Flow cytometry in the bone marrow evaluation of follicular and diffuse large B-cell lymphomas

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Bone marrow biopsies are routinely performed in the staging of patients with lymphoma. Despite the lack of evidence for its usefulness, many institutions include flow cytometry (FC) of bone-marrow aspirates in an attempt to increase sensitivity and specificity. The aim of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of FC for the assessment of bone-marrow involvement by lymphoma in follicular (FL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL). DESIGN AND METHODS: Seventy-nine bone marrow biopsies from 65 patients diagnosed with FL or DLBCL were examined to compare histology and FC for the assessment of bone-marrow involvement by lymphoma. RESULTS: Bone marrow histology showed involvement (BM+) in 16 cases (20.3%), lack of infiltration (BM(-)) in 52 cases (65.8%) and undetermined or undiagnosed for involvement (BMu) in 11 cases (13.9%). FC was positive for involvement in 28 cases (35.4%) and negative in 51 cases (64.6%). 65 cases (95%) showed concordance between the results of morphology and FC (BM(+)/FC(+) or BM(-)/FC(-)). No BM(+)/FC(-) cases were observed. 3 cases showed discrepant results (BM(-)/FC(+)). In these 3 cases the molecular studies (PCR) demonstrated clonal rearrangement of the heavy immunoglobulin chain (IgH) and/or bcl2-IgH in agreement with the flow results. Among the 11 cases with BMu, all but 2 were FC(+) and concordance with the PCR results was seen in 9 cases (81.9%). INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that FC is just as sensitive or perhaps slightly more sensitive than histology in the detection of bone marrow involvement in FL and DLBCL. FC studies may be warranted in those cases in which the morphology is not diagnosed. The clinical relevance of the small clonal B-cell population in patients without histologic bone marrow involvement (BM(-)/FC(+) cases) remains an open question.