Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare hematologic malignancy now known to derive from immature plasmacytoid dendritic cells. However, the cell of origin for this entity was unknown a mere two decades ago when it was alternatively speculated to be of natural killer (NK)-cell or monocytic origin. Coupled with recent advancements in genetic technologies, we have been at an inflection point in time for understanding the essence of this disease.1
The recent paper by Sapienza et al., in this issue of the Journal, makes a groundbreaking and essential push forward in our understanding of BPDCN.2 The work is pivotal as: 1) it is the first to focus specifically on understanding epigenetic alterations in BPDCN; 2) it studies a large number of well annotated cases of BPDCN using broad and comprehensive genetic analyses; and 3) it assesses the therapeutic value of targeting BPDCN with epigenetic modifying therapies in vivo. However, to understand the importance of the study by Sapienza et al., it is critical to provide an overview of this neoplasm.
Initially described in 1990 as a possible histiocytic or monoblastic leukemia,43 and then later believed to be an NK-cell tumor due to expression of both CD56 and CD4,65 the cellular lineage of BPDCN was debated for more than a decade. Then, in 1999, Lucio et al.7 postulated a dendritic cell origin due to expression of CD123, a sensitive, though not specific, plasmacytoid dendritic cell marker. Further research continued to support the plasmacytoid dendritic cell origin based not only on CD123 expression but also expression of TCL1 and also cellular differentiation assays, all which pointed to plasmacytoid dendritic cells as the normal cellular counterpart for this tumor.108 In the 2008 World Health Organization classification, it was finally introduced as BPDCN and has continued with this designation in the revised 2016 WHO classification. BPDCN demonstrates aggressive behavior, presenting with cutaneous lesions and bone marrow involvement, and, despite a frequent good response to initial therapy, the median survival varies from 10 to 19.8 months.
The genetics and molecular aspects of this entity have also been explored by several groups. An abnormal karyotype is common (>50% of patients) and particular chromosome regions are more frequently targeted in BPDCN based on classic cytogenetic analyses as well as comparative genomic hybridization studies: 4q, 5q, 6q, 9, 12p, 13q, and 15q (Figure 1).1311 Deletion of the 9p21.3 locus is the most recurrent event in BPDCN, found to be associated with a poor outcome when biallelic.11 More recently, the presence of a recurrent gene rearrangement involving the MYC locus, specifically t(6;8)(p21;q24) has been reported in several studies including one by our own group, and has been seen in association with older onset and shorter median survival.1614 Whole-exome sequencing (WES) and targeted sequencing studies have identified recurrent mutations involving TET2, ASXL1, TP53, and NPM1,1817 while separate studies have appointed E-box transcription factor TCF4 as a master regulator of the BPDCN oncogenic program as bromodomain and extra-terminal domain inhibitors (BETis) induced BPDCN apoptosis due to disruption of the TCF4 dependent regulatory network.19 Finally, aberrant activation of the NF-kB pathway has been identified through gene expression profiling.20 However, as can be seen, our understanding of the genetic aspects of BPDCN has been somewhat limited.
In the current issue of the Journal, Sapienza et al.2 significantly advance our understanding of BPDCN by analyzing 14 patients, as well as the patient-derived CAL-1 cell line, by WES. This broad and detailed sequencing demonstrated that BPDCN patients were affected by mutations of genes involved in epigenetic regulation, with 25 mutated epigenetic modifier genes including those implicated in DNA methylation (TET2 and IDH2), chromatin accessibility (ARID1a, CHD8, SMARCA1), and histone modification including: methylation (ASXL1, SUZ12, MLL), demethylation (KDM4D), acetylation (EP300, EP400), ubiquitination (PHC1, PHC2), dephosphorylation (EYA2) and exchange (SRCAP) (Figure 1). This finding highlights the dysregulation of the epigenetic program in BPDCN as a hallmark of the disease indicating possible therapeutic interventions. In addition, by analyzing the transcriptome of the samples studied by WES, they examined the specific impact of these epigenetic-associated gene mutations. Gene set enrichment analysis additionally revealed two significant deregulation signatures associated with methylation of DNA: one driven by KDM5B34 histone demethylase and another by the PRMT5 methyltransferase-associated gene. The authors also detected gene set enrichment of those genes associated with response to decitabine, a DNA demethylating agent. Finally, based on the apparent significance of epigenetics in BPDCN, the authors did what few have done before, and tested in vivo the efficacy of four US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved epigenetic drugs (5’-Azacytidine, decitabine, romidepsin and bortezomib) in a mouse xenograft model using the CAL-1 cell line. These drugs were used as single agents or in combination, and when used as a single agent, 5’-Azacytidine and decitabine significantly prolonged mice overall survival, while among all the combinations tested, treatment with 5’-Azacytidine in combination with decitabine achieved the best result in terms of survival. The significance of this study cannot be understated as it links genotype to advancements in epigenetic forms of treatment and fundamental biological processes.
Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm is a rare disease with an extremely aggressive behavior; the advances here in the genetics and molecular aspects of this entity, as well as the therapeutic approach, are quite revealing and significantly open the door for future clinical trials. This work nicely provides further support for the essence of why development of new epigenetic treatment strategies are a rational approach for this aggressive disease.
References
- Laribi K, Denizon N, Besancon A. Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasm: From Origin of the Cell to Targeted Therapies. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016; 22(8):1357-1367. Google Scholar
- Sapienza MR, Abate F, Melle F, Orecchioni FF, Etebari M. Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm: genomics mark epigenetic dysregulation as a primary therapeutic target. Haematologica. 2019; 104(4):729-737. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2018.202093Google Scholar
- Tauchi T, Ohyashiki K, Ohyashiki JH. CD4+ and CD56+ acute monoblastic leukemia. Am J Hematol. 1990; 34(3):228-229. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.2830340315Google Scholar
- Gattei V, Carbone A, Zagonel V, Pinto A. Expression of natural killer antigens in a subset of ‘non-T, non-B lymphoma/leukaemia with histiocytic features’. Br J Haematol. 1990; 76(3):444-448. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kimura S, Kakazu N, Kuroda J. Agranular CD4+CD56+ blastic natural killer leukemia/lymphoma. Ann Hematol. 2001; 80(4):228-231. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s002770000257Google Scholar
- Kameoka J, Ichinohasama R, Tanaka M. A cutaneous agranular CD2- CD4+ CD56+ “lymphoma”: report of two cases and review of the literature. Am J Clin Pathol. 1998; 110(4):478-488. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/110.4.478Google Scholar
- Lucio P, Parreira A, Orfao A. CD123hi dendritic cell lymphoma: an unusual case of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Ann Intern Med. 1999; 131(7):549-550. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grouard G, Rissoan MC, Filgueira L, Durand I, Banchereau J, Liu YJ. The enigmatic plasmacytoid T cells develop into dendritic cells with interleukin (IL)-3 and CD40-ligand. J Exp Med. 1997; 185(6):1101-1111. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1084/jem.185.6.1101Google Scholar
- Herling M, Teitell MA, Shen RR, Medeiros LJ, Jones D. TCL1 expression in plasmacytoid dendritic cells (DC2s) and the related CD4+ CD56+ blastic tumors of skin. Blood. 2003; 101(12):5007-5009. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2002-10-3297Google Scholar
- Petrella T, Comeau MR, Maynadie M. ‘Agranular CD4+ CD56+ hematodermic neoplasm’ (blastic NK-cell lymphoma) originates from a population of CD56+ precursor cells related to plasmacytoid monocytes. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002; 26(7):852-862. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-200207000-00003Google Scholar
- Lucioni M, Novara F, Fiandrino G. Twenty-one cases of blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm: focus on biallelic locus 9p21.3 deletion. Blood. 2011; 118(17):4591-4594. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-03-337501Google Scholar
- Dijkman R, van Doorn R, Szuhai K, Willemze R, Vermeer MH, Tensen CP. Gene-expression profiling and array-based CGH classify CD4+CD56+ hematodermic neoplasm and cutaneous myelomonocytic leukemia as distinct disease entities. Blood. 2007; 109(4):1720-1727. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-04-018143Google Scholar
- Leroux D, Mugneret F, Callanan M. CD4(+), CD56(+) DC2 acute leukemia is characterized by recurrent clonal chromosomal changes affecting 6 major targets: a study of 21 cases by the Groupe Francais de Cytogenetique Hematologique. Blood. 2002; 99(11):4154-4159. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V99.11.4154Google Scholar
- Sakamoto K, Katayama R, Asaka R. Recurrent 8q24 rearrangement in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm: association with immunoblastoid cytomorphology, MYC expression, and drug response. Leukemia. 2018; 32(12):2590-2603. Google Scholar
- Boddu PC, Wang SA, Pemmaraju N. 8q24/MYC rearrangement is a recurrent cytogenetic abnormality in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasms. Leuk Res. 2018; 66:73-78. Google Scholar
- Sumarriva Lezama L, Chisholm KM, Carneal E. An analysis of blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm with translocations involving the MYC locus identifies t(6;8)(p21;q24) as a recurrent cytogenetic abnormality. Histopathology. 2018; 73(5):767-776. Google Scholar
- Menezes J, Acquadro F, Wiseman M. Exome sequencing reveals novel and recurrent mutations with clinical impact in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm. Leukemia. 2014; 28(4):823-829. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2013.283Google Scholar
- Jardin F, Ruminy P, Parmentier F. TET2 and TP53 mutations are frequently observed in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm. Br J Haematol. 2011; 153(3):413-416. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08556.xGoogle Scholar
- Ceribelli M, Hou ZE, Kelly PN. A Druggable TCF4- and BRD4-Dependent Transcriptional Network Sustains Malignancy in Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasm. Cancer Cell. 2016; 30(5):764-778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2016.10.002Google Scholar
- Sapienza MR, Fuligni F, Agostinelli C. Molecular profiling of blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm reveals a unique pattern and suggests selective sensitivity to NF-kB pathway inhibition. Leukemia. 2014; 28(8):1606-1616. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2014.64Google Scholar