For patients with optimally treated chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy can lead to treatment-free remission. In previous trials, TKI discontinuation has been associated with increased musculoskeletal pain in some patients (“withdrawal syndrome”), based on physician-reported adverse events (AE). Patient-reported pain has not been described. The Life After Stopping TKI study was a 14-site prospective, non-randomized clinical trial of TKI discontinuation. We defined increased pain after discontinuation as: (i) a physician-reported pain AE, (ii) a 2-level increase in self-reported musculoskeletal pain (4-level single item), or (iii) initiation of a medication for pain. We plotted the trajectory of patient-reported pain over time using a piecewise mixed-effects ordinal logistic model. Within 3 months of discontinuation, 35 of 172 patients (20.3%) had a physician-reported pain AE, 22 of 172 (12.8%) had an increase in self-reported pain, and 18 of 154 (11.7%) initiated a pain medication. Agreement among these measures was limited; overall, 60 of 172 patients (34.9%) had increased pain. Three patients (1.7%) restarted a TKI because of pain. The modelpredicted trajectory showed an increase in pain in the first 3 months followed by a decrease, returning to baseline levels by 6 months and further decreasing after that. This trajectory was similar among patients who did and did not restart TKI, suggesting that resuming a TKI for withdrawal syndrome may be necessary for some, but other approaches to manage pain should be tried so that patients can remain in treatment-free remission when possible.
Compared to other treatments for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are highly effective1 and less toxic.2,3 However, they are still associated with side effects, particularly fatigue and gastrointestinal symptoms.4 Moreover, TKI may be cost-prohibitive for patients, leading to non-adherence.5 For select patients who achieve a sustained deep molecular response, TKI discontinuation may lead to treatment-free remission (TFR), effectively a “cure” for CML.6 In TKI discontinuation trials, 32-67% of patients sustained TFR.7-1 6 For patients without sustained TFR, restarting TKI therapy was effective in restoring stable remission, including return to deep molecular response. TKI discontinuation is hypothesized to improve patient-reported symptoms and functioning, and this was recently demonstrated in the US Life After Stopping TKI (LAST) study.16,17 However, previous trials found that TKI discontinuation was unexpectedly associated with increased musculoskeletal pain for some patients, which has been called “TKI withdrawal syndrome”. In these previous trials, physician-reported adverse events (AE) related to musculoskeletal pain were reported for anywhere from 10-50% of patients.18
Uncertainty about the extent of increased musculoskeletal pain associated with TKI discontinuation is compounded by the reliance on physician-reported AE. Studies with patients with solid tumor cancers have documented generally poor-to-moderate agreement between physician and patient reports of pain.19 A previous study in CML assessed physician-patient agreement on nine symptoms and found 44% agreement for musculoskeletal pain, with physicians underestimating patient musculoskeletal pain for 42% of patients and overestimating it for 14% of patients.20 To our knowledge, no previous studies have described patient-reported musculoskeletal pain after TKI discontinuation. Herein we describe physician-reported pain-related AE and patientreported musculoskeletal pain, as well as their overlap, in the context of the LAST study.
LAST was a 14-site, single-arm, prospective longitudinal TFR study. Eligible patients had chronic-phase CML, were aged ≥18 years, and receiving imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, or bosutinib for ≥3 years with continuous documented BCR-ABL <0.01% International Standardized by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) for ≥2 years. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of each participating institution, and all patients provided written informed consent. Additional methodological details are included in the Online Supplementary Appendix and have previously been published.21
Physician-reported adverse events
AE were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. We defined painrelated AE as any grade AE that was reported after TKI discontinuation using toxicity group “musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders”.
In order to measure musculoskeletal pain, we used a single item with four response options from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CML24 that asks about aches or pains in muscles or joints. We assessed how much pain affected daily life using the PROMIS® Pain Interference computerized adaptive test.22
On the 3-month PRO assessment for those in TFR (off TKI), we asked patients about changes in medications since TKI discontinuation, including whether they had started any new prescription or over-the-counter medications. For any “yes” responses, patients were asked to name the medication. These responses were coded by a physician (EA) to determine whether they were related to pain. We included analgesics, anti-inflammatory medications, and muscle relaxants.
We summarized the different measures of pain using frequencies and percentages. Patients were classified as having an indicator of increased pain after stopping TKI if they had any of the following within 3 months of stopping: (i) physician-reported pain AE, (ii) a ≥ 2 level increase from their previous assessment in self-reported musculoskeletal pain, or (3) initiation of a medication for pain (while a 1 category change may reflect meaningful change, because of uncertainty around what to consider a meaningful change on this single item, for subsequent analyses we selected the ≥ 2 category increase to be conservative.) Characteristics of patients who did and did not have increased pain within 3 months were compared using Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous or ordinal categorical variables and c2 tests for categorical variables. Among patients with increased pain within 3 months, we plotted the distribution of responses over time for self-reported musculoskeletal pain and for PROMIS Pain Interference scores. In order to better account for missing data, we also plotted the predicted trajectory of pain using piece-wise mixed-effects ordinal logistic (EORTC QLQ-CML24 item on musculoskeletal pain) and a piecewise mixed-effects ordinal logistic regression model (EORTC QLQCML24 item on musculoskeletal pain) and a piecewise mixed-effects linear regression model (PROMIS Pain Interference) that allowed the slope to differ before and after the 3-month visit. Random intercepts and slopes were included in models to allow the trajectories to differ among individual patients. For time points after 6 months, we computed the percentage of patients with no or mild pain. We used a 2-tailed significance level of α=0.05 for all assessments. Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
From 12/2014 to 12/2016, 173 patients from 14 US centers were enrolled, of whom 172 had evaluable data. Median duration of TKI therapy prior to study enrollment was about 7 years (Table 1), similar to other studies.8,9,23
Indicators of increased pain within 3 months afer TKI discontinuation
Physician-reported pain-related adverse events
Cumulatively, 35 patients (20.4%) had physician-reported pain-related AE in the first 3 months (Table 2), with most happening within the first month. One month after TKI discontinuation, physicians reported pain-related AE for 26 patients (15.1%). At 2 months, physicians reported pain-related AE for 11 patients (6.4%), and at 3 months it was five patients (2.9%). For most patients, the maximum pain grade was mild (Table 3). While our study focused on increased pain within 3 months, ten additional patients (5.8%) had pain-related AE reported at time points later than 3 months, for a total of 45 patients (26%) who had a pain-related AE after TKI discontinuation.
We previously reported that for patients in the LAST study, baseline pain interference scores were the same as the average in the US general population (score of 50).13 Regarding musculoskeletal pain specifically, the majority of patients (77.8%) reported some musculoskeletal pain before TKI discontinuation. At baseline, 38 patients (22.2%) reported no musculoskeletal pain, 60 patients (35.1%) reported a little bit, 43 patients (25.2%) reported quite a bit, and 30 patients (17.5%) reported very much (1 missing response at baseline). Within the first 3 months after TKI discontinuation, the worst musculoskeletal pain rating reported by patients was “a little bit” for 43 patients (25%), “quite a bit” for 64 patients (37.2%), and “very much” for 57 patients (33.1%). Eight patients (4.7%) consistently reported no musculoskeletal pain between baseline and 3 months, while 62% of patients reported a ≥ 1 category increase in musculoskeletal pain, and 13% reported a ≥ 2 category increase in pain (Table 2).
Initiation of medications for pain
At 3 months, of the 154 patients who reported on changes in medications, 18 patients (11.7%) reported adding a medication for pain, including eight (5.2%) who started an over-the-counter medication and 11 (7.1%) who started a prescription medication; one patient reported starting both over-the-counter and prescription medications for pain.
Agreement among indicators of increased pain
Agreement between physician-reported pain-related AE and patient-reported pain varied depending on the threshold considered for increase in patient-reported pain (Table 2; Online Supplementary Table S1). There was slightly better agreement between patients and physicians regarding the presence of increased pain using a ≥ 1 level increase (14%) compared to considering a ≥ 2 level increase (4%); however, there was also worse agreement regarding the absence of increased pain (31% agreement for a ≥ 1 level increase vs. 71% for a ≥ 2 level increase), resulting in a better overall agreement for a ≥ 2 level increase (75%) compared to a ≥ 1 level increase (45%). The cross-tabulation of AE grade and patient-reported increase in musculoskeletal pain is shown in Table 3. Although physicians and patients reported the symptoms using different methodologies and scales, Table 3 suggests that physicians’ ratings reflect under-reporting (values in the upper right cells) more than over-reporting (values in the lower left cells).
Using the ≥ 2 level increase in patient-reported pain, 45 patients (26%) had a single indicator of increased pain (AE, increase on PRO measure, or reported new medication), and 15 patients (9%) had more than one indicator of increased pain, for a total of 60 patients (35%) who had strong evidence of increased pain within 3 months after TKI discontinuation.
Characteristics of patients experiencing increased pain afer stopping tyrosine kinase inhibitors
There were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics of patients who did and did not have increased pain within 3 months (Table 1), including age or the particular TKI the patient had been taking prior to discontinuation. Of the 60 patients with evidence of increased pain within 3 months, at 4 years of follow-up, 40 (66.7%) had molecular relapse-free survival and 37 (61.7%) had sustained TFR, similar to the rates for patients who did not have increased pain within 3 months (64.0% molecular relapse-free survival and 60.4% TFR, Online Supplementary Figure S1).
Trajectories of pain afer stopping tyrosine kinase inhibitors
Self-reported musculoskeletal pain
Figure 1 displays the distribution of self-reported musculoskeletal pain over time by TFR, among patients who had an indicator of increased pain after TKI discontinuation.
The black line represents the best estimated pain trajectory for patients who experienced an increase in pain after TKI discontinuation. Both the observed (blue) line and the model-adjusted (black) line (which accounts for missing data) show an average increase in pain in the first 3 months that then decreases over time, returning to the baseline level by 6 months and further decreasing after that. Importantly, by 12 months, half of patients on TKI as well as more than half of patients off TKI reported little-to-no musculoskeletal pain (Figure 2). By 24 months this had increased to about three-quarters of patients who reported little-to-no pain.
PROMIS pain interference
Figure 3 displays the distribution of pain interference scores over time by TFR, among patients who had an indicator of increased pain after TKI discontinuation. As with the single musculoskeletal pain item, there was an increase in pain interference after TKI discontinuation that peaked at 3 months and then decreased again. By 12 months, more than half of patients on TKI as well as three-quarters of patients off TKI reported little-to-no pain interference (Figure 2).
Restarting TKI because of pain
Three patients (1.7%) restarted a TKI due to withdrawal syndrome of pain. All three patients had physician-reported pain-related AE by 3 months and none reported starting a new medication for pain. The observed trajectories of patient-reported pain for these patients are shown in Figure 4. All demonstrate an increase in pain or sustained high level of pain after TKI discontinuation, followed by a decrease in patient-reported pain after restarting a TKI. They also show variation in patient-reported pain scores during both periods (on and off TKI). These patients restarted a TKI at 3 months, 7 months, and 12 months.
In this large, multi-center trial, 26% of patients had a physician-reported pain-related AE, in line with the 10-50% with physician-reported pain-related AE in previous studies.18 When including patient-reported indicators of increased pain, 35-72% of patients had increased pain in the first 3 months after TKI discontinuation. We did not observe differences in pain after TKI discontinuation by type of TKI.
An important question for patients who experience increased pain after TKI discontinuation is whether resumption of a TKI will reduce pain more effectively than remaining off the TKI. Our data provide some insight into this question, because the 60 patients who experienced increased pain within 3 months of discontinuation included patients who did and did not restart a TKI. Almost all who restarted a TKI did so because of disease recurrence. We found that trajectories of musculoskeletal pain and pain interference showed similar patterns of improvement among patients who did and did not restart a TKI. Furthermore, the percentage of patients with well-controlled pain was similar for both groups of patients, suggesting that for patients who have increased pain after TKI discontinuation, pain should decrease again over time. The three patients who resumed a TKI because of increased pain evidenced similar trajectories of pain as the other patients who remained off TKI or restarted because of recurrence. Together, these data suggest that many patients in TFR who experience an increase in pain after stopping TKIs are likely to experience reductions in pain over time without having to restart a TKI. Whereas resuming a TKI may be necessary for some, other approaches to manage pain should be tried so that patients can remain in TFR when possible.
In previous studies, correlations between clinician-reported symptomatic AE and PRO measures have been shown to be moderate at best.19 In the LAST study, we also found moderate agreement. Over 60% of LAST patients reported any increase in musculoskeletal pain in the first 3 months after TKI discontinuation, while 13% of patients reported a 2- or 3-level increase in musculoskeletal pain, and 12% added a medication for pain relief. Using the threshold of a ≥ 2 level increase, there was an overall agreement of 75% between patients and physicians, with the data suggesting physicians reported fewer pain increases and less severe pain increases than patients did. There are a few possible explanations for discrepancies in patient and physician reports. First, patients have direct access to their own pain, whereas physicians have indirect access through observation and conversation with the patient. Second, patient reports and physician AE reports were made on different measurement scales. Third, physicians reported on pain that emerged after TKI discontinuation whereas changes in self-reported pain were based on repeated assessments of pain, reported using a recall period of 7 days.
It is important to consider these findings in the context of previously published findings from the LAST study. The majority of patients reported improvements in fatigue and diarhea16 and in social functioning,24 but there were no corresponding improvements in physical function,24 which may seem surprising.25 One hypothesis for this is that while reduced fatigue and diarrhea may be sufficient to improve someone’s ability to participate in social roles and activities, it may not be enough to increase their physical function without a concerted effort to increase physical activity. Interventions to increase physical activity have been successful in many other oncologic settings.26,27 TKI discontinuation may represent an opportunity to encourage patients to increase their physical activity, taking advantage of the expected improvement in symptoms. This may also serve to mitigate the potential increase in musculoskeletal pain.
LAST patients were representative of the current TKI prescribing patterns in the US, with 59% of patients receiving imatinib.23 The rate of molecular recurrence in LAST was similar to other studies.24 That said, our sample was drawn from academic medical centers and may not be representative of all patients treated for CML. Self-reported musculoskeletal pain was measured using a single item that might have had limited precision, though the pain trajectory over time was very similar to the multi-item PROMIS Pain Interference assessment. Patients self-reported the changes in prescription and over-the-counter medications at 3 months after TKI discontinuation; we did not verify prescriptions. Finally, this was a group of patients who had been on therapy for nearly 7 years, so they were most likely to have been tolerating their medications well. Assessing the benefits of TKI discontinuation with regard to musculoskeletal pain is complicated. In the initial few months, the benefit of TKI discontinuation may be masked by the onset of TKI withdrawal syndrome. Our study has demonstrated that musculoskeletal pain improves with time after TKI discontinuation. For patients who experience increased pain, behavioral or cognitive approaches to managing musculoskeletal pain should be considered. In addition, given that TFR is associated with decreased fatigue, increased physical activity to improve musculoskeletal symptoms may be an effective modality to decrease pain. Finally, the use of analgesics and/or anti-inflammatory pain medication may help control pain. Additional studies to elucidate the mechanism of increased joint pain are warranted.
- Received November 17, 2021
- Accepted April 22, 2022
KEF reports receiving personal fees from Inhibikase and Pfizer and grants to her institution from Novartis outside the submitted work. EA reports receiving personal fees from Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Takeda and grants to his institution from Novartis and Takeda outside the submitted work. NPS reports receiving funding to his institution from Bristol-Myers Squibb outside the submitted work. JPR reports receiving personal fees from Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, Amgen, Cepheid, Bio-Rad, Adaptive, and SeaGen outside the submitted work. JP-I reports receiving personal fees from Janssen, AbbVie, Astra-Zeneca, Novartis, Pfizer, and Takeda outside the submitted work. VK reports receiving personal fees from Novartis and Pfizer outside the submitted work. RAL reports receiving grants and personal fees from Novartis and Celgene; personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, Amgen, CVS/Caremark, Epizyme, AstraZeneca, and Agios; and grants from Forty Seven, Rafael Pharmaceuticals, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, and Cellectis, outside the submitted work; in addition, RAL had a patent to UptoDate Inc with royalties paid. JET reports receiving grants from Novartis and Bristol Myers Squibb outside the submitted work. VGO reports receiving personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, Novartis and Pfizer outside the submitted work. MJM reports personal fees and research funding from Novartis Oncology and Bristol Myers Squibb; personal fees from Takeda and Pfizer; and research funding from Sun Pharma/SPARC outside the submitted work. JC reports grants to his institution and personal fees from Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma and Takeda; and grants from BMS outside the submit work. No other disclosures were reported.
KEF, EA and KPW developed the concept and design of the study; all authors acquired and interpreted data; KEF, LL and KPW performed statistical analysis; KEF, EA, LL and KPW drafted the manuscript; all authors critically revised the manuscript; KEF and EA obtained funding.
The data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly due to the privacy of individuals that participated in the study. The data will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.
This study was supported by grant R01 CA184798 from the National Cancer Institute. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the ofcial views of the National Cancer Institute.
- Bower H, Bjorkholm M, Dickman PW, Hoglund M, Lambert PC, Andersson TM. Life expectancy of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia approaches the life expectancy of the general population. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34(24):2851-2857. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.66.2866PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hahn EA, Glendenning GA, Sorensen MV. Quality of life in patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia on imatinib versus interferon alfa plus low-dose cytarabine: results from the IRIS Study. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21(11):2138-2146. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2003.12.154PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Druker BJ, Guilhot F, O'Brien SG. Five-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355(23):2408-2417. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa062867PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Efficace F, Cardoni A, Cottone F, Vignetti M, Mandelli F.. Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors and patient-reported outcomes in chronic myeloid leukemia: a systematic review. Leuk Res. 2013; 37(2):206-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2012.10.021PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Winn AN, Keating NL, Dusetzina SB. Factors associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor initiation and adherence among medicare meneficiaries with chronic myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34(36):4323-4328. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.67.4184PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Flynn KE, Mauro MJ, George G. Patients' perspectives on the definition of cure in chronic myeloid leukemia. Leuk Res. 2019; 80:40-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2019.03.007PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mahon FX, Rea D, Guilhot J. Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia who have maintained complete molecular remission for at least 2 years: the prospective, multicentre Stop Imatinib (STIM) trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010; 11(11):1029-1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70233-3Google Scholar
- Etienne G, Guilhot J, Rea D. Long-term follow-up of the french stop imatinib (STIM1) study in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35(3):298-305. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.68.2914PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ross DM, Branford S, Seymour JF. Safety and efficacy of imatinib cessation for CML patients with stable undetectable minimal residual disease: results from the TWISTER study. Blood. 2013; 122(4):515-522. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-02-483750PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rousselot P, Charbonnier A, Cony-Makhoul P. Loss of major molecular response as a trigger for restarting tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in patients with chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia who have stopped imatinib after durable undetectable disease. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32(5):424-430. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.48.5797PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mahon F-X, Rea D, Guilhot J. Long term follow-up after imatinib cessation for patients indeep molecular response: the update results of the STIM1 study. Blood. 2013; 122(21):255. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V18.104.22.168Google Scholar
- Rea D, Rousselot P, Guilhot Fo. Discontinuation of second generation (2G) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in chronic phase (CP)-chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients with stable undetectable BCR-ABL transcripts. Blood. 2012; 120(21):916. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V120.21.916.916Google Scholar
- Oh YJ, Choi SY, Lee S-E. Results from the Korean Imatinib discontinuation study (KIDS): updated data with 14-month median follow up. Blood. 2013; 122(21):4003. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V122.21.4003.4003Google Scholar
- Zang DY, Lee WS, Mun Y-C. Long-term follow-up after treatment discontinuation in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: the Korean Imatinib Discontinuation (KID) study. Blood. 2018; 132(Suppl 1):S4252. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-99-118026Google Scholar
- Mahon F-X, Nicolini FE, Noël M-P. Preliminary report of the STIM2 study: a multicenter stop imatinib trial for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia de novo patients on imatinib. Blood. 2013; 122(21):654. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V122.21.654.654Google Scholar
- Atallah E, Schiffer CA, Radich JP. Assessment of outcomes after stopping tyrosine kinase inhibitors among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: a nonrandomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021; 7(1):42-50. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.5774PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Schoenbeck KL, Atallah E, Lin L. Patient-reported functional outcomes in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia after stopping tyrosine kinase inhibitors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022; 114(1):160-164. Google Scholar
- Kota V, Atallah E.. Musculoskeletal pain in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia after tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy cessation. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019; 19(8):480-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2019.05.007PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Atkinson TM, Ryan SJ, Bennett AV. The association between clinician-based common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO): a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2016; 24(8):3669-3676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3297-9PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Efficace F, Rosti G, Aaronson N. Patient- versus physician-reporting of symptoms and health status in chronic myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 2014; 99(4):788-793. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2013.093724PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Atallah E, Schiffer CA, Weinfurt KP. Design and rationale for the life after stopping tyrosine kinase inhibitors (LAST) study, a prospective, single-group longitudinal study in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. BMC Cancer. 2018; 18(1):359. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4273-1PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Cella D, Riley W, Stone A. The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. J Clinl Epidemiol. 2010; 63(11):1179-1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Saussele S, Richter J, Guilhot J. Discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in chronic myeloid leukaemia (EURO-SKI): a prespecified interim analysis of a prospective, multicentre, non-randomised, trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018; 19(6):747-757. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30192-XGoogle Scholar
- Schoenbeck KL, Atallah E, Lin L. Patient-reported functional outcomes in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia after stopping tyrosine kinase inhibitors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022; 114(1):160-164. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djab184PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Efficace F, Baccarani M.. Quality of life improvements in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia after stopping long-term therapy: who can benefit the most?. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022; 114(1):9-11. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djab185PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kiss N, Baguley BJ, Ball K. Technology-supported self-guided nutrition and physical activity interventions for adults with cancer: systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019; 7(2):e12281. https://doi.org/10.2196/12281PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Stout NL, Baima J, Swisher AK, Winters-Stone KM, Welsh J.. A systematic review of exercise systematic reviews in the cancer literature (2005-2017). PM&R. 2017; 9(9):S347-S384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.07.074PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Figures & Tables
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.