In accordance with a recent study by Mareschal et al., in which they classified diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) by using expression profiling techniques, we show that elderly patients (≥ 80 years) are more common in the “non-germinal center subgroup” (non-GC) compared to younger patients (50–59 years), while younger patients are more common in the “germinal center subgroup” (GC) when compared to elderly patients (P=0.02).1 We also show that classifying (DLBCL) into the non-GC group or the GC group by means of certain immunohistochemistry criteria according to Hans et al. gives similar results in terms of differences in age distribution as observed by Mareschal et al.1,2
DLBCL is the most common type of B-cell lymphoma and accounts for about 40% of all lymphoid tumors.3 DLBCL is characterized by an aggressive clinical course and a clinical, pathological and molecular heterogeneity which makes the choice of treatment and prognosis difficult. The International Prognostic Index (IPI), which relies on clinical parameters such as age, clinical stage, performance status, etc. is currently used for prognostic prediction in DLBCL. However, many studies have found molecular markers of prognostic relevance, such as the classification of DLBCL into germinal center B-like (GCB) and activated B cell-like (ABC) groups using expression profiling techniques.4,5
In a study by Hans and colleagues, this classification of DLBCL into GCB and ABC groups by expression profiling can also be performed by immunohistochemistry using the antibodies BCL-6, CD10, MUM1, and cases can be assigned to either of two groups using a new nomenclature: GC-group and non-GC group.2 Nevertheless, according to Hans et al., the GCB group is more or less the same group as the GC group and the ABC group is more or less equivalent to the non-GC group.2
Mareschal et al. recently reported that the proportion of ABC subtype among de novo DLBCL increased with age.1 This group found that the ABC/non-ABC distribution differed significantly between younger patients (50–60 years) and elderly patients (≥ 80 years); the ABC subtype was more common in the elderly group (P=0.01).1 Complementing this comprehensive study, we analyzed the age distribution between GC-group and non-GC group in a cohort of 192 de novo DLBCL patients with 90 patients in the GC-group and 102 patients in the non-GC group.
In accordance to the Mareschal et al. study, we found that the non-GC group/GC-group distribution differed significantly between younger patients (50–59 years) and elderly patients (≥ 80 years), where the non-GC group subtype was more common in the elderly group (P=0.02) (Figure 1). The explanation for this skewing distribution of non-GC group and GC-group in different age groups has already been discussed by Mareschal et al. They speculate that it reflects a change in the B-cell population during aging or relates to the pathological specificity of DLBCL in elderly patients.1
In summary, in line with the Mareschal et al. study, we show that there is a higher frequency of elderly patients (≥ 80 years) in the non-GC group compared to younger patients (50–59 years) while there is an overrepresentation of younger patients in the GC group. We also show that classifying DLBCL into non-GC or GC groups by using immunohistochemistry according to Hans et al. shows a similar pattern in terms of differences in age distribution, as by the Mareschal et al. classification.1,2 However, it is necessary to further explore the biological aspects behind this finding. It would also be desirable to confirm the finding in a number of larger cohorts.
References
- Mareschal S, Lanic H, Ruminy P, Bastard C, Tilly H, Jardin F. The proportion of activated B-cell like subtype among de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma increases with age. Haematologica. 2011; 96(12):1888-90. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2011.050617Google Scholar
- Hans CP, Weisenburger DD, Greiner TC, Gascoyne RD, Delabie J, Ott G. Confirmation of the molecular classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray. Blood. 2004; 103(1):275-82. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2003-05-1545Google Scholar
- Coiffier B. Diffuse large cell lymphoma. Curr Opin Oncol. 2001; 13(5):325-34. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1097/00001622-200109000-00003Google Scholar
- Alizadeh AA, Eisen MB, Davis RE, Ma C, Lossos IS, Rosenwald A. Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature. 2000; 403(6769):503-11. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/35000501Google Scholar
- Rosenwald A, Wright G, Chan WC, Connors JM, Campo E, Fisher RI. The use of molecular profiling to predict survival after chemotherapy for diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(25):1937-47. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa012914Google Scholar