Primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (pcALCL), a hematological neoplasm caused by skin-homing CD30+ malignant T cells, is part of the spectrum of primary cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders. To date, only a small number of molecular alterations have been described in pcALCL and, so far, no clear unifying theme that could explain the pathogenetic origin of the disease has emerged among patients. In order to clarify the pathogenetic basis of pcALCL, we performed high-resolution genetic profiling (genome/transcriptome) of this lymphoma (n=12) by using whole-genome sequencing, whole-exome sequencing and RNA sequencing. Our study, which uncovered novel genomic rearrangements, copy number alterations and small-scale mutations underlying this malignancy, revealed that the cell cycle, T-cell physiology regulation, transcription and signaling via the PI-3-K, MAPK and G-protein pathways are cellular processes commonly impacted by molecular alterations in patients with pcALCL. Recurrent events affecting cancer-associated genes included deletion of PRDM1 and TNFRSF14, gain of EZH2 and TNFRSF8, small-scale mutations in LRP1B, PDPK1 and PIK3R1 and rearrangements involving GPS2, LINC-PINT and TNK1. Consistent with the genomic data, transcriptome analysis uncovered upregulation of signal transduction routes associated with the PI-3-K, MAPK and G-protein pathways (e.g., ERK, phospholipase C, AKT). Our molecular findings suggest that inhibition of proliferation-promoting pathways altered in pcALCL (particularly PI-3-K/AKT signaling) should be explored as potential alternative therapy for patients with this lymphoma, especially, for cases that do not respond to first-line skin-directed therapies or with extracutaneous disease.
Primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (pcALCL) is a hematologic neoplasm produced by malignant CD30+ large T cells that infiltrate the skin forming solitary or localized tumors.1,2 pcALCL is largely an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-negative lymphoma with only ~2% of ALK positive (ALK+) cases.3 Patients with pcALCL have a favorable prognosis with a 5-year survival of 90%; yet, a minority of patients (~10% of cases) develop extracutaneous dissemination with a more aggressive
Unlike systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL), which appears to be driven by a variety of genetic alterations that overactivate STAT3 signaling,5-9 the pathogenetic basis of pcALCL has remained elusive. Previous studies using cytogenetic techniques, array-based platforms (DNA, RNA and miRNA) and whole-exome sequencing (WES) have only identified a few recurrent molecular alterations in this lymphoma;10 thus, genetic abnormalities underlying pcALCL are still largely unknown.
Chromosomal rearrangements involving ALK, DUSP22, TP63 and TYK2, common in sALCL, have also been detected in pcALCL, albeit at much lower frequencies.3,10 Frequent copy number alterations (CNA) include losses within chromosomes 6 and 13 and gains within chromosomes 7 and 17.11,12 Overexpressed genes with potential pathogenic and/or diagnostic relevance include EZH2 and IRF4.11,13,14 Oncomir miR-155, which is associated with other cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) variants, is over-expressed in pcALCL too.15,16 Finally, single nucleotide variants (SNV) presumed to be pathogenic have been reported in JAK1, MSC and STAT3 in a few cases.6,9
Given the lack of a clear unifying theme between the few reported molecular alterations in the disease, we performed a genome-wide analysis (genome/transcriptome) of pcALCL using whole-genome sequencing (WGS), WES and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to investigate genetic defects underlying this neoplasm. Our data show that molecular alterations in genes involved in the regulation of the cell cycle, T-cell physiology, transcription and signaling via the PI-3-K, MAPK and G-protein pathways underlie pcALCL. Hence, the inhibition of proliferation-promoting pathways operative in pcALCL (especially PI-3-K/AKT signaling) could be explored as an alternative therapy for pcALCL, in particular, for patients who do not respond to skin-directed therapies or with extracutaneous dissemination.
Patient selection and sequencing
Frozen tumor biopsies (≥75% tumor cells) from 12 patients with (ALK–) pcALCL (Online Supplementary Figure S1,; Online Supplementary Table S1) were subjected to WGS and RNA-seq. Seven matched tumor/germline (granulocytes) samples from this cohort (i.e., cAL2-5/9-11) were additionally subjected to WES. Details of sequencing, data processing and DNA/RNA analyses are provided in the Online Supplementary Appendix (Online Supplementary Figures S2 to S4; Online Supplementary Tables S2 to S18). Diagnosis was performed by an expert panel of pathologists and dermatologists according to the criteria of the World Health Organization-European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (WHO-EORTC) classification for primary cutaneous lymphomas. Patient material was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Leiden University Medical Center. Informed consent was obtained from patients in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Validation of genetic alterations and differentially expressed genes
Select rearrangements and SNV were validated by Sanger sequencing. Target sequences were polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplified, run on a 1% agarose gel, column-purified and sequenced on the Applied Biosystems ABI3730xl platform (Applied Biosystems) (Online Supplementary Figures S5 and S6). Select CNA were validated by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) using QX200 ddPCR system (Bio-Rad) following the manufacturer's guidelines. In short, genomic DNA (20-40 ng) was mixed with a frequent-cutting restriction enzyme, ddPCR supermix and probes against the target/reference genes (FAM/HEX-labeled, respectively). The reaction mix was partitioned into 20,000 nanodroplets and PCR-amplified. FAM/HEX fluorescence was measured with Bio-Rad QX200 droplet reader. Copy number values were determined using Bio-Rad Quantasoft software v1.7.4. (Online Supplementary Table S19). Select differentially expressed (DE) genes were validated by reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) as described by van Doorn et al.17
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor sections from sequenced patients with available tissue material (i.e., cAL3-4/7-12) were immunohistochemically stained with primary antibodies against phospho-AKT (Abcam, Cat. No. ab38449) and phospho-STAT3 (Cell Signaling Technology, Cat. No. 9145) following the manufacturer’s intructions, counterstained in Mayer’s Hematoxylin solution and coverslipped using DPX-mountant (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat. No. 06522).
Landscape of genomic rearrangements
The landscape of rearrangements of pcALCL showed considerable inter-patient heterogeneity. The number of rearrangements varied from one to 51 per patient (205 total events; mean/patient ± standard deviation [SD], 17 ± 17) (Figures 1 and 2A). Sixty-one percent of events were intrachromosomal (range/patient, 0–100%) (Figure 2B). We identified events fusing two annotated genes (30%), a gene with a non-genic region (42%), two non-genic regions (25%) or reordering sequences within a single gene (3%). Ten percent of rearrangements led to the expression of fusion transcripts (mean fusions/patient, 1.6; range, 0–4 fusions/patient) (Figure 2C). Complex rearrangements involving chromosome 3 and 7 were observed in patients cAL8 and cAL1, respectively (Online Supplementary Figure S7).
We detected a total of 166 rearranged genes in our cohort (Online Supplementary Table S8), including a subset of 44 genes implicated in cancer (Figure 1; Online Supplementary Table S8). The vast majority of events were patient-specific. DUSP22 and TP63 rearrangements, reported in pcALCL before,10 were found in single cases (Online Supplementary Figure S6). Gene ontology annotation with DAVID revealed that rearranged genes were involved in multiple cellular processes/pathways, several of which have relevant roles in cancer onset and progression (e.g., transcription, cell cycle, chromatin modification, MAPK pathway) (Figure 2D; Online Supplementary Table S7). Analysis of rearranged genes with NCG 6.0 uncovered cancer genes principally associated with three cellular processes/pathways: the cell cycle (i.e., FMN2, FOXM1, HORMAD1, KMT2E, LINC-PINT, NUMA1, TP53, TP63, USP7), signaling via the PI-3-K and MAPK pathways (i.e., DGKI, ERBB2IP, GPS2, GRM8, MAP3K20, MET, PIK3C2B, PPM1L, PTPRK, TNK1) and the regulation of RNA expression/processing (i.e., ETS1, RBFOX1, TRERF1, ZNF208, ZNF28) (Online Supplementary Figure S6).
A group of five genes were found to be recurrently rearranged in pcALCL: GPS2 (2 patients), LINC-PINT (3 patients), RBFOX1 (2 patients), TNK1 (2 patients) and VPS13D (2 patients). Notably, four of five of these genes encode products with roles in the cell cycle, transcription or signaling. LINC-PINT is a long non-coding RNA that acts as a TP53-dependent regulator of the cell cycle and a PRC2-dependent silencer of gene expression.18 RBFOX1 is an RNA-binding protein that regulates alternative splicing.19 GPS2 and TNK1 are negative regulators of RAS/JNK1 and RAS/RAF1 signaling, respectively.20,21
Since deregulated RAS-MAPK signaling is a frequent driver of human cancers, we looked at potential detrimental effects of the rearrangements on the expression of GPS2 and TNK1. The expression data confirmed that both genes were functionally compromised in the affected patients. For instance, patient cAL4 expressed a truncated GPS2-CHD3 transcript which rendered both fusion partners dysfunctional (Figure 2E, F). Similarly, patient cAL3 expressed a transcript encoding a truncated form of TNK1 which was structurally analogous to a variant with proven oncogenic activity reported in Hodgkin lymphoma (Figure 2G, H).22
Landscape of copy number alterations
pcALCL displayed a predominance of large numerical imbalances which included losses within 3q, 6q, 7p, 7q, 8p, 13q, and 16q as well as loss of chromosome Y. Also, gains within 1q, 2p, 2q, 7q and 12q (Figures 3A and 4). Our analysis detected 15 focal (≤ 3Mb) minimal common regions (MCR) between CNA found in our patients (9 deletions, 6 gains), six of which enclosed (putative) cancer genes (Figure 4; Online Supplementary Table S6). Half of these genes participate in the regulation of T-cell physiology.
Deletion at 6q21, observed in six of 12 patients, was the most recurrent focal MCR in pcALCL. This region contained tumor suppressor PRDM1 (BLIMP1) (Figure 3B, C), which encodes a transcription factor that attenuates the proliferation and survival of T cells through suppression of IL-2 signaling.23 Three of 12 patients had deletions at 13q32.2 which enclosed STK24 (Figure 3D). This gene encodes a proapoptotic serine/threonine kinase that modulates phosphorylation of JNK and p38 kinases in response to stress stimuli.24 Two of 12 patients had deletions at 1p36.32 and 16p13.3, which encompassed TNFRSF14 (HVEM) and RBFOX1, respectively. TNFRSF14 is a multifaceted receptor capable of sending stimulatory or inhibitory signals to T cells depending on the ligand it binds.25 Of note, loss of TNFRSF14 has been reported in pcALCL before.12
In addition, focal (≤ 3Mb) gains at 1p36.22 and 2p15 were observed in two and three of 12 patients, respectively. The former contained TNFRSF8 which encodes receptor CD30 (Figure 3D), whose overexpression is a hallmark of pcALCL. The latter enclosed XPO1, a gene that encodes a protein involved in the export of a plethora of proteins and RNA from the nucleus to the cytoplasm.26 Furthermore, six of 12 patients had gains at 7q36.1 (MCR ~ 6 Mb), which contained EZH2, the catalytic subunit of gene silencing complex PRC2 (Figure 3D).
Landscape of small-scale mutations and mutational signatures
In order to detect somatic small-scale mutations (indels, SNV) in pcALCL, we performed WES on matched tumor/germline samples from seven patients. The number of somatic indels/SNV ranged from 44 to 246 (653 total events; mean/patient ± SD, 93 ± 70). The average somatic mutation rate was 15.8 mutations/Mb (range/patient, 9.2– 38.6 mutations/Mb). The majority of small-scale mutations were missense SNV (Figure 5A; Online Supplementary Table S9). The most frequent base substitution was C>T (mean/cohort, 56.2%), (Figure 5B), which was attributable to ultraviolet (UV) light exposure and aging-associated spontaneous deamination of 5-methylcytosine. DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair deficiency and activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID)-mediated somatic hypermutation were smaller contributors to the mutational landscape (Figure 5C). A total of 603 genes were found to carry somatic mutations across seven patients, 158 of which were genes associated with cancer (134 candidate cancer genes, 24 bona fide oncogenes/tumor suppressors) (Online Supplementary Table S11). All small-scale mutations were patient-specific. Gene set analysis of mutated genes with Panther identified enrichment of genes involved in signaling mediated by G-proteins (β-adrenergic receptors, glutamate receptors, etc.) and PI-3-K signaling (Figure 5D; Online Supplementary Table S12). Analysis of mutated genes with NCG 6.0 database revealed a group of cancer genes with established roles in chromatin modification (i.e., ARID1B, BCOR, KDM5A, PRDM16, TRRAP), hematopoiesis (i.e., FLT3, FSTL3 and GATA2), signaling via the PI-3-K and MAPK pathways (i.e., ERBB4, MAP3K1, PDPK1, PIK3R1, RET and WNK2) and G-protein signaling (i.e., CREB3L1, DRD5, RGS7 and RGS12). Of note, although JAK-STAT mutations leading to STAT3 overactivation are common in sALCL, no mutations in JAK-STAT pathway genes were found in our pcALCL patients.
We identified a group of 30 recurrently mutated genes (npatients=2-5) in our cohort (Online Supplementary Table S10), which included (putative) oncogenes (i.e., CDK14, CNOT1, LRP2, PDPK1) and tumor suppressors (i.e., CSMD1, LRP1B, PIK3R1) (Online Supplementary Figure S5). Within this group, PDPK1 and PIK3R1 were genes of special interest. PDPK1 encodes a master serine/threonine kinase that activates AKT, a kinase with a central role in the PI-3-K/AKT pathway. Two of 12 patients had mutations in the PH domain of PDPK1 (cAL4: p.T518M; cAL10: p.W535L) (Figure 5E and F). In contrast, PIK3R1 encodes the regulatory (inhibitory) subunit of class IA phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI-3-K). Class IA PI-3-K mediate the production of PIP3, a membrane phospholipid that induces PI-3-K/AKT pathway activation by recruiting PDPK1 and AKT to the plasma membrane where AKT activation occurs. Activated AKT triggers downstream signaling events leading to cell proliferation and survival. Two of 12 patients had splice site mutations in PIK3R1 (cAL5: G>T at chr5:68,296,342; cAL9: G>A at chr5:68,293,835) (Figure 5E, F).
Differentially expressed genes and fusion transcripts
Given the fact that the CD4+ T-cell subset giving rise to pcALCL is unknown at present, we compared gene expression in pcALCL with gene expression in a control group formed by several CD4+ T-cell subsets to find in this lymphoma abnormal expression profiles absent in various normal phenotypes of CD4+ T cells (Online Supplementary Figure S3). This comparison identified 3,162 DE genes (1,716 upregulated, 1,446 downregulated, false discovery rate [FDR] >0.01) (Figure 6A; Online Supplementary Table S15). The analysis not only confirmed upregulation of genes found to be overexpressed in pcALCL in prior studies (e.g., CCR8, CCR10, EZH2, IRF4, MIR155HG and TNFRSF8) (Figure 6B),11,14-16 but also revealed upregulation of a group of (proto)-oncogenes (e.g., CSF1R, EGFR, FGFR1/2/3, MET and PDGFRA/B) involved in signaling through the P-I-3K/AKT pathway and/or the MAPK pathway (Figure 6C). Of note, CSF1R overexpression has been reported in sALCL before.27 Downregulated cancer genes included inhibitors of the PI-3K/AKT pathway (i.e., PIK3IP1 and PIK3R1), inhibitors of the MAPK pathway (i.e., DUSP2, DUSP16, GPS2) and tumor suppressors implicated in other hematological cancers (i.e., FHIT, RHOH and TNFAIP3) (Figure 6C).
Twenty-five fusion transcripts were identified in our cohort (Table 1), nine of which were formed by genes with established roles in cancer (i.e., ERBB2IP–SQRDL, ETS1– SLC37A4, GPS2–CHD3, NFAT5–WWP2, SIRT3–NFKB2, SMARCAD1–TP63, TNK1–GPS2, TP53–TNK1 and TP63–SMARCAD1).
Deregulated cellular processes/pathways
In order to investigate deregulated cellular processes/pathways in pcALCL, we analyzed up- and downregulated genes separately with GeneAnalytics. Upregulated canonical signal transduction routes were ERK signaling (enrichment score: 166.10), phospholipase C signaling (enrichment score: 86.47), PAK signaling (enrichment score: 59.21), AKT signaling (enrichment score: 49.09) and G-protein couple receptor (GPCR) signaling (enrichment score: 48.91). In addition, the analysis revealed upregulation of adhesion-related cellular processes (e.g., focal adhesion, integrin pathway) (Figure 6D). In contrast, all downregulated profiles were signaling processes leading to T-cell activation (T-cell receptor (TCR) signaling, Icos-IcosL pathway, etc.) (Figure 6E).
Transcriptome analysis with Enrichr using the ARCHS4 database revealed that genes known to be co-expressed with receptor tyrosine kinases DDR2 and PDGFR (especially PDGFRβ) were the most overrepresented in the group of upregulated genes (Figure 6F), suggesting that these receptors and/or their associated signal transduction networks might play relevant roles in the disease. DDR2 binds to collagen and activates signaling pathways (e.g., MAPK pathway) implicated in cell adhesion, proliferation and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling. Similarly, PDGFR binds to its cognate ligands (PDGFs) and activates the PI-3-K/AKT and MAPK pathways, promoting cell proliferation and survival.
In order to validate the upregulation of DDR2 and PDGFRB in pcALCL, transcript abundance of these genes was quantified by RT-qPCR in pcALCL tumors and a control group formed by benign inflammatory dermatoses (BID) and healthy CD4+ T cells (HC). Both genes were confirmed to be consistently upregulated in pcALCL in comparison to the control group (P<0.0001, Mann-Whitney U test) (Figure 6G). Additionally, we used RT-qPCR to assess in these two groups the expression of tumor suppressors GPS2 and PIK3R1, which displayed recurrent genetic defects and were downregulated in pcALCL according to the sequencing data. The analysis confirmed the downregulation of both tumor suppressors in pcALCL as well (P<0.05, Mann-Whitney U test) (Figure 6H).
Since the PI-3-K/AKT pathway was the most consistently affected canonical signal transduction route in pcALCL (i.e., mutations in PDPK1/PIK3R1, generalized PIK3R1 downregulation, AKT signature), we investigated the presence of activated AKT (pAKT) by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in eight sequenced patients with available tumor tissue (i.e., cAL3-4/7-12). Robust AKT activation was observed in seven of the eight evaluated patients (Figure 7A; Online Supplementary Figure S8). Surprinsingly, although our pcALCL patients carried no mutations in JAK-STAT pathway genes, we detected STAT3 activation (pSTAT3) by IHC in three of eight evaluated patients. This suggests that STAT3 signaling might be induced in some cases by alternative non-JAK-STAT molecular alterations or via mutation-independent mechanisms (Figure 7B; Online Supplementary Figures S4 and S8).
In order to gain insight into the pathogenetic basis of pcALCL, we investigated rearrangements, CNA, small-scale mutations and gene expression in this lymphoma by analyzing genome (WGS, WES) and transcriptome (RNA-seq) data. In agreement with previous studies, we observed solitary cases with DUSP22 and TP63 rearrangements in our cohort, which are events known to occur at low frequencies in pcALCL.10,28 We also confirmed that losses within 6q and gains within 7q were the most recurrent large-scale chromosomal imbalances. Moreover, similar to other CTCL variants (e.g., mycosis fungoides, Sézary syndrome, cutaneous γ/d T-cell lymphomas), we found that pcALCL displayed a predominant C>T mutational signature which was mainly attributable to UV light exposure and aging. Although UV-associated mutations appear to be a common feature among distinct CTCL variants, their significance in the lymphomagenesis of this group of neoplasms remains unclear.
Even though pcALCL exhibited a manifest inter-patient heterogeneity in terms of number of genetic abnormalities and affected genes, our analysis showed that the cell cycle, T-cell physiology regulation, transcription and particularly signaling through the PI-3-K and MAPK pathways, were commonly affected cellular processes/pathways in our cohort. Recurrent genetic alterations involving cancer-associated genes included rearrangements involving GPS2, LINC-PINT and TNK1, deletion of PRDM1 and TNFRSF14, amplification of TNFRSF8 (CD30) and EZH2, and small-scale mutations in CDK14, LRP1B, PDPK1 and PIK3R1.
Deletion of PRDM1 and gain of EZH2, each observed in six of 12 patients, were the two most frequent genetic alterations in our cohort. PRDM1, which is recurrently deleted in sALCL too, acts as a tumor suppressor.29 Prior research showed that reintroduction of PRDM1 in a sALCL cell line triggered cell proliferation impairment, cell cycle block and apoptosis.29 Notably, PRDM1 reintroduction also down-regulated in these cells the expression of MIR155HG (miR-155 precursor) and IRF4, two genes that are consistently overexpressed in sALCL and pcALCL.29 On the other hand, previous studies have shown that EZH2 is overexpressed in pcALCL.11,14 EZH2 appears to operate as an oncogene in the disease by epigenetically silencing TXNIP and CXCL10, two genes with anti-tumor effects in pcALCL.14 Although the molecular mechanisms leading to EZH2 over-expression in pcALCL require further study, our data suggest that gene amplification may be one of them.
Four additional genes implicated in cancer underwent recurrent alterations in pcALCL (LINC-PINT, LRP1B, RBFOX1 and USH2A). LINC-PINT and RBFOX1 behave as tumor suppressors in gastric cancer and glioblastoma.30-33 LRP1B, an LDL family receptor involved in endocytosis, is inactivated by genetic and epigenetic mechanisms in several cancers (gastric, renal, thyroid, etc.).34-36 USH2A, one of the two most SNV-mutated genes in our cohort, is the 21st most mutated gene in breast cancer according to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)37 yet its function remains unclear. Genetic alterations impacting genes associated with the P-I-3K/AKT pathway, the MAPK family of pathways (via ERK, JNK and p38 kinases), and to a lesser extent G-protein signaling, were the most notable common denominator between patients with pcALCL. Nine of 12 patients had abnormalities in one or more genes linked to the aforementioned pathways (Online Supplementary Table S20). Patient-specific genetic alterations, which accounted for the vast majority of events, included rearrangements and small-scale mutations in CREB3L1, DGKI, DRD5, ERBB2IP, ERBB4, GRM8, MAP3K1, MAP3K20, MET, PIK3C2B, PPM1L, PTPRK, RET, RGS7, RGS12 and WNK2. In addition, recurrent molecular defects were found in two inhibitors of the MAPK pathway (GPS2 and TNK1) and two key regulators of the PI-3-K/AKT pathway (PDPK1 and PIK3R1).
GPS2 and TNK1 had structural defects in two of 12 patients. GPS2 formed dysfunctional fusions with other cancer genes (CHD3 and TNK1), inactivating both fusion partners in a single event. GPS2 is lowly expressed in liposarcoma and rearranged in spindle cell sarcoma.38 In vitro knockdown of GPS2 has been shown to enhance proliferation, migration and dedifferentiation of liposarcoma cells, supporting its role as a tumor suppressor in this neoplasm.38 Similarly, rearrangements abolished TNK1 expression or rendered it dysfunctional in two of 12 patients. TNK1 is often deleted and lowly expressed in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.39 Mouse models carrying monoallelic or biallelic TNK1 inactivation exhibit tissues with higher levels of RAS activation and develop spontaneous tumors at high rates, including lymphomas and carcinomas.21 Curiously, although wild-type TNK1 exhibits antiproliferative properties, C-terminus truncated forms of the protein, like the one observed in patient cAL3, appear to activate proliferation-promoting kinases such as AKT and STAT3/5.22
We observed small-scale mutations affecting PDPK1 or PIK3R1 in four of 12 patients. PDPK1 is frequently amplified or overexpressed in human cancers, but uncommonly affected by pathogenic SNV.40 Surprinsingly, we found two patients with SNV (p.T518M; p.W535L) affecting the PH domain of this kinase. PDPK1 becomes contitutively active as a monomer upon dissociation from its inactive homodimeric form.41 As activation of PDPK1 requires auto-phosphorylation of residues in the PH domain to destabilize the inactive homodimeric state, these mutations might impact the stability of the latter favoring an active monomeric state. This mechanism has been demonstrated for the PH domain mutation p.T513E.41 In contrast, loss-of-function mutations in PIK3R1 occur in glioblastoma, endometrial carcinoma and immune disorders.42 One of the two splice site mutations found in our cohort is causative of PASLI-like disease, a disorder characterized by immunodeficiency, lymphoproliferation, antibody defects and senescence of CD8+ T cells. This splice site mutation (G>A at chr5:68,293,835), which results in exon 11 skipping during mRNA maturation, leads to overactivation of the PI-3-K/AKT pathway in immune cells from these patients.42 The other observed splice site mutation (G>T at chr5:68,296,342) is predicted to result in exon 15 skipping, and consequently, deletion of the C-terminal SH2 domain of the protein which is essential for inhibiting the catalytic subunit of PI-3-K.
In line with the genomic data, transcriptome analysis revealed upregulation of several signal transduction routes associated with the PI-3-K/AKT pathway, the MAPK pathway and G-protein signaling (e.g., ERK, PLC and AKT). The PI-3-K/AKT pathway, the signaling route most prominently altered in our cohort, was confirmed to be activated in our patients through IHC. Thus, suppresion of this pathway using PI-3-K inhibitors (e.g., duvelisib) could be explored as an alternative therapy for patients who do not respond to skin-directed therapies or with extracutaneous involvement. Upregulated genes in pcALCL matched expression patterns primarily associated with overexpression of receptor kinases DDR2 and PDGFRβ, suggesting a potential role of these receptors in the development of the disease. The upregulation of DDR2 and PDGFRB in pcALCL was confirmed by RT-qPCR. DDR2 is overexpressed in subsets of patients with sALCL and most Hodgkin lymphoma cases.43,44 Similarly, PDGFR is commonly overexpressed in sALCL and various other human cancers.45,46 Of note, PDGFR blockade with imatinib has been shown to be therapeutically effective in murine models of sALCL and a patient with refractory sALCL.45 Since our data suggest that PDGFR is overexpressed in pcALCL too, blockade of this receptor might also have a positive therapeutic effect on patients with pcALCL. However, validation of our molecular findings in large series of patients will be essential before the eventual clinical exploration of these potential therapies.
In agreement with prior reports, our data showed that pcALCL shares some pathogenic features with sALCL such as the overexpression of several markers and oncogenes (e.g., CSF1R, IRF4, MIR155HG, PDGFRB and TNFRSF8), the deletion of PRDM1, and the occasional presence of specific rearrangements (e.g., DUSP22 and TP63). However, our cohort displayed recurrent molecular alterations in cancer genes thus far not associated with sALCL (e.g., GPS2, LINC-PINT, PDPK1, PIK3R1 and TNK1). In addition, our patients were devoid of alterations in JAK-STAT pathway genes which are common in sALCL. Still, our results should be interpreted with caution as future whole-genome studies involving larger cohorts are necessary to obtain a more precise estimate of the frequency of molecular alterations underlying pcALCL, including possible JAK-STAT mutations. Despite the absence of JAK-STAT alterations, some of our pcALCL patients exhibited STAT3 activation, suggesting that STAT3 signaling was either induced by non-JAK-STAT molecular alterations (e.g., oncogenic TNK1 variant in patient cAL3)22 or mediated by mutation-independent mechanisms in these individuals. In line with the latter, ALK– sALCL cell lines lacking JAK-STAT alterations have been found to induce STAT3 signaling through aberrant autocrine cytokine receptor stimulation.47 Yet, alternative activation mechanisms of JAK-STAT signaling (e.g., signaling crosstalk, epigenetics-related) cannot be excluded.
In summary, our study has uncovered novel genetic alterations with pathogenic significance in pcALCL and established relevant molecular characteristics of this lymphoma. Firstly, pcALCL was found to be genetically heterogeneous. Secondly, pcALCL displayed a mutational signature mainly attributable to UV light and aging with smaller contributions from DSB repair deficiency and AID-mediated somatic hypermutation. Thirdly, some pcALCL cases displayed STAT3 activation even in the absence of canonical JAK-STAT alterations which generally underlie aberrant STAT3 signaling in other lymphomas. Finally, pcALCL appears to develop as a result of defects in genes with roles in the cell cycle, T-cell physiology, transcription, and especially signaling via the PI-3-K/AKT pathway, the MAPK pathway and G-proteins.
- Received June 26, 2020
- Accepted August 3, 2021
No conflicts of interest to disclose.
ANBT, RM, KQ, RW, MV and CPT conceptualized and designed the project; ANBT, RM and CPT wrote the manuscript; ANBT, LG, HM, CA and TK performed the bioinformatic analyses; ANBT and JO performed the experiments; ANBT and RM analyzed the results, interpreted the data and produced figures and tables; KQ, RW and MV provided valuable biological specimens; ANBT, RM, LG, JO, HM, CA, TK, KQ, RW, MV and CPT revised and approved the final manuscript.
Data sharing statement
The sequencing data that support the findings of this study are openly available in the European Genome-Phenome Archive (EGA) at https://ega-archive.org, reference number [EGAS00001004429]. Additional data and protocols can be made available to other investigators upon request.
This study was funded by the Dutch Cancer Society (KWF, grant UL2013-6104), the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw, grant 40-43500-98-4027/435004503), Takeda Nederland B.V. and the Foundation for Pathological Research and Development (S.P.O.O., grant SPOO-2016003).
The authors thank Julian van Toledo for valuable bioinformatic support.
- Willemze R, Jaffe ES, Burg G. WHO-EORTC classification for cutaneous lymphomas. Blood. 2005; 105(10):3768-3785. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2004-09-3502Google Scholar
- Bekkenk MW, Geelen FA, van Voorst Vader PC. Primary and secondary cutaneous CD30(+) lymphoproliferative disorders: a report from the Dutch Cutaneous Lymphoma Group on the longterm follow-up data of 219 patients and guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. Blood. 2000; 95(12):3653-3661. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V95.12.3653.012k23_3653_3661Google Scholar
- Melchers RC, Willemze R, van de Loo M. Clinical, histologic, and molecular characteristics of anaplastic lymphoma kinasepositive primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2020; 44(6):776-781. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001449Google Scholar
- Melchers RC, Willemze R, Vermaat JSP. Outcomes of rare patients with a primary cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorder developing extracutaneous disease. Blood. 2020; 135(10):769-773. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2019002799Google Scholar
- Velusamy T, Kiel MJ, Sahasrabuddhe AA. A novel recurrent NPM1-TYK2 gene fusion in cutaneous CD30-positive lymphoproliferative disorders. Blood. 2014; 124(25):3768-3771. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2014-07-588434Google Scholar
- Luchtel RA, Zimmermann MT, Hu G. Recurrent MSC (E116K) mutations in ALK-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Blood. 2019; 133(26):2776-2789. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2019000626Google Scholar
- Luchtel RA, Dasari S, Oishi N. Molecular profiling reveals immunogenic cues in anaplastic large cell lymphomas with DUSP22 rearrangements. Blood. 2018; 132(13):1386-1398. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-03-838524Google Scholar
- Hu G, Dasari S, Asmann YW. Targetable fusions of the FRK tyrosine kinase in ALK-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Leukemia. 2017; 32(2):565-569. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2017.309Google Scholar
- Crescenzo R, Abate F, Lasorsa E. Convergent mutations and kinase fusions lead to oncogenic STAT3 activation in anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Cancer Cell. 2015; 27(4):516-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2015.03.006Google Scholar
- Prieto-Torres L, Rodriguez-Pinilla SM, Onaindia A, Ara M, Requena L, Piris MA. CD30-positive primary cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders: molecular alterations and targeted therapies. Haematologica. 2019; 104(2):226-235. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2018.197152Google Scholar
- van Kester MS, Tensen CP, Vermeer MH. Cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma and peripheral T-cell lymphoma NOS show distinct chromosomal alterations and differential expression of chemokine receptors and apoptosis regulators. J Invest Dermatol. 2010; 130(2):563-575. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2009.270Google Scholar
- Laharanne E, Oumouhou N, Bonnet F. Genome-wide analysis of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas identifies three clinically relevant classes. J Invest Dermatol. 2010; 130(6):1707-1718. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2010.8Google Scholar
- Wada DA, Law ME, Hsi ED. Specificity of IRF4 translocations for primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a multicenter study of 204 skin biopsies. Mod Pathol. 2011; 24(4):596-605. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2010.225Google Scholar
- Yi S, Sun J, Qiu L. Dual role of EZH2 in cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma: promoting tumor cell survival and regulating tumor microenvironment. J Invest Dermatol. 2018; 138(5):1126-1136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2017.10.036Google Scholar
- Benner MF, Ballabio E, van Kester MS. Primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma shows a distinct miRNA expression profile and reveals differences from tumor-stage mycosis fungoides. Exp Dermatol. 2012; 21(8):632-634. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0625.2012.01548.xGoogle Scholar
- Sandoval J, Diaz-Lagares A, Salgado R. MicroRNA expression profiling and DNA methylation signature for deregulated microRNA in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J Invest Dermatol. 2015; 135(4):1128-1137. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2014.487Google Scholar
- van Doorn R, Slieker RC, Boonk SE. Epigenomic analysis of Sezary syndrome defines patterns of aberrant DNA methylation and identifies diagnostic markers. J Invest Dermatol. 2016; 136(9):1876-1884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2016.03.042Google Scholar
- Marin-Bejar O, Mas AM, Gonzalez J. The human lncRNA LINC-PINT inhibits tumor cell invasion through a highly conserved sequence element. Genome Biol. 2017; 18(1):202. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1331-yGoogle Scholar
- Carreira-Rosario A, Bhargava V, Hillebrand J, Kollipara RK, Ramaswami M, Buszczak M.. Repression of Pumilio protein expression by Rbfox1 promotes germ cell differentiation. Dev Cell. 2016; 36(5):562-571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2016.02.010Google Scholar
- Spain BH, Bowdish KS, Pacal AR. Two human cDNAs, including a homolog of Arabidopsis FUS6 (COP11), suppress G-protein- and mitogen-activated protein kinase-mediated signal transduction in yeast and mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1996; 16(12):6698-6706. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.16.12.6698Google Scholar
- Hoare S, Hoare K, Reinhard MK, Lee YJ, Oh SP, May WS. Tnk1/Kos1 knockout mice develop spontaneous tumors. Cancer Res. 2008; 68(21):8723-8732. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1467Google Scholar
- Gu TL, Cherry J, Tucker M, Wu J, Reeves C, Polakiewicz RD. Identification of activated Tnk1 kinase in Hodgkin's lymphoma. Leukemia. 2010; 24(4):861-865. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2009.293Google Scholar
- Martins G, Calame K.. Regulation and functions of Blimp-1 in T and B lymphocytes. Annu Rev Immunol. 2008; 26:133-169. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090241Google Scholar
- Ling P, Lu TJ, Yuan CJ, Lai MD. Biosignaling of mammalian Ste20-related kinases. Cell Signal. 2008; 20(7):1237-1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2007.12.019Google Scholar
- Steinberg MW, Cheung TC, Ware CF. The signaling networks of the herpesvirus entry mediator (TNFRSF14) in immune regulation. Immunol Rev. 2011; 244(1):169-187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-065X.2011.01064.xGoogle Scholar
- Kim J, McMillan E, Kim HS. XPO1-dependent nuclear export is a druggable vulnerability in KRAS-mutant lung cancer. Nature. 2016; 538(7623):114-117. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19771Google Scholar
- Mathas S, Kreher S, Meaburn KJ. Gene deregulation and spatial genome reorganization near breakpoints prior to formation of translocations in anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(14):5831-5836. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900912106Google Scholar
- Schrader AM, Chung YY, Jansen PM. No TP63 rearrangements in a selected group of primary cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders with aggressive clinical course. Blood. 2016; 128(1):141-143. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-02-694455Google Scholar
- Boi M, Rinaldi A, Kwee I. PRDM1/BLIMP1 is commonly inactivated in anaplastic large T-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2013; 122(15):2683-2693. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-04-497933Google Scholar
- Zhang M, Zhao K, Xu X. A peptide encoded by circular form of LINC-PINT suppresses oncogenic transcriptional elongation in glioblastoma. Nat Commun. 2018; 9(1):4475. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06862-2Google Scholar
- Feng H, Zhang J, Shi Y, Wang L, Zhang C, Wu L.. Long noncoding RNA LINC-PINT is inhibited in gastric cancer and predicts poor survival. J Cell Biochem. 2019; 120(6):9594-9600. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.28236Google Scholar
- Hu J, Ho AL, Yuan L. Neutralization of terminal differentiation in gliomagenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(36):14520-14527. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308610110Google Scholar
- Sengupta N, Yau C, Sakthianandeswaren A. Analysis of colorectal cancers in British Bangladeshi identifies early onset, frequent mucinous histotype and a high prevalence of RBFOX1 deletion. Mol Cancer. 2013; 12:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-12-1Google Scholar
- Lu YJ, Wu CS, Li HP. Aberrant methylation impairs low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1B tumor suppressor function in gastric cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2010; 49(5):412-424. https://doi.org/10.1002/gcc.20752Google Scholar
- Ni S, Hu J, Duan Y. Down expression of LRP1B promotes cell migration via RhoA/Cdc42 pathway and actin cytoskeleton remodeling in renal cell cancer. Cancer Sci. 2013; 104(7):817-825. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.12157Google Scholar
- Prazeres H, Torres J, Rodrigues F. Chromosomal, epigenetic and microRNA-mediated inactivation of LRP1B, a modulator of the extracellular environment of thyroid cancer cells. Oncogene. 2011; 30(11):1302-1317. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2010.512Google Scholar
- Cancer Genome Atlas N. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2012; 490(7418):61-70. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11412Google Scholar
- Huang XD, Xiao FJ, Wang SX. G protein pathway suppressor 2 (GPS2) acts as a tumor suppressor in liposarcoma. Tumour Biol. 2016; 37(10):13333-13343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-016-5220-xGoogle Scholar
- May WS, Hoare K, Hoare S, Reinhard MK, Lee YJ, Oh SP. Tnk1/Kos1: a novel tumor suppressor. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2010; 121:281-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2009.05.010Google Scholar
- Gagliardi PA, Puliafito A, Primo L.. PDK1: at the crossroad of cancer signaling pathways. Semin Cancer Biol. 2018; 48:27-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.04.014Google Scholar
- Ziemba BP, Pilling C, Calleja V, Larijani B, Falke JJ. The PH domain of phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1 exhibits a novel, phospho-regulated monomer-dimer equilibrium with important implications for kinase domain activation: single-molecule and ensemble studies. Biochemistry. 2013; 52(28):4820-4829. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi400488fGoogle Scholar
- Lucas CL, Zhang Y, Venida A. Heterozygous splice mutation in PIK3R1 causes human immunodeficiency with lymphoproliferation due to dominant activation of PI3K. J Exp Med. 2014; 211(13):2537-2547. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20141759Google Scholar
- Willenbrock K, Kuppers R, Renne C. Common features and differences in the transcriptome of large cell anaplastic lymphoma and classical Hodgkin's lymphoma. Haematologica. 2006; 91(5):596-604. Google Scholar
- Renne C, Willenbrock K, Kuppers R, Hansmann ML, Brauninger A.. Autocrine- and paracrine-activated receptor tyrosine kinases in classic Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2005; 105(10):4051-4059. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2004-10-4008Google Scholar
- Laimer D, Dolznig H, Kollmann K. PDGFR blockade is a rational and effective therapy for NPM-ALK-driven lymphomas. Nat Med. 2012; 18(11):1699-1704. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2966Google Scholar
- Papadopoulos N, Lennartsson J.. The PDGF/PDGFR pathway as a drug target. Mol Aspects Med. 2018; 62:75-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mam.2017.11.007Google Scholar
- Chen J, Zhang Y, Petrus MN. Cytokine receptor signaling is required for the survival of ALK- anaplastic large cell lymphoma, even in the presence of JAK1/STAT3 mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114(15):3975-3980. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1700682114Google Scholar
Figures & Tables
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.