Open access journal of the Ferrata-Storti Foundation, a non-profit organization
Articles

Antiplatelet antibody predicts platelet desialylation and apoptosis in immune thrombocytopenia

Haematology Research Unit, St. George and Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Department of Haematology, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales
Haematology Research Unit, St. George and Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney
Haematology Research Unit, St. George and Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney
Haematology Research Unit, St. George and Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Department of Haematology, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales
Haematology Research Unit, St. George and Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Department of Haematology, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales
Haematology Research Unit, St. George and Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney
Haematology Research Unit, St. George and Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Department of Haematology, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales
Vol. 107 No. 9 (2022): September, 2022 https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2021.279751

Abstract

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a bleeding disorder caused by dysregulated B- and T- cell functions, which lead to platelet destruction. A well-recognized mechanism of ITP pathogenesis involves anti-platelet and anti-megakaryocyte antibodies recognizing membrane glycoprotein (GP) complexes, mainly GPIb/IX and GPIIb/IIIa. In addition to the current view of phagocytosis of the opsonised platelets by splenic and hepatic macrophages via their Fc γ receptors, antibodyinduced platelet desialylation and apoptosis have also been reported to contribute to ITP pathogenesis. Nevertheless, the relationship between the specific thrombocytopenic mechanisms and various types of anti-platelet antibodies has not been established. In order to ascertain such association, we used sera from 61 ITP patients and assessed the capacity of anti-platelet antibodies to induce neuraminidase 1 (NEU1) surface expression, RCA-1 lectin binding and loss of mitochondrial inner membrane potential on donors’ platelets. Sera from ITP patients with detectable antibodies caused significant platelet desialylation and apoptosis. Anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies appeared more capable of causing NEU1 surface translocation while anti-GPIb/IX complex antibodies resulted in a higher degree of platelet apoptosis. In ITP patients with anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies, both desialylation and apoptosis were dependent on FcγRIIa signaling rather than platelet activation. Finally, we confirmed in a murine model of ITP that destruction of human platelets induced by anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies can be prevented with the NEU1 inhibitor oseltamivir. A collaborative clinical trial is warranted to investigate the utility of oseltamivir in the treatment of ITP.

Introduction

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired autoimmune disease characterized by enhanced platelet destruction and impaired platelet production from megakaryocytes.1 ITP patients can present with no predisposing condition (hence, primary ITP) or with a variety of associated disorders (secondary ITP),2 such as autoimmune diseases (especially systemic lupus erythematosus),3 infections (notably Hepatitis C virus and HIV)4 as well as malignancies.5 Primary ITP is estimated to represent approximately 80% of all adult ITP.4 Regarding the incidence of ITP, studies from Europe have estimated that to be 2.9-3.9/100,000 annually in adults,6-9 with an overall incidence slightly higher in females than males. The prevalence is approximately 9.5-23.6/100,000.6,7,10

The pathogenesis of ITP involves antibodies recognizing membrane glycoprotein (GP) complexes.2,9 The seminal Harrington-Hollingsworth experiment of self-infusion of ITP plasma led to the discovery of a humoral factor accountable for platelet destruction in ITP.11,12 Subsequently, Shulman identified that this factor could be adsorbed by platelets and was associated with immunoglobulin G (IgG).13 Currently, the widely-accepted mechanism is that antibody-coated platelets are phagocytosed by splenic and/or hepatic macrophages of the reticuloendothelial system, via their Fc γ receptors (FcγR), resulting in accelerated platelet clearance.1,9,14 Equally important in the pathogenesis of ITP is the dysfunction of T cells.15 Both CD4+ T-regulatory cells reduction16-18 and CD8+ T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity19-21 have been reported in ITP.2,9,15 In addition, CD8+ T-regulatory cells’ immunosuppressive role in ITP has been recognized.22 This further highlights the significant role of T cells in immune dysregulation and ITP.23

Antibody-mediated platelet apoptosis has also been suggested in ITP. In 2006, Leytin and colleagues reported in the mouse model that monoclonal anti-GPIIb antibody injection induced thrombocytopenia, caspase-3 activation, enhanced phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure and mitochondrial inner transmembrane potential (AΨm) depolarisation.24 In 2012, Winkler et al. demonstrated similar findings in pediatric patients with ITP.25 More recently, platelet apoptosis was also confirmed in adult ITP patients by Goette and colleagues.26 However, the relationship between platelet apoptosis and ITP antibody specificity was unclear, as only one patient carried sole anti-GPIb/IX antibodies in this study.

Another ITP pathway that has also been previously27 and recently28 described is Fc-independent platelet clearance. Li and co-workers reported platelet desialylation through antibody-induced platelet activation by treating donor platelets with monoclonal anti-GPIb/IX antibodies and ITP sera.28 Using a murine model of ITP secondary to monoclonal anti-GPIba antibodies, the group demonstrated evidence of platelet removal via Ashwell-Morell receptors on hepatocytes, and the use of sialidase inhibitors to attenuate thrombocytopenia.28 Although the model is not directly relevant to human disease due to the absence of platelet surface FcyRIIA on mouse platelets and the polyclonal nature of primary ITP,9,29 these findings still have potential therapeutic implications: patients with antiGPIb/IX antibodies may respond to sialidase inhibitors while patients with anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies were considered unlikely to respond to this novel treatment.

Conversely, patients who harbor anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies possibly respond to IVIg therapy better than those with sole anti-GPIb/IX antibodies, because anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies could drive ITP in an Fc-dependent fashion.23,30,32 Similarly, splenectomy may be ineffective in patients with only anti-GPIb/IX autoantibodies as desialylated platelets are removed by the liver.28 This differential effect and, therefore, determining antibody specificity, may influence treatment decision and ultimately patient outcomes. Nevertheless, these views have been recently challenged by Cantoni et al., who studied 93 ITP patients and found no predictability of anti-platelet antibody (APA)-specificity on the site of platelet clearance.33 Thus, ongoing investigations to determine whether antibody specificity predicts therapeutic response is vital.

The true extent to which platelet desialylation and/or platelet apoptosis are involved in ITP pathology remains unclear. Notably, both desialylated and apoptotic platelets were reported to be removed by the liver.28,34,35 Yet, platelet apoptosis was observed in a murine ITP model induced by monoclonal anti-GPIIb antibodies,24 but desialylation has been demonstrated in ITP patients with anti-GPIba28 and anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies.36,37 Whether there is a link between platelet desialylation and platelet intrinsic apoptosis in ITP caused by these two antibodies is still not defined. In addition, the possibility of using neuraminidase inhibitors in the treatment of ITP is also to be investigated. We recently examined the sera from 61 ITP patients for the presence of APA and their specificities.38 Here, we further scrutinize the sera’s capability to induce platelet desialylation and apoptosis, and studied these two potential thrombocytopenic mechanisms’ relationship with the antibody subtypes. Additionally, we established a mouse model to elucidate the therapeutic effect of neuraminidase inhibitor in preserving human platelet number in the presence of patients’ antibody and provide in vivo data on the feasibility of this agent in the treatment of ITP.

Methods

Patient sample collection

The study was approved by the Human Research and Animal Care Ethics Committees of the University of New South Wales (Sydney, Australia). Sera were obtained from 61 adult ITP patients (aged between 18-90 years) and 21 healthy controls with written informed consent. All 61 patients were diagnosed with ITP according to the international working group’s criteria,39 which was also consistent with the 2019 updated consensus report.40 Whole blood was centrifuged at 860xg for 10 minutes (min). The sera and plasma were stored in aliquots at -80°C until required for analysis. In some experiments, IgG fraction, purified using Protein G affinity chromatography (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), was used. The purity was over 95% as determined by gel densitometry (ImageJ, Version 2.1.0/1.53c).

Anti-platelet antibody detection and specificity determination

The indirect detection of APA and the determination of antibody specificities in this cohort of patients have recently been published.38 Briefly, venous blood was collected into 3.2% trisodium citrate. Platelet pellets were washed with wash buffer (pH 6.0) containing 140 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 12 mM trisodium citrate, 10 mM glucose, 12.5 mM sucrose, followed by resuspension in buffer (pH 7.4) containing 140 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM NaHCO3, 10 mM glucose and 10 mM HEPES. Washed platelets (1x106) were incubated with patients’ samples at various dilutions for 30 min at 37°C, washed twice, incubated with Alexa Fluor 488 or 647-labeled anti-human IgG (Invitrogen, 1:100), washed and analyzed by flow cytometry (LSRFortessaTM X-20 [BD, USA]).

For antibody specificity determination, monoclonal antibody immobilization of platelet specific antigens assay (MAIPA) was performed as previously described.38,41 Donor platelets were incubated with sera, followed by washing and incubation with antibodies against GPIIb/IIIa complex (AP2; Beckman Coulter, USA), GPIX (FMC25, Millipore, USA) or GPV (G-11, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. USA). The platelets were washed, solubilized and incubated in goat anti-mouse IgG Fc fragment-specific antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch, USA) precoated microtiter plates (ThermoFisher, USA). The reactions were washed and further incubated with goat anti-human IgG Fc fragment-specific-horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). SureBlue™ TMB–microwell peroxidase substrate (KPL Inc. USA) was then added and stopped at 10 min with 0.18 M sulphuric acid. The absorbance was read at dual wavelength (450 nm and 492 nm).

Platelet neuraminidase expression, desialylation and activation

In order to examine sera-induced platelet neuraminidase expression, 1x106 washed donor platelets were incubated with patient or control sera (1:25) for 30 min at 37°C followed by washing and incubation with anti-NEU1 mouse monoclonal antibody (1:25, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. USA) for 20 min at room temperature and washing. Similarly, for platelet desialylation, the washed sera-donor platelet reactions were incubated with FITC-labeled Ricinus communis lectin (RCA-1, Vector Laboratories, USA, 0.5 µg/mL). In order to determine the effect of patients’ IgG, control experiments were performed using purified IgG from healthy donors and ITP patients (50 µg/mL). Platelet activation was assessed by flow cytometry with anti-P-selectin monoclonal antibody APC (1:5, eBioscience™, Germany).

Platelet apoptosis

In order to evaluate ITP patient sera’s effect on platelet mitochondrial inner membrane depolarization potential, 1x106 washed donor platelets in phosphate-buffered saline containing 1 mM MgCl2, 5.6 mM glucose, 10 mM HEPES and 0.1% bovine serum albumin were incubated with patients’ or controls’ sera (1:10) for 30 min at 37°C, followed by washing and incubation with 100 nM DiOC6 (Molecular Probes) for 15 min in the dark. In order to examine the role of FcγR in platelet apoptosis, platelets were pre-incubated with anti-FcγRIIa antibody (clone IV.3, 2.5 µg/mL) for 10 min at 37°C prior to treatment with patients’ sera. In order to determine the effect of patients’ IgG on platelet apoptosis, experiments were performed using 50 µg/mL of IgG, followed by washing and incubation with 50 nM DiOC6.

NOD/SCID mouse model of immune thrombocytopenia

Human platelets (450x106) were transfused via the tail vein into the non-obese diabetic/severe combined immuno-deficient (NOD/SCID) mice and allowed to stabilize for 2.5 hours (h). Forty µg/g of patients’ or controls’ IgG was then administered intravenously.42 Oseltamivir-treated mice received intraperitoneal (IP) injection of 10 µg/g oseltamivir immediately prior to human platelet infusion and again, immediately before IgG injection. Mouse blood was collected at time 0 (prior to IgG injection), 2, 4 and 6 h following IgG injection. Human platelets were identified using anti-human CD41a V450 (BD Biosciences, USA) by flow cytometry. The percentage of human platelets at time 0 was set at 100%.

Statistical analysis

Flow cytometry data were processed with FlowJo software (LCC, USA). Data were analyzed with GraphPad Prism version 8 (GraphPad Software, USA). The significance level was set at less than 0.05. Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison was carried out for in vitro desialylation and apoptosis experiments. Linear mixed model was used to examine the effect of neuraminidase inhibitor on platelet survival in vivo. Mann Whitney test was applied in other analyses.

Results

Patient characteristics

Of the 61 patients (aged between 18-90 years old) included in this study, 61% were female. The majority (84%) had primary ITP. Thirty-five patients (57%) had detectable APA in their sera as determined by flow cytometry. MAIPA demonstrated that nine patients had sole anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies, five patients had sole anti-GPIb/IX antibodies while seven other patients had antibodies against both complexes. The rest (14 patients, 23%) had no detectable anti-GPIIb/IIIa or anti-GPIb/IX antibodies by MAIPA (Figure 1A).38 Compared to the direct testing,43 the lower detection rate of dual antibody positive patients may reflect the lower sensitivity in antibody determination using indirect method, which is consistent with a prior MAIPA report.41 Recent work demonstrated that GPV is an important target of APA in ITP.44,45 We additionally interrogated patient samples with positive indirect APA (sera from 31 patients were available) for the presence of anti-GPV antibodies. Using a cutoff of 3 standard deviations (SD) over the mean of 20 normal controls, 21 patients were positive for antibodies against GPIIb/IIIa, GPIb/IX and/or GPV (Table 1). Seven were found to have anti-GPV antibodies in their sera. However, two patients have co-existing anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies, two others have co-existing anti-GPIb/IX antibodies, and one patient had all three antibodies (Table 1; Figure 1B).

Anti-platelet antibodies predict platelet desialylation

In order to determine whether ITP patients’ sera can induce desialylation, we treated donor platelets with ITP or control sera and measured NEU1 expression by flow cytometry. NEU1 expression was significantly increased in ITP sera-treated platelets compared to controls (Figure 2A). Further scrutiny of the patient subgroups, determined by the antibody status, demonstrated that NEU1 translocation was significantly different from controls only in platelets treated with sera from patients with detectable APA (Figure 2B). Indeed, when we examined the level of platelet desialylation, as assessed by RCA-1 binding, we found that only antibody-positive sera could induce detectable desialylation (Figure 2C). Of note, a significant difference in RCA-1 binding was not detected when comparing the whole ITP group (antibody-positive and -negative sera) to normal controls (Figure 2D). This is likely due to the weak binding of lectins (such as RCA-1) to their target sugars.46

Figure 1.Antibody patern by indirect flow cytometry and monoclonal antibody immobilization of platelet-specific antigen assay. (A) Focusing on GPIIb/IIIa and GPIb/IX in 61 immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) patients, 43% had no detectable antibodies by flow cytometry (Ab negative); of the 35 patients with positive antibody by flow cytometry, 15% had antibodies against GPIIb/IIIa (IIb/IIIa); 8% against GPIb/IX (Ib/IX); 11% had antibodies against both complexes (IIb/IIIa & Ib/IX). (B) Examination of anti-GPV antibody by monoclonal antibody immobilization of platelet-specific antigen assay (MAIPA) in 31 patients with available sera, in relation to anti GPIIb/IIIa and GPIb/IX antibodies. GP: glycoprotein.

We further examined whether the IgG fraction was responsible for platelet desialylation. We used purified IgG from two ITP patients containing anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies to treat donor’s platelets. Figure 2E shows that the IgG fraction causes significant platelet desialylation. This result confirmed the findings by Marini and colleagues, that ITP patients’ IgG leads to cleavage of platelets’ sialic acid and hence, platelet desialylation.36 Together, these data show that ITP autoantibodies induce NEU1 translocation and platelet desialylation.

Table 1.Summary of anti-platelet antibodies found in sera as determined by monoclonal antibody immobilization of platelet-specific antigens assay.

Given the previous observation of platelet activation by monoclonal antibodies against GPIbα causing platelet desialylation,28 we examined the ability for ITP patients’ sera to induce P-selectin externalization. Compared to the control group, there was no enhanced anti-CD62P binding to treated platelets (Figure 2F). Unlike NEU1 expression and desialylation, no difference in platelet activation was noted between sera from patients with or without detectable APA (Figure 2G). Interestingly, the three sera with the highest P-selectin expression were all from secondary ITP patients (systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE], anti-phospholipid syndrome [APS] and B-cell lymphoma), raising the likelihood of distinct disease biology in secondary ITP. Finally, no difference was seen when patients with GPIIb/IIIa APA were compared with those with anti-GPIb/IX antibodies (Figure 2H).

Anti-platelet antibodies predict platelet apoptosis

In order to determine the role of ITP auto-antibodies in platelet apoptosis, washed platelets were treated with either ITP or control sera. Like NEU1 expression, upon treatment with patients’ sera, platelets showed significantly reduced DiOC6 fluorescence compared to the control (Figure 3A). This denotes the loss of mitochondrial inner membrane potential, ΔΨm, indicating the presence of platelet apoptosis. Consistent with the observations for desialylation, when compared to the controls, antibody positive patients’ sera disrupted mitochondrial ΔΨm more effectively than the antibody negative group (Figure 3B). Importantly, these changes are induced by the IgG fraction of ITP sera (Figure 3C). Therefore, the presence of APA in ITP sera induces platelet apoptosis as determined by changes in mitochondrial ΔΨm.

Anti-GPIIb/IIIa antiplatelet antibodies induce platelet apoptosis via Fcγ receptor

Prior literature demonstrated that the platelet desialylat-ing capacity of anti-GPIba antibody was FcγR-indepen-dent.28 However, in the case of anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies induced ITP, we and others have shown that FcγR is the driver of antibody-mediated platelet desialylation.36,37 Also clinically relevant is that, anti-GPIIb/IIIa auto-antibodies account for the majority of antibody positive cases in our patient population (Figure 1B), which is consistent with a recent report.43 Therefore, further examination into the pathogenesis of anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibody driven ITP is of clinical significance.

Figure 2.Effect of immune thrombo-cytopenia patient sera on platelet de-sialylation and activation. (A and B) NEU1 surface translocation and (C and D), RCA-1 lectin binding comparing patient subgroups and controls. (E) Effect of purified immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) immu-noglobulin G (IgG) (50 µg/mL) on RCA-1 lectin binding. (F and G) P-selectin expression on control and patient sera treated platelets. (H) P-selectin expression on platelets treated with GPIIb/IIIa or GPIb/IX antibodies. CTRL: control; Pt: patient; Neg: antibody-negative; Pos: antibody-positive; MFI: mean fluorescence intensity. Data shown as mean ± standard deviation. Levels of significance are expressed as P-values. ns: non-significant, *P<0.05, **, P<0.01. Mann Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison.

In order to establish the relationship amongst anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies, platelet FcyR and platelet apoptosis in ITP, we evaluated the impact of FcyRIIA inhibition with the monoclonal antibody IV.3 on platelet apoptosis. Platelets were treated with patient sera with or without the presence of IV.3, and the effect on platelet AWm was examined. In the presence of FcyRIIA inhibitor, APA’ ability to induce loss of AWm was impaired (Figure 3D). The rise in AWm in platelets pretreated with IV.3 was quantified and is shown in Figure 3E. This observation indicates that the anti-GPIIb/IIIa auto-antibodies signal via FcyRIIA to initiate platelet apoptosis pathway.

Anti-platelet antibodies have differential effects on the thrombocytopenic pathway

We further examined the differential effects of the most common APA’s on platelet desialylation and apoptosis. Although only nine sera contained anti-GPIIb/IIIa without the presence of anti-GPIb/IX antibodies, six of these antibodies induced NEU1 translocation (defined as mean fluorescence intensity [MFI] greater than 2SD of the controls). In contrast, only one of the five sera with anti-GPIb/IX antibodies, without anti-GPIIb/IIIa, was able to do so (Figure 4A, table 2). To our surprise, four of these five anti-GPIb/IX sera led to platelet apoptosis as reflected by significant loss of ΔΨm (defined as MFI lower than 2SD of the controls) while only three of the nine anti-GPIIb/IIIa sera induced this change (Figure 4B; Table 2). Together, these novel findings indicate that APA specificity is an important determinant of platelet fate in ITP and the missing link between the previously unobserved relationship between platelet desialylation and apoptosis.36

Two patient sera were found to have sole anti-GPV antibodies. Repeated experiments using these two sera did not show evidence of desialylation on donor platelets (Figure 5A). However, treatment of donor platelets using one of the two patients’ sera produced significant reduction of DiOC6 fluorescence (Figure 5B). The second sample also led to decreased ΔΨm compared to controls but was not statistically significant (P=0.15; Kruskal Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparison), indicating that anti-GPV APA possibly lead to platelet apoptosis. A larger sample size with sole anti-GPV antibody is needed to assess its functional effect on platelets.

Figure 3.Effect of immune thrombocytopenia sera on platelet apoptosis. Loss of mitochondrial inner transmembrane potential (AWm) as measured by DiOC6 in platelets treated by (A) immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) patients’ (Pt) and controls’ sera (CTRL), as well as (B) antibody-positive (Pos) and antibody-negative (Neg) patients’ sera. (C) Effect of purified ITP immunoglobulin G (IgG) (50 µg/mL) on washed platelets. (D) Histogram representing the effect of anti-FcyRIIa antibody IV.3 on AWm despite the presence of patient sera. (E) Effect of anti-FcyRIIa antibody IV.3 on AWm of 3 patients; data point represents the mean of 3 experiments. MFI: mean fluorescence intensity. Data shown as mean ± standard deviation. Levels of significance are expressed as P-values. ns: non-significant, *P<0.05, ***P<0.001. Mann Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison. Repeated measures ANOVA used in 3E.

Table 2.Relative effects of anti-GPIIb/IIIa and anti-GPIb/IX antibodies on platelet desialylation and apoptosis.

Oseltamivir protects platelets from GPIIb/IIIa antibody mediated destruction in vivo

Neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir has been previously reported to protect platelets from anti-GPIbα monoclonal antibody driven platelet destruction in murine studies.28 More recently, we demonstrated oseltamivir’s effect on platelet number preservation in the presence of polyclonal human anti-GPII/IIIa antibody from a patient with acquired Glanzmann Thrombasthenia.37 Following our findings that anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies induce desialylation (Figure 4A), we extended our in vivo experiments to examine other ITP patients with sole anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies. In order to test whether destruction of human platelets could be prevented in vivo, we treated recipient mice with oseltamivir. As shown in Figure 6, oseltamivir protected human platelets from anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibody-mediated destruction. Therefore, the protective effect of desialylation inhibitors could be generalized to patients with anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies. Oseltamivir reduces platelet destruction in ITP and is potentially an efficacious treatment for a larger proportion of ITP patients as anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibody is a more common antibody than anti-GPIbα antibody.

Discussion

ITP is a heterogenous disease with multiple proposed mechanisms. Potential therapeutic advances require more detailed understanding of the means that lead to platelet destruction. As such, we sought to examine platelet desialylation and apoptosis as contributors to thrombo-cytopenia in ITP. We studied 61 ITP patient sera and examined the presence of APA as a predictor for these two processes. Antibody specificity was interrogated, specifically, anti-GPIb/IX, anti-GPIIb/IIIa and GPV antibodies. GPIa was not examined as isolated anti-GPIa/IIa antibody positivity has not been reported in recent literature.43,47 We demonstrated that the presence of APA in ITP patients’ sera is associated with platelet desialylation in our patient population. Although desialylation was initially thought to be induced by anti-GPIb/IX antibodies in ITP,28 here we found that enhanced neuraminidase expression was observed in the majority of our patient cohort with detectable APA. This supports recent studies which reported that the loss of sialic acid is a more frequent finding in ITP than previously thought.36,48 Furthermore, in a murine model of ITP utilising patients’ anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies and human platelets, we found solid and reproducible36 evidence to support the use of neuraminidase inhibitors as potential new therapeutics for ITP.

The status of whether the patients have detectable ITP antibodies also influences the degree of platelet apoptosis. Sera with ITP antibodies induced significantly greater loss of ΔΨm compared to the controls, which was not observed in the antibody-negative group. As we and others have found that desialylation depends on FcR activity in anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibody-driven ITP,36,37 we further examined the relationship between platelet FcyR and the downstream signaling of these ITP antibodies in platelet apoptosis. FcyRIIa inhibitor IV.3 effectively suppressed antibody-induced platelet loss of AWm, indicating that anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies may signal through FcyR to initiate platelet apoptosis.

Figure 4.Differential effect of anti-GPIIb/IIIa and anti-GPIb/IX antibodies on NEU1 surface translocation and mitochondrial inner transmembrane potential. (A) Effect on NEU1 surface translocation and (B) on mitochondrial inner transmembrane potential (Δψm). CTRL: control. Black horizontal lines represent the means for each group. Green horizontal lines indicate the cutoff for positive samples (2SD over [for NEU1] and under [for DIOC6] the average of controls). Two patients in the anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibody subgroup and 2 patients in the anti-GPIb/IX subgroup had concomitant anti-GPV antibodies. MFI: mean fluorescence intensity.

In addition to the ability to predict desialylation and apoptosis, antibody specificity appears to have an impact on the predominant thrombocytopenic mechanism in ITP. Unlike a prior report,28 we found that anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies resulted in higher degree of NEU1 translocation. On the other hand, anti-GPIb/IX antibodies appeared to cause more platelet apoptosis. A recent systematic study examined antibody specificity and platelet/megakaryocyte desialylation.36 The report described no association between antibody-induced desialylation and platelet apoptosis in TP.36 However, this study did not report the relationship between antibody specificity and the induction of either desialylation or apoptosis. In our study, the finding of differential effects with respect to the antibody specificity provides a potential new dimension to the understanding of ITP pathogenesis.

The small number of patients containing sole anti-GPV antibodies precludes definite conclusions on its effect on the subsequent platelet events, but it is notable that sera from both patients did not induce desialylation. Interestingly, this result is consistent with the finding by Amini and colleagues, who recently reported the lack of hepatic uptake of Indium-111 labeled platelet in patients with antiGPV antibodies.49 Of note, serum from one anti-GPV positive patient induced significant loss of platelet ΔΨm, indicating anti-GPV may drive ITP via platelet apoptosis. While APA testing is available in specialized platelet laboratories, routine testing has not been recommended, and ITP remains a disease without any confirmatory investigation or a “gold standard” test. Given the additional important information provided by a positive result, which is the ability of patients’ antibodies to induce platelet desialylation and apoptosis, we suggest ITP antibody testing to be incorporated into ITP management algorithm. It may provide new insight into ITP pathology and could guide treatment individualization.

Figure 5.Effect of anti-GPV antibodies on platelet desialylation and apoptosis. (A) Effect on desialytion and (B) on apoptosis. CTRL: control; Pt: patient. Data shown as mean ± standard deviation. ns: non-significant, ***P<0.001. Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison. MFI: mean fluorescence intensity.

Figure 6.Murine model of immune thrombocytopenia with anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies. Effect of 3 immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) patients’ (Pt) immunoglobulin G (IgG) (black dots) and oseltamivir treatment (red dots) in the presence of patient IgG, on human platelet (plt) survival in NOD/SCID mice (n=5 for each patient group) measured as human platelet percentage at 2, 4, and 6 hours after IgG injection. Data shown as mean ± standard error of the mean. Levels of significance are expressed as P-values. ns: nonsignificant, **P<0.01, ****P<0.0001. Linear mixed model. NOD/SCID: non-obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient.

The main weakness of our study is that it was performed on stored patient samples. Prospective evaluation of pathological ITP sera would allow us to correlate the sera’s ability to induce desialylation and apoptosis with patients’ treatment and disease response. Another significant limitation in using stored samples is the lack of direct testing on patient platelets. Direct glycoprotein-specific APA assays will improve testing sensitivity43,50 and is the recommended test by the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH).51 Nevertheless, indirect examination allowed us to determine the impact of APA present in the patient serum on donor platelets and compared such effect of different patient samples as well as with controls.

Another limitation is the small number of patients with single APA specificity. Larger sample size is desirable to capture the difference between each antibody type and the associated downstream effect on platelet survival more accurately, which may ultimately lead to ITP treatment individualization. An additional challenge is the difficulties in performing platelet antibody testing outside specialized laboratories. In agreement with the ISTH recommendation, we recommend referral of platelet immunology tests to a centralized laboratory, where staff are adequately trained in specialized methods to minimize laboratory variability.51

In conclusion, we report the predictive capability of APA in relation to the potential underlying ITP mechanisms, specifically platelet desialylation and apoptosis. We showed the differential effects of antibody subtypes on these two ITP pathogenesis pathways and the role of FcγR on anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies induced platelet apoptosis.

We also demonstrated the therapeutic effect of neuraminidase inhibitor in platelet preservation despite the presence of anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies. Hence, such treatment can potentially be applied to most ITP patients since it is likely that both anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibodies (this study) and anti-GPIb/IX antibodies28 lead to platelet desialylation. Further collaboration is required to investigate the treatment potential using neuraminidase and/or apoptosis inhibitors in prospective randomized ITP clinical trials.

Footnotes

  • Received August 5, 2021
  • Accepted February 18, 2021

Correspondence

#JSP and BHC contributed equally as co-senior authors

S. S. Zheng silvia.zheng@health.nsw.gov.au

Disclosures

No conflicts of interest to disclose.

Contributions

SSZ designed and performed experiments, collected, and analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript; ZA, HHLL, RW, FY performed the experiments; JSP and BHC contributed equally, provided project supervision, and reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Data-sharing statement

Data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. All data generated or analysed are included in this published article.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council project grant to BHC (GNT 1012409) as well as St. George and Sutherland Medical Research Foundation Grant to JSP. SSZ received NSW Ministry of Health PhD Scholarship. In Vivo data presented in this work was acquired at the Mark Wainright Analytical Centre (MWAC) of UNSW Sydney, which is in part funded by the Research Infrastructure Program of UNSW.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Zhixin Liu (Stats Central, UNSW) for her statistical expertise.

References

  1. Johnsen J. Pathogenesis in immune thrombocytopenia: new insights. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2012; 2012:306-312. https://doi.org/10.1182/asheducation.V2012.1.306.3798320PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Zufferey A, Kapur R, Semple JW. Pathogenesis and therapeutic mechanisms in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). J Clin Med. 2017; 6(2):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm6020016PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Arkfeld DG, Weitz IC. Immune thrombocytopenia in patients with connective tissue disorders and the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2009; 23(6):1239-1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hoc.2009.08.010PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cines DB BJ, Liebman HA, Luning Prak ET. The ITP syndrome: pathogenic and clinical diversity. Blood. 2009; 113(26):6511-6521. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-01-129155PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Krauth MT, Puthenparambil J, Lechner K. Paraneoplastic autoimmune thrombocytopenia in solid tumors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2012; 81(1):75-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2011.02.004PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Abrahamson PE, Hall SA, Feudjo-Tepie M, Mitrani-Gold FS, Logie J. The incidence of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura among adults: a population-based study and literature review. Eur J Haematol. 2009; 83(2):83-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0609.2009.01247.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Schoonen WM, Kucera G, Coalson J. Epidemiology of immune thrombocytopenic purpura in the General Practice Research Database. Br J Haematol. 2009; 145(2):235-244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07615.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Moulis G, Palmaro A, Montastruc JL, Godeau B, Lapeyre-Mestre M, Sailler L. Epidemiology of incident immune thrombocytopenia: a nationwide population-based study in France. Blood. 2014; 124(22):3308-3315. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2014-05-578336PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Audia S, Mahévas M, Nivet M, Ouandji S, Ciudad M, Bonnotte B. Immune thrombocytopenia: recent advances in pathogenesis and treatments. Hemasphere. 2021; 5(6):e574-e574. https://doi.org/10.1097/HS9.0000000000000574PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Segal JB, Powe NR. Prevalence of immune thrombocytopenia: analyses of administrative data. J Thromb Haemost. 2006; 4(11):2377-2383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.02147.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Harrington WJ, Minnich V, Hollingsworth JW, Moore CV. Demonstration of a thrombocytopenic factor in the blood of patients with thrombocytopenic purpura. J Lab Clin Med. 1951; 38(1):1-10. Google Scholar
  12. Schwartz RS. Immune thrombocytopenic purpura--from agony to agonist. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(22):2299-2301. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe0707126PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Shulman NR, Marder VJ, Weinrach RS. Similarities between known antiplatelet antibodies and the factor responsible for thrombocytopenia in idiopathic purpura. Physiologic, serologic and isotopic studies. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1965; 124(2):499-542. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1965.tb18984.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cines DB, Cuker A, Semple JW. Pathogenesis of immune thrombocytopenia. Presse Med. 2014; 43(4P2):e49-e59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2014.01.010PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Semple JW, Rebetz J, Maouia A, Kapur R. An update on the pathophysiology of immune thrombocytopenia. Curr Opin Hematol. 2020; 27(6):423-429. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOH.0000000000000612PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Stasi R, Cooper N, Del Poeta G. Analysis of regulatory T-cell changes in patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura receiving B cell-depleting therapy with rituximab. Blood. 2008; 112(4):1147-1150. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-12-129262PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu B, Zhao H, Poon MC. Abnormality of CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells in idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Eur J Haematol. 2007; 78(2):139-143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0609.2006.00780.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ling Y, Cao X, Yu Z, Ruan C. Circulating dendritic cells subsets and CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in adult patients with chronic ITP before and after treatment with high-dose dexamethasome. Eur J Haematol. 2007; 79(4):310-316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0609.2007.00917.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Olsson B, Andersson PO, Jernas M. T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity toward platelets in chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Nat Med. 2003; 9(9):1123-1124. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm921PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhang F, Chu X, Wang L. Cell-mediated lysis of autologous platelets in chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Eur J Haematol. 2006; 76(5):427-431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0609.2005.00622.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhao C, Li X, Zhang F, Wang L, Peng J, Hou M. Increased cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity predominant in patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura without platelet autoantibodies. Haematologica. 2008; 93(9):1428-1430. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.12889.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ma L, Simpson E, Li J. CD8+ T cells are predominantly protective and required for effective steroid therapy in murine models of immune thrombocytopenia. Blood. 2015; 126(2):247-256. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-03-635417PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Swinkels M, Rijkers M, Voorberg J, Vidarsson G, Leebeek FWG, Jansen AJG. Emerging concepts in immune thrombocytopenia. Front Immunol. 2018; 9:880. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00880PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Leytin V, Mykhaylov S, Starkey AF. Intravenous immuno-globulin inhibits anti-glycoprotein IIb-induced platelet apoptosis in a murine model of immune thrombocytopenia. Br J Haematol. 2006; 133(1):78-82. Google Scholar
  25. Winkler J, Kroiss S, Rand ML. Platelet apoptosis in paediatric immune thrombocytopenia is ameliorated by intravenous immunoglobulin. Br J Haematol. 2012; 156(4):508-515. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08973.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Goette NP, Glembotsky AC, Lev PR. Platelet apoptosis in adult immune thrombocytopenia: insights into the mechanism of damage triggered by auto-antibodies. PLoS One. 2016; 11(8):e0160563. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160563PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Nieswandt B, Bergmeier W, Rackebrandt K, Gessner JE, Zirngibl H. Identification of critical antigen-specific mechanisms in the development of immune thrombocytopenic purpura in mice. Blood. 2000; 96(7):2520-2527. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V96.7.2520.h8002520_2520_2527PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Li J, Van Der Wal DE, Zhu G. Desialylation is a mechanism of Fc-independent platelet clearance and a therapeutic target in immune thrombocytopenia. Nat Commun. 2015; 6:7737. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8737PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Chan H, Moore JC, Finch CN, Warkentin TE, Kelton JG. The IgG subclasses of platelet-associated autoantibodies directed against platelet glycoproteins IIb/IIIa in patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Br J Haematol. 2003; 122(5):818-824. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04509.xPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Webster ML, Sayeh E, Crow M. Relative efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin G in ameliorating thrombocytopenia induced by antiplatelet GPIIbIIIa versus GPIbalpha antibodies. Blood. 2006; 108(3):943-946. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2005-06-009761PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Go RS, Johnston KL, Bruden KC. The association between platelet autoantibody specificity and response to intravenous immunoglobulin G in the treatment of patients with immune thrombocytopenia. Haematologica. 2007; 92(2):283-284. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.10667PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Peng J, Ma SH, Liu J. Association of autoantibody specificity and response to intravenous immunoglobulin G therapy in immune thrombocytopenia: a multicenter cohort study. J Thromb Haemost. 2014; 12(4):497-504. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.12524PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Cantoni S, Carpenedo M, Nichelatti M. Clinical relevance of antiplatelet antibodies and the hepatic clearance of platelets in patients with immune thrombocytopenia. Blood. 2016; 128(17):2183-2185. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-03-708388PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rumjantseva V, Grewal PK, Wandall HH. Dual roles for hepatic lectin receptors in the clearance of chilled platelets. Nat Med. 2009; 15(11):1273-1280. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2030PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang H, Nimmer PM, Tahir SK. Bcl-2 family proteins are essential for platelet survival. Cell Death Differ. 2007; 14(5):943-951. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4402081PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Marini I, Zlamal J, Faul C. Autoantibody-mediated desialylation impairs human thrombopoiesis and platelet lifespan. Haematologica. 2021; 106(1):196-207. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2019.236117PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Zheng SS, Perdomo JS, Leung HHL, Yan F, Chong BH. Acquired Glanzmann thrombasthenia associated with platelet desialylation. J Thromb Haemost. 2020; 18(3):714-721. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.14722PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Zheng SS, Perdomo JS, Ahmadi Z, Chong BH. Indirect detection of anti-platelet antibodies in immune thrombocytopenia. Pathology. 2021; 53(6):759-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2020.12.006PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Rodeghiero F, Stasi R, Gernsheimer T. Standardization of terminology, definitions and outcome criteria in immune throm-bocytopenic purpura of adults and children: report from an international working group. Blood. 2009; 113(11):2386-2393. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-07-162503PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Provan D, Arnold DM, Bussel JB. Updated international consensus report on the investigation and management of primary immune thrombocytopenia. Blood Adv. 2019; 3(22):3780-3817. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000812PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Brighton TA, Evans S, Castaldi PA, Chesterman CN, Chong BH. Prospective evaluation of the clinical usefulness of an antigen-specific assay (MAIPA) in idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and other immune thrombocytopenias. Blood. 1996; 88(1):194-201. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V88.1.194.194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Liang SX, Pinkevych M, Khachigian LM, Parish CR, Davenport MP, Chong BH. Drug-induced thrombocytopenia: development of a novel NOD/SCID mouse model to evaluate clearance of circulating platelets by drug-dependent antibodies and the efficacy of IVIG. Blood. 2010; 116(11):1958-1960. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-02-268326PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Al-Samkari H, Rosovsky RP, Karp Leaf RS. A modern reassessment of glycoprotein-specific direct platelet autoantibody testing in immune thrombocytopenia. Blood Adv. 2019; 4(1):9-18. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000868PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Vollenberg R, Jouni R, Norris PAA. Glycoprotein V is a relevant immune target in patients with immune thrombocytopenia. Haematologica. 2019; 104(6):1237-1243. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2018.211086PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Porcelijn L, Schmidt DE, van der Schoot CE, Vidarsson G, de Haas M, Kapur R. Anti-glycoprotein Ibα autoantibodies do not impair circulating thrombopoietin levels in immune thrombocytopenia patients. Haematologica. 2020; 105(4):e172-e174. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2019.228908PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Yamamoto K, Kawasaki N. Chapter Eleven - Detection of Weak-Binding Sugar Activity Using Membrane-Based Carbohydrates. 2010;233-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(10)78011-3PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Porcelijn L, Huiskes E, Oldert G, Schipperus M, Zwaginga JJ, de Haas M. Detection of platelet autoantibodies to identify immune thrombocytopenia: state of the art. Br J Haematol. 2018; 182(3):423-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.15404PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Grodzielski M, Goette NP, Glembotsky AC. Multiple concomitant mechanisms contribute to low platelet count in patients with immune thrombocytopenia. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):2208. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-38086-1PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Amini SN, Porcelijn L, Sobels A. Anti-glycoprotein antibodies and sequestration pattern of indium labeled platelets in immune thrombocytopenia. Blood Adv. 2022; 6(6):1797-1803. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004822PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Vrbensky JR, Moore JE, Arnold DM, Smith JW, Kelton JG, Nazy I. The sensitivity and specificity of platelet autoantibody testing in immune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of a diagnostic test. J Thromb Haemost. 2019; 17(5):787-794. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.14419PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Arnold DM, Santoso S, Greinacher A. Platelet Immunology Scientific Subcommittee of the ISTH. Recommendations for the implementation of platelet autoantibody testing in clinical trials of immune thrombocytopenia. J Thromb Haemost. 2012; 10(4):695-697. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04664.xPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Figures & Tables

Article Information

Vol. 107 No. 9 (2022): September, 2022 : Articles
 
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2021.279751
Pubmed
35199503
 
Published
2022-02-24
Published By
Ferrata Storti Foundation, Pavia, Italy
Print ISSN
0390-6078
Online ISSN
1592-8721
 
Copyright & Usage
Copyright (c) 2022 Ferrata Storti Foundation
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Article Usage

Online Views
3670
PDF Downloads
1401

Statistics from Altmetric.com

No Data
Navigate
For Authors
For Reviewers
For Advertisers
Education
Privacy
More
Copyright © 2024 by the Ferrata Storti Foundation | Web design ￫ | Development ￫
ISSN 0390-6078 print | ISSN 1592-8721 online