index from three different cohorts.

There is currently no predictive scoring index for the progression of respiratory viruses in patients with leukemia, lymphoma, or multiple myeloma. On the other hand, there are well-described risk factors that are associated with progression to LRTI in HM patients; these include lymphopenia and neutropenia,57555437284 which are generally defined as ≤200 lymphocytes/mL575437 and ≤500 neutrophils/mL, respectively. In multiple retrospective analyses of HCT recipients, lymphocytopenia5754374 and neutropenia5754374 at the time of the diagnosis of RSV were independent predictors of progression to LRTI.

In a cohort of 237 allogeneic HCT recipients with RSV infection, the hazard ratio (HR) of experiencing progression from RSV URTI to LRTI was 4.1 for an absolute neutrophil count of <500 cells/mL and 2.6 for an absolute lymphocyte count of <200 cells/mL,53 making them the most predictive factors for progression.53 Among leukemia patients, post-induction chemotherapy neutropenia and leukopenia have also been shown to increase the risk of progression to LRTI.2422 In a recent retrospective study, neutropenia and lymphopenia were not independently associated with progression of disease in HM patients, but the combination of the two factors was associated with a higher risk of progression.37 However, time from last chemotherapy was not shown to play a role in progression to LRTI in HM patients.37 On the other hand, lack of ribavirin therapy was associated with progression of disease in HCT recipients and HM patients with RSV infections.585337 The protective benefits of ribavirin are discussed further in the treatment section.

Long-term complications of respiratory syncytial virus infection

Certain long-term complications after RSV infection have been described in HCT recipients, with the most widely described long-term complication being a reduction in pulmonary function.61594324 Delayed engraftment after RSV infection is less commonly described, with an uncertain association in small numbers of patients.624645

A decrease in forced expiration in 1 second (FEV1) by more than 5% from baseline after HCT has been associated with poor outcomes.63 In fact, previous studies have shown that a decrease in FEV1 of 10% or greater is associated with the development of bronchiolitis obliterans.64 However, the relationship between respiratory viruses (RSV in particular) and changes in FEV1 or other markers of pulmonary function is not fully understood.

There are limited data on HCT recipients and pulmonary function (including changes in FEV1 and oxygen diffusion capacity) after an RSV infection. Avetisyan et al. showed that, compared to a control group, HCT recipients with RSV infections were more likely to develop mild or marked changes in vital capacity or diffusion capacity during pulmonary function tests.24 Subsequently, Seo et al. described significant decreases in patients’ diffusion capacity 3 months after RSV infection, which persisted for a year.43 There were some indications that FEV1 and total lung capacity were also affected, but the sample size was too small to draw definite conclusions. Another study compared the effects of different viruses on pulmonary function in HCT recipients;60 RSV and parainfluenza were associated with FEV1 decreases of at least 10%. It was postulated that subclinical shedding of these viruses may augment airway inflammation, leading to airway restriction. In comparison, lung transplant recipients who are infected with respiratory viruses are at increased of risk of developing bronchiolitis obliterans, with an associated mortality of up to 29%.65 Similarly, HCT recipients with prior respiratory viral infections were more likely to develop bronchiolitis obliterans or changes in FEV1,6659 with a higher mortality rate than that of patients without bronchiolitis obliterans (HR: 2.7).59

Delayed or failed engraftment of stem cells during or after acute RSV infection has been reported; however, it is an uncommon complication with a total of only seven patients having been described in a few case series.624645 This association was first described in 1999 by McCarthy et al., who noted that four patients with graft failure had had an RSV infection in the pre-engraftment period,45 with no other identified infections. Furthermore, during an RSV outbreak in a hematologic unit in Australia, delayed neutrophil and platelet engraftment occurred in two autologous HCT recipients and graft failure occurred in one allogeneic HCT recipient with an RSV infection.62 On the other hand, a study by Waghmare et al. showed no significant changes in lymphocyte count dynamics in HCT recipients who experienced progression to RSV LRTI compared to patients who did not.46 Overall, there are very limited data supporting that RSV infection per se leads to graft failure or contributes to a delay in engraftment.

Mortality and associated risk factors

High mortality rates have been reported in HM patients and HCT recipients with RSV infection. RSV-attributable mortality rates in HCT recipients vary between 0% in outbreak situations,676248 in which some patients received reduced-intensity conditioning regimens,62 and 43% in other circumstances.5142252422205 When HCT recipients develop RSV LRTI, the mortality rate can range from 21% to 83% 684846454342314 Of note, when HCT recipients with RSV infections were classified into those with possible RSV LRTI (only radiological evidence of chest abnormalities and negative or no bronchoscopy data) or proven RSV LRTI (RSV detected in the lower respiratory tract),31 the mortality rate increased from 0% to 26%, respectively.31 Multiple other risk factors for mortality from RSV have been identified, most of which are host-related, including neutropenia and lymphopenia, time from transplant to infection, cell source, older age, steroid exposure, graft-versus-host disease, hypoxia, and the use of myeloablative chemotherapy.4746434225 The RSV-ISI has been validated to predict mortality risk in HCT recipients565312 (Table 2). Based on the derivative cohort of allogeneic HCT recipients with RSV infections, the predicted mortality for patients with high RSV-ISI was 29%53 and 50% in one of the validation cohorts.44 Interestingly, some studies showed that ribavirin may have a protective effect in HCT recipients and HM patients.5853444237 This is discussed further in the treatment section.

Delaying transplant in patients diagnosed with RSV or other respiratory viruses prior to HCT was shown to improve survival.69 Campbell et al. reviewed 116 patients who had pre-transplant respiratory viral infections and found that, regardless of the virus, they had a higher 100-day mortality rate than did those without infections.70 At our institution, HCT is delayed for approximately 2 weeks when patients are diagnosed with RSV infections prior to transplantation.

Among HCT recipients with RSV infections, mortality was considerably lower in pediatric patients than in adults. Mortality varied from 0 to 5% among all pediatric HCT recipients with RSV infections4139 and is higher in patients with LRTI (up to 15%).

The mortality rate amongst HM patients with RSV can be as high as 18%.504 The mortality rate in a small study conducted in the mid-1990s was 80% among leukemia patients with RSV LRTI who had recently undergone myelosuppressive chemotherapy.57 More recent studies of HM patients with RSV LRTI found mortality rates of 8% to 17%583837 This better outlook could be explained in part by the improvement in supportive care over the years and the use of ribavirin for the treatment of RSV in this population of patients.5837 Risk factors associated with mortality in RSV-infected leukemia patients include neutropenia (≤500 neutrophils/mL), lymphopenia (≤200 lymphocytes/mL), and a high APACHE II score at diagnosis.5837 These host factors reflect the patients’ immune status and its ability to curtail the impact of RSV infections. The severity and stage of the infection (URTI vs. LRTI) or the virulence of the RSV may also affect mortality. In HM patients with proven LRTI, the 30-day mortality rate was reported to be 36% compared to 14% in patients with possible LRTI.38 In a recent retrospective analysis, patients with HM, including HCT recipients, in whom respiratory viral infections were detected in the intensive care unit had a higher intensive care unit mortality rate, with the association being strongest when influenza, parainfluenza or RSV was detected.10

Treatment options for respiratory syncytial virus infection in patients with hematologic malignancies and in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients

The current treatments for RSV infections in immunocompromised adult patients are ribavirin, in different formulations [although it has not been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for this purpose], and immuno-modulators, such as conventional IVIG or RSV monoclonal antibodies (palivizumab).

Ribavirin

Ribavirin is a nucleoside analog that is active against a broad spectrum of RNA viruses. It acts through intercalation into the RNA virus, enhancing its mutation rate. Ribavirin is available in aerosolized, oral, and intravenous formulations. Aerosolized ribavirin was approved by the FDA for the treatment of RSV LRTI in hospitalized infants and young children in 1985 and is the most studied formulation in HCT recipients.77715853494544422454 The conventional dosing regimen is 6 g delivered over 18 h through a small particle aerosol generator, with patients in a scavenger tent to decrease environmental contamination and exposure to healthcare workers (ribavirin is teratogenic). In an alternative regimen, the same total dose of ribavirin is given but is divided into three doses per day (2 g over 3 h, 3 times a day). This intermittent regimen was shown to be equivalent to the conventional continuous regimen in an adaptive randomized trial.78

Most of the studies on the use of ribavirin for RSV infections in HCT recipients and HM patients are retrospective in nature, lacking a comparison or control group.807974734526 Yet cumulative evidence, albeit not from clinical trials, suggests a better outcome when ribavirin is used in HCT recipients with early disease or URTI.83817871464 A decrease in the rate of progression from RSV URTI to LRTI after aerosolized ribavirin therapy in HCT recipients with RSV infections was pronounced (from 59% to 20%) in one study.4 A randomized control trial that was halted before completing enrollment for different reasons, including slow accrual, showed a trend towards a lower rate of progression to LRTI when aerosolized ribavirin was used.71 Of the nine patients who were treated with ribavirin, only one experienced progression compared to two of the five patients who were not treated.

A systemic review of the treatment of RSV infections in adult HCT recipients showed an overall reduction in the rate of progression to LRTI, from 45% to 16%, and a reduction in the rate of RSV-related mortality in patients with LRTI, from 70% to 35%, after early treatment with aerosolized ribavirin.84 In the largest retrospective study to date of the impact of aerosolized ribavirin therapy in HCT recipients (n=280) with RSV infections,42 early ribavirin therapy at the URTI stage reduced the risk of progression to LRTI. In addition, a lack of ribavirin therapy was associated with an increased mortality rate (odds ratio: 2.4).

Data on the use of ribavirin in HM patients with RSV infections are limited. Several retrospective studies demonstrated that early use of aerosolized ribavirin reduced the mortality rate in leukemia patients with RSV infections.5857 A large retrospective study of 181 HM patients showed better outcomes with aerosolized ribavirin.37 On the other hand, Vakil et al. found that ribavirin use, at either the URTI or LRTI stage, did not reduce overall mortality,38 but the objective of this study was to assess risk factors for mortality and not the role of ribavirin in HM patients. Although some of these studies showed a positive trend towards a benefit from therapy with ribavirin, specific recommendations cannot be made at present.

Despite our experience with aerosolized ribavirin for the treatment of RSV infections in adult HCT recipients and its increase in popularity over the years, a major shift to the oral formulation occurred around 3 years ago, at least at our institution, when the cost of ribavirin increased drastically.85 Oral ribavirin has been used to treat RSV URTI or LRTI in both HCT recipients and HM patients.8886828179 The dosing regimens vary between a weight-based regimen of 15 mg/kg to 60 mg/kg to a standardized dosage of 600 mg-800 mg twice daily or 600 mg three times daily for a maximum of 1800 mg/day. Oral ribavirin is more readily available than is aerosolized ribavirin and is well tolerated, on the basis of data on its long-term use in patients with hepatitis C virus infections.89 In a retrospective analysis of our experience with aerosolized ribavirin and the recent switch to oral ribavirin, we found no significant differences in outcomes, including progression to LRTI and day 30 or 60 all-cause mortality, in HCT recipients with RSV infections.90 On the basis of the results of a recent analysis, we propose the use of oral ribavirin as a viable alternative to aerosolized ribavirin (Figure 1). At our institution, we implemented a decision-making treatment algorithm as guidance for our clinical providers. HCT recipients are stratified on the basis of their RSV-ISI score and stage of RSV diagnosis (URTI vs. LRTI).

Figure 1.Proposed treatment algorithm for respiratory syncytial virus infections in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. HCT: hematopoietic cell transplant; RSV: respiratory syncytial virus; CT: computed tomography; LRTI: lower respiratory tract infection; URTI: upper respiratory tract infection; ISI: Immunodeficiency Scoring Index; IVIG: intravenous immunoglobulins.

Side effects associated with oral and aerosolized ribavirin have been reported in prior publications. One of the common side effects associated with aerosolized ribavirin is that patients often complained of feeling “lonely’ and seeing “hail” while they were in the scavenger tent.57 There have been a few reports of hepatotoxicity associated with the use of aerosolized ribavirin.9176 In a randomized, placebo-controlled trial assessing the use of aerosolized ribavirin for the treatment of RSV in HCT recipients, the rates of hepatotoxicity were similar in the two groups, although the sample size was small;71 no other side effects were noted in the trial. Hepatotoxicity was reported in association with the use of oral ribavirin for the treatment of hepatitis C virus.92 However, the observed hepatotoxicity was probably due to the co-administration of interferon therapy.92 In a retrospective study assessing the use of oral ribavirin in immunocompromised patients, including HCT recipients,79 only one of the 38 patients who received oral ribavirin developed hemolytic anemia and lactic acidosis. The latter was thought to be due to severe gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease. In a recent retrospective analysis comparing outcomes of HCT recipients with RSV infections who received either aerosolized or oral ribavirin,90 two of 29 (6.9%) patients on oral ribavirin developed new-onset grade 3 or more anemia at day 14 compared to two of 41 (4.9%) patients who received the aerosolized formulation. These studies demonstrate that both aerosolized and oral ribavirin have similar safety profiles.

Intravenous ribavirin has been used to treat RSV infection in HCT recipients.80494524 The most common regimen used is a single 33 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 16 mg/kg four times a day for 4 days with a maintenance dose of 8 mg/kg three times a day until symptoms resolve. The intravenous formulation of ribavirin is not readily available in the USA due to the lack of FDA approval; however, it can be acquired through the FDA for emergency or compassionate use.

Adjunctive therapies

Many immunomodulators have been used as adjunctive therapy for RSV infections in adult HM patients and HCT recipients. There have been no randomized control trials comparing the benefits of adding IVIG to ribavirin therapy. Many retrospective analyses have reported variable results for this combination.949385534946454222 Shah et al. suggested a minimal benefit in HCT recipients with RSV infections;42 all 51 HCT patients who were treated with combination therapy survived, and only one of 61 patients treated with ribavirin alone died. This was not evaluated in multivariate analysis. Another study showed no clinical benefit in HCT recipients who received weekly or high-dose IVIG as adjunctive therapy for RSV infections.46 It was hypothesized that humanized IVIG lacks sufficient specific antibodies to RSV, which would explain the mixed results seen in retrospective studies.

RSV-specific monoclonal antibodies, such as palivizumab, have also been evaluated for the treatment of RSV infections in HCT recipients and HM patients. Originally, palivizumab was approved for the prevention of RSV infections in neonates and children. Experience with palivizumab as treatment in HCT recipients with RSV is very limited. Several studies showed no survival benefit when comparing palivizumab as adjunctive therapy to ribavirin as monotherapy for RSV infections in adult HCT recipients.9695834642 In a recent retrospective study of a mixed population of adult HCT recipients and patients with HM,97 those treated with palivizumab for RSV infections showed a trend towards better 90-day survival compared to the control group, with mortality rates of 11% compared to 17%, respectively.97 However, this difference was not statistically significant and recommendations for the routine use of palivizumab in this population of patients cannot be made.

Investigational agents

As previously discussed, there are limited therapeutic options for RSV infections and new therapies are desperately needed. Presatovir is an oral RSV fusion inhibitor with selective anti-RSV activity in vitro. In a phase I, first-in-human, single- and multiple-ascending dose study,98 presatovir had an excellent safety profile, despite having an extended half-life. The oral bioavailability was also good, regardless of prandial state.98 Although clinical trials on RSV infections in transplant recipients have been challenging due to low recruitment,71 two phase II trials on presatovir in HCT recipients with RSV infections were recently completed10099 (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02254408). To overcome potential low recruitment, 189 HCT recipients with RSV infections limited to the upper respiratory tract were recruited from a total of 43 centers in nine countries over 2.5 years.10099 Preliminary data showed that presatovir was not effective at reducing nasal RSV viral load over time or at reducing the incidence of lower respiratory tract complications. However, in an exploratory analysis, presatovir did reduce the rate of progression to lower respiratory tract complications in patients with lymphopenia relative to the rate in placebo-treated patients. Furthermore, presatovir was not effective at reducing nasal RSV viral load, supplemental oxygen use or all-cause mortality in another phase II trial in HCT recipients with RSV LRTI.10099 Several lessons were learned from the two trials. HCT recipients with one or more risk factors (i.e. lymphopenia, neutropenia, or infected within a year from transplant) for poorer outcomes from RSV infections may benefit the most from an effective antiviral therapy. On the other hand, time from symptom onset and time before the development of lower respiratory tract complications are probably critical factors in determining the effectiveness of fusion inhibitors.

The development of another novel agent, ALX-0171, was recently stopped and the drug may not enter clinical trials on RSV infections in HCT recipients. This inhaled agent is a trivalent nanobody that inhibits RSV replication by binding the F-protein on the surface of the virus and thereby neutralizes RSV by blocking virus uptake into cells. A recent phase 1 trial in infants with RSV infections was prematurely terminated due to lack of efficacy (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03418571).

Prevention of respiratory syncytial virus infection

The prevention of RSV in HM patients and HCT recipients is limited to infection control measures and interventions. There are many reports of outbreaks in these populations of patients,1021011813 and the emphasis has been on multifaceted interventions, including compliance with hand hygiene, contact precautions with gowns and the use of gloves, screening visitors and healthcare workers for respiratory symptoms and restricting visitors and healthcare workers if they are symptomatic, grouping RSV-infected patients together, and sometimes screening asymptomatic patients in the same treatment areas. These interventions have been shown to be effective in mixed adult and pediatric patients.10410319 At our institution, we place all patients diagnosed with respiratory viral infections on contact and droplet precautions.105

Interestingly, the use of chemoprophylaxis with palivizumab was described during an outbreak15 in patients who were at high risk of acquiring RSV infections in a bone marrow transplant ward. Sixteen asymptomatic patients were given one prophylactic dose of palivizumab during the outbreak, and none developed an RSV infection. These results warrant further investigation into the use of palivizumab in an outbreak; however, no definite recommendation can be made at this time. Finally, an RSV vaccine for children or adults is not available at present. Multiple trials in children and healthy adults are in progress (www: ClinicalTrials.gov). Whether immunization for RSV would be beneficial in immunocompromised patients is uncertain.

Conclusions

RSV is a common respiratory viral infection in adult HM patients and HCT recipients. Its incidence is affected by its seasonality and geography and the diagnostic method used. The mortality rate associated with RSV can be high in severely immunocompromised patients with LRTI. The use of an ISI is helpful to stratify HCT recipients into risk categories; a similar scoring system is needed for HM patients. Ribavirin, with or without IVIG, may mitigate the impact of RSV infections in this population of patients. The further development of new antiviral agents or other treatment modalities is of the utmost importance to have a greater impact on rates of progression to LTRI and mortality in adult HM patients and HCT recipients.

Footnotes

  • Received January 15, 2019.
  • Accepted June 6, 2019.

References

  1. Wu X, Wang Q, Wang M. Incidence of respiratory viral infections detected by PCR and real-time PCR in adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a meta-analysis. Respiration. 2015; 89(4):343-352. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1159/000369561Google Scholar
  2. Ruuskanen O, Lahti E, Jennings LC, Murdoch DR. Viral pneumonia. Lancet. 2011; 377(9773):1264-1275. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61459-6Google Scholar
  3. Jain S, Self WH, Wunderink RG. Community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization among U.S. Adults. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373(5):415-427. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1500245Google Scholar
  4. Chemaly RF, Ghosh S, Bodey GP. Respiratory viral infections in adults with hematologic malignancies and human stem cell transplantation recipients: a retrospective study at a major cancer center. Medicine (Baltimore). 2006; 85(5):278-287. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.md.0000232560.22098.4eGoogle Scholar
  5. Ljungman P, Ward KN, Crooks BN. Respiratory virus infections after stem cell transplantation: a prospective study from the Infectious Diseases Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001; 28(5):479-484. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703139Google Scholar
  6. Chemaly RF, Shah DP, Boeckh MJ. Management of respiratory viral infections in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients and patients with hematologic malignancies. Clin Infect Dis. 2014; 59(Suppl 5):S344-S351. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu623Google Scholar
  7. Atilla E, Sahin D, Atilla PA. Upper respiratory viral infections in patients with haematological malignancies after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a retrospective study. Antivir Ther. 2018; 23(6):523-527. Google Scholar
  8. Mikulska M, Del Bono V, Gandolfo N. Epidemiology of viral respiratory tract infections in an outpatient haematology facility. Ann Hematol. 2014; 93(4):669-676. Google Scholar
  9. Moreira LP, Watanabe AS, Carraro E. A survey strategy for human respiratory syncytial virus detection among haematopoietic stem cell transplant patients: epidemiological and methodological analysis. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2013; 108(1):119-122. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0074-02762013000100021Google Scholar
  10. Legoff J, Zucman N, Lemiale V. Clinical significance of upper airway virus detection in critically ill hematology patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019; 199(4):518-528. Google Scholar
  11. Spahr Y, Tschudin-Sutter S, Baettig V. Community-acquired respiratory paramyxovirus infection after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a single-center experience. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018; 5(5):ofy077. Google Scholar
  12. Wang L, Allen J, Diong C. Respiratory virus infection after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in a tropical center: predictive value of the immunodeficiency scoring index. Transpl Infect Dis. 2017; 19(3)Google Scholar
  13. Lavergne V, Ghannoum M, Weiss K, Roy J, Beliveau C. Successful prevention of respiratory syncytial virus nosocomial transmission following an enhanced seasonal infection control program. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011; 46(1):137-142. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2010.67Google Scholar
  14. Kelly SG, Metzger K, Bolon MK. Respiratory syncytial virus outbreak on an adult stem cell transplant unit. Am J Infect Control. 2016; 44(9):1022-1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2016.03.075Google Scholar
  15. Kassis C, Champlin RE, Hachem RY. Detection and control of a nosocomial respiratory syncytial virus outbreak in a stem cell transplantation unit: the role of palivizumab. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010; 16(9):1265-1271. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.03.011Google Scholar
  16. Jones BL, Clark S, Curran ET. Control of an outbreak of respiratory syncytial virus infection in immunocompromised adults. J Hosp Infect. 2000; 44(1):53-57. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1053/jhin.1999.0666Google Scholar
  17. Inkster T, Ferguson K, Edwardson A, Gunson R, Soutar R. Consecutive yearly outbreaks of respiratory syncytial virus in a haematooncology ward and efficacy of infection control measures. J Hosp Infect. 2017; 96(4):353-359. Google Scholar
  18. Garcia R, Raad I, Abi-Said D. Nosocomial respiratory syncytial virus infections: prevention and control in bone marrow transplant patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1997; 18(6):412-416. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1086/647640Google Scholar
  19. French CE, McKenzie BC, Coope C. Risk of nosocomial respiratory syncytial virus infection and effectiveness of control measures to prevent transmission events: a systematic review. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2016; 10(4):268-290. Google Scholar
  20. Anaissie EJ, Mahfouz TH, Aslan T. The natural history of respiratory syncytial virus infection in cancer and transplant patients: implications for management. Blood. 2004; 103(5):1611-1617. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2003-05-1425Google Scholar
  21. Whimbey E, Champlin RE, Couch RB. Community respiratory virus infections among hospitalized adult bone marrow transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 1996; 22(5):778-782. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/22.5.778Google Scholar
  22. Small TN, Casson A, Malak SF. Respiratory syncytial virus infection following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2002; 29(4):321-327. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703365Google Scholar
  23. Chakrabarti S, Avivi I, Mackinnon S. Respiratory virus infections in transplant recipients after reduced-intensity conditioning with Campath-1H: high incidence but low mortality. Br J Haematol. 2002; 119(4):1125-1132. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03992.xGoogle Scholar
  24. Avetisyan G, Mattsson J, Sparrelid E, Ljungman P. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in recipients of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation: a retrospective study of the incidence, clinical features, and outcome. Transplantation. 2009; 88(10):1222-1226. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e3181bb477eGoogle Scholar
  25. Martino R, Porras RP, Rabella N. Prospective study of the incidence, clinical features, and outcome of symptomatic upper and lower respiratory tract infections by respiratory viruses in adult recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplants for hematologic malignancies. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005; 11(10):781-796. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.07.007Google Scholar
  26. Hassan IA, Chopra R, Swindell R, Mutton KJ. Respiratory viral infections after bone marrow/peripheral stem-cell transplantation: the Christie hospital experience. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003; 32(1):73-77. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704048Google Scholar
  27. Machado CM, Boas LS, Mendes AV. Low mortality rates related to respiratory virus infections after bone marrow trans plantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003; 31(8):695-700. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703900Google Scholar
  28. Martino R, Ramila E, Rabella N. Respiratory virus infections in adults with hematologic malignancies: a prospective study. Clin Infect Dis. 2003; 36(1):1-8. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1086/344899Google Scholar
  29. Roghmann M, Ball K, Erdman D, Lovchik J, Anderson LJ, Edelman R. Active surveillance for respiratory virus infections in adults who have undergone bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003; 32(11):1085-1088. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704257Google Scholar
  30. Hong KW, Choi SM, Lee DG. Lower respiratory tract diseases caused by common respiratory viruses among stem cell transplantation recipients: a single center experience in Korea. Yonsei Med J. 2017; 58(2):362-369. Google Scholar
  31. Waghmare A, Xie H, Kimball L. Supplemental oxygen-free days in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients with respiratory syncytial virus. J Infect Dis. 2017; 216(10):1235-1244. Google Scholar
  32. Ogimi C, Waghmare AA, Kuypers JM. Clinical significance of human coronavirus in bronchoalveolar lavage samples from hematopoietic cell transplant recipients and patients with hematologic malignancies. Clin Infect Dis. 2017; 64(11):1532-1539. Google Scholar
  33. Seo S, Xie H, Leisenring WM. Risk factors for parainfluenza virus lower respiratory tract disease after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019; 25(1):163-171. Google Scholar
  34. Waghmare A, Xie H, Kuypers J. Human rhinovirus infections in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: risk score for progression to lower respiratory tract infection. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019; 25(5):1011-1021. Google Scholar
  35. Salter A, Laoi BN, Crowley B. Molecular epidemiology of human respiratory syncytial virus subgroups A and B identified in adults with hematological malignancy attending an Irish hospital between 2004 and 2009. J Med Virol. 2011; 83(2):337-347. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Kami M, Kishi Y, Hamaki T. A prospective surveillance of nosocomial respiratory syncytial virus infection in a hematology ward: a single-center experience in Japan. Int J Hematol. 2001; 74(3):357-359. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Azzi JM, Kyvernitakis A, Shah DP. Leukopenia and lack of ribavirin predict poor outcomes in patients with haematological malignancies and respiratory syncytial virus infection. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018; 73(11):3162-3169. Google Scholar
  38. Vakil E, Sheshadri A, Faiz SA. Risk factors for mortality after respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract infection in adults with hematologic malignancies. Transpl Infect Dis. 2018; 20(6):e12994. Google Scholar
  39. El-Bietar J, Nelson A, Wallace G. RSV infection without ribavirin treatment in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016; 51(10):1382-1384. Google Scholar
  40. Rowan CM, Gertz SJ, Zinter MS. A multicenter investigation of respiratory syncytial viral infection in children with hematopoietic cell transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis. 2018; 20(3):e12882. Google Scholar
  41. Chemaly RF, Ghantoji SS, Shah DP. Respiratory syncytial virus infections in children with cancer. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2014; 36(6):e376-381. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1097/MPH.0000000000000086Google Scholar
  42. Shah DP, Ghantoji SS, Shah JN. Impact of aerosolized ribavirin on mortality in 280 allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients with respiratory syncytial virus infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013; 68(8):1872-1880. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt111Google Scholar
  43. Seo S, Campbell AP, Xie H. Outcome of respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract disease in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients receiving aerosolized ribavirin: significance of stem cell source and oxygen requirement. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013; 19(4):589-596. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.12.019Google Scholar
  44. Pilie P, Werbel WA, Riddell J, Shu X, Schaubel D, Gregg KS. Adult patients with respiratory syncytial virus infection: impact of solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation on outcomes. Transpl Infect Dis. 2015; 17(4):551-557. https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.12409Google Scholar
  45. McCarthy AJ, Kingman HM, Kelly C. The outcome of 26 patients with respiratory syncytial virus infection following allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1999; 24(12):1315-1322. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1702078Google Scholar
  46. Waghmare A, Campbell AP, Xie H. Respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory disease in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: viral RNA detection in blood, antiviral treatment, and clinical outcomes. Clin Infect Dis. 2013; 57(12):1731-1741. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cit639Google Scholar
  47. Renaud C, Xie H, Seo S. Mortality rates of human metapneumovirus and respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract infections in hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013; 19(8):1220-1226. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.05.005Google Scholar
  48. Mendes ET, Ramos J, Peixoto D. An outbreak of respiratory syncytial virus infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation outpatients: good outcome without specific antiviral treatment. Transpl Infect Dis. 2013; 15(1):42-48. Google Scholar
  49. Ljungman P. Respiratory virus infections in stem cell transplant patients: the European experience. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2001; 7(Suppl):5S-7S. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1053/bbmt.2001.v7.pm11777102Google Scholar
  50. Khanna N, Widmer AF, Decker M. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in patients with hematological diseases: single-center study and review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis. 2008; 46(3):402-412. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1086/525263Google Scholar
  51. Campbell AP, Chien JW, Kuypers J. Respiratory virus pneumonia after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT): associations between viral load in bronchoalveolar lavage samples, viral RNA detection in serum samples, and clinical outcomes of HCT. J Infect Dis. 2010; 201(9):1404-1413. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1086/651662Google Scholar
  52. Mazzulli T, Peret TC, McGeer A. Molecular characterization of a nosocomial outbreak of human respiratory syncytial virus on an adult leukemia/lymphoma ward. J Infect Dis. 1999; 180(5):1686-1689. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1086/315085Google Scholar
  53. Shah DP, Ghantoji SS, Ariza-Heredia EJ. Immunodeficiency scoring index to predict poor outcomes in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients with RSV infections. Blood. 2014; 123(21):3263-3268. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-12-541359Google Scholar
  54. Kim YJ, Guthrie KA, Waghmare A. Respiratory syncytial virus in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: factors determining progression to lower respiratory tract disease. J Infect Dis. 2014; 209(8):1195-1204. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jit832Google Scholar
  55. Nichols WG, Gooley T, Boeckh M. Community-acquired respiratory syncytial virus and parainfluenza virus infections after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center experience. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2001; 7(Suppl):11S-5S. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1053/bbmt.2001.v7.pm11777098Google Scholar
  56. Damlaj M, Bartoo G, Cartin-Ceba R. Corticosteroid use as adjunct therapy for respiratory syncytial virus infection in adult allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2016; 18(2):216-226. Google Scholar
  57. Whimbey E, Couch RB, Englund JA. Respiratory syncytial virus pneumonia in hospitalized adult patients with leukemia. Clin Infect Dis. 1995; 21(2):376-379. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/21.2.376Google Scholar
  58. Torres HA, Aguilera EA, Mattiuzzi GN. Characteristics and outcome of respiratory syncytial virus infection in patients with leukemia. Haematologica. 2007; 92(9):1216-1223. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.11300Google Scholar
  59. Sheshadri A, Shah D, Kmeid J. Pulmonary function decline after respiratory viral infection predicts mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Am J Resp Crit Care Med. 2017; 195:A2706. Google Scholar
  60. Erard V, Chien JW, Kim HW. Airflow decline after myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: the role of community respiratory viruses. J Infect Dis. 2006; 193(12):1619-1625. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1086/504268Google Scholar
  61. Fisher CE, Preiksaitis CM, Lease ED. Symptomatic respiratory virus infection and chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Clin Infect Dis. 2016; 62(3):313-319. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ871Google Scholar
  62. Abdallah A, Rowland KE, Schepetiuk SK, To LB, Bardy P. An outbreak of respiratory syncytial virus infection in a bone marrow transplant unit: effect on engraftment and outcome of pneumonia without specific antiviral treatment. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003; 32(2):195-203. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704116Google Scholar
  63. Chien JW, Martin PJ, Gooley TA. Airflow obstruction after myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003; 168(2):208-214. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200212-1468OCGoogle Scholar
  64. Abedin S, Yanik GA, Braun T. Predictive value of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome stage 0p in chronic graft-versus-host disease of the lung. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015; 21(6):1127-1131. Google Scholar
  65. Khalifah AP, Hachem RR, Chakinala MM. Respiratory viral infections are a distinct risk for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and death. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004; 170(2):181-187. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200310-1359OCGoogle Scholar
  66. Versluys AB, Rossen JW, van Ewijk B, Schuurman R, Bierings MB, Boelens JJ. Strong association between respiratory viral infection early after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and the development of life-threatening acute and chronic alloimmune lung syndromes. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010; 16(6):782-791. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.12.534Google Scholar
  67. Yue C, Kang Z, Ai K. Virus infection facilitates the development of severe pneumonia in transplant patients with hematologic malignancies. Oncotarget. 2016; 7(33):53930-53940. Google Scholar
  68. Ebbert JO, Limper AH. Respiratory syncytial virus pneumonitis in immunocompromised adults: clinical features and outcome. Respiration. 2005; 72(3):263-269. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1159/000085367Google Scholar
  69. Peck AJ, Corey L, Boeckh M. Pretransplantation respiratory syncytial virus infection: impact of a strategy to delay transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2004; 39(5):673-680. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1086/422994Google Scholar
  70. Campbell AP, Guthrie KA, Englund JA. Clinical outcomes associated with respiratory virus detection before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Clin Infect Dis. 2015; 61(2):192-202. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ272Google Scholar
  71. Boeckh M, Englund J, Li Y. Randomized controlled multicenter trial of aerosolized ribavirin for respiratory syncytial virus upper respiratory tract infection in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2007; 44(2):245-249. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1086/509930Google Scholar
  72. Field K, Slavin MA, Seymour JF. Severe respiratory syncytial virus pneumonia complicating fludarabine and cyclophosphamide treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Eur J Haematol. 2002; 69(1):54-57. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0609.2002.02745.xGoogle Scholar
  73. Ghosh S, Champlin RE, Englund J. Respiratory syncytial virus upper respiratory tract illnesses in adult blood and marrow transplant recipients: combination therapy with aerosolized ribavirin and intravenous immunoglobulin. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000; 25(7):751-755. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1702228Google Scholar
  74. McColl MD, Corser RB, Bremner J, Chopra R. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in adult BMT recipients: effective therapy with short duration nebulised ribavirin. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998; 21(4):423-425. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1701091Google Scholar
  75. McCoy D, Wong E, Kuyumjian AG, Wynd MA, Sebti R, Munk GB. Treatment of respiratory syncytial virus infection in adult patients with hematologic malignancies based on an institution-specific guideline. Transpl Infect Dis. 2011; 13(2):117-121. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3062.2010.00561.xGoogle Scholar
  76. Sparrelid E, Ljungman P, Ekelof-Andstrom E. Ribavirin therapy in bone marrow transplant recipients with viral respiratory tract infections. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1997; 19(9):905-908. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1700752Google Scholar
  77. Win N, Mitchell D, Pugh S, Russell NH. Successful therapy with ribavirin of late onset respiratory syncytial virus pneumonitis complicating allogeneic bone transplantation. Clin Lab Haematol. 1992; 14(1):29-32. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Chemaly RF, Torres HA, Munsell MF. An adaptive randomized trial of an intermittent dosing schedule of aerosolized ribavirin in patients with cancer and respiratory syncytial virus infection. J Infect Dis. 2012; 206(9):1367-1371. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jis516Google Scholar
  79. Marcelin JR, Wilson JW, Razonable RR, Transplant Infectious Diseases Services. Oral ribavirin therapy for respiratory syncytial virus infections in moderately to severely immunocompromised patients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2014; 16(2):242-250. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1111/tid.12194Google Scholar
  80. Schleuning M, Buxbaum-Conradi H, Jager G, Kolb HJ. Intravenous ribavirin for eradication of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and adenovirus isolates from the respiratory and/or gastrointestinal tract in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants. Hematol J. 2004; 5(2):135-144. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/sj.thj.6200358Google Scholar
  81. Casey J, Morris K, Narayana M, Nakagaki M, Kennedy GA. Oral ribavirin for treatment of respiratory syncitial virus and parainfluenza 3 virus infections post allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013; 48(12):1558-1561. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2013.112Google Scholar
  82. Gueller S, Duenzinger U, Wolf T. Successful systemic high-dose ribavirin treatment of respiratory syncytial virus-induced infections occurring pre-engraftment in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2013; 15(4):435-440. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1111/tid.12092Google Scholar
  83. Lewinsohn DM, Bowden RA, Mattson D, Crawford SW. Phase I study of intravenous ribavirin treatment of respiratory syncytial virus pneumonia after marrow transplantation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996; 40(11):2555-2557. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.40.11.2555Google Scholar
  84. Shah JN, Chemaly RF. Management of RSV infections in adult recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2011; 117(10):2755-2763. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-08-263400Google Scholar
  85. Chemaly RF, Aitken SL, Wolfe CR, Jain R, Boeckh MJ. Aerosolized ribavirin: the most expensive drug for pneumonia. Transpl Infect Dis. 2016; 18(4):634-636. Google Scholar
  86. Chakrabarti S, Collingham KE, Holder K, Fegan CD, Osman H, Milligan DW. Preemptive oral ribavirin therapy of paramyxovirus infections after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a pilot study. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001; 28(8):759-763. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703216Google Scholar
  87. Gorcea CM, Tholouli E, Turner A. Effective use of oral ribavirin for respiratory syncytial viral infections in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. J Hosp Infect. 2017; 95(2):214-217. Google Scholar
  88. Mori T, Nakamura Y, Kato J. Oral ribavirin therapy for lower respiratory tract infection of respiratory syncytial virus complicating bronchiolitis obliterans after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Int J Hematol. 2011; 93(1):132-134. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-010-0756-9Google Scholar
  89. Gupta SK, Kantesaria B, Glue P. Pharmacokinetics and safety of single-dose ribavirin in patients with chronic renal impairment. Drug Discov Ther. 2013; 7(4):158-163. Google Scholar
  90. Foolad F, Aitken SL, Shigle TL. Oral versus aerosolized ribavirin for the treatment of respiratory syncytial virus infections in hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2018. Google Scholar
  91. Chaves J, Huen A, Bueso-Ramos C, Safdar A, Vadhan-Raj S. Aerosolized ribavirin-induced reversible hepatotoxicity in a hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipient with Hodgkin lymphoma. Clin Infect Dis. 2006; 42(8):e72-75. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1086/502651Google Scholar
  92. Marcellin P, Levy S, Erlinger S. Therapy of hepatitis C: patients with normal amino-transferase levels. Hepatology. 1997; 26(3 Suppl 1):133S-136S. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1002/hep.510260723Google Scholar
  93. Falsey AR, Koval C, DeVincenzo JP, Walsh EE. Compassionate use experience with high-titer respiratory syncytical virus (RSV) immunoglobulin in RSV-infected immunocompromised persons. Transpl Infect Dis. 2017; 19(2)Google Scholar
  94. Markovic SN, Adlakha A, Smith TF, Walker RC. Respiratory syncytial virus pneumonitis-induced diffuse alveolar damage in an autologous bone marrow transplant recipient. Mayo Clin Proc. 1998; 73(2):153-156. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.4065/73.2.153Google Scholar
  95. de Fontbrune FS, Robin M, Porcher R. Palivizumab treatment of respiratory syncytial virus infection after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2007; 45(8):1019-1024. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1086/521912Google Scholar
  96. Tsitsikas DA, Oakervee H, Cavenagh JD, Gribben J, Agrawal SG, Mattes FM. Treatment of respiratory syncytial virus infection in haemopoietic stem cell transplant recipients with aerosolized ribavirin and the humanized monoclonal antibody palivizumab: a single centre experience. Br J Haematol. 2009; 146(5):574-576. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07763.xGoogle Scholar
  97. Permpalung N, Mahoney MV, McCoy C. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes among respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-infected hematologic malignancy and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients receiving palivizumab. Leuk Lymphoma. 2019; 60(1):85-91. Google Scholar
  98. German P, Xin Y, Chien JW. Phase 1 first-in-human, single- and multiple-ascending dose, and food effect studies to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of presatovir for the treatment of respiratory syncytial virus infection. J Clin Pharmacol. 2018. Google Scholar
  99. Marty FMC, Roy F, Bergeron A.Paper presented at: ; Google Scholar
  100. Chemaly RFD, Sanjeet S, Bergeron A.Paper presented at: ; Google Scholar
  101. Jalal H, Bibby DF, Bennett J. Molecular investigations of an outbreak of parainfluenza virus type 3 and respiratory syncytial virus infections in a hematology unit. J Clin Microbiol. 2007; 45(6):1690-1696. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01912-06Google Scholar
  102. Lehners N, Schnitzler P, Geis S. Risk factors and containment of respiratory syncytial virus outbreak in a hematology and transplant unit. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013; 48(12):1548-1553. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2013.94Google Scholar
  103. Gala CL, Hall CB, Schnabel KC. The use of eye-nose goggles to control nosocomial respiratory syncytial virus infection. JAMA. 1986; 256(19):2706-2708. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1986.03380190076028Google Scholar
  104. Krasinski K, LaCouture R, Holzman RS, Waithe E, Bonk S, Hanna B. Screening for respiratory syncytial virus and assignment to a cohort at admission to reduce nosocomial transmission. J Pediatr. 1990; 116(6):894-898. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(05)80646-8Google Scholar
  105. Ariza-Heredia EJ, Chemaly RF. Update on infection control practices in cancer hospitals. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68(5):340-355. Google Scholar

Article Information

Vol. 104 No. 7 (2019): July, 2019 : Review Articles
 
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2018.215152
Pubmed
31221784
Pubmed Central
PMC6601091
 
Published
2019-07-01
Published By
Ferrata Storti Foundation, Pavia, Italy
Print ISSN
0390-6078
Online ISSN
1592-8721
 

Article Usage

Online Views
4673
PDF Downloads
1075

Statistics from Altmetric.com

No Data
Navigate
For Authors
For Reviewers
For Advertisers
Education
Privacy
More
Copyright © 2024 by the Ferrata Storti Foundation | Web design ￫ | Development ￫
ISSN 0390-6078 print | ISSN 1592-8721 online