B-cell lymphoma mutations: improving diagnostics and enabling targeted therapies

Abstract

B-cell lymphomas comprise an increasing number of clinicopathological entities whose characterization has historically been based mainly on histopathological features. In recent decades, the analysis of chromosomal aberrations as well as gene and miRNA expression profile studies have helped distinguish particular tumor types and also enabled the detection of a number of targets with therapeutic implications, such as those activated downstream of the B-cell receptor. Our ability to identify the mechanisms involved in B-cell lymphoma pathogenesis has been boosted recently through the use of Next Generation Sequencing techniques in the analysis of human cancer. This work summarizes the recent findings in the molecular pathogenesis of B-cell neoplasms with special focus on those clinically relevant somatic mutations with the potential to be explored as candidates for the development of new targeted therapies. Our work includes a comparison between the mutational indexes and ranges observed in B-cell lymphomas and also with other solid tumors and describes the most striking mutational data for the major B-cell neoplasms. This review describes a highly dynamic field that currently offers many opportunities for personalized therapy, although there is still much to be gained from the further molecular characterization of these clinicopathological entities.

Introduction

B-cell lymphoma classification comprises a relatively large number of well-defined entities whose characterization has historically been based on the histopathological features of these tumors. In recent decades, many chromosomal translocations involving oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes have been described, among which C-MYC (MYC hereafter), CCND1 (CYCLIN-D1 hereafter), BCL2, BCL6, to name but a few, have given rise to a scenario in which these diseases (e.g. mantle cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma) carry specific molecular alterations that can allow individual lymphoma types to be distinguished, with advanced stages of progression being recognizable because of the accumulation of alterations in tumor suppressor genes, such as TP53 or CDKN2A.1 Moreover, specific gene expression and miRNA profiling signatures have also helped to distinguish between particular tumor types as the consequence of the deregulation of specific genes or pathways.2 In addition to this, we now know that signaling from the B-cell receptor3,4 and co-receptors (CD19, Toll-like receptors)5,6 can be considered as triggers for activating critical signaling pathways that regulate a range of biological activities in B-cell lymphomas, including altered metabolism,7 enhanced proliferation and survival,1 and cell migration in response to soluble factors.8 These highlight the increasing interest in developing BCR downstream signaling inhibitors with the potential for use in clinical practice. Despite the great efforts made towards understanding the critical mechanisms governing B-cell lymphomagenesis, and the amount of data already generated, we are still faced with an imperfect scenario in which many well-defined clinicopathological entities still lack specific genetic markers with a pathogenic role, and where the clinical diversity of many of these conditions remains partially unexplained. More importantly, the genetic changes identified so far have not enabled targeted therapies to be assigned, so cytotoxic and immune therapies continue to be the main therapeutic tools for treating B-cell lymphoma.

Our ability to identify the mechanisms involved in B-cell lymphoma pathogenesis has been boosted recently through the use of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) techniques in the analysis of human cancer. This has revealed an unsuspected degree of complexity in the cancer cell machinery.9,10 The application of these high-throughput sequencing techniques to the study of different lymphoma types has yielded a considerable amount of whole genome and exome/transcriptome sequencing data for the most frequent B-cell mature neoplasms, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL),11–13 Burkitt Lymphoma (BL),14 multiple myeloma (MM),15 chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL),16–18 mantle cell lymphoma (MCL),19,20 follicular lymphoma (FL),21 hairy cell leukemia (HCL),22 lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL)23 and splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL).24,25 Although the work continues, the data generated so far are helping us revise our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of these lymphomas through the revelation of new oncogenic mechanisms and mutated genes. These results are providing us with a more solid rationale for the therapeutic targeting of these tumors.

Mutation frequency in B-cell lymphoma

Solid tumors have a notably variable mutation rate, from the high mutational index (MI; number of mutations/megabase (Mb)) of tobacco-associated lung cancer and UV-induced melanoma (MI > 7), to the lower rates for the non-hypermutated form of colorectal carcinoma (MI = 3.2) and breast cancer (MI = 1.4).26–31 Despite there being no established correlation between mutational load and clinical outcome, and considering that the current data have been generated using different NGS platforms, including whole genome (WGS), whole exome (WES) and whole transcriptome (mRNA-seq) approaches, we have compared the mutational index data of B-cell lymphomas obtained from independent NGS studies (Figure 1 and Table 1) and found that, in general, B-cell lymphomas have a mutational load that is lower than in UV-induced melanomas or tobacco-associated lung cancer, and roughly comparable to that seen in solid tumors in adults. Of the B-cell lymphomas, aggressive B-cell lymphomas (i.e. BL: MI = 4.2; DLCBL: MI = 1.7–3.2) have a higher MI than the other low-grade B-cell lymphomas analyzed (MM, SMLZ, CLL, MCL and HCL: MI ≤ 1). Analyzing the nucleotide substitutions, the rate between transitions (A/G or C/T base changes) versus transversions (C,T/A,G) (Figure 1), we observed that percentage differences between these nucleotide substitutions seem to be more restricted (mostly not exceeding 65% of transitions) in B-cell lymphomas than in the solid tumors induced by tobacco or UV radiation (melanoma > 72%) (Figure 1 and Table 1).

More remarkable results are summarized below.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Cell survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) seems to depend on the integrated signaling derived from the B-cell receptor coupled with signaling from other surface receptors such as chemokine receptors (CXCR5/CXCL13, CXCR4/SDF1), TOLL-like receptors, the co-stimulators CD40/CD40L and integrins.33–35 Copy number studies have found multiple copy number variations in CLL, including deletions in 13q (33–64%) and 11q22.3(ATM) (10–20%) and trisomy 12 (15–25%), which have been associated with different probabilities of disease progression and survival.36 Amongst them, mutations and/or deletions in 17p affecting TP53 can be found in 3–12% of newly diagnosed CLL cases, with patients presenting del17p being highly resistant to conventional therapies.37

NGS analyses have recently revealed a relatively high number of recurrent somatic mutations within CLL cases. The most frequent mutation (4 – 15%) affects NOTCH1, and generates a premature stop codon, resulting in a C-terminal truncated NOTCH1 protein lacking the C-terminal domain, which contains a PEST sequence that, upon removal, results in the accumulation of an active protein isoform.16 Interestingly, NOTCH1 mutations are more frequent in IGVH-unmutated cases and have been associated with disease progression.16,38–41 More specifically, the NOTCH1 mutations have been found in up to 42% of trisomy 12 CLL cases.42

Additionally, SF3B1, a ubiquitously expressed splicing factor, has been found mutated in 5–17% of CLL cases, in which it is also associated with a poor prognosis, reduced overall survival and resistance to treatment with fludarabine, through a mechanism that still requires further attention since those genes targeted by the deregulation of this splicing factor remain to be fully identified.17 A variable proportion (3–10%) of CLL patients also carry the recurrent mutation L265P in the MYD88 gene; in these cases, MyD88 immunoprecipitation identified IRAK1 as binding MyD88. MyD88 plays an active part in the signaling pathways of interleukin-1 and Toll-like receptors during the immune response.16,18

Molecular prognosis in CLL has benefited from all these changes.43 Therefore, Rossi and co-workers have stratified CLL patients into subgroups: high-risk, with TP53 and/or BIRC3 abnormalities (10-year survival: 29%); intermediate-risk, with NOTCH1 and/or SF3B1 mutations and/or del11q22–q23 (10-year survival: 37%); low-risk, with +12 or normal cytogenetics (10-year survival: 57%); and very low-risk, with only del13q14, whose 10-year survival (69.3%) was comparable with that of the matched general population.43 There is a growing expectation that the mutational landscape and other genomic analysis in CLL may enable a more personalized targeted therapy. Thus, increased expression of BCR downstream effectors such as Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK), SYK or PLC (Figure 2) has been correlated with a poorer prognosis and shorter time to progression,4 this association favoring a therapy based on BCR/BTK inhibitors. Additional evidence in favor of targeting BCR signaling is found in the mutational studies showing clustering of somatic mutations in genes belonging to pathways involved in BTK downstream effectors, such as those found in PLC/Ca2 signaling, including PLC, CAMK and NFAT (6 of 105 of the patients analyzed by Quesada et al.).17 This is also supported by the BCR downstream pathway mutations detected in the series by Domenech et al.,44 which affects KRAS, SMARCA2, NFK-BIE and PRKD3, all of which have been shown to play a role in BCR, NF-kB and related signaling pathways.44 Additionally, members of the MAPK signaling pathway have been found mutated (e.g. EGFR, FGFR2, KRAS, BRAF)16,17 or with increased mRNA expression (e.g. increased expression of SOS1, an RAS upstream regulator and CYCLIN-D2, a cell cycle promoting protein).4

Different therapeutic agents (e.g. fosfomatininb, a SYK inhibitor; GS-1101, an inhibitor of PI3Kδ; ibrutinib (PCI-32765), a BTK inhibitor; and navitoclax (ABT-263), an inhibitor of BCL2 and related proteins) have shown promising results in in vitro studies and early clinical trials, although the association between response and specific mutational changes has still to be established.45–49 CLL sequencing projects have also illustrated the fascinating phenomenon of subclonal dynamics, which is partially shaped by the treatment received by the patients,50 a finding that clinical trials targeting mutated genes should take into account.

Hairy cell leukemia

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) molecular analysis and targeted therapy is a success story in cancer genomic research.22 The use of a genome-wide sequencing approach has enabled the detection of a gain of function oncogenic mutation in BRAF (BRAF-V600E), which was previously identified as playing a critical role in other human cancers such as malignant melanoma and colorectal adenocarcinoma.51 Mutated cases expressed phosphorylated MEK and ERK (the downstream targets of the BRAF kinase), indicating a constitutive activation of the RAF-MEK-ERK pathway.22 This oncogenic alteration is highly specific to this type of lymphoma since it has only rarely been detected in other B-cell lymphomas such as SMZL, BL, follicular lymphoma (FL), DLBCL, MCL and CLL.22,52 Moreover, mutations in BRAF can be found in almost 100% of the cases and can be considered a driver mutation of this disease.

Thus, it is possible that HCL patients may benefit from a targeted inhibition of activated BRAF, following the recently described example of a refractory HCL treated with vemurafenib.53 In this respect, downstream of BRAF-V600E, high levels of phosphorylated MEK and ERK proteins in this pathway were detected in FFPE as well as purified HCL cell samples by IHC and IF,22 corroborating previous results from HCL cells.54 Moreover, since the BRAF-V600E mutation may largely explain the activation of MEK/ERK observed in HCL, it is possible that the detection of this mutation using a specific antibody55 may serve to discriminate qualitative (HCL from HCL-like) and quantitative (percentage of positive BRAF cells) differences between those cases of non-responsive HCL that may require alternative therapy.

Mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a clinically challenging B-cell lymphoma that responds poorly to conventional chemotherapy. Malignant B cells present in this lymphoma are CD5-positive and have a higher level of expression of CYCLIN-D1 due to the chromosomal translocation t(11,14)(q13, 32), which is present in up to 95% of cases and usually co-exists with a number of other oncogenic molecular features, including enhanced expression of MYC, inactivation of the cell cycle inhibitors p16/INK4A and p14/ARF, or gains of 3q, 12q and losses of 9p, 9q and 17p.56 Mutations in TP53 affect up to 15% of MCL cases, usually giving rise to high-risk variants with high proliferative activity and poor prognosis.57 Alongside this, truncating or missense mutations involving the PI3K domain in the ATM gene have also been found in 40–45% of MCL cases.58,59

Figure 1.Somatic mutations affecting B-cell lymphomas. The bar graph shows the mutational indexes (MIs) of B-cell lymphoma studies compared with selected studies reflecting those of solid tumours. MI indicates the number of mutations (possibly affecting protein activity) per Megabase (Mb), assuming the size of the human exome to be 30 Mb. The table shows the MI, range, percentage of transitions and transversions, sample size and type of mutational analysis: whole exome sequence (WES), whole genome sequence (WGS), mRNA-seq. (c) indicates cell lines used. (u) indicates untreated. Table 1. Data supporting Figure 1. Mutational Indexes (MI), range, percentage of transitions and transversions, sample size and type of mutational analysis: whole exome sequence (WES), whole genome sequence (WGS), mRNA-seq. (c) indicates cell lines used. *Focused on mutations affecting protein function.

More recently, mutations in NOTCH1, which produce a truncated protein in the C-terminal with increased oncogenic activity, were detected in up to 12% of the clinical samples analyzed,19 and those patients harboring this mutation had a shorter OS than controls (1.43 vs. 3.86 years, respectively). This mutation can have therapeutic implications since γ-secretase inhibitors preventing the generation of the oncogenic domain of Notch and suppressing the Notch activity are under development60 and could be used in NOTCH1-positive MCL cases. A global NGS analysis of somatic mutations in MCL samples has recently been published.20 The results obtained showed up to 34.5% of the samples harboring mutations in CYCLIN-D1. Moreover a number of mutated genes that could potentially co-operate with CYCLIN-D1 in the pathogenesis of MCL were also detected. Among these, WHSC1 and MLL2, two genes with epigenetic activity as histone methyltransferases, carried mutations in 10% and 14% of the samples. In addition, a number of genes involved in intracellular signaling have been found recurrently mutated, like the anti-apoptotic gene BIRC3 (6%) or NOTCH1 (5.2%) and NOTCH2 (4.7%). These results are pointing at multiple potential therapeutic applications ready to be explored. In this respect, MCL researchers have identified the loss of 9p, 19p and 6q24/25, leading to the reduced expression of several members (MOBKL2A, MOBKL2B and LATS2, respectively) of the Hippo pathway,61 a finding that has been associated with poorer MCL survival.62

Splenic marginal zone lymphoma

Although splenic marginal zone lymphomas (SMZL) lack recurrent translocations, up to 45% of cases have 7q deletions, which are considered to be their main cytogenetic abnormality.63 Genomic analysis using NGS approaches have identified multiple mutations in the NF-kB signaling pathway that activate this pathway in up to 58% of SMZL cases.64 Of the latter, inactivating mutations can be detected in negative regulators of NF-kB activity such as BIRC3 (11%), IKBKB (3%) and TNFAIP3 (13%), whereas activating mutations may be present in other molecules such as TRAF3 (10%) and NIK (8%).25 More recently, NOTCH2, a gene required for marginal zone differentiation, was found to be mutated in 20–25% of SMZL cases.24,25 This NOTCH2-Q2325X mutant generates a gain of function C-terminal truncated mutant that lacks degradation signals and hence increases protein accumulation and the subsequent activation of this signaling pathway. The clinical relevance of NOTCH2 mutations is still under debate,24,25 and the role of γ-secretase inhibitors remains to be explored.

Figure 2.Principal inhibitors of BCR downstream signaling. Principal signaling pathways activated downstream of BRC and its associated co-receptors. Brown: CD19-mediated PI3K/mTOR activity; Blue: MAPK activation; Red: BTK/PLC downstream activity and signaling through secondary messengers (Ca²⁺ and DAG); Purple: Toll-like receptors/Myd88 activation of NFKB; Pink: direct specific inhibitors of potential use in targeted therapy for B-cell lymphomas.

Follicular lymphoma

Most follicular lymphoma (FL) cases are characterized by the hallmark t(14;18)(q32;q21) translocation, which brings about constitutive overexpression of the apoptosis inhibitor BCL2 protein.65 Mutational profile studies of FL patients now reveal a number of abnormalities mostly affecting chromatin remodeling proteins that are being explored for their suitability as FL therapeutic targets.66 Thus, FL samples harbor mutations in chromatin regulatory genes such as MLL2 (in 89% of cases reported by Morin et al.32), EZH2, a histone methyl transferase (22% of cases presenting activating mutations in codon 641,21,67) or the closely related histone acetyltransferases CREBBP (36%) and EP300 (8%).21 Importantly, mutant CREBBP and EP300 proteins were shown to be deficient in acetylating BCL6 and p53, leading to constitutive BCL6 activation and to a decreased p53 tumor suppressor activity.68 In the light of these data, it is conceivable that drugs targeting EZH2 such as those already described (GSK126)66 or acetylation/deacetylation mechanisms can be considered good candidates for combination FL therapy. In addition, FL samples contain mutations in TNFRSF14 (a member of the superfamily of TNF receptors) and other genes.69

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) molecular pathogenesis divides it into GCB-DLCBL (germinal center B cell), the more aggressive ABC-DLBCL (activated B cell),70 and primary mediastinal (PM) DLBCL, a tumor displaying some Hodgkin-like molecular traits. Molecular alterations, like translocations involving BCL2 oncogene loci, have been found in 30–40% of cases of GCB-DLBCL,70 whereas translocations affecting BCL6 seem to occur more frequently in the ABC-subtype.71 Genetic changes and sensitivity to targeted drugs seem to be essentially related with this molecular subclassification.

More than 300 genes, with a long tail distribution and strong variations between patients, have been found to be recurrently mutated in DLBCL, an enormous diversity that should be taken into account when selecting possible targets.72 The list of more frequently mutated genes includes TP53, MYD88, PIM1, CARD11, BCL6, CREBBP, EZH2 and others.72

A significant number of these somatic mutations involve members of the NF-kB pathway, including MYD88. Thus, 29% of ABC-DLBCL have been shown to carry an activating mutation (MYD88-L265P) that can promote cell survival by assembling a protein complex containing IRAK1 and IRAK4 which leads to IRAK4 kinase activity towards IRAK1 phosphorylation, and a subsequent activation of NF-κB signaling, secretion of IL-6, IL-10 and interferon-β which have been shown to elicit a latter auto-paracrine activation of JAK kinases and STAT proteins, hence making MYD88 a major downstream effector of BTK signaling (39% of the total number of DLBCL cases analyzed) towards NF-KB activation.11,72–77 In general, mutations in signaling pathways converging on NF-kB activation have been detected in 63% of the activated ABC cases compared with 31% of the GCB-DLBCL samples analyzed.11 The ABC signature in DLBCL75,77 is associated with a more aggressive phenotype, a finding that has led to the establishment of a mouse model consisting of activated NF-kB signaling against a BLIMP knock-out background that causes an ABC-DLBCL-like disease.74 This model may help develop new therapeutic alternatives for the treatment of ABC-DLBCL, including combination strategies using NF-kB inhibitors in conjunction with other agents (Figure 2).

A complex biological interrelationship has been shown between STAT3 and NF-kB pathways in ABC-DLBCL.73 JAK-STAT pathway can be considered actionable in DLBCL, since its inactivation using pharmacological or genetic inhibition in ABC-DLBCL cells has been shown to inhibit cell proliferation and trigger apoptosis. This observation is accompanied with an increased expression and activation of important oncogenes, such as C-JUN and MYC, and decreased expression of p27/KIP2 (an anti-oncogene that regulates cell cycle and differentiation programs), which have been found deregulated in ABC-DLBCL samples.78

BCR signaling is critical for B-cell lymphomagenesis and, therefore, can be considered a major therapeutic target (see Discussion) (Figure 2).79 Using a combinatory approach of DLBCL biopsies and cell lines, it has been shown that chronically active BCR signaling in ABC-DLBCL can be dependent on BTK-dependent signaling or can be elicited by somatic mutations affecting the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM) signaling modules of CD79B and CD79A and also can be influenced by mutations in the signaling adaptor CARD11 which can lead to enhanced NF-kB signaling in ABC-DLBCL.77 These results highlight the therapeutic potential of targeting BCR downstream effectors with specific pharmacological agents like dasatinib, for the SRC family of tyrosine kinase inhibitors,80 SYK inhibitors,8 ibrutinib (PCI-32765), a selective BTK inhibitor of proven value in the treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies,47,81 or CAL-101, a PI3Kδ inhibitor.82

Our perspective on the mutational landscape governing DLBCL pathogenesis has improved after learning that a number of nuclear proteins that control chromatin structure and gene expression harbor mutations like MLL2, a histone methyltransferase that is inactivated in 24–32% of cases,32,68 MEF2B (15.7% reported by Morin et al.32) and EZH2, a protein that forms part of the repressive PRC2 (polycomb repressive complex 2) and has been found bearing activating mutations in 32% of DLBCL cases,32 or CREBBP/EP300 mutations, as present in 39% of DLBCLs.68 This observation may be clinically relevant in the near future since selective inhibition of EZH2 activity using a pharmacological inhibitor (GSK126) has been shown to be efficient in anti-DLBCL cell growth activity both in vitro and in vivo.66

Opportunities for targeting GC-DLBCL have also emerged from the study by Amengual and co-workers, which recently demonstrated that treatment of DLBCL cell lines with pan-DAC inhibitors in combination with niacinamide produces synergistic cytotoxicity in GC-DLBCL, correlated with acetylation of both Bcl6 and p53.83

Rational targeting of actionable mutated genes in DLBCL is nevertheless a challenge, particularly after the discovery of an unexpected high grade of mutational/genetic heterogeneity found in the different NGS studies of human DLBCLs,72 and following the observations that ongoing acquisition of mutations and intratumoral clonal heterogeneity are frequent findings in DLBCL.13 Both the prognostic and predictive value of these mutations is still a matter of active research.

Burkitt lymphoma

Rearrangements in 8q24 occur in almost all cases of Burkitt lymphoma (BL), leading to a deregulated expression of the MYC oncogene.84 This abnormal MYC/MAX activity directly regulates the expression of multiple sets of genes85 hence controlling a plethora of cellular activities such as the activation of proliferation/metabolism and inhibition of differentiation and apoptosis.86 However, current BL therapies are still far from targeting this activity effectively, since MYC has not been found to be an actionable target so far. Nevertheless, it has been recently proposed that indirect targeting of MYC via BRD4, a transcriptional regulatory protein known to up-regulate MYC, may help target human cancers (like BL) highly dependent on MYC activity.87,88

Newly generated NGS data are improving our understanding of BL, enabling the detection of multiple mutations in genes with the potential to co-operate with MYC in B-cell lymphomagenesis. In this regard, two recent studies showed that up to 70% of BLs had mutations in the transcription factor TCF3 (E2A) or its negative regulator ID3.14,89,90 These findings may have important implications for therapy since E2A/ID3 mutations elicited a concomitant activation of BCR/PI3K signaling, and raised the possibility of using targeted inhibition of BCR downstream signaling through the usage of BTK inhibitors47 or PI3K/mTOR inhibitors (including BMK120 or rapamycin/rapalogs).91 Other mutated genes were CYCLIN-D3 (in 38% of sporadic cases) and members of the E2F family of transcription factors (in 11%), playing a role in the progression of cell cycle and potential indicator for the targeted inhibition of CDK/cell cycle progression.92 These findings are consistent with a recent publication showing that transgenic mice with deregulated MYC/PI3K activity in their B cells develop BL tumors that are phenotypically and genetically similar to those of humans, with multiple somatic mutations in CYCLIN-D3, similar to those found in human BL specimens.93 Finally, the most frequently mutated gene in BL is MYC14 (up to 70% of cases), although the functional relevance of these mutations remains to be fully clarified.

Table 1.Mutations affecting B-cell lymphoma main subtypes. Most frequent genetic alterations and mutations affecting B-cell lymphomas. Selection of important genetic events affecting specific types of B-cell lymphomas and those mutations now considered being important in the pathogenesis of each entity. Percentages are for the cohorts in each study. Other: multiple molecular events that can occur alongside mutations; N/D: not determined; N/A: not applicable.

Multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a complex malignancy characterized by a range of structural chromosomal changes, including multiple recurrent IGH reciprocal translocations such as t(11;14)(q13;q32), t(4;14)(p16;q32), t(14;16)(q32;q23) and del(13q14), which result in the increased expression of CYCLIN-D1, the membrane receptor FGFR3, the oncogene C-MAF and the loss of RB expression, respectively.94,95 It has been proposed that other secondary alterations can occur as this tumor progresses, including somatic mutations like those known to activate the RAS family of monomeric GTPases (24–50% of MMs) and the acquisition of t8q24 (50% of advanced MMs), which increases MYC expression.96,97 RAS downstream signaling also seems to be central to the pathogenesis of MM, since RAS itself and other downstream RAS effectors (i.e. BRAF) bear activating mutations that can be found in up to 50% of MM cases.15,98

Previous observations highlighted NF-kB signaling as a critical survival mechanism for MM cells, with copy number variations and mutations affecting up to 20% of the primary MM cases.99,100 Sequencing studies have confirmed and extended these observations through the identification of multiple mutations in NF-kB-associated genes that may affect up to one-third of the cases.15 These findings have provided a rationale for the successful usage of NF-kB inhibitors, including drugs such as thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib.101 Other genes found mutated are DIS3, a gene involved in mRNA processing, and a number of genes with epigenetic activities such as MLL, MLL2, MLL3 and UTX.15 Therapeutic targeting of MM patients will nevertheless need to address the dynamic changes being described through the life of the tumor.98,102,103

Discussion

The mutational analysis presented in this review indicates that the total number of somatic mutations in BCL is much lower than in UV-induced or tobacco-induced solid tumors, but is still in the range of other solid adult tumors like breast or colorectal cancer (rates of 0.5–4 mutations/Mb).28 Within B-cell lymphomas, it seems that CLL and HCL carry a lower proportion of mutated genes, with some CLL cases even failing to show exomic mutations in potentially relevant genes. These findings could have beneficial consequences for targeted therapy, since it might be easier to detect key targets for the development of specific personalized therapies in tumors with lower mutational indexes. Despite the relatively low MI observed, the collected data strikingly confirm that some entities previously defined by precise histological features have underlying specific molecular alterations, as seems to be the case for LPL (MYD88), HCL (BRAF) and SMZL (NOTCH2), thus confirming the existence of these entities and indicating that these tumor type-specific events could be used for molecular diagnosis of individual tumor types.

In addition, sequencing data also show that not only specific genes, but also a number of signaling pathways are recurrently mutated in various lymphoma types. For instance, mutations in genes and pathways already suspected to participate in B-cell lymphoma pathogenesis, like those elicited by BCR/BTK, PI3K, RAS/MAPK, TLR or NF-kB, have been confirmed, but sequencing studies also show that other unsuspected pathways, like those affecting chromatin remodeling and transcriptional control of gene expression, are deregulated as a consequence of very frequent mutational events that occur in almost every type of lymphoma.

Mutated genes and pathways seem to point towards strong links between precise B-cell differentiation program alterations and specific tumor types. Thus, MZL cases carry mutations in genes involved in normal marginal zone differentiation (NOTCH2 and others), FL and GC-DLBCL show mutations in EZH2,104 MZL and post-GC tumors display mutation in NF-kB genes, while ABC DLBCL and MZL cases carry changes in genes involved in chronic active BCR signaling.

The mutational analysis of B-cell lymphomas highlights the role of deregulated BCR signaling in B-cell lymphoma-genesis. The most relevant BCR and co-receptor signaling pathways, together with the specific inhibitors that are currently available or under clinical development for specifically targeting deregulated BCR-downstream pathways, depending on the molecular context, are summarized in Table 1, illustrated in Figure 2, and described below.

• Downstream of BCR, BTK can activate PLC-gamma and generate secondary messenger signaling that triggers the activation of important effectors such as PKC (in response to DAG) and CaM/Calcineurin (in response to transient Ca2⁺ release). Deregulated expression of multiple members of this pathway, as well as multiple somatic mutations, have been detected in different B-cell lymphoma types. This finding is of particular interest since a number of pharmacological agents have been developed to target BCR downstream activity (Figure 2), being of particular interest the data obtained from the BTK inhibitor PCI32765 (ibrutinib) in multiple B-cell lymphomas including MCL, a lymphoma known not to be responsive to current therapies and that showed improved clinical responses to this inhibitor.47 Along these lines of evidence, it has recently been shown that a group of relapsed/refractory ABC DLBCL patients with enhanced/chronically active BCR signaling can specifically benefit from receiving ibrutinib,105 thus highlighting the use of molecular characterization as a powerful tool for guiding new targeted therapies. In addition, downstream of BCR/SYK-LYN tyrosine kinases, the RAS-MAPK pathway is frequently altered in B-cell lymphomas (e.g. HCL or MM) and probably plays a role in promoting a more transformed phenotype, possibly through the MAPK-mediated activation of highly oncogenic transcription factors such as AP-1 or MYC.108 Activating mutations directly affecting RAS or RAF protein activities have been found in most HCL (BRAF) and in MM (N- and K-RAS), but only rarely in other lymphopro-liferative lesions. This contrasts with the findings in solid tumors and AML, where activating BRAF and RAS mutations are relatively common events.
• As part of this intricate signaling network, deregulated PI3K/mTOR signaling can sustain the metabolic requirements of highly proliferative lymphomas, such as BL,110 thereby possibly co-operating with MYC, which is typically over-expressed in all BL cases and targets the expression of a number of metabolism genes.111 In this respect, mutations that give rise to activated E2A-mediated transcription and elevated PI3K signaling have been found recurrently in BL, highlighting a possible requirement for PI3K/mTOR in early stages of Burkitt lymphomagenesis. It seems that highly proliferative lymphomas like BL or specific cases of MM112 may be excellent case scenarios for therapeutic targeting of this pathway with rapamycin or its derivatives.113
• Playing a key role in downstream signaling from BCR, TLR and other co-receptors, NF-kB activity seems to be deregulated in the majority of B-cell lymphomas, although specific features of activation and potential inhibition may differ among specific entities and even tumor subgroups. Deregulated NF-kB can be elicited by the numerous activating mutations found in NF-kB upstream regulators including those found in MYD88 (in CLL, DLBCL, LPL) or in NIK/TNFAIP3 in SMLZ, to name but a few. Through these mutations, B-cell lymphoma cells can acquire survival advantages and also promote oncogenic interactions with the microenvironment. These biological activities can be elicited through the transcriptional activation of multiple cytokines and soluble factors such as IL-6, IL-4 and IL-10, which also control normal B-cell activities.106 Promising pre-clinical data show that the novel IRAK4 inhibitors (ND-2110 and ND-2158), when combined with the BTK-inhibitor, ibrutinib, work synergistically, inducing apoptosis in B-cell lymphoma with the L265 MYD88 mutation.76

In addition to considering BCR downstream signaling as a mayor target for the development of new and future therapeutic strategies, NGS approaches have enabled the detection of a number of somatic mutations affecting chromatin remodeling proteins. These include MLL2, EZH2, MEF2B, SMARCA2, ARID1A, EP300 and CREBBP, and splicing factors such as SF3B1.17,18 This has broadened our mechanistic perspective on the molecular pathogenesis of B-cell lymphomas and is likely to have an important influence on the direction of future clinical studies.

Analyzing the current mutational data from a broader perspective, the results of NGS projects in B-cell lymphoma have essentially confirmed the taxonomy we currently apply in diagnosis, but at the same time, several layers of complexity are being added to our understanding of lymphoma pathogenesis. Mutational rate and specific mutated pathways and genes may differ markedly within individual entities, as has recently been shown in DLBCL,72 hence suggesting that therapeutic indications may require mutational signatures to be established case by case. In addition, initial data are starting to show that at least some BCL may carry a large number of micro-clones with rich complex dynamics throughout the life of the tumor,13,21,98,102,103,107 which may imply that mutational signatures need to be re-investigated at different times during the life of the tumor in order to capture its changing nature.

Lessons learned from solid and hematopoietic tumors suggest that the likely scenario for a more successful targeted therapy will be based on a combination of drugs targeting actionable mutated genes or deregulated pathways detected in major or minor clones within the tumor. The information we now have available suggests that a great effort should be made to understand better the inhibition of genes regulating chromatin conformation and together with other better characterized targets.

Finally, together with the somatic mutations described above, B-cell lymphomas harbor multiple structural aberrations, including CNVs and translocations, whose role in the pathobiology, characterization and clinical significance has been extensively studied (Table 1). Nevertheless, NGS analysis may still enable the detection of multiple structural changes affecting yet-to-be-determined coding and non-coding regions of the genome that may have critical roles in cancer (e.g. ENCODE project).

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by grants from the Asociación Española contra el Cáncer (AECC), the Spanish Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (SAF2008-03871) and the Sociedad para el Desarrollo Regional de Cantabria (Gobierno de Cantabria-SODERCAN). MSB currently holds a Miguel Servet contract from the Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (Instituto de Salud Carlos III, FIS), Spain.

Footnotes

• Authorship and Disclosures Information on authorship, contributions, and financial & other disclosures was provided by the authors and is available with the online version of this article at www.haematologica.org.

• Received August 17, 2013.
• Accepted November 19, 2013.