In the current issue of Haematologica, Ong and colleagues interrogate the regulatory mechanisms of TAL1 in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) cells by taking advantage of the very powerful dTAG degradation system.1,2 TAL1, together with GATA3 and LMO2, are among a select group of master transcription factors (TF) that orchestrate normal thymocyte development.3 When such TF are dysregulated through chromosomal translocation or somatic mutation, thymocytes undergo differentiation arrest, often, but not always, at a developmental time point where these genes are not normally expressed. TAL1, for instance, is usually downregulated after the double-positive stage of thymic development. In T-ALL, chromosomal lesions, such as the ~80 kb deletion that juxtaposes the ubiquitously active STIL promoter to TAL1,4 or the TAL1 neo-enhancer mutations that create binding sites for MYB,5 lead to its continuous overexpression during thymic development and differentiation arrest at the post-cortical stage. Class-defining lesions, such as those affecting TAL1, TLX1, TLX3 and MEF2C, define their gene expression program and are typically not seen together in the same T-ALL. Ong and colleagues offer a credible rationale for why this is the case.
TAL1 relies on secondary hits in signaling pathways to lead to full transformation to T-ALL. For instance, in mouse models of Tal1-induced T-ALL, three-quarters of tumors harbored activating-mutations in Notch1,6 suggesting cooperativity between these two factors. However, the molecular crosstalk between NOTCH1 and TAL1 has not been fully elucidated.
Up to now, studies interrogating the transcriptional program induced by TF oncogenes in T-ALL have mainly used small-interference RNA (siRNA) or short-hairpin RNA (shRNA) knockdown approaches.5,7 Despite their validity, the knockdown achieved by these tools is often slow and incomplete, prone to off-target effects, and relies on electroporation or viral transduction that can induce indirect gene expression changes. Instead, Ong and colleagues introduced a mutant FKBP12 sequence in-frame to the 3’ of TAL1 using CRISPR/ Cas9. On the addition of dTAG, a heterobifunctional small molecule capable of binding to both mutant FKBP12 and the E3 ligase system, TAL1 is rapidly degraded within 2 hours, giving the opportunity to analyze the kinetics and dynamics of direct TAL1 target genes with minimal cell manipulation.
By employing acute protein degradation of TAL1 for a period of 2-72 hours in Jurkat T-ALL cells, the authors classified three subsets of TAL1 target genes: i) group A genes that show the most rapid and dynamic downregulation on TAL1 depletion, i.e., are positively regulated by TAL1, ii) group B genes that exhibit less extreme downregulation and whose expression reaches a plateau, and iii) group C genes that are upregulated on TAL1 depletion i.e., negatively regulated by TAL1. Whereas genes belonging to group A comprise the oncogenic TAL1 signature and are likely to be direct TAL1 targets, genes that belong to group B were partially dependent on TAL1, and group C genes, most likely represent indirect negative targets. The latter include genes such as RAG1, RAG2 and PTCRA, which are known to be positively regulated by E-proteins, highlighting the antagonism that can occur with TAL1 at specific loci.7
Utilizing ATAC sequencing, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) sequencing and H3K27ac high-throughput ChIP (HiChIP), the authors further characterized the chromatin features of each subgroup, thus inferring the regulatory mechanisms of TAL1. By taking as an example the ALDH1A2 and SIX6 gene loci, group A genes that show a lack of chromatin accessibility in hematopoietic stem cells or normal T cells, chromatin loops at enhancers were lost upon TAL1 degradation. Importantly, the role of TAL1 in chromatin loop formation has only been addressed in erythroid cells where TAL1 mediates the interaction between the γ-globin gene and its enhancer through LDB1.8 The authors then explored whether TAL1 or LMO1 alone, or together, were sufficient to establish an open chromatin state in TAL1-negative HBP-ALL cells. Only when TAL1 and LMO1 were expressed together was there significant upregulation of target genes, highlighting the cooperativity between these two factors, with relevance to the observation that T-ALL patients often have activating lesions in both TAL1 and LMO1/2.9 A subset of these genes were direct TAL1 target genes identified by the dTAG approach, including, ALDH1A2 and SIX6 gene, which exhibited gain of chromatin accessibility by ATAC sequencing and a dramatic increase of mRNA expression. In contrast, group B genes, that include members of the previously recognized transcriptional regulatory circuit, such as MYB and RUNX1, were characterized by dense chromatin interactions with only marginal reductions in chromatin loops upon TAL1 depletion. This finding most likely reflects a more intricate pattern of regulation of group B genes, where in addition to TAL1, other factors are likely to play a role. Focusing on the GIMAP locus, a known TAL1 and NOTCH1 target,10 a reduction of chromatin loops was achieved by the combination of TAL1 degradation and NOTCH1 inhibition. These findings indicate that one regulatory factor can compensate for the loss of another, but the loss of both has a severe effect.
Lastly, the authors tested the functionality of TAL1 in HBP-ALL cells, a TAL1-negative cell line of the TLX3 subgroup. Combined overexpression of TAL1 and LMO1 resulted in cell proliferation arrest concomitant with downregulation of NOTCH1 target genes, including MYC. Overexpression of MYC partially rescued cells from proliferative arrest. Although a previous study where TLX3 was overexpressed in TAL1-positive cell lines did not interrogate cell proliferation11 the results indicate that TF oncogenes that define the molecular T-ALL subtypes may have antagonistic effects, thus explaining the fact that TLX1/3 translocations and TA L1 activating lesions are mutually exclusive in T-ALL. These findings underscore the cell context-dependent nature of TAL1 in T-ALL, acting cooperatively with NOTCH1 in one cell type and inhibiting the NOTCH1 downstream program in another.
Overall, the study from Ong and colleagues provides a comprehensive view of the TAL1-induced transcriptional program and addresses context-dependent roles of TAL1 that can further provide a rationale for improved targeted therapies. Importantly, this is the first study where TAL1-mediated chromatin looping is recognized as a mechanism that sustains gene activation in T-ALL.
Footnotes
- Received November 27, 2023
- Accepted December 1, 2023
Correspondence
Disclosures
No conflicts of interest to disclose.
Contributions
Both authors contributed equally.
References
- Ong JZL, Tan TK Wang L, Tan SH, Sanda T. Regulatory mechanisms and context-dependent roles of TAL1 in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica. 2024; 109(5):1359-1372. Google Scholar
- Nabet B, Roberts JM, Buckley DL. The dTAG system for immediate and target-specific protein degradation. Nat Chem Biol. 2018; 14(5):431-441. Google Scholar
- Kueh HY, Rothenberg EV. Regulatory gene network circuits underlying T cell development from multipotent progenitors. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2012; 4(1):79-102. Google Scholar
- Aplan PD, Lombardi DP, Ginsberg AM, Cossman J, Bertness VL, Kirsch IR. Disruption of the human SCL locus by “illegitimate” V-(D)-J recombinase activity. Science. 1990; 250(4986):1426-1429. Google Scholar
- Mansour MR, Abraham BJ, Anders L. Oncogene regulation. An oncogenic super-enhancer formed through somatic mutation of a noncoding intergenic element. Science. 2014; 346(6215):1373-1377. Google Scholar
- O’Neil J, Calvo J, McKenna K. Activating Notch1 mutations in mouse models of T-ALL. Blood. 2006; 107(2):781-785. Google Scholar
- Sanda T, Lawton LN, Barrasa MI. Core transcriptional regulatory circuit controlled by the TAL1 complex in human T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Cell. 2012; 22(2):209-221. Google Scholar
- Yun WJ, Kim YW, Kang Y, Lee J, Dean A, Kim A. The hematopoietic regulator TAL1 is required for chromatin looping between the β-globin LCR and human γ-globin genes to activate transcription. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42(7):4283-4293. Google Scholar
- Rahman S, Magnussen M, León TE. Activation of the LMO2 oncogene through a somatically acquired neomorphic promoter in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2017; 129(24):3221-3226. Google Scholar
- Liau WS, Tan SH Ngoc PCT. Aberrant activation of the GIMAP enhancer by oncogenic transcription factors in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 2017; 31(8):1798-1807. Google Scholar
- Botten GA, Zhang Y, Dudnyk K. Structural variation cooperates with permissive chromatin to control enhancer hijacking-mediated oncogenic transcription. Blood. 2023; 142(4):336-351. Google Scholar
Figures & Tables
Article Information
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.