Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare L-group histiocytosis. Orbital involvement is found in a third of cases, but few data are available concerning the radiological features of ECD-related orbital disease (ECD-ROD). Our aim was to characterize the initial radiological phenotype and outcome of patients with ECD-ROD. Initial and follow-up orbital magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from the patients with histologically proven ECD at a national reference center were reviewed. Pathological orbital findings were recorded for 45 (33%) of the 137 patients included, with bilateral involvement in 38/45 (84%) cases. The mean age (± standard deviation) of these patients was 60 (±11.3) years and 78% were men. Intraconal fat infiltration around the optic nerve sheath adjacent to the eye globe (52%), with intense gadolinium uptake and a fibrous component was the most frequent phenotype described. Optic nerve signal abnormalities were observed in 47% of cases. Two patients had bilateral homogeneous extraocular muscle enlargement suggestive of a myositis-like involvement of ECD-ROD. None had isolated dacryoadenitis but in 17 eyes dacryodenitis was described in association with other types of orbital lesions. Only seven patients (15%) had normal brain MRI findings. ECD-associated paranasal sinus involvement and post-pituitary involvement were detected in 56% and 53% of patients, respectively. A decrease/disappearance of the lesions was observed in 17/24 (71%) of the patients undergoing late (>12 months) followups. Interestingly, ECD-ROD only rarely (7/45; 16%) revealed the disease, with exophthalmos being the most frequently identified feature in this subgroup (3/45; 6%). Even though ECD-ROD can be clinically silent, it comprises a broad array of lesions often resulting in optic nerve signal abnormalities, the functional outcome of which remains to be established. ECD-ROD should thus be assessed initially and subsequently monitored by orbital MRI and ophthalmological follow-up.
Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare, L-group histiocytosis1 encompassing various pathophysiological processes and diverse clinical manifestations originating from the xanthomatous or xanthogranulomatous infiltration of tissues by foamy histiocytes, “lipid-laden” macrophages, or histiocytes, with the infiltrate surrounded by fibrosis.2 It commonly affects the long bones (96-99%),2-4 and is frequently characterized by bilateral symmetric long-bone osteosclerosis.2,5–7 About half the patients present with extraskeletal manifestations, including orbital infiltration in about 30% of cases.8 Intraorbital infiltration, sometimes described as “intraorbital masses”, has been reported in association with clinical exophthalmos in ECD patients.9,14 ECD-related orbital disease (ECD-ROD) may have imaging features in common with other causes of orbital inflammation, such as immunoglobulin G4-related orbital disease (IgG4-ROD), lymphoproliferative disease, or granulomatosis with polyangiitis, particularly if there is associated lacrimal gland involvement (dacryoadenitis).
There is no published systematic description of a substantial series of patients with ECD-ROD, and no follow-up data are currently available. Our aim here was to characterize the orbital involvement in ECD by retrospectively reviewing orbital magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. We also evaluated the available clinical and radiological follow-up data.
This retrospective study analyzing patients’ medical records and imaging data was approved (n. 20210810160633) by the ethics committee of our institution (Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris). It was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Patients with a histologically proven diagnosis of ECD referred to our French tertiary center between 1996 and 2020 were enrolled in the study. The inclusion criteria were: (i) patient over 18 years of age; (ii) definitive diagnosis of ECD established on the basis of the consensus criteria;15 and (iii) available brain and orbital MRI. Patients with mixed histiocytosis (ECD and Langerhans cell histiocytosis/Rosai-Dorfman disease) were excluded.
Magnetic resonance imaging protocol
Orbital MRI included 3 or 1.5 Tesla images with at least T2-weighted (T2W) coronal and T1-weighted (T1W) spinecho fat-saturated, gadolinium-enhanced sequences covering the entire orbit and the visual pathways, including the optic chiasm. Brain MRI included at least T2W-and diffusion-weighted imaging axial, three-dimensional or axial T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences.
The imaging data were collected and retrospectively reviewed by two neuroradiologists (YG and NS) with 5 and 7 years of experience in neuroradiology. Differences in assessment were settled by consensus with the third reader (DG) with 20 years of experience. Only the patients with positive identification of orbital lesions were included in the final imaging analysis. The readers assessed the following characteristics of each orbital lesion: (i) its lateral location, defined as left, right or bilateral; (ii) its location within orbital regions, as follows: adjacent to the globe, intraconal or extraconal orbital fat involvement, extraocular muscle, lacrimal gland; (iii) its main signal on T2W imaging, defined as hypointense, isointense or hyperintense, relative to the signal for healthy oculomotor muscles, the temporal muscles; (iv) its enhancement after contrast injection, relative to that of healthy extraocular muscles, classified as absent, moderate if weaker than that of healthy extraocular muscles, or major if at least as strong as that of healthy oculomotor muscles; (v) its extension to the cavernous sinus, foramen ovale or foramen rotundum; (vi) exophthalmos: defined as the posterior third of the orbital globe lying in front of the external bicanthal line;16,17 (vii) enophthalmos: defined as half the orbital globe lying behind the external bicanthal line; and (viii) optic nerve T2 signal abnormality and optic nerve sheath enlargement.
The following information was collected from the brain MRI sequences: (i) the presence of thickening of the pituitary stem and/or a loss of spontaneous T1W hyperintensity of the posterior pituitary gland and infundibular stalk abnormalities; (ii) pachymeningeal and leptomeningeal involvement; (iii) intra-axial mass; (iv) high T2 FLAIR signal intensity within the dentate nuclei; (v) ischemic sequelae; and (vi) cortico-subcortical atrophy.
The presence of paranasal sinus involvement suggestive of ECD was also assessed. All of the available follow-up MRI scans were analyzed.
Clinical data, including age at the time of orbital MRI, sex, and BRAF status, were collected. Available visual acuity test results and the existence of associated cardiac damage or kidney damage were also assessed.
Age is expressed as the mean and standard deviation (SD). Categorical variables are expressed as counts and percentages. Comparisons between categorical variables were performed with the Fisher exact test and the χ2 test, for univariate analysis. We considered P values <0.05 to be statistically significant. SPSS software was used for the analyses.
In total, 304 patients with suspected ECD were referred to the internal medicine department of our hospital between January 1996 and July 2020. We excluded 62 (20%) of these patients due to mixed histiocytosis or because the diagnosis of ECD was not proven according to predefined and accepted criteria.2,15 The 137 brain MRI scans for the remaining patients included specific, orbital sequences, and 45 (33%) of these MRI revealed orbital abnormalities. The selection of participants is illustrated in Figure 1. The patients with orbital MRI abnormalities were mainly men (78%), with a mean age (± SD) of 60 (±11.3) years. BRAF status was obtained for 122 of the 137 patients with proven ECD disease. A BRAF mutation was detected in 32 of the 80 (40%) without orbital abnormalities, and in 11 of the 42 (26%) patients with ECD-ROD (P=0.188, χ2 test).
Orbital magnetic resonance imaging data
The initial MRI scans of 45 patients (83 affected eyes) were analyzed. Bilateral lesions were detected in 38 (84%) patients, and 25 (55%) patients had symmetric orbital involvement. Orbital fat infiltration was observed in 88% of cases, whereas the intraconal fat surrounding the optic nerve sheath was involved in 84% of cases. This involvement was anterior, adjacent to the eyeball, resulting in radiological images resembling “hairy globes” in 52% of cases. It resulted in optic nerve signal abnormalities in 47% of cases (Figure 2). For orbital infiltration, it was possible to assess the intensity of the T2W signal on MRI for only 67 affected eyes, due to significant movement artifacts. In most cases, the infiltration presented a hypointense T2W signal reflecting a fibrous component. We were able to analyze the gadolinium uptake of the infiltration in 69 affected eyes. The vast majority (90%) of lesions presented intense gadolinium enhancement, with only 10% having weaker enhancement than for the temporal muscle. Interestingly, 7% of affected eyes displayed isolated bilateral optic nerve sheath enlargement and/or isolated optic nerve signal abnormalities. Two patients had homogeneous bilateral extraocular muscle enlargement (Figure 3). Both these patients tested negative for Graves’ disease and neither was on interferon treatment. None of the patients had isolated dacryoadenitis. Only 31% of affected eyes presented exophthalmos, and 10% presented enophthalmos.
Orbital involvement is summarized in Table 1.
Brain magnetic resonance imaging data
Out of 45 patients with orbital lesions only seven (15%) had normal brain MRI results. Paranasal sinus involvement (56%) and the loss of the T1W bright spot in the posterior pituitary lobe (53%) were the most frequent extraorbital findings. Cortico-subcortical atrophy was observed in 20 of 45 (45%) patients. The extraorbital lesions are summarized in Table 2. The brain MRI findings of the patients included before 2010 were reported by Drier et al.8
There was no significant statistical link between the presence of orbital, encephalic, and paranasal sinus lesions. For the 45 patients with orbital abnormalities, we found no significant associations with the involvement of other organs. No significant statistical link was detected between “hairyglobe” infiltration and the “hairy-kidney” sign (P=0.5). One of the three patients with isolated optic nerve hyperintensity had a history of glaucoma, whereas the other two had undergone no ophthalmological monitoring.
Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging data
Twenty-nine patients underwent at least one follow-up MRI scan. Eleven patients underwent MRI at a check-up visit within 1 year (early follow-up), and 24/45 had longitudinal follow-up data for more than a year (late follow-up). Follow-up lasted a mean of 55 months and a median of 33.5 months (range, 7-238 months). Infiltration remained stable on the early follow-up MRI scans for all but one of the 11 patients with such scans available. Late follow-up MRI scans were performed for 24 patients (among whom 12 were treated with interferon-α, 5 with a BRAF inhibitor, 1 with dual therapy (BRAF + MEK inhibitor), 2 with remicade, 1 with tocilizumab, and 1 with anakinra). In 17 (71%) of the 24 patients the lesions decreased in size or disappeared. It should be noted that lesions decreased in two patients who were off therapy (Figure 4). For all these patients, we observed a decrease in the intensity of gadolinium uptake followed by a decrease in lesion volume. Two of the seven patients displaying no significant modification had an isolated enlargement of the optic nerve sheath. Four of the five remaining patients with infiltrative lesions had an initial hypointense signal lesion on the T2W sequence relative to the intensity of the signal from temporal muscles, suggesting a mostly fibrous component.
We were able to collect visual acuity data for 26/45 patients. Sixteen (61%) had a visual acuity of 10/10. Three of the 45 patients (11%) had a visual acuity ≤5/10, and all three had anterior “hairy-globe” lesions. Interestingly, orbital involvement was rarely (7/45; 16%) identified as the sign revealing the disease, and clinical exophthalmos was the most frequent form of optical involvement detected (3/45; 6%).
This is, to the best of our knowledge, the largest study to date of patients with ECD-ROD. It is also the only study providing follow-up analysis of the orbital imaging. As such, it provided sufficient data for a rich topographical and semiological description. In this series of 137 patients, orbital MRI results were abnormal for 45 (33%) patients. The previously reported intraconal, anterior “hairy globelike” lesions18-22 were the most frequent type in patients with ECD-ROD, but unilateral orbital abnormalities were not exceptional (16%) (Figure 5). Four affected eyes presented homogeneous extraocular muscle enlargement with no significant intraorbital fat infiltration. This myositis-like pattern of ECD-ROD has not previously been reported in ECD-ROD. This new feature is of particular importance for the differential diagnosis of Graves’ disease-associated or-bitopathy or idiopathic orbital myositis-related inflamma-tion.23 Only 31% of the patients had exophthalmos evident on radiological examination, and ophthalmological symptoms revealed the disease in only 16% of cases. However, a large proportion of patients (47% of affected eyes with intraorbital fat infiltration) presented optic nerve signal abnormalities. Given the scarcity of residual visual acuity data and the lack of systematic monitoring of the visual field or retinal thickness, both of which are expected to be modified by chronic extrinsic compression, no conclusions can yet been drawn about the clinical implications of this finding.24-26
Head MRI results were frequently abnormal in the patients with orbital lesions (85%). Consistent with the findings of previous studies, associated lesions most frequently detected were paranasal sinus and pituitary lobe abnormalities.8
Late follow-up MRI revealed a remarkable decrease in the size of orbital infiltrative lesions or the total disappearance of these lesions. Gadolinium enhancement, reflecting the intensity of inflammation, was the first sign to disappear during follow-up.
Case reports and very small series of patients have resulted in descriptions of ophthalmological symptoms such as reduced visual acuity or exophthalmos associated with ECD-ROD, which is often the first clinical manifestation of the disease.10,11,22,27,28 In our study, ophthalmological symptoms (exophthalmos) helped to reveal the disease in only a small proportion of cases. When available, the visual acuity seemed to be generally well preserved (89% had a visual acuity ≥6/10), but no data were available concerning retinal nerve fiber layer thickness/visual field. No isolated lacrimal gland lesions were observed in our series. Furthermore, the extension of lesions towards the cavernous sinus/foramen rotundum was very rare (10% of the infiltrative lesions). This feature may be of use for distinguishing between ECD-ROD and its principal differential diagnoses, such as IgG4-ROD and sarcoidosis. Of note, almost every orbital structure may be involved in IgG4-ROD, lacrimal gland involvement being the most frequent (up to 53-87.7%).29-31 Orbital involvement may be isolated.30,32
Perineural spread along the V1, V2 (into the foramen rotundum) and especially V3 branches (into the foramen ovale) is a specific feature of IgG4-ROD.32 The most common orbital features in neurosarcoidosis include uveitis,33 lacrimal gland involvement (42% and 63%)34,35 and retro-bulbar optic neuritis (63%).
The most recent consensus recommendations15 indicate the performance of brain MRI with gadolinium injection during initial diagnostic investigations. However, these recommendations do not stress the importance of including specific orbital sequences. The results of our study demonstrate the difficulty of diagnosing ECD-ROD and the need for systematic orbital MRI sequences to be included in the initial assessment and follow-up of ECD-associated organ involvement.
The retrospective design of this study was one of its limitations. Furthermore, the rarity of the disease necessitated the collection of data for patients seen over a period of 24 years, to ensure the inclusion of sufficient numbers of patients. These data were, inevitably, incomplete, and the quality of the orbital MRI scans available was highly variable, in terms of both the sequences performed and their resolution. Visual acuity data were available for only 56% of patients, and no data on the visual field or the thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer were available for a substantial number of patients.
In conclusion, ECD-ROD corresponds to an array of lesions, mostly silent, but often resulting in optic nerve signal abnormalities. The initial assessment and subsequent monitoring of ECD-ROD by orbital MRI and ophthalmological follow-up is therefore essential to prevent possible functional handicaps, such as visual field limitation.
- Received December 14, 2021
- Accepted April 12, 2022
No conflicts of interest to disclose.
YG analyzed data, wrote the manuscript and conducted research; JH and NS: designed the study, analyzed data, wrote the manuscript and conducted research; DG, FCA, DD, ZA, TR and VT reviewed the work and contributed to the data analysis. All the authors critically reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors (NS & JH) on reasonable request
- Emile J-F, Abla O, Fraitag S. Revised classification of histiocytoses and neoplasms of the macrophage-dendritic cell lineages. Blood. 2016; 127(22):2672-2681. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-01-690636PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Haroche J, Arnaud L, Cohen-Aubart F. Erdheim-Chester disease. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2014; 16(4):412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-014-0412-0PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mazor RD, Manevich-Mazor M, Shoenfeld Y.. Erdheim-Chester disease: a comprehensive review of the literature. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013; 8:137. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-8-137PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Arnaud L, Hervier B, Néel A. CNS involvement and treatment with interferon-α are independent prognostic factors in Erdheim-Chester disease: a multicenter survival analysis of 53 patients. Blood. 2011; 117(10):2778-2782. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-06-294108PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dion E, Graef C, Miquel A. Bone involvement in Erdheim-Chester disease: imaging findings including periostitis and partial epiphyseal involvement. Radiology. 2006; 238(2):632-639. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2382041525PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Estrada-Veras JI, O’Brien KJ, Boyd LC. The clinical spectrum of Erdheim-Chester disease: an observational cohort study. Blood Adv. 2017; 1(6):357-366. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2016001784PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Veyssier-Belot C, Cacoub P, Caparros-Lefebvre D. Erdheim-Chester disease. Clinical and radiologic characteristics of 59 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). 1996; 75(3):157-169. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005792-199605000-00005PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Drier A, Haroche J, Savatovsky J. Cerebral, facial, and orbital involvement in Erdheim-Chester disease: CT and MR imaging findings. Radiology. 2010; 255(2):586-594. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10090320PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alper MG, Zimmerman LE, Piana FG. Orbital manifestations of Erdheim-Chester disease. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1983; 81:64-85. Google Scholar
- Broccoli A, Stefoni V, Faccioli L. Bilateral orbital Erdheim-Chester disease treated with 12 weekly administrations of VNCOP-B chemotherapy: a case report and a review of literature. Rheumatol Int. 2012; 32(7):2209-2213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-1998-4PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gilles M, Alberti N, Seguy C. [An ophthalmologic diagnostic error leading to a rare systemic diagnosis: Erdheim-Chester disease]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2014; 37(5):377-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2013.09.009PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mamlouk MD, Aboian MS, Glastonbury CM. Case 245: Erdheim-Chester disease. Radiology. 2017; 284(3):910-917. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017141151PubMedGoogle Scholar
- de Abreu MR, Chung CB, Biswal S. Erdheim-Chester disease: MR imaging, anatomic, and histopathologic correlation of orbital involvement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004; 25(4):627-630. Google Scholar
- Sheidow TG, Nicolle DA, Heathcote JG. Erdheim-Chester disease: two cases of orbital involvement. Eye (Lond). 2000; 14(Pt 4):606-612. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2000.151PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goyal G, Heaney ML, Collin M. Erdheim-Chester disease: consensus recommendations for evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment in the molecular era. Blood. 2020; 135(22):1929-1945. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2019003507PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Héran F, Lafitte F.. Chapitre 4 - Pathologie orbitopalpébrale: Exophtalmie. Elsevier Masson. 2018;81-153.e30. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-2-294-75446-3.00004-1Google Scholar
- Fang ZJ, Zhang JY, He WM. CT features of exophthalmos in Chinese subjects with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. Int J Ophthalmol. 2013; 6(2):146-149. Google Scholar
- Grumbine FL, Aderman C, Vagefi MR. Orbital MRI pre- and post-vemurafenib therapy for Erdheim-Chester disease. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 31(6):e169. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000000401PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pineles SL, Liu GT, Acebes X. Presence of Erdheim-Chester disease and Langerhans cell histiocytosis in the same patient: a report of 2 cases. J Neuroophthalmol. 2011; 31(3):217-223. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0b013e31820a204ePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lau WW, Chan E, Chan CW. Orbital involvement in Erdheim-Chester disease. Hong Kong Med J. 2007; 13(3):238-240. Google Scholar
- Perić P, Antić B, Knezević-Usaj S. Successful treatment with cladribine of Erdheim-Chester disease with orbital and central nervous system involvement developing after treatment of Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2016; 73(1):83-87. https://doi.org/10.2298/VSP140915037PPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abdellateef EE, Abdelhai AR, Gawish HH. The first reported case of Erdheim-Chester disease in Egypt with bilateral exophthalmos, loss of vision, and multi-organ involvement in a young woman. Am J Case Rep. 2016; 17:360-370. https://doi.org/10.12659/AJCR.897479PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mombaerts I, Bilyk JR, Rose GE. Consensus on diagnostic criteria of idiopathic orbital inflammation using a modified Delphi approach. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017; 135(7):769-776. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.1581PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rosiene J, Liu X, Imielinska C. Structure-function relationships in the human visual system using DTI, fMRI and visual field testing: pre- and post-operative assessments in patients with anterior visual pathway compression. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006; 119:464-466. Google Scholar
- Ryu WHA, Starreveld Y, Burton JM. The utility of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing patients with pituitary tumors compressing the anterior visual pathway. J Neuroophthalmol. 2017; 37(3):230-238. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0000000000000408PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Danesh-Meyer HV, Yoon JJ, Lawlor M. Visual loss and recovery in chiasmal compression. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2019; 73:100765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2019.06.001PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pichi F. Choroidal mass as the first presentation of Erdheim-Chester disease. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2019; 16:100539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2019.100539PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Valmaggia C, Neuweiler J, Fretz C. A case of Erdheim-Chester disease with orbital involvement. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997; 115(11):1467-1468. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1997.01100160637021PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shor N, Sené T, Zuber J. Discriminating between IgG4-related orbital disease and other causes of orbital inflammation with intra voxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MR imaging at 3T. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2021; 102(12):727-734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2021.06.006PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tiegs-Heiden CA, Eckel LJ, Hunt CH. Immunoglobulin G4-related disease of the orbit: imaging features in 27 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014; 35(7):1393-1397. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3865PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sogabe Y, Ohshima K, Azumi A. Location and frequency of lesions in patients with IgG4-related ophthalmic diseases. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014; 252(3):531-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-013-2548-4PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ben Soussan J, Deschamps R, Sadik JC. Infraorbital nerve involvement on magnetic resonance imaging in European patients with IgG4-related ophthalmic disease: a specific sign. Eur Radiol. 2017; 27(4):1335-1343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4481-5PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lutt JR, Lim LL, Phal PM. Orbital inflammatory disease. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 37(4):207-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2007.06.003PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Prabhakaran VC, Saeed P, Esmaeli B. Orbital and adnexal sarcoidosis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007; 125(12):1657-1662. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.125.12.1657PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Demirci H, Christianson MD. Orbital and adnexal involvement in sarcoidosis: analysis of clinical features and systemic disease in 30 cases. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011; 151(6):1074-1080.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2010.12.011PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leclercq M, Sené T, Chapelon-Abric C. Prognosis factors and outcomes of neuro-ophthalmologic sarcoidosis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2020; 9:1-8. Google Scholar
Figures & Tables
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.