Abstract
Promoting access to and excellence in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) by collecting and disseminating data on global HCT activities is one of the principal activities of the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, a non-governmental organization in working relations with the World Health Organization. HCT activities are recorded annually by member societies, national registries and individual centers including indication, donor type (allogeneic/autologous), donor match and stem cell source (bone marrow/peripheral blood stem cells/cord blood). In 2018, 1,768 HCT teams in 89 countries (6 World Health Organization regions) reported 93,105 (48,680 autologous and 44,425 allogeneic) HCT. Major indications were plasma cell disorders and lymphoma for autologous, and acute leukemias and MDS/MPN for allogeneic HCT. HCT numbers increased from 48,709 in 2007. Notable increases were seen for autoimmune diseases in autologous and hemoglobinopathies in allogeneic HCT. The number of allogeneic HCT more than doubled with significant changes in donor match. While HCT from HLA-identical siblings has seen only limited growth, HCT from non-identical related donors showed significant increase worldwide. Strongest correlation between economic growth indicator of gross national income/capita and HCT activity/10 million population was observed for autologous HCT (correlation coefficient [r]=0.79). HCT from unrelated donors showed strong correlation (r=0.68), but only moderate correlation was detected from related donors (r=0.48 for HLA-identical sibling; r=0.45 for other). The use of HCT doubled in about a decade worldwide at different speed and with significant changes regarding donor match as a sign of improved access to HCT worldwide. Although narrowing, significant gaps remain between developing and non-developing countries.
Introduction
After more than 65 years from the first attempt, hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains the only curative treatment for many malignant and non-malignant hematologic disorders.1 Destruction of malignant cells by intensive preparative regimens, the replacement of a diseased hematopoietic system and the induction of immunological reactions against tumor cells are key mechanisms for the curative success of allogeneic HCT. Autologous HCT was first reported in the 1980s and used to facilitate maximal chemo-/radiotherapy dosing and to restore the hematopoietic system. Recently, autologous HCT has also been used to correct genetic aberrations with gene modified/edited hematopoietic stem cells.2
Newer developments have extended HCT to elderly or frail patients with the introduction of reduced or non-myeloablative preparative regimens and to patients lacking a matched donor with the use of mismatched related donors and cyclophosphamide post-transplant. Since the beginning of the new millennium, improvements in supportive care have in addition reduced morbidity and mortality.3-5 The lack of alternative curative treatments contributed to the continuous increase and diffusion of HCT worldwide reaching 1.5 million procedures since 1957.6-8 However, despite its increasing application and ease of access, HCT continues to be a highly specialized and expensive treatment, that requires extensive experience, significant infrastructure and a multidisciplinary team of specialists.
Increasing specialization and complexity of health care systems still threaten the equity of access to global HCT. Having declared the transplantation of organs, cells and tissues a global priority, the World Health Organization (WHO; www. who.org) formed a task force to evaluate continuously equity of access, quality, safety and evolving trends. The Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (WBMT; www.wbmt.org), a non-governmental organization (NGO) in working relation with the WHO, was established with the mission to support excellence in HCT worldwide. Regular activity reporting is of fundamental importance in a quality management system and one of the major tasks of the WBM T. 6-8 Up-to-date information on indications, use of different technologies, donor types and trends over time will provide the basis for computing worldwide HCT utilization in different diseases (and indirect information on non-HCT treatments) as previously described for multiple myeloma (MM) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML).9 ,10 The global activity surveys help support physicians to provide patient counseling and guide health care agencies’ to build the required infrastructure plans. Informed by the surveys, WBMT aims at narrowing the gaps by conducting workshops to promote and support the development of new HCT programs, and to optimize existing programs.11,12 Sharing accumulated experiences, successes and setbacks continue to be a cornerstone for improving access and outcomes of HCT.
Biennial reports were published by the WBMT from 2006 on. Up to 2016, a major but differential activity increase was described across all regions, higher in developing as compared to developed countries. Despite narrowing, gaps remained especially in the Africa and Eastern Mediterranean region. With this survey, we would like to report the developments up to the year 2018 and discuss opportunities to improve the access to HCT further.
Methods
Study design
This retrospective observational study involved the worldwide HCT activity from the first published series of bone marrow transplants collected from the scientific literature and from member societies for very early transplants. After 2006, activities were obtained annually through the WBMT network using a unified center-based reporting system. Since 2007, reports on HCT activity from all WHO regions are being continued. The total number of HCT available in the registry were computed summing up the reports from 2006 to 2018. HCT activity analysis by WHO regions are performed comparing 2018 to 2007. Details of data collection and validation is described in the Online Supplementary Appendix.
Main outcome measures were the spread of HCT over time and transplants by donor type, country of origin, and WHO region. Secondary outcome measures were to document any trends in the number of HCT by donor type or region, to classify these trends, and quantify differences in the use of autologous or allogeneic HCT across indications and regions. Population data and economy and growth indicator data were obtained from the World Bank (https://databank. worldbank.org/home.aspx).
As no individual patient data were used no ethics committee approval was mandated.
Participating hematopoietic cell transplantation teams, groups, countries and continents
In 2018, 1,768 HCT teams in 89 countries over six WHO continental regions delivered HCT services globally (www. who.int/about/regions/en/). These regions included the Americas (AMR; WHO regions North-, Middle- and South-America and Canada); Asia (SEAR/WPR; WHO regions South East Asia and Western Pacific Region, which includes Australia and New Zealand); Europe (EUR; which includes Turkey and Israel) and AFR/EMR (WHO regions Africa and Eastern Mediterranean). In this paper, AMR activities were divided in North America of US and Canada (AMR North) and Middle- and South-America (AMR Latin). European data were derived from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) database for the years 1965-89 and from the EBMT annual activity survey office since 1990. Non-European data were initially provided by the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) since 1964. They were supplemented or replaced by the activity surveys of the Asian Pacific Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group (APBMT) since 1974, the Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry (ABMTRR) currently Australia and New Zealand Transplant and Cellular Therapies (ANZTCT) Registry since 1982, the Eastern Mediterranean Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group (EMBMT) since 1984, the Cell Therapy Transplant Canada (CTTC) since 2002, the Latin American Bone Marrow Transplantation Group (LABMT) since 2009, and the African Blood and Marrow Transplant Group (AFBMT) since 2010. Unrelated donor and cord blood information were derived from the World Marrow Donor Association (WMDA) and Bone Marrow Donors Worldwide (BMDW).
Definitions
The number of patients who received a first HCT in the survey year is defined as the number of HCT in the corresponding year. Transplant rates (TR) were computed as the number of HCT per 10 million inhabitants for each country not corrected for population age, without adjusting for patients receiving their HCT in a foreign country. We assessed patients by donor type (allogeneic or autologous), donor match, relation with patient (related or unrelated), stem cell source (bone marrow, peripheral blood stem cells, or cord blood) and indication including stage of the disease (according to https://www.ebmt.org/ebmt/documents/dismclfd-list-disease-classifications).
There was no adjustment for patients who crossed borders and received their HCT in a foreign country. We computed team density (TD) for each country as the number of teams per 10 million inhabitants. Gross national income (GNI) per capita is a statistical measure that quantifies the average income earned by individuals in a country. Other definitions for macroeconomic indicators are described in the Online Supplementary Appendix. Family member donors were categorized in two donor types as HLA-identical sibling (twin included in the HLA-id sibling donor group) or other relatives, which comprises haploidentical related donors.
Results
Worldwide hematopoietic cell transplantation activity in 2018
A total of 93,105 HCT were performed worldwide in 2018, including 48,680 autologous and 44,425 allogeneic transplants (Table 1). By region, the number of autologous HCT were largest in EUR, followed by AMR North, SEAR/WPR, AMR Latin, and EMR/AFR, while the number of allogeneic HCT were largest in EUR, followed by SEAR/WPR, AMR North, AMR Latin, and EMR/AFR. Plasma cell disorders was the leading indication for autologous HCT in 2018 with approximately 1.6 times the number of autologous HCT for lymphoma, the second leading indication. Leading indications for autologous HCT are in all regions plasma cell disorders followed by lymphoma and solid tumors. In non-malignant indication, autoimmune disease is the most frequent indication for autologous HCT with especially high activity in Europe (N=546) and AMR Latin (N=159). After inclusion of the activities in 2017 and 2018, the WBMT registry comprises 877,883 (allo 408,611; auto 469,272) reports.
AML was the leading indication in allogeneic HCT. Leukemia (AML, acute lymphoblastic leukemia [ALL], chronic myeloid leukemia [CML], myelodysplastic syndromes [MDS]/myeloproliferative neoplasms [MPN], chronic lymphocytic leukemia [CLL], other leukemia) accounted for 75% of all allogeneic HCT. Allogeneic HCT for non-malignant diseases were performed in 7,186 patients (16% of allogeneic HCT) with bone marrow failure (N=3,276), hemoglobinopathies (N=1,827) and primary immune deficiencies (N=1,226) as the most prominent indications (Table 1).
Transplant rates in 2018
In order to account for population size of a country, TR, the number of HCT per 10 million inhabitants for each country, were calculated and presented in Figure 1 according to HLA-identical related, HLA-non-identical related and unrelated donors. The number of countries with TR of more than 25 for HLA-identical sibling HCT, HCT from HLA-mismatched related donors, HCT from unrelated donors, and unrelated CBT were 45, 26, 37, and two, respectively, and the number of countries with TR of more than 50 were 25, 8, 33, and one, respectively. As shown in Figure 1A TR for HCT from HLA-identical siblings amounted >51 HCT/10 million inhabitants in the US, central and western Europe, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Lebanon, Turkey, Singapore, Hong Kong, China, South Korea and Australia/New Zealand and were lowest in the majority of African countries and Ukraine. HCT from non-HLA-identical related donors were highest (>51 TR) in the US, Spain, France, Italy, Belgium, Lebanon, Singapore and South Korea (Figure 1B). High density TR for HCT from unrelated donors (>101 TR) is concentrated in countries in Europe, North America, East Asia, and Australia (Figure 1C). The TR from cord blood was highest in Japan (Figure 1D).
Macroeconomic factors and hematopoietic cell transplantation activity in 2018
Macroeconomics are important determinants for HCT activities, but not for all transplant types. Strongest positive correlation between GNI per capita and HCT activity in 2018 per 10 million population was observed for autologous HCT (correlation coefficient [r]=0.79, P<0.001). Overall allogeneic HCT showed less strong positive correlation (r=0.66, P<0.001) with GNI per capita. Among allogeneic, HCT from unrelated donors showed strong positive correlation (r=0.68, P<0.001). Moderate correlation was observed for both HCT from HLA-identical sibling donors and HCT from other related donors (r=0.48, P<0.001 and r=0.45, P<0.001, respectively; Figure 2). Three countries with GNI per capita >US$ 20,000 did not report any activity of allogeneic HCT (Cyprus, Iceland, and Luxembourg). Among the health expenditure macroeconomic indicators, per capita total expenditure on health on autologous HCT (r=0.80, P<0.001) and allogeneic HCT from unrelated donors (r=0.70, P<0.001) showed strong positive correlations. Other heath expenditure indicators expressed as percentages of total government expenditure, GDP, or total expenditure on health showed moderate to weak correlations (Table 2).
Global trends
Despite having a higher increase of allogeneic HCT since 2007, autologous HCT remains overall the most frequent HCT. HCT increase was mainly due to increase of yearly activity per HCT team reaching 52.7 in contrast to 35.1 in 2007 (Online Supplementary Figure S1). TD (teams/10 million inhabitants) of the 68 countries reported in 2007 was 4.92 (median, 25th and 75th percentile, 0.94 and 9.58) and 5.02 (median, 25th and 75th percentile, 1.86 and 9.30) in 2018. Reporting countries increased by 20 to 88 countries in 2018. Online Supplementary Figure S1 displays the number of HCT per 10 million population on the same scale for 2007 and 2018, showing an increasing trend in the number of HCT per population for all, autologous, allogeneic, related, and unrelated HCT in all WHO regions.
Trends by region
Allogeneic HCT from HLA identical siblings has seen limited growth from 2007 to 2018, with the exception of SEAR/ WPR, which has nearly doubled in number (Figure 3A). In AMR North, allogeneic HCT from HLA-identical siblings has shown a subtle decline in most recent years. HCT from other related donors showed significant increase from 2007 to 2018 in all regions (Figure 3B). Instead, the global trend of unrelated cord blood transplantation showed decrease since 2011 in all regions except SEAR/WPR (Figure 3D). Thus, trends in the proportions of HCT from HLA-mismatched related donors, from unrelated donors, and unrelated cord blood transplantation varied widely by region. EUR, AMR North and SEAR/WPR showed increasing trends in other related and unrelated donors and, with exception of SEAR/ WPR, decreasing trends in cord blood transplantation. SEAR/WPR increased in all type of transplant (related, other related, unrelated cord blood) from 2007 to 2018 (Figure 3A-D). AMR Latin and EMR/AFR increased the activity primarily due to higher number of HCT from HLA mismatched related and unrelated donors.
Trends by indications
The number of autologous HCT for plasma cell disorders and lymphoma were similar in 2006 (Table 1). Both have seen an increase in the number of autologous HCT from 2007 to 2018, with a remarkable 137% increase in plasma cell disorders (Table 3). Autologous HCT for AML has declined globally by -42% during this period, but has varied by region, with an increase (+45%) only in SEAR/WPR. A notable increase was observed in autologous HCT for autoimmune disease (+269%), related to the increase in AMR Latin (+622), EUR (+264) and to a lesser extend in SEAR/ WPR and AMR North (both <100%).
The total number of allogeneic HCT has doubled between 2007 and 2018. The indications which showed more than 100% increase during the period were AML, ALL, and MDS/ MPN, while the number of allogeneic HCT decreased for CML, CLL, plasma cell disorder, and solid tumors. Among non-malignant diseases, hemoglobinopathies demonstrated a remarkable increase in all regions with a global increase of 329%, highlighted by a high increase of 822% for SEAR/ WPR and 571% for AMR North.
Trends by disease stage
AML in first complete remission (CR1) followed by non-CR1 is the most frequent indication for allogeneic HCT. The proportion of non-CR1 is decreased by approximately 10% globally as a sign that AML are transplanted earlier in their disease stage. Similar applies to ALL, although the amount is approximately 5%. Trends in CML as an overall indication for HCT are decreasing as shown in Tables 1 and 2, but more importantly the proportion of >1st chronic phase (>1CP) in overall CML is approaching 80% in AMR North and SAER/WPR. The proportion in other regions are also high, but below 60%. There is no trend in favor of HCT in earlier stage of the disease (Figure 4).
Discussion
HCT activity continues to increase worldwide in 2018 and no plateau is detectable in any of the regions. Plasma cell disorder, most commonly multiple myeloma, is the most common indication for autologous transplantation in all WHO regions. The increase in the last decade is remarkable and more pronounced than the increase in patients with lymphoma. During this period, the development of new drugs, including targeted therapies for MM, has changed the standard treatment algorithm at diagnosis, and autologous HCT remains part of first line treatment.13-16 A utilization analysis considering the incidence of MM reported a worldwide increase of autologous HCT utilization for MM from 2006 to 2015, but this was limited in high-income regions.9 Although the overall number of HCT is limited, autoimmune diseases are among the indications with the highest increase rates.17-19 Regional differences were observed, with Latin America and Europe having the highest number of transplants.19 Correlation analyses between economic indicators of GNP per capita and per capita total expenditure on health in US dollars and HCT activity showed that the strongest correlation was found for autologous HCT. As discussed earlier, the development of new drugs may have contributed to the increase in the number of autologous HCT, but the rapid launch of new drugs is usually limited to economically affluent countries.
For allogeneic HCT, the most frequent indication in all WHO regions was AML, followed by ALL and MDS/MPN, whose numbers more than doubled in the decade until 2018.10 Survival outcomes for allogeneic HCT in acute leukemia continue to improve, as studies primarily in leukemia have shown improvement in survival outcomes, with notable decreases in non-relapse mortality over time.3-5,20,21 Thus, allogeneic HCT has become the standard of care in many patients with leukemia especially in diseases with high relapse risk including older patients.22,23 Allogeneic HCT for non-malignant disease, including hereditary disease in pediatric patients, showed a more than 2-fold increase in this decade. Notable global increase was observed in non-malignant indication (i.e., hemoglobinopathies) for allogeneic HCT, highlighting a growing awareness of its efficacy.24-28 During the dramatic increase in the number of allogeneic HCT for acute leukemia of more than 2-fold, the proportion of non-CR1 at transplant showed gradual decrease in both AML and ALL. The trend shows increased utilization of allogeneic HCT in the earlier disease stages for both AML and ALL. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) treatment has revolutionized the management of CML by effectively inhibiting the BCR-ABL fusion protein, leading to high rates of hematological, cytogenetic, and molecular responses. However, primary and secondary resistance to TKI is a significant barrier to optimal outcomes, and factors contributing to response heterogeneity remain unclear.29 Higher risk of mortality after allogeneic HCT among recipients with CML is reported for recipients of HCT at >1CP with observed >20% decreased survival, and with BCR-ABL1 mutations.30,31 Strategies to predict TKI treatment resistance and optimal timing consideration for allogeneic HCT for young patients with CML-CP who manifest resistance to multiple TKI therapies should be followed as proposed in the ELN recommendations.32
Donor/stem cell sources that contributed to improved access to allogeneic HCT showed different trends in each WHO region, but all regions were marked by an increase in the percentage of HCT from other related donors, the majority of whom were haploidentical donors. In many countries where the number of siblings is limited, the chance of finding a healthy HLA-identical sibling donor capable of providing hematopoietic stem cells is estimated to be about 25%, and this probability decreases further as the patient population ages. Therefore, increasing the number of HCT from other related donors or unrelated donors is a prerequisite for improving HCT accessibility. HCT from an unrelated donor is a well-studied and well-established treatment with an increasingly favorable outcome, survival outcomes after allele-level HLA-matched HCT outcomes are now equivalent to that of HLA-identical sibling.33-36 The matching of HLA at a high-resolution level for unrelated donors has been repeatedly confirmed in studies worldwide, and overall, an HLA single mismatch in HCT from an unrelated donor is considered to reduce survival probabilities by 5% to 10% in the context of calcineurin inhibitor plus methotrexate GVHD prophylaxis.37,38
An HLA-haploidentical donor is a related donor who shares exactly one HLA haplotype and differs by a variable number of HLA genes on the unshared haplotype, and can be found for nearly every patient that is referred for allogeneic HCT. Different approaches to overcome graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after HLA-haploidentical HCT from related donors were reported with reasonable outcomes.39-41 Ly mphocyte replete haploidentical HCT has been developed by using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy).42-44 With its selective depletion strategy of alloreactive lymphocytes, the incidence of acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, and NRM after PTCy-based haploidentical HCT is remarkedly low, thus its use is rapidly increasing.45-47 For allogeneic transplantation, as expected, HCT from unrelated donors showed a strong correlation with the economic indicator of GNP per capita and per capita total expenditure on health. HCT from other related donors showed similar moderate correlation to HCT from HLA-identical sibling donors. Use of unrelated donors for HCT is reported with significant higher cost, even if the costs of stem cell procurement are not included.48,49
In this study, the results of a carefully conducted global HCT activity survey by WBMT, a network of 23 member societies related to HCT, are displayed but some potential limitations remain. Despite all efforts to improve the situation including close collaboration with member societies and workshops conduct, possible gaps of less than 5% for allogeneic HCT and less than 15% for autologous HCT in reporting remain.8 Succeeding HCT, i.e., second or third HCT for the same recipient are not considered, since eligibility for Global Activity Data reporting is the first HCT for the recipient in the survey year. Priority is given to feasibility in this Global Transplant Activity data collection, the survey uses simple survey items and does not involve the collection of individual patient level data. Therefore, information available for consideration or comparison are limited. Recipient age is not considered, so the HCT activity analyzed in the study includes recipients of all ages. Activity analyses for specific age groups, such as pediatric or elderly patients, were therefore not performed. For autologous HCT, the age of 75 or younger, and for allogeneic HCT, the age of 65 or younger are generally candidates for HCT recipients. Therefore, the age distribution of the general population may affect the TR: if 10%, 20%, and 30% of the population were 65 years or older, compared to 0% of the population, the TR could be considered as 1.11, 1.25, and 1.43 times higher, respectively. The study was able to include data of HCT up to 2018. Introduction of chimeric-antigen-receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies, novel immune therapies and targeted therapies in late 2010s may change treatment strategies for major indications of HCT. Global HCT activity survey is being continued by the WBMT, and the impact of these novel therapies for HCT activity in 2019 and beyond will be analyzed in its future studies using the new internet-based registry in a time sensitive way.
In conclusion, increased HCT activity in all WHO regions from 2007 to 2018 was shown. Major indication for autologous HCT is PCD followed by lymphoma, and for allogeneic HCT is AML, followed by ALL and MDS/MPN across WHO regions. Variations in proportion of donor/stem cell source were seen among the WHO regions, all resulted in an increase of access to HCT worldwide.
Footnotes
- Received January 7, 2024
- Accepted April 30, 2024
Correspondence
Disclosures
YA reports consulting fees from JCR Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. and Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd.; lecture fees from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Novartis Pharma KK and AbbVie GK; and honorarium from Meiji Seika Pharma Co, Ltd. MI is affiliated with the Department of Promotion for Blood and Marrow Transplantation at the Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, and the department is endowed by AIR WATER INC., Clinigen K.K., and JCR Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. CF reports support for attending meetings from Casa Bollar; and support for attending meetings and travel from Diaz Gill Lab and Prosalud. LG reports consulting fees from Sanofi, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, and GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals; and support for attending meetings and travel from Pfizer and Sanofi. KK reports honoraria from Pierre Fabre, medac, and Novartis. JAS reports consulting fees from Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Medac Pharma and Vertex Pharmaceuticals, and participation in a Data Safety Monitoring Board in Kiadis Pharma. All others authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Funding
Funding for this study was indirectly provided by support of the WBMT. Funding was solely to support the study; no individual payment was made to any of the persons involved in the study.
Acknowledgments
The cooperation of all participating teams, countries and organizations with their staff is greatly appreciated, specifically the following: ABMTRR, St. Vincent´s Hospital Sydney, APBMT, Aichi Medical School, CTTC, CIBMTR, Medical College of Wisconsin, EBMT: Coordination offices in Barcelona, Paris and London and the Austrian Registry (ASCTR), the Czech BMT Registry, the French Registry (SFGM), the German Registry (DRST), the Italian Registry (GITMO), the Dutch Registry (HOVON), the Spanish BMT Registry (GETH), the Swiss Registry (SBST), the Turkish BMT Registry and the British Registry (BSBMT), EMBMT, SBTMO, LABMT, AFBMT, WMDA, and Eurocord.
References
- Copelan EA. Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354(17):1813-1826. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra052638PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Germino-Watnick P, Hinds M, Le A, Chu R, Liu X, Uchida N. Hematopoietic stem cell gene-addition/editing therapy in sickle cell disease. Cells. 2022; 11(11):1843. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11111843PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gooley TA, Chien JW, Pergam SA. Reduced mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(22):2091-2101. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1004383PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hahn T, McCarthy PL Jr, Hassebroek A. Significant improvement in survival after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation during a period of significantly increased use, older recipient age, and use of unrelated donors. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31(19):2437-2449. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.46.6193PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Penack O, Peczynski C, Mohty M. How much has allogeneic stem cell transplant-related mortality improved since the 1980s? A retrospective analysis from the EBMT. Blood Adv. 2020; 4(24):6283-6290. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003418PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gratwohl A, Baldomero H, Aljurf M. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a global perspective. JAMA. 2010; 303(16):1617-1624. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.491PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gratwohl A, Pasquini MC, Aljurf M. One million haemopoietic stem-cell transplants: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Haematol. 2015; 2(3):e91-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00028-9PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Niederwieser D, Baldomero H, Bazuaye N. One and a half million hematopoietic stem cell transplants: continuous and differential improvement in worldwide access with the use of non-identical family donors. Haematologica. 2022; 107(5):1045-1053. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2021.279189PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Cowan AJ, Baldomero H, Atsuta Y. The global state of hematopoietic cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: an analysis of the Worldwide Network of Blood and Marrow Transplantation Database and the Global Burden of Disease Study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020; 26(12):2372-2377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.08.018PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Tokaz MC, Baldomero H, Cowan AJ. An analysis of the worldwide utilization of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for cute myeloid leukemia. Transplant Cell Ther. 2023; 29(4):279.e1-279.e10. Google Scholar
- Pasquini MC, Srivastava A, Ahmed SO. Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (WBMT) recommendations for establishing a hematopoietic cell transplantation program (part I): minimum requirements and beyond. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2020; 13(3):131-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hemonc.2019.08.001PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Aljurf M, Weisdorf D, Hashmi SK. Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (WBMT) recommendations for establishing a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation program in countries with limited resources (part II): clinical, technical and socio-economic considerations. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2020; 13(1):7-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hemonc.2019.08.002PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gandolfi S, Prada CP, Richardson PG. How I treat the young patient with multiple myeloma. Blood. 2018; 132(11):1114-1124. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2017-05-693606PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma: 2020 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management. Am J Hematol. 2020; 95(5):548-567. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.25791PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rajkumar SV, Kumar S. Multiple myeloma current treatment algorithms. Blood Cancer J. 2020; 10(9):94. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-020-00359-2PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kastritis E, Terpos E, Dimopoulos MA. How I treat relapsed multiple myeloma. Blood. 2022; 139(19):2904-2917. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2020008734PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sullivan KM, Muraro P, Tyndall A. Hematopoietic cell transplantation for autoimmune disease: updates from Europe and the United States. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010; 16(Suppl 1)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.10.034PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Farge D, Labopin M, Tyndall A. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for autoimmune diseases: an observational study on 12 years’ experience from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Working Party on Autoimmune Diseases. Haematologica. 2010; 95(2):284-292. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2009.013458PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Snowden JA, Badoglio M, Alexander T. The rise of autologous HCT for autoimmune diseases: what is behind it and what does it mean for the future of treatment? An update on behalf of the EBMT Autoimmune Diseases Working Party. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2019; 15(10):981-985. https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2019.1656526PubMedGoogle Scholar
- McDonald GB, Sandmaier BM, Mielcarek M. Survival, nonrelapse mortality, and relapse-related mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: comparing 2003-2007 versus 2013-2017 cohorts. Ann Intern Med. 2020; 172(4):229-239. https://doi.org/10.7326/M19-2936PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nishiwaki S, Akahoshi Y, Morita-Fujita M. Improvements in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes for adults with ALL over the past 3 decades. Blood Adv. 2022; 6(15):4558-4569. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008032PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Heinicke T, Krahl R, Kahl C. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation improves long-term outcome for relapsed AML patients across all ages: results from two East German Study Group Hematology and Oncology (OSHO) trials. Ann Hematol. 2021; 100(9):2387-2398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-021-04565-1PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rocha V, Fatobene G, Niederwieser D. Brazilian Society of Bone Marrow T the Worldwide Network for B Marrow T. Increasing access to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant: an international perspective. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2021; 2021(1):264-274. https://doi.org/10.1182/hematology.2021000258PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sabloff M, Chandy M, Wang Z. HLA-matched sibling bone marrow transplantation for beta-thalassemia major. Blood. 2011; 117(5):1745-1750. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-09-306829PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Anurathapan U, Pakakasama S, Mekjaruskul P. Outcomes of thalassemia patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation by using a standard myeloablative versus a novel reduced-toxicity conditioning regimen according to a new risk stratification. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014; 20(12):2066-2071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.07.016PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Santarone S, Angelini S, Natale A. Survival and late effects of hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with thalassemia major. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2022; 57(11):1689-1697. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-022-01786-4PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gluckman E, Cappelli B, Bernaudin F. Sickle cell disease: an international survey of results of HLA-identical sibling hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2017; 129(11):1548-1556. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-10-745711PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Eapen M, Brazauskas R, Walters MC. Effect of donor type and conditioning regimen intensity on allogeneic transplantation outcomes in patients with sickle cell disease: a retrospective multicentre, cohort study. Lancet Haematol. 2019; 6(11):e585-e596. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30154-1PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Krishnan V, Schmidt F, Nawaz Z. A single-cell atlas identifies pretreatment features of primary imatinib resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2023; 141(22):2738-2755. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2022017295PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chalandon Y, Sbianchi G, Gras L. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia in the era of third generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A retrospective study by the chronic malignancies working party of the EBMT. Am J Hematol. 2023; 98(1):112-121. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.26764PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Tachibana T, Kondo T, Uchida N. The clinical significance of BCR-ABL1 mutations in patients with Philadelphia chromosomepositive chronic myeloid leukemia who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Transplant Cell Ther. 2022; 28(6):321.e1-321.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtct.2022.03.009PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hochhaus A, Baccarani M, Silver RT. European LeukemiaNet 2020 recommendations for treating chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2020; 34(4):966-984. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-020-0776-2PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Saber W, Opie S, Rizzo JD, Zhang MJ, Horowitz MM, Schriber J. Outcomes after matched unrelated donor versus identical sibling hematopoietic cell transplantation in adults with acute myelogenous leukemia. Blood. 2012; 119(17):3908-3916. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-09-381699PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kanda J, Saji H, Fukuda T. Related transplantation with HLA-1 Ag mismatch in the GVH direction and HLA-8/8 allelematched unrelated transplantation: a nationwide retrospective study. Blood. 2012; 119(10):2409-2416. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-08-372573PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brissot E, Labopin M, Stelljes M. Comparison of matched sibling donors versus unrelated donors in allogeneic stem cell transplantation for primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a study on behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT. J Hematol Oncol. 2017; 10(1):130. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-017-0498-8PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wieduwilt MJ, Metheny L, Zhang MJ. Haploidentical vs sibling, unrelated, or cord blood hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood Adv. 2022; 6(1):339-357. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004916PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lee SJ, Klein J, Haagenson M. High-resolution donorrecipient HLA matching contributes to the success of unrelated donor marrow transplantation. Blood. 2007; 110(13):4576-4583. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-06-097386PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morishima Y, Kashiwase K, Matsuo K. Biological significance of HLA locus matching in unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation. Blood. 2015; 125(7):1189-1197. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2014-10-604785PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Apperley J, Niederwieser D, Huang XJ. Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a global overview comparing Asia, the European Union, and the United States. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016; 22(1):23-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.11.001PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang Y, Liu QF, Xu LP. Haploidentical vs identical-sibling transplant for AML in remission: a multicenter, prospective study. Blood. 2015; 125(25):3956-3962. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-02-627786PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ruggeri A, Labopin M, Sanz G. Comparison of outcomes after unrelated cord blood and unmanipulated haploidentical stem cell transplantation in adults with acute leukemia. Leukemia. 2015; 29(9):1891-1900. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2015.98PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Luznik L, O’Donnell PV, Symons HJ. HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation for hematologic malignancies using nonmyeloablative conditioning and high-dose, posttransplantation cyclophosphamide. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008; 14(6):641-650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.03.005PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Solomon SR, Sizemore CA, Sanacore M. Haploidentical transplantation using T cell replete peripheral blood stem cells and myeloablative conditioning in patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies who lack conventional donors is well tolerated and produces excellent relapse-free survival: results of a prospective phase II trial. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012; 18(12):1859-1866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.06.019PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sugita J, Kawashima N, Fujisaki T. HLA-haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide after busulfan-containing reduced-intensity conditioning. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015; 21(9):1646-1652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.06.008PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ciurea SO, Zhang MJ, Bacigalupo AA. Haploidentical transplant with posttransplant cyclophosphamide vs matched unrelated donor transplant for acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2015; 126(8):1033-1040. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-04-639831PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bashey A, Zhang X, Jackson K. Comparison of outcomes of hematopoietic cell transplants from T-replete haploidentical donors using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide with 10 of 10 HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1 allele-matched unrelated donors and HLA-identical sibling donors: a multivariable analysis including disease risk index. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016; 22(1):125-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.09.002PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Atsuta Y, Sugita J, Nakamae H. Comparable survival outcomes with haploidentical stem cell transplantation and unrelated bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2022; 57(12):1781-1787. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-022-01822-3PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Khera N, Zeliadt SB, Lee SJ. Economics of hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 2012; 120(8):1545-1551. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-05-426783PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Patnaik H, Zhu YJ, Griffin J, Borah B, Khera N. Total and out-of-pocket expenditures for patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2023; 58(4):456-458. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-023-01910-yPubMedGoogle Scholar
Data Supplements
Figures & Tables
Article Information
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.