TEMPI syndrome is a rare multisystem disorder characterized by telangiectasias, elevated erythropoietin and erythrocytosis, monoclonal gammopathy, perinephric fluid collections and intrapulmonary shunting, first described by Sykes and reported in the literature in a total of 29 patients.1 Regimens based on plasma cell-directed drugs have shown to be effective,2 suggesting a pathogenic role of the monoclonal antibody or the monoclonal plasma cell in the syndrome. It has been hypothesized that autoimmune or oxygen sensing disorders mediated by aberrant monoclonal antibodies or their fragments are involved in the pathogenesis of TEMPI syndrome.2,3 However, no convincing evidence has been identified. Professor Hu has reported the duplication of 22q11.23, where the gene of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is located, in one TEMPI syndrome case and high expression of MIF was observed in three TEMPI syndrome patients, suggesting a possible role of MIF in the pathophysiology of TEMPI syndrome,4 which still needed further study to verify these findings as recurrent or episodic. In this study, we report a novel fusion gene, IRF4-BLOC1S5, that drives the expansion of a plasma cell clone in a TEMPI syndrome patient. The patient exhibited a favorable response to a bortezomib-based regimen with decreased IRF4-BLOC1S5 expression, consistent with in vitro sensitivity data. This report unveils a previously unreported fusion gene between IRF4 and BLOC1S5, offering a pioneering insight into the molecular mechanism implicated in TEMPI syndrome and opening avenues for targeted therapeutic strategies.
A 75-year-old female, with an 8-year history of diffuse telangiectasia, was referred to our hospital in July 2019 with unexplained erythrocytosis and exertional dyspnea. The physical examination corroborated the presence of widespread telangiectasia (Figure 1A). The laboratory investigations revealed elevated hemoglobin (156 g/L), serum erythropoietin (1,035 mIU/mL), and immunoglobulin A-λ monoclonal protein (10.96 g/L). Bone marrow aspirates indicated 13% monoclonal plasma cells, expressed with CD38+, CD138+, CD19-, CD56+, CD117P+, CD27dim, CD81dim, CD45dim. Imaging confirmed perinephric fluid collections, and 99mTc macro-aggregated albumin scintigraphy detected intrapulmonary shunting (Figure 1A). The patient did not exhibit signs and symptoms of hypercalcemia, renal failure, anemia, and bone lesion, excluding multiple myeloma. Molecular testing showing that BCR/ABL translocation and mutations of JAK2V617F, JAK2 exon 12, CALR, and MFL were negative, excluding myeloproliferative neoplasms. Therefore, a diagnosis of TEMPI syndrome was made.
In order to identify the genetic abnormalities in this patient, we performed whole-genome sequencing and transcriptome analysis. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ruijin Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from the patient. Whole-genome sequencing of paired tumor (CD138+ plasma cells) and normal samples revealed a 7.6-Mb somatic inversion on chromosome 6 in the region 6p25.3-6p24.3 (Figure 1B; Online Supplementary Figure S1). Bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) showed that this inversion caused fusion of exon 1-5 of IRF4 to the 3’UTR of BLOC1S5, which generated a short N-terminal-truncated IRF4 protein. Western blotting confirmed that the corresponding truncated IRF4 protein was only expressed in the CD138+ plasma cells of this patient, but not in the CD138- cells of this patient (Figure 1C). Furthermore, the truncated IRF4 protein was also not detectable in the multiple myeloma (MM) samples and cells from normal donors (Figure 1D, E). This specificity in expression substantiates the potential role of the truncated IRF4 in the TEMPI syndrome pathogenesis of this patient.
In order to decipher the role of the truncated-IRF4 protein in the aberrant plasma cell transcriptional program, single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) was performed, incorporating data from eight healthy controls to construct normal bone marrow cell types, particularly the scarce plasma cell population. A notable 11.2-fold expansion of the plasma cell population, with high expression of the rearranged IRF4-BLOC1S5, was observed in the patient (Figure 2A, B, D; Online Supplementary Figure S2). Furthermore, incorporating B-cell antigen receptor (BCR) sequence information into the scRNA-seq analysis revealed that this uniquely expanded plasma cluster expressed one specific immunoglobulin clonotype, sharing the same third complementarity determining region (CDR3) sequence (Figure 2B, C). The results indicated that this abnormally expanded cluster shared characteristics of one common B-cell origin. Differentially expressed genes (DEG) in plasma cells between this patient and healthy controls were enriched in the KEGG pathways, such as ribosome and protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (Figure 2E, F), implicating that highly expressed truncated IRF4 contributed to the production of monoclonal immunoglobulin and the survival and expansion of monoclonal plasma cells.
In order to further dissect the contribution of the BLOC1S5 moiety to the pathogenic role of the truncated IRF4, we mapped the chromatin occupancy of H3K27 acetylation (H3K27ac) on the BLOC1S5 gene locus and found that high H3K27ac signals were enriched on the 3’UTR of BLOC1S5, i.e., the genomic locus fused to the IRF4 gene (Online Supplementary Figure S3).5 The results suggested that the inversion did merely truncate IRF4; it also repositioned the regulatory elements of the BLOC1S5 gene in proximity to the truncated IRF4, thereby triggering its overexpression. In order to determine the most appropriate treatment regimen for this patient, we constructed plasma cell lines with the ectopic expression of the IRF4-BLOC1S5 fusion. The cell models were used to test the sensitivity of the fusion-expressing cells to various therapeutic agents commonly used in TEMPI syndrome, such as bortezomib and lenalidomide. Interestingly, we found that cells with the ectopic expression of IRF4-BLOC1S5 demonstrated sensitivity to bortezomib but showed resistance to lenalidomide (Figure 3A-E). This finding was further corroborated by the recent literature, which reported a similar resistance pattern in a multiple myeloma cell line with a similar truncated IRF4 formed by an IRF4-BTN3A3 inversion mutation.6 Based on the in vitro sensitivity data and the patient’s age and overall health status, a decision was made to initiate a bortezomib-based treatment regimen for this patient. After four cycles of bortezomib and dexamethasone (BD) treatment, the patient achieved a complete response with a negative minimal residual disease (MRD) status, undetectable level of the serum M protein and normalization of free light-chain K/λ ratio, hemoglobin and erythropoietin level (Figure 3F-I). The symptoms were completely relieved, with the disappearance of the cyanosis, telangiectasias, and perinephric-fluid collection and significant amelioration of intrapulmonary shunting (Figure 1A). Furthermore, the expression of IRF4-BLOC1S5 was significantly decreased after the BD treatment and during the clinical follow-up (up to 18 months) (Figure 3J), suggesting that IRF4-BLOC1S5 could act as a biomarker for TEMPI syndrome treatment and prognosis.
IRF4 plays essential roles in the transition from B cells to plasma cells, orchestrating class-switch recombination and somatic hypermutation.7-9 IRF4 activates genes essential for plasma cell identity and effector function, including CD138, immunoglobulin heavy/light chains, and XBP1.10 The high expression of IRF4, necessary for the survival of MM plasma cells, is associated with a poor prognosis11-13 and is often elevated due to IgH/IRF4 rearrangements.14 The truncated-IRF4 protein, a product of this fusion, emerges as a significant factor in the monoclonal gammopathy characteristic of TEMPI syndrome.
The exclusive expression of truncated-IRF4 in the patient’s abnormal plasma cells not only offers insights into disease mechanisms but also presents potential therapeutic avenues. Targeting the aberrant protein or pathways it affects could pave the way for more effective treatments for TEMPI syndrome. The patient’s positive response to bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, suggests that therapies targeting protein degradation pathways might be particularly promising. While this case report sheds light on possible molecular mechanisms driving TEMPI syndrome, further studies are essential. Investigating the prevalence of the IRF4-BLOC1S5 fusion in other TEMPI patients, exploring its functional implications in cellular models or mouse models, and assessing the therapeutic potential of targeting this fusion are all critical future directions.
Footnotes
- Received November 25, 2023
- Accepted April 8, 2024
Correspondence
Disclosures
No conflicts of interest to disclose.
Funding
Acknowledgments
Informed consent was obtained from the patient. The authors thank the patient presented in this study. The computations in this paper were run on the π 2.0 (or the Siyuan-1) cluster supported by the Center for High Performance Computing at Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
References
- Sykes DB, Schroyens W, O’Connell C. The TEMPI syndrome - a novel multisystem disease. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365(5):475-477. Google Scholar
- Sykes DB, O’Connell C, Schroyens W. The TEMPI syndrome. Blood. 2020; 135(15):1199-1203. Google Scholar
- Zhang X, Fang M. TEMPI syndrome: erythrocytosis in plasma cell dyscrasia. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2018; 18(11):724-730. Google Scholar
- Sun C, Xu J, Zhang B. Whole-genome sequencing suggests a role of MIF in the pathophysiology of TEMPI syndrome. Blood Adv. 2021; 5(12):2563-2568. Google Scholar
- Jia Y, Zhou J, Tan TK. Myeloma-specific superenhancers affect genes of biological and clinical relevance in myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2021; 11(2):32. Google Scholar
- Zhu YX, Shi CX, Bruins LA. Identification of lenalidomide resistance pathways in myeloma and targeted resensitization using cereblon replacement, inhibition of STAT3 or targeting of IRF4. Blood Cancer J. 2019; 9(2):19. Google Scholar
- Ochiai K, Maienschein-Cline M, Simonetti G. Transcriptional regulation of germinal center B and plasma cell fates by dynamical control of IRF4. Immunity. 2013; 38(5):918-929. Google Scholar
- Klein U, Casola S, Cattoretti G. Transcription factor IRF4 controls plasma cell differentiation and class-switch recombination. Nat Immunol. 2006; 7(7):773-782. Google Scholar
- Sciammas R, Shaffer AL, Schatz JH, Zhao H, Staudt LM, Singh H. Graded expression of interferon regulatory factor-4 coordinates isotype switching with plasma cell differentiation. Immunity. 2006; 25(2):225-236. Google Scholar
- Low MSY, Brodie EJ, Fedele PL. IRF4 activity is required in established plasma cells to regulate gene transcription and mitochondrial homeostasis. Cell Rep. 2019; 29(9):2634-2645. Google Scholar
- Shaffer AL, Emre NC, Lamy L. IRF4 addiction in multiple myeloma. Nature. 2008; 454(7201):226-231. Google Scholar
- Wang L, Yao ZQ, Moorman JP, Xu Y, Ning S. Gene expression profiling identifies IRF4-associated molecular signatures in hematological malignancies. PLoS One. 2014; 9(9):e106788. Google Scholar
- Heintel D, Zojer N, Schreder M. Expression of MUM1/IRF4 mRNA as a prognostic marker in patients with multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2008; 22(2):441-445. Google Scholar
- Yoshida S, Nakazawa N, Iida S. Detection of MUM1/IRF4-IgH fusion in multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 1999; 13(11):1812-1816. Google Scholar
Data Supplements
Figures & Tables
Article Information
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.