Abstract
Patients with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis are at risk for both thrombotic and bleeding complications. While the hemostatic defects have been extensively studied, less is known about thrombotic complications in this disease. This retrospective study examined the frequency of venous thromboembolism in 929 patients with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis presenting to a single referral center, correlated risk of venous thromboembolism with clinical and laboratory factors, and examined complications of anticoagulation in this population. Sixty-five patients (7%) were documented as having at least one venous thromboembolic event. Eighty percent of these patients had events within one year prior to or following diagnosis. Lower serum albumin was associated with increased risk of VTE, with a hazard ratio of 4.30 (CI 1.60–11.55; P=0.0038) for serum albumin less than 3 g/dL compared to serum albumin greater than 4 g/dL. Severe bleeding complications were observed in 5 out of 57 patients with venous thromboembolism undergoing treatment with anticoagulation. Prospective investigation should be undertaken to better risk stratify these patients and to determine the optimal strategies for prophylaxis against and management of venous thromboembolism.Introduction
Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL) is a rare systemic disorder resulting from organ deposition of amyloid fibrils comprised of immunoglobulin light chains, typically associated with an underlying clonal plasma cell or lymphoproliferative disorder.
AL is known to affect hemostasis with both severe thrombotic and bleeding complications reported.51 The predilection for bleeding complications has been attributed to acquired factor X deficiency, acquired von Willebrand syndrome, and vascular fragility due to amyloid fibril deposition in small capillaries.9642 The last is primarily responsible for the periorbital ecchymoses considered pathognomonic of the disease. The etiology, risk, and optimal management of thrombotic complications in AL have not been established. The nephrotic syndrome, a common presentation of AL, is associated with hypercoagulability and may contribute to the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in this population.1510 Other potential contributors to thromboembolic risk include monoclonal gammopathy and plasma cell dyscrasia16 as well as AL treatments, specifically immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs)2317 and those requiring central venous catheters. A means of risk stratification of VTE in this population is needed to guide prophylaxis and treatment strategies.
In this study, we retrospectively examined the frequency of VTE events among patients with AL presenting to a single referral center, and determined specific factors that may influence the risk of VTE in this disease.
Methods
Study population
Clinical and laboratory data were collected prospectively on patients presenting to the Amyloid Clinic at the Boston University Medical Center through an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. All patients gave written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients typically returned at least annually for re-evaluation and repeat laboratory testing but generally received care at other institutions. Patients with AL who presented between January 2003 and September 2013 were included in this study.
Cases of VTE were determined by searching the electronic medical record for the co-occurrence of “AL amyloidosis” along with terms related to VTE, including “thrombosis”, “DVT”, “PE”, and “embolism” in the above patients’ charts. Cases of VTE were verified by chart review. Only VTEs occurring within one year prior to diagnosis or at any time following the diagnosis of AL were included. Cases of arterial thrombosis and embolic cerebrovascular accidents were not included in this analysis.
Bleeding events complicating anticoagulation treatments were identified by chart review in patients with confirmed VTE. Significant bleeding events were defined as bleeding requiring hospitalization, fatal bleeding, symptomatic bleeding into a critical area or organ, or bleeding requiring transfusion.
Laboratory data from the initial evaluation at the Amyloid Clinic were used in this analysis. Urinary protein excretion was measured by 24-h collection when available. Urine protein to creatinine ratio was used to estimate proteinuria if 24-h collection was not available. Due to modification of the D-dimer assay during the period of study, the D-dimer result was converted to a binary positive or negative result based on the normal range established by the clinical laboratory at the Boston University Medical Center at the time. An intermediate result by the qualitative assay was considered to be positive. Data at the time of VTE were not available as the majority of events happened at other institutions.
Statistical analysis
Patients’ characteristics were summarized by median and range for continuous variables, frequency and proportion for categorical variables (Tables 1 and 2). Time-dependent individual risk factors and the set of final models were assessed by Cox’s regression model (Table 3). P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. The analysis was conducted by SAS 9.3.
Results
Patients’ characteristics
A total of 929 patients with AL were identified on initial medical record search and included in the descriptive analysis. Of these, 105 patients were excluded from the statistical analysis because of incomplete data, including poor follow up, or because VTE occurred prior to diagnosis. Therefore, 824 patients were included in the final statistical analysis. Base-line characteristics of this group are described in Table 1.
Frequency of and description of events
Out of 929 patients who underwent evaluation, 65 patients (7%) had at least one occurrence of VTE less than one year prior to or following diagnosis of AL. Among the 65 patients identified, there were a total of 71 VTEs diagnosed; 40 deep venous thromboses (DVTs), 23 pulmonary emboli (PEs), one portal vein thrombosis, and 4 occurrences of simultaneous DVT and PE. In 3 cases, the type of VTE could not be determined. Seventeen VTEs (23.9%) occurred in the setting of indwelling central venous catheter (CVC) and 15 (21.1%) occurred within 100 days of IMiD therapy (Table 2). Patients undergoing treatment with IMiD therapy were taking full-dose aspirin prophylaxis or were on therapeutic anticoagulation unless contraindicated. Sixteen events (22.5%) occurred within 100 days of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), of which 6 events were CVC associated. Of the twenty events (29%) that were not in the setting of indwelling CVC or treatment, 14 of these occurred in patients with nephrotic-range proteinuria.
Fifty-two patients (80%) had events occurring within one year of diagnosis (Figure 1). VTE preceded the diagnosis of AL in 12 patients. These patients were included in the descriptive analysis on the presumption that the VTE occurred in the presence of undiagnosed disease, but excluded from statistical analysis. An additional 7 patients were excluded from further analysis because they did not return for follow up after the initial visit or because laboratory data were incomplete.
Risk of VTE in AL
The results of univariate analysis of clinical and laboratory data and risk of VTE are shown in Table 3. An increasing risk of VTE with lower serum albumin was observed, with hazard ratio of 2.16 for serum albumin of 3–4g/dL (CI 0.80–5.81; P=0.13), and a hazard ratio of 4.30 in patients with serum albumin of less than 3 g/dL (CI 1.60–11.55; P=0.0038) (Figure 2). Increasing proteinuria was also associated with increased risk of VTE, with a hazard ratio of 1.84 for urine protein of 1–3.5 g per day (CI 0.74–4.57; P=0.19), 1.94 for urine protein of 3.5–8 g per day (CI 0.85–4.41, P=0.11), and 2.60 for urine protein of greater than 8 g per day (CI 1.19–5.72, P=0.017). Levels of serum albumin and proteinuria were correlated in this analysis, and thus urine protein was not included in final analysis. Age at diagnosis, sex, non-white race, fibrinogen, D-dimer, and partial thromboplastin time (PTT) were not significantly associated with an increased risk of VTE.
VTE among patients with nephrotic range proteinuria
To determine the specific risk factors for VTE in the setting of nephrotic-range proteinuria, we examined the 382 patients with proteinuria of more than 3.5 g per day. In this subgroup, 37 patients (9.7%) had at least one documented episode of VTE within one year prior to or anytime following the diagnosis of AL. Univariate analysis of PTT, fibrinogen, D-dimer, urine protein excretion greater than 8 g per day, and albumin did not reveal any significant associations with risk of VTE in this subgroup.
Bleeding complications
The incidence of bleeding complications among the cohort of patients with a documented VTE was assessed by chart review. Fifty-seven of the 65 patients with documented VTE had a treatment history which could be verified by chart review. Of those, 5 patients were documented as experiencing at least one episode of major bleeding related to anticoagulation (Table 4). In 2 of these cases, transfusion support was required. Of note, one patient was treated with thrombolysis followed by unfractionated heparin drip for high clot-burden pulmonary emboli on day 25 following ASCT; he developed intraperitoneal hemorrhage 21 days after thrombolysis leading to PEA arrest and death.
Discussion
Venous thromboembolism and its treatment are associated with significant morbidity and mortality in AL. A better understanding of how often VTEs occur and in which patients is of extreme importance in guiding clinicians in the optimal management of these patients.
Venous thromboembolism occurred in 7% of AL patients presenting to our center, and the risk of VTE was strongly associated with low serum albumin. The frequency of VTE observed in this study is consistent with what has previously been described in the nephrotic syndrome associated with membranous nephropathy1211 and with what has been reported in AL and multiple myeloma.25245 Interestingly, no renal vein thromboses were documented in this group; this may reflect the often clinically silent nature of these events, which have been observed in as many as 40–50% of patients with nephrotic syndrome,15 but were not screened for in our population. The majority of observed events occurred during treatment of the disease with chemotherapy, IMiDs, ASCT, or in the setting of an indwelling CVC. Among the events unrelated to treatment, 14 out of 20 occurred in patients with nephrotic-range proteinuria.
The hypercoagulable state of nephrotic syndrome is thought to be multifactorial and, in part, a result of the imbalance of antithrombotic and prothrombotic factors involved in the coagulation cascade.2926 The association between low serum albumin and risk of VTE has been previously described in nephrotic syndrome.30141211 Serum albumin is inversely correlated with the degree of urinary protein loss, and may be a surrogate marker for loss of endogenous antithrombotic proteins such as antithrombin III and plasminogen. Serum albumin levels may have direct effects on hemostasis and platelet aggregation26 and in addition levels may be decreased in critical illness and thus correlate with more advanced disease. Low serum albumin should be a consideration in risk-stratifying patients during treatment of AL and further prospective studies are warranted to determine the benefits of prophylactic anticoagulation in this high-risk group. Given the high rate of bleeding complications in these patients, prophylactic anticoagulation cannot be recommended without a prospective randomized trial. In particular, the role of novel oral anticoagulants should be investigated given the potential better bleeding profile of these agents.
Measures of the coagulation cascade or fibrinolysis such as PTT, fibrinogen and D-dimer were not associated with risk of VTE in this study. This may in part be explained by the fact that these data were collected at the time of initial presentation and not at the time of VTE diagnosis. Data on antithrombin III and factor VIII levels were not available at the time of this analysis, but have been demonstrated in some studies to correlate with risk of VTE.3129 Prospective collection of these data may have value in further risk stratifying patients.
The vast majority of documented VTEs in our cohort occurred within one year of diagnosis. Although this may be in part due to the median follow up of 2.3 years, it is consistent with reports of other studies of VTE in nephrotic syndrome patients1411 and in MGUS/myeloma patients.16 The etiology of this increased incidence closer to the time of diagnosis is uncertain, but may reflect an increased risk of VTE associated with various treatments of the disease or a decrease in hypercoagulable state with treatment of the underlying disease. This may have therapeutic implications, particularly in decisions regarding duration of anticoagulation.
This study is complimentary to others examining the incidence of VTE in AL patients, and, to our knowledge, is the first to correlate risk with serum albumin in this disease state. Our study was strengthened by the large number of patients with AL presenting to our center and the breadth of laboratory and clinical data available on these patients. Limitations of the study include its retrospective design and reliance on clinician documentation of venous thromboembolic events. The majority of patients presented to our center for consultation and received treatment elsewhere, and details of the circumstances surrounding the event, such as disease-specific treatment, immobility, surgery and infections, were therefore limited. The analysis was limited by the duration of patient follow up, which varied widely from less than one month to 13.2 years in the entire cohort. Median follow up was longer in the VTE cohort (2.36 years) than the controls (9.72 months); therefore, the observed incidence of VTE may be underestimated. Laboratory data were taken from the initial visit, and may not reflect the state of the patient at the time of VTE. In addition, complete data on treatment and response in these patients were not available to correlate with the occurrence of VTE.
In summary, VTE is a frequent complication of AL and the majority of VTEs occurred within one year of diagnosis and most often in the setting of treatment of the disease. Decisions regarding treatment duration should take this into consideration. Serum albumin is strongly correlated with risk of VTE in patients with AL and may be a consideration in determining the optimal treatment for these patients. Further prospective trials are needed to determine the risk/benefit ratio of prophylactic anticoagulation, as major bleeding complications in AL patients on anticoagulation were observed, including death in one patient receiving thrombolytics.
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge our colleagues in the Amyloidosis Center and Clinical Trials Office at Boston University School of Medicine and the Solomont Center for Hematology and Medical Oncology at Boston Medical Center who assisted with the evaluation and care of these patients. This research was supported by the Amyloid Research Fund and the Gruss Foundation. We particularly express our gratitude for the late Dr Seldin’s contribution to this paper and extraordinary work in the field of amyloidosis.
Footnotes
- Check the online version for the most updated information on this article, online supplements, and information on authorship & disclosures: www.haematologica.org/content/101/1/86
- Received July 16, 2015.
- Accepted October 7, 2015.
References
- Falk RH, Comenzo RL, Skinner M. The systemic amyloidoses. N Engl J Med. 1997; 337(13):898-909. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199709253371306Google Scholar
- Freeman B, Sloan JM, Seldin DC, Cowan AJ, Ruberg FL, Sanchorawala V. Multiple arterial and venous thromboembolic complications in AL amyloidosis and cardiac involvement: a case report and literature review. Amyloid. 2012; 19(3):156-160. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.3109/13506129.2012.694825Google Scholar
- Gamba G, Montani N, Anesi E. Clotting alterations in primary systemic amyloidosis. Haematologica. 2000; 85(3):289-292. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yood RA, Skinner M, Rubinow A, Talarico L, Cohen AS. Bleeding manifestations in 100 patients with amyloidosis. Jama. 1983; 249(10):1322-1324. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1983.03330340064034Google Scholar
- Halligan CS, Lacy MQ, Vincent Rajkumar S, Dispenzieri A, Witzig TE, Lust JA. Natural history of thromboembolism in AL amyloidosis. Amyloid. 2006; 13(1):31-36. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1080/13506120500537285Google Scholar
- Amyloid and amyloidosis. Excerpta Medica: Amsterdam; 1980. Google Scholar
- Kos CA, Ward JE, Malek K. Association of acquired von Willebrand syndrome with AL amyloidosis. Am J Hematol. 2007; 82(5):363-367. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.20829Google Scholar
- Furie B, Greene E, Furie BC. Syndrome of acquired factor X deficiency and systemic amyloidosis in vivo studies of the metabolic fate of factor X. N Engl J Med. 1977; 297(2):81-85. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197707142970203Google Scholar
- Furie B, Voo L, McAdam KP, Furie BC. Mechanism of factor X deficiency in systemic amyloidosis. N Engl J Med. 1981; 304(14):827-830. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198104023041407Google Scholar
- Christiansen CF, Schmidt M, Lamberg AL. Kidney disease and risk of venous thromboembolism: a nationwide population-based case-control study. J Thromb Haemost. 2014; 12(9):1449-1454. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1111/jth.12652Google Scholar
- Barbour SJ, Greenwald A, Djurdjev O. Disease-specific risk of venous thromboembolic events is increased in idiopathic glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int. 2012; 81(2):190-195. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2011.312Google Scholar
- Lionaki S, Derebail VK, Hogan SL. Venous thromboembolism in patients with membranous nephropathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012; 7(1):43-51. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.04250511Google Scholar
- Kayali F, Najjar R, Aswad F, Matta F, Stein PD. Venous thromboembolism in patients hospitalized with nephrotic syndrome. Am J Med. 2008; 121(3):226-230. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.08.042Google Scholar
- Mahmoodi BK, ten Kate MK, Waanders F. High absolute risks and predictors of venous and arterial thromboembolic events in patients with nephrotic syndrome: results from a large retrospective cohort study. Circulation. 2008; 117(2):224-230. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.716951Google Scholar
- Kerlin BA, Ayoob R, Smoyer WE. Epidemiology and pathophysiology of nephrotic syndrome-associated thromboembolic disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012; 7(3):513-520. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.10131011Google Scholar
- Kristinsson SY, Fears TR, Gridley G. Deep vein thrombosis after monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma. Blood. 2008; 112(9):3582-3586. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-04-151076Google Scholar
- Bennett CL, Angelotta C, Yarnold PR. Thalidomide- and lenalidomide-associated thromboembolism among patients with cancer. Jama. 2006; 296(21):2558-2560. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.21.2558-aGoogle Scholar
- Cavo M, Zamagni E, Cellini C. Deep-vein thrombosis in patients with multiple myeloma receiving first-line thalidomide-dexamethasone therapy. Blood. 2002; 100(6):2272-2273. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2002-06-1674Google Scholar
- Knight R, DeLap RJ, Zeldis JB. Lenalidomide and venous thrombosis in multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354(19):2079-2080. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc053530Google Scholar
- Osman K, Comenzo R, Rajkumar SV. Deep venous thrombosis and thalidomide therapy for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344(25):1951-1952. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200106213442516Google Scholar
- Zangari M, Anaissie E, Barlogie B. Increased risk of deep-vein thrombosis in patients with multiple myeloma receiving thalidomide and chemotherapy. Blood. 2001; 98(5):1614-1615. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V98.5.1614Google Scholar
- Menon SP, Rajkumar SV, Lacy M, Falco P, Palumbo A. Thromboembolic events with lenalidomide-based therapy for multiple myeloma. Cancer. 2008; 112(7):1522-1528. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23336Google Scholar
- Urbauer E, Kaufmann H, Nosslinger T, Raderer M, Drach J. Thromboembolic events during treatment with thalidomide. Blood. 2002; 99(11):4247-4248. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2001-12-0245Google Scholar
- Srkalovic G, Cameron MG, Rybicki L, Deitcher SR, Kattke-Marchant K, Hussein MA. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma are associated with an increased incidence of venothromboembolic disease. Cancer. 2004; 101(3):558-566. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20405Google Scholar
- Srkalovic G, Cameron MG, Deitcher SR, Kattke-Marchant K, Hussein MA. Incidence and risk factors of venous thromboembolism (VTD) in patients with amyloidosis. Int Semin Surg Oncol. 2005; 2:17. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7800-2-17Google Scholar
- Yoshida N, Aoki N. Release of arachidonic acid from human platelets. A key role for the potentiation of platelet aggregability in normal subjects as well as in those with nephrotic syndrome. Blood. 1978; 52(5):969-977. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Loscalzo J. Venous thrombosis in the nephrotic syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368(10):956-958. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcibr1209459Google Scholar
- Barbano B, Gigante A, Amoroso A, Cianci R. Thrombosis in nephrotic syndrome. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2013; 39(5):469-476. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1343887Google Scholar
- Kauffmann RH, de Graeff J, de la Riviere GB, van Es LA. Unilateral renal vein thrombosis and nephrotic syndrome. Report of a case with protein selectivity and antithrombin III clearance studies. Am J Med. 1976; 60(7):1048-1054. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(76)90579-9Google Scholar
- Kuhlmann U, Steurer J, Bollinger A, Pouliadis G, Briner J, Siegenthaler W. Incidence and clinical significance of thromboses and thrombo-embolic complications in nephrotic syndrome patients. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1981; 111(27–28):1034-1040. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cherng SC, Huang WS, Wang YF, Yang SP, Lin YF. The role of lung scintigraphy in the diagnosis of nephrotic syndrome with pulmonary embolism. Clin Nucl Med. 2000; 25(3):167-172. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1097/00003072-200003000-00001Google Scholar