TITLE Randomized controlled trial of azacitidine in patients with the myelodysplastic syndrome: a study of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B
AUTHORS Silverman LR, Demakos EP, Peterson BL, et al.
JOURNAL Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2002;20(10):2429-2440. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.04.117.
DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitors such as azacitidine and decitabine inhibit DNA methyltransferase, an enzyme that regulates DNA methylation and gene expression. These agents were initially developed in the 1980s as epigenetic modifiers to upregulate fetal hemoglobin in β-thalassemia and sickle cell disease. Although those early studies did not advance, they laid the groundwork for exploring DNMT inhibitors in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), hematologic malignancies characterized by aberrant DNA methylation. Building on encouraging phase I and II studies assessing the safety and efficacy of azacitidine in MDS,1 the phase III CALGB 9221 trial randomized patients with MDS to either azacitidine 75 mg/m² given subcutaneously for 7 days every 4 weeks, or best supportive care. The results were striking: 60% of patients receiving azacitidine demonstrated hematologic improvements (complete response, 7%; partial response, 16%; improvement, 37%), compared with only 5% in the best supportive care arm (P<0.001). Furthermore, the median time to leukemic transformation or death was significantly prolonged in the azacitidine arm at 21 months versus 13 months in the best supportive care arm, along with improvements in quality-of-life measures. This study represented the first instance in which a therapy for MDS demonstrated not only sustained improvement in cytopenias but also altered the course of the disease. This trial led to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of azacitidine for the treatment of MDS (May 19, 2004), and over two decades later, DNMT inhibitors remain foundational in the treatment of MDS and related hematologic malignancies. The subsequent AZA-001 trial,3 which confirmed the overall survival benefit of azacitidine in high-risk MDS, and a phase III study of decitabine in MDS4 reinforced the therapeutic effects of this class of agents. More recently, the VIALE-A study5 demonstrated that azacitidine, when combined with the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax, significantly improved survival in older or medically unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Interestingly, despite these successes, no subsequent trial has fully replicated the survival outcomes reported in the MDS CALGB 9221 and AZA-001 studies. Real-world studies of DNMT inhibitors in MDS show median overall survivals closer to 15 months, with consistent improvements in leukemia-free survival. The CALGB 9221 and AZA-001 trials also led to the FDA approval of azacitidine for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). In CALGB 9221, only seven patients with CMML received azacitdine, while seven received best supportive care. Most patients in both studies had myelodysplastic-CMML and thus far, there is limited evidence supporting the use of DNMT inhibitors in myeloproliferative-CMML (white blood cell count ≥13.0x109/L). Indeed, the recent DACOTA study6 found that decitabine conferred no event-free survival benefit over hydroxyurea in myeloproliferative-CMML.
Figure 1.Time to acute myeloid leukemia transformation or death in patients with my-elodyplastic syndrome receiving azacitidine versus best supportive care in the CALGB 9221 trial.2 Figure adapted, with permission, from figure 3 in the paper by Silverman LR et al.2
Ultimately, the legacy of CALGB 9221 lies in its validation of epigenetic modulation as a viable therapeutic strategy in myeloid neoplasms. Moreover, it inspired the development of additional drugs in this space with a focus on optimizing delivery and tolerability of DNMT inhibitors. Newer second-generation, oral formulations of DNMT inhibitors promise to further improve patients’ quality of life, treatment adherence, and access to care.
Figure 2.Impact of 5-azaciditine on DNA methylation via inhibition of DNMT3A, which converts cytosine to 5-methylcytosine. DNMT3A: DNA methyltranserase 3 alpha; IDH: isocitrate dehydrogenase; TET2: Tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 2; TCA: tricarboxylic acid.
Footnotes
Correspondence
Disclosures
MMP has received research support from Kura Oncology, Stem Line Pharmaceuticals, Polaris, Epigenetix and Solutherapeutics. He has also served on advisory boards for GSK, SOBI and AstraZeneca. EM has no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Contributions
Both authors contributed to this paper.
References
- Silverman LR, McKenzie DR, Peterson BL. Further analysis of trials with azacitidine in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome: studies 8421, 8921, and 9221 by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(24):3895-3903. Google Scholar
- Silverman LR, Demakos EP, Peterson BL. Randomized controlled trial of azacitidine in patients with the myelodysplastic syndrome: a study of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20(10):2429-2440. Google Scholar
- Pierre Fenaux GJ, Mufti V, Santini C. Azacitidine (AZA) treatment prolongs overall survival (OS) in higher-risk MDS patients compared with conventional care regimens (CCR): results of the AZA-001 phase III study. Blood. 2007; 110(11):817. Google Scholar
- Kantarjian H, Issa JP, Rosenfeld CS. Decitabine improves patient outcomes in myelodysplastic syndromes: results of a phase III randomized study. Cancer. 2006; 106(8):1794-1803. Google Scholar
- DiNardo CD, Jonas BA, Pullarkat V. Azacitidine and venetoclax in previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383(7):617-629. Google Scholar
- Itzykson R, Santini V, Thepot S. Decitabine versus hydroxyurea for advanced proliferative chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: results of a randomized phase III trial within the EMSCO Network. J Clin Oncol. 2023; 41(10):1888-1897. Google Scholar
Figures & Tables
Article Information

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.