Rosai-Dorfman Disease (RDD), also known as sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy, is a rare, nonmalignant histiocytic proliferation of unknown etiology. According to the new classification, it belongs to the R group of histiocytoses.1 The clinical course of this disease is quite unpredictable with alternating episodes of worsening and reliving of symptoms. The outcome is usually good, and the disease is often self-limiting. Treatment for RDD is only advised in patients with symptomatic disease or who have a vital organ or system compromised. Common therapeutic modalities include surgery, corticosteroids, interferon, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy.2
Although most individuals with RDD have a benign clinical course, some cases are quite challenging, and optimal target therapeutic agents are missing. The BRAFV600E mutation in the proto-oncogene BRAF of the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK pathway has been consistently reported in histiocytic disorders, including disorders of the non-LCH group, but not in RDD yet.52
Herein, we report on an 18-year-old man with no previous medical history who presented to his primary care physician with a complaint of progressive bilateral cervical node enlargement in the preceding weeks. Apart from node enlargement, he had no other symptoms (fever, weight loss or night sweats). A node biopsy was obtained, and diagnosis of RDD was established.
The patient was then referred to our center. At the initial evaluation, he maintained nonpainful cervical lymphadenopathy without evidence of airway obstruction or dysphagia (Figure 1A). Physical examination found no neurological signs, skin changes, or hepatosplenomegaly. Laboratory exams were unremarkable, except for an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of 25 mm/hr (normal range 5–12 mm/hr). A Positron Emission Tomography - Computed Tomography (PET-CT) scan exhibited multiple bilateral hypermetabolic cervical node lesions measuring up to 3 cm and with maximal standardized uptake value (SUV) of 4.8 (Figure 1B); bone lesions (either hypermetabolic or not) were absent. Slides were reviewed at our center, and a diagnosis of RDD was confirmed.
The diagnosis was independently confirmed by two experts (J.F.E. and F.C.) (Figures 1D and 1E). Immunohistochemical stains demonstrated that large histiocytes were S100 positive (Figure 1F), CD68 positive and CD1a negative. Immunohistochemistry also revealed abundant BRAFV600E-positive RDD cells (Figure 2A–2B), and disclosed nuclear and cytoplasmic expression of phosphoERK by some typical RDD cells, thus confirming the activation of MAPkinase cell signaling pathway (Figure 2C), Screening for BRAF mutations by pyrosequencing failed to detect a mutation in the p.V600 codon. Nonetheless, the BRAF mutation detected by immunohistochemistry was confirmed by two independent multiplex picodroplet digital PCRs6 (pddPCR) revealed 152 and 124 BRAFV600E droplets out of a total of 76,372 and 101,479 droplets analyzed, respectively (0.16%) (Figure 2D).
Since the disease was cervically localized and had been stable, the patient was managed with watchful waiting. Over the next eight months, the cervical nodes showed spontaneous regression. Accordingly, the last follow-up PET-CT scan evidenced marked decrease both in size (up to 1.4 cm) and SUV (maximum 3.4) in the previous lesions (Figure 1C).
In the group of histiocytic disorders, the BRAFV600E mutation has been found in more than 50% of cases of LCH and Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD).51 Recently, vemurafenib, a BRAF mutant-inhibitor, has shown important clinical and biological response in both LCH and ECD, corroborating the role of the mutation in the pathogenesis of those disorders.7 Concerning the non-L group of histiocytoses, the BRAFV600E mutation has only been reported in a few malignant histiocytoses.52
The distinctive feature about the case we describe is the presence of the BRAFV600E mutation. To our knowledge, this is the first report on a BRAF mutation in RDD. In a previous study, we failed to detect any BRAF mutation within 23 different RDD samples.2 This result was then confirmed in 13 cases by other authors.53 The low mutant allelic percentage found in our case may explain the absence of detection in previous studies using other techniques. However, we analyzed 12 other RDD samples with pddPCR with a median of 10,364 droplets analyzed (Range [1,671 to 59,861]), and did not find BRAFV600E mutation.
It has been suggested that BRAF mutations could help discriminating between LHC and RDD in the unusual cases in which immunophenotype and morphology findings were equivocal.1 However, this case report refutes the usefulness of the BRAFV600E mutation for that purpose, even though it might be far more common in LCH compared to RDD. It is of special interest to evaluate if there is a distinct prevalence of the mutation in the systemic form of the disease in comparison to purely cutaneous RDD, which has been pointed out as a separate clinical entity.21
Regarding treatment implications, we hypothesize vemurafenib, which has been shown to be effective in LCH and ECD,762 might be a promising therapeutic agent in RDD cases with the BRAFV600E mutation. The search for the mutation should be carried out particularly in the refractory and/or recurrent setting. Prospective trials testing vemurafenib in BRAFV600E -positive RDD and also other histiocytic disorders are needed to further address its role in treating these rare diseases.
The etiology of RDD is largely unknown so far, since a number of presumed causative agents have shown conflicting results.2 The polyclonal nature of RDD has been inferred in early studies. It has been postulated that RDD histiocytes represent macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF)-induced immune suppressive macrophages with potent T-cell inhibitor effect. According to these findings, RDD might be an inappropriate, reactive histiocytic proliferation responding to unknown stimuli. Nevertheless, our case shows a clonal BRAFV600E mutation, which suggests at least some RDD cases might possess an underlying clonal pathogenesis, and LHC, ECD and some RDD cases may share similar oncogenic pathways, even a common progenitor.
Besides the BRAFV600E mutation, other distinct mutations affecting the MAPK pathway and ultimately causing ERK activation have been described in histiocytoses,108 and some cases of RDD were reported with upstream RAS or downstream MAP2K1 mutations, also suggesting the clonal nature of this disease.12119 Recently successful treatment with MEK inhibitor cobimetinib was reported in one patient.13
The pathophysiology of the wide spectrum of clinical manifestations of BRAF-mutated histiocytocytic disorders (varying from indolent to aggressive disease) is still not understood. The state of cell differentiation in which BRAFV600E mutation arises seems to determine the clinical extent of the disease; the more primitive the cell harboring the mutation, the more aggressive the disease phenotype.14 Loss of oncogene-induced senesce – a protective mechanism characterized by cell-cycle arrest and a robust local inflammatory response – has also been related to clinical aggressiveness in histiocytoses.15
Despite these recent promising findings, further studies applying genomic analysis tools (i.e., whole exome/genome sequencing, methylation studies, and RNA sequencing) are warranted in order to better elucidate the pathophysiology of RDD and other histiocytoses and identify eventual therapeutic targets.
References
- Emile J-F, Abla O, Fraitag S. Revised classification of histiocytoses and neoplasms of the macrophage-dendritic cell lineages. Blood. 2016; 127(22):2672-2681. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-01-690636Google Scholar
- Haroche J, Cohen-Aubart F, Rollins BJ. Histiocytoses: emerging neoplasia behind inflammation. Lancet Oncol. 2017; 18(2):e113-e125. Google Scholar
- Haroche J, Charlotte F, Arnaud L. High prevalence of BRAF V600E mutations in Erdheim-Chester disease but not in other non-Langerhans cell histiocytoses Brief report High prevalence of BRAF V600E mutations in Erdheim-Chester disease but not in other non-Langerhans cell histiocytoses. Blood. 2012; 120(13):2700-2703. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-05-430140Google Scholar
- Go H, Jeon YK, Huh J. Frequent detection of BRAF V 600E mutations in histiocytic and dendritic cell neoplasms. Histopathology. 2014; 65(2):261-272. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1111/his.12416Google Scholar
- Chakraborty R, Hampton OA, Shen X. Mutually exclusive recurrent somatic mutations in MAP2K1 and BRAF support a central role for ERK activation in LCH pathogenesis. Blood. 2014; 124(19):3007-3015. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2014-05-577825Google Scholar
- Haroche J, Cohen-Aubart F, Emile J-F. Dramatic efficacy of vemurafenib in both multisystemic and refractory Erdheim-Chester disease and Langerhans cell histiocytosis harboring the BRAF V600E mutation. Blood. 2013; 121(9):1495-1500. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-07-446286Google Scholar
- Hyman DM, Puzanov I, Subbiah V. Vemurafenib in multiple nonmelanoma cancers with BRAF V600 mutations. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373(8):726-736. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1502309Google Scholar
- Emile J-F, Diamond EL, Helias-Rodzewicz Z. Recurrent RAS and PIK3CA mutations in Erdheim-Chester disease. Blood. 2014; 124(19):3016-3019. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2014-04-570937Google Scholar
- Diamond EL, Durham BH, Haroche J. Diverse and targetable kinase alterations drive histiocytic neoplasms. Cancer Discov. 2016; 6(2):154-165. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-0913Google Scholar
- Lee LH, Gasilina A, Roychoudhury J. Real-time genomic profiling of histiocytoses identifies early-kinase domain BRAF alterations while improving treatment outcomes. JCI Insight. 2017; 2(3):e89473. Google Scholar
- Garces S, Medeiros LJ, Patel KP. Mutually exclusive recurrent KRAS and MAP2K1 mutations in Rosai–Dorfman disease. Mod Pathol. 2017; 30(10):1367-1377. Google Scholar
- Matter MS, Bihl M, Juskevicius D, Tzankov A. Is Rosai-Dorfman disease a reactve process? Detection of a MAP2K1 L115V mutation in a case of Rosai-Dorfman disease. Virchows Arch. 2017; 471(4):545-547. Google Scholar
- Jacobsen E, Shanmugam V, Jagannathan J. Rosai–Dorfman disease with activating KRAS mutation - response to cobimetinib. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377(24):2398-2399. Google Scholar
- Allen CE, Ladisch S, McClain KL. How I treat Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Blood. 2015; 126(1):26-35. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2014-12-569301Google Scholar
- Chilosi M, Facchetti F, Caliò A. Oncogene-induced senescence distinguishes indolent from aggressive forms of pulmonary and non-pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Leuk Lymphoma. 2014; 55(11):2620-2626. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.3109/10428194.2014.887713Google Scholar