In this issue of Haematologica, Midkar et al. show the dual role of adenosine signaling in erythroid and myeloid differentiation.1 Besides their involvement in DNA and RNA synthesis, nucleosides such as adenosine are also signaling molecules that regulate tissue homeostasis through various biological functions: cell growth, migration, neurotransmission, immune regulation, and vascular tone. Adenosine levels are highly up-regulated during hypoxia, ischemia, physical activity, epilepsy, pain, and cancers, and deal with oxygen demand and inflammation. This regulation implicates a tightly controlled network of catabolic enzymes, nucleoside transporters, and receptors. In particular, the extra-/intracellular levels of adenosine are controlled by the equilibrative nucleoside transporters (ENT) and the concentrative nucleoside transporters (CNT). Extracellular adenosine can be generated from dephosphorylation of extracellular ATP, ADP, and AMP through the action of the cell-surface-associated enzymes CD39 (ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolylase 1) and CD73 (ecto-5'-nucleotidase). Adenosine can be rapidly phosphorylated to AMP by adenosine kinase or deaminated to inosine by adenosine deaminase. As a signaling molecule, adenosine can bind to four adenosine G protein-coupled receptor (AR) subtypes: A1AR, A2AAR, A2BAR, and A3AR. Transcriptomic databases of human hematopoiesis showed the predominant expression of ADORA3 and ADORA2B, encoding A3AR and A2BAR, in CD34+ progenitors, and erythroid and myeloid cells. Following adenosine binding, activation of the receptors modulates the AMPc/PKA axis and related transcription factors and kinases, and the Phospholipase C and MAPK pathways (ERK, P38, JNK).2
The involvement of adenosine in the regulation of hematopoiesis is well known. However, very few studies, including those on the role of nucleosides in general, have reported its role in erythropoiesis, the process of differentiating hematopoietic stem cells into red blood cells (RBC).3 Defective erythropoiesis was observed both in ENT1-null patients harboring the extremely rare Augustine blood group system and in Ent1 knock-out (KO) mice. Both models displayed increased extracellular nucleosides, including adenosine.4 In the present study, Midkar et al. have focused on the impact of extracellular adenosine during early and late erythropoiesis. They used an in vitro differentiation system derived from purified CD34+ progenitors with the addition of stem cell factor (SCF), interleukin-3 (IL-3), and erythropoietin. They showed that, in contrast to other nucleosides, a high concentration of adenosine is able to negatively impact erythropoiesis by inhibiting proliferation and differentiation. The combination of ENT1 potent bidirectional inhibitor (NTBI) and adenosine further potentiated the inhibitory effect on proliferation, leading to altered erythropoiesis, and suggesting the involvement of extracellular adenosine signaling. This hypothesis was elegantly confirmed by the use of the A3AR agonist (CI-IB-MECA), which is in line with a previous study in primary human cells.5 Since A2BAR was also expressed in myeloid and erythroid cells, the authors tested the BAY60-6583 agonist. This delayed erythroid maturation but did not impact proliferation. Taken together, this study provides evidence that extracellular adenosine is a signaling molecule that regulates erythropoiesis at different stages. It would be interesting to investigate the expression of these receptors in order to clarify their role.
Interestingly, the authors found that the negative effect of adenosine on erythropoiesis was through P53-mediated apoptosis. This was confirmed by a proteomic analysis of erythroblasts which showed numerous over-expressed proteins in both the P53-related apoptotic and the DNA repair pathways. Of note, P53-induced apoptosis upon extracellular adenosine accumulation has already been described in breast and ovarian cancer cell lines. In particular, it was shown that P53 can promote transcription of ADORA2B, which in turn activates caspase- and Pumadependent apoptotic pathways through P53.6 Alternatively, one could hypothesize that the activation of P53 by AR could be triggered through its phosphorylation by P38. P53 is known to be a critical molecule for effective erythropoiesis. In early stages, P53 should be tightly regulated to maintain a high rate of erythroblast proliferation. In later stages, when decreased ribosome biogenesis occurs in basophilic erythroblasts, P53 is required to respond to ribosome stress and ensure terminal maturation. A premature or abnormal activation of P53 during erythropoiesis, such as that observed upon extracellular adenosine treatment or in ribosomopathies, may lead to differentiation blockade and anemia.7
Midkar et al. report that extracellular adenosine and A3AR agonist decreased erythroid differentiation in favor of myeloid differentiation, while the A2BAR agonist had no effect (Figure 1). Similarly, Ent1 KO mice displayed reduced numbers of erythroid cells while showing increased granulocytic cell counts, at both the mature and progenitor stages.4 A3AR activation has already been shown to promote mouse granulo-monocytic progenitor growth by increasing the effects of growth factors such as IL-3, SCF, and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in vitro,3 and by promoting granulocyte (G)-CSF production in vivo in mice.8 In contrast, in a sickle cell disease mouse model harboring elevated levels of extracellular adenosine, treatment with polyethylene glycol-modified adenosine deaminase, which lowers adenosine concentrations, leads to a decrease in leukocyte counts, and increased RBC counts.9 Deletion of A3AR in mice leads to several abnormalities in the peripheral blood, such as decreased neutrophil and monocyte counts, increased erythrocyte and hemoglobin levels, and a decrease in platelet counts.10 However, the erythroid compartment still needs to be studied in more detail. While studies so far agree on the role of adenosine/A3AR signaling in erythroid/myeloid commitment and differentiation, other lineages, such as the megakaryocytic lineage, could also be affected, and there is still no clear indication as to how adenosine signaling can influence erythroid versus myeloid commitment. Could it strengthen the cytokine effect? Does it have an impact on transcription factor expression? Does it generate metabolic changes that will dictate differentiation?
The work of Mikdar et al. adds adenosine to the plethora of factors that can modulate normal erythropoiesis. Different types of AR agonists are already in use or are being developed in clinical trials in several diseases: auto-immune diseases, inflammation, neurological diseases, and diabetes. Therefore, one could consider their use in diseases with erythroid hyperplasia (hereditary erythrocytosis or myeloproliferative diseases such as polycythemia vera). In contrast, since adenosine plays a broad immunosuppressive role that regulates both innate and adaptive immune responses, inhibitors of extracellular adenosine have also been widely developed to promote antitumor activities in cancers. It would be interesting to determine the levels of extracellular adenosine in hematologic malignancies or diseases with defective erythropoiesis, and explore how these levels could contribute to disease development using adenosine inhibitors or agonists.
Footnotes
- Received June 22, 2023
- Accepted July 11, 2023
Correspondence
Disclosures
No conflicts of interest to disclose.
Contributions
Both authors contributed equally.
References
- Mikdar M, Serra M, Colin E. Adenosine signaling inhibits erythropoiesis and promotes myeloid differentiation. Haematologica. 2024; 109(1):175-185. Google Scholar
- Antonioli L, Blandizzi C, Csóka B, Pacher P, Haskó G. Adenosine signalling in diabetes mellitus-pathophysiology and therapeutic considerations. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015; 11(4):228-241. Google Scholar
- Hofer M, Pospisil M, Weiterova L, Hoferova Z. The role of adenosine receptor agonists in regulation of hematopoiesis. Molecules. 2011; 16(1):675-685. Google Scholar
- Mikdar M, González-Menéndez P, Cai X. The equilibrative nucleoside transporter ENT1 is critical for nucleotide homeostasis and optimal erythropoiesis. Blood. 2021; 137(25):3548-3562. Google Scholar
- Bhanu NV, Aerbajinai W, Gantt NM. Cl-IB-MECA inhibits human erythropoiesis. Br J Haematol. 2007; 137(3):233-236. Google Scholar
- Long JS, Crighton D, O’Prey J. Extracellular adenosine sensing-a metabolic cell death priming mechanism downstream of p53. Mol Cell. 2013; 50(3):394-406. Google Scholar
- Le Goff S, Boussaid I, Floquet C. p53 activation during ribosome biogenesis regulates normal erythroid differentiation. Blood. 2021; 137(1):89-102. Google Scholar
- Bar-Yehuda S, Madi L, Barak D. Agonists to the A3 adenosine receptor induce G-CSF production via NF-κB activation. Exp Hematol. 2002; 30(12):1390-1398. Google Scholar
- Zhang Y, Dai Y, Wen J. Detrimental effects of adenosine signaling in sickle cell disease. Nat Med. 2011; 17(1):79-86. Google Scholar
- Hofer M, Pospíšil M, Dušek L, Hoferová Z, Komůrková D. Lack of adenosine A3 receptors causes defects in mouse peripheral blood parameters. Purinergic Signal. 2014; 10(3):509-514. Google Scholar
Figures & Tables
Article Information
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.