Abstract
Background The regulation of normal and stress-induced erythropoiesis is incompletely understood. Integrin-dependent adhesion plays important roles in erythropoiesis, but how integrins are regulated during erythropoiesis remains largely unknown.Design and Methods To obtain novel insights into the regulation of erythropoiesis, we used cellular and molecular approaches to analyze the role of SWAP-70 and the control of integrins through SWAP-70. In addition, mice deficient for this protein were investigated under normal and erythropoietic stress conditions.Results We show that SWAP-70, a protein involved in cytoskeletal F-actin rearrangements and integrin regulation in mast cells, is expressed in hematopoietic stem cells and myeloid-erythroid precursors. Although Swap-70−/− mice are not anemic, erythroblastic differentiation is perturbed, and SWAP-70 is required for an efficient erythropoietic stress response to acute anemia and for erythropoietic recovery after bone marrow transplantation in irradiated mice. SWAP-70 deficiency impairs colony-forming unit erythroid development, while burst-forming unit erythroid development is normal, and significantly affects development of late erythroblasts in the spleen and bone marrow. The α4 integrin is constitutively hyper-activated in Swap-70−/− colony-forming unit erythroid cells, which hyper-adhere to fibronectin. Blocking α4 and β1 integrin chains in vivo restored erythroblastic differentiation and the erythropoietic stress response in Swap-70−/− mice.Conclusions Our study reveals that SWAP-70 is a novel regulator of integrin-mediated red blood cell development and stress-induced erythropoiesis.Introduction
Erythropoiesis is a complex multistep process of red blood cell generation that continues throughout the lifespan of vertebrates. Like hematopoiesis, the development of red blood cells is a hierarchical process: it proceeds from hematopoietic stem cells through several multipotent progenitor stages to committed erythroid progenitors, burst-forming unit-erythroid (BFU-E) cells and colony-forming unit-erythroid (CFU-E) cells. The latter differentiate into proerythroblasts (proEB) and subsequently to basophilic (basoEB), polychromatophilic (polyEB), and orthochromatophilic erythroblasts (orthoEB) and finally into mature erythrocytes through the reticulocyte stage.1
Homeostatic erythropoiesis requires tight regulation to consistently and efficiently replace senescent circulating erythrocytes. At each stage of development, it is controlled by a variety of intracellular and extracellular regulatory molecules. Surface expression of many adhesion molecules on erythrocyte progenitors and their role in erythopoiesis have been reviewed by Chasis and Mohandas.2 A number of these adhesion molecules, including α4, α5, β1, CD44, Lu, and ICAM-4, are responsible for various adhesive homotypic and heterotypic interactions within the erythropoietic niche, namely the erythroblastic island, providing survival, proliferation and differentiation signals at early stages, and supporting enucleation during terminal erythroid maturation. Moreover, homotypic and heterotypic adhesive interactions between developing erythrocyte precursors and a central macrophage, mediated by α4β1 and ICAM-4, are required for the formation and integrity of erythroblastic islands and thus for erythroid development. Adhesion molecules modulate erythrocyte development alone or together with growth factors in a temporal manner.3,4 In addition, growth factors modulate adhesion between hematopoietic progenitors and extracellular matrix via changes in integrin receptor expression and activation.5,6 Interestingly, crosstalk between different integrins (α4β1 and α5β1) and cytokines (Kit ligand) has been shown to have opposing effects on growth and survival of erythroid progenitors.3 Akt-, Bcl-2- and Bcl-xL-dependent survival, focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and extracellular-regulated kinase (ERK)-mediated proliferation have been described as signaling events after integrin engagement in erythroid cells.3,4,7 However, in vitro and in vivo data have not been consistent. For instance, engagement of α4β1 has been shown to support proliferation and to provide anti-apoptotic protection on maturing erythroblasts,4 whereas different conclusions were made by others.3 Blocking of α4β1 by antibodies impairs erythrocyte development in vitro and in vivo.8,9 which is in agreement with studies employing α4 knockout mutants,10 although the conditional knockout of α4 mainly affects the stress response.11,12 In contrast, complete deletion of β1 does not affect erythrocyte development,13 but β1 is indispensable for survival during recovery from anemic stress.12 Furthermore, very little is known about the molecules that regulate integrin function in erythroid precursors.
SWAP-70 was initially isolated from activated B-cell nuclear protein complexes.14 It contains an F-actin-binding domain and a pleckstrin homology domain, binds PIP3, associates with RAC1, and regulates cytoskeletal F-actin rearrangements.15 SWAP-70 is involved in integrin-mediated interactions in B cells and mast cells and its deficiency impairs in vitro and in vivo migration of these cells.16 A conceivable function of SWAP-70 as a protein that integrates surface receptors such as integrins with signaling pathways and the F-actin cytoskeleton led us to suggest a potential role for SWAP-70 in hematopoietic cell development, particularly in erythropoiesis. Here we report SWAP-70 expression in hematopoietic stem cells and myeloid-erythroid precursors, postulate a novel function for this protein in steady-state and stress-induced erythrocyte differentiation, and lastly propose SWAP-70 as an integrin function regulator in the development of erythroid progenitor cells.
Design and Methods
Mice
Previously described wild-type (wt) and Swap-70 mice of two different genetic backgrounds of M. musculus, 129SvEMS and C57BL/6N, were used.17 Each experiment was performed using wt and Swap-70 mice of the same strain, and in most cases both genetic backgrounds were used.
FACS analysis and immunostaining
Flow cytometry and immunostaining were performed as described elsewhere.18 The details are provided in the Online Supplementary Appendix. To detect live erythroblastic islands, surface markers were immunostained as described previously,19 without prior paraformaldehyde fixation, and 1 h incubation with antibodies and second-step reagents.
Colony-forming assay
The numbers of BFU-E and CFU-E were quantified in standard colony assays as previously described.20 Details are given in the Online Supplementary Appendix.
Soluble ligand-binding assay
Bone marrow cells were incubated with soluble VCAM-1 or ICAM-1 Fc-chimeric molecules (20 ng/mL, R&D Systems) in either Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM) or IMDM with 2 mM Mn. Ligand binding was terminated by fixing cells with 3.7% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Bound VCAM-1 or ICAM-1 was detected with anti-Fc fragment antibodies by FACS.
Colony-forming unit-erythroid adhesion assay and erythroblastic island reconstitution assay
The CFU-E adhesion assay and the erythroblastic island reconstitution assay were performed as previously described.19,21 Details are given in the Online Supplementary Appendix.
In vivo integrin-blocking assay
Mice were injected i.v. with 30 μg of blocking antibodies (eBioscience, CD49d (clone CR1-2) and CD29 (clone eBioHMb1-1) diluted in PBS. Control mice received 30 μg of isotype-matched control antibodies in PBS or PBS alone. Hematopoietic organs were analyzed by FACS.
Induction of anemia
Hemolytic anemia was induced by phenylhydrazine injection. Mice received sterile phenylhydrazine solution (Sigma) intraperitoneally to achieve a desired dose (40 mg/kg or 80 mg/kg) at indicated time points. Control mice were injected with PBS only. Blood was analyzed at days 0, 3, 6 and 10 on a hematological analyzer: ADVIA 120 (Bayer Diagnostic, Rockefeller University, NY, USA) or XE-2100 (Sysmex, Medical Clinik I, Hematology/Oncology, TU, Dresden, Germany).
Statistic analysis
Data were analyzed using unpaired two-tailed t-tests. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.005.
Results
SWAP-70 is expressed early in erythropoiesis and is required for colony-forming unit-erythroid development
SWAP-70 is expressed in cells of the hematopoietic system,22 including B lymphocytes,14 mast cells23 and dendritic cells.24 However, a detailed analysis of the different hematopoietic lineages and cell types has not yet been performed. We, therefore, aimed to investigate the expression of SWAP-70 during early hematopoiesis. As shown in Online Supplementary Figure S1A, SWAP-70 was found in the primitive stem cell and progenitor containing fraction (Linc-kitSca-1) and myeloid-erythroid progenitors (Linc-kitSca-1). SWAP-70 levels in terminally differentiating erythroblasts were analyzed as proposed by Liu et al.25 (Online Supplementary Figure S1B). According to the scheme, Ery.A, Ery.B and Ery.C erythroblast subpopulations form a developmental sequence with earlier progenitors (basophilic erythroblasts) residing in the Ery.A gate, followed by late basophilic and polychromatic erythroblasts (Ery.B), and later erythroid progenitors (orthochromatic erythroblasts) and reticulocytes found in the Ery.C gate. High levels of SWAP-70 were detected in the majority of Ery.A cells (Online Supplementary Figure S1B, lower right), which, comparable to splenic B220+ cells, was used as a positive control (Online Supplementary Figure S2A). Some of the Ery.A and Ery.B cells were SWAP-70 (Online Supplementary Figure S1B, histograms). Ery.C did not withstand the fixation and permeabilization procedure and were not, therefore, analyzed. SWAP-70 was not detected by immunoblotting of lysates from mature erythrocytes circulating in the bloodstream (data not shown). As assessed by immunofluorescence analysis of MACS-purified Ter119 erythroblasts, SWAP-70 is distributed throughout the cytoplasm with partial overlap of F-actin structures at the cell membrane (Online Supplementary Figure S2B). Since SWAP-70 regulates F-actin dynamics in several cell types, we stained F-actin for microscopic analysis and for FACS analysis of F-actin content in wt and Swap-70 erythroblasts. No significant difference was observed (Online Supplementary Figure S2C and 2D). On Giemsa stained cytospins (data not shown) Swap-70 erythroblasts looked similar to wt ones suggesting that erythroblast morphology is not grossly affected by the absence of SWAP-70.
As SWAP-70 expression was detected in early erythroid progenitors, we sought to investigate whether SWAP-70 deficiency affects erythrocyte development. Megakaryocyte-erythocyte progenitors were identified by the surface expression of FcγR (CD16/32) and CD34 within lineage-Sca-1c-kit bone marrow cells (Figure 1A) as proposed by Akashi et al.26 A significant reduction in the percentage of megakaryocyte-erythocyte progenitors was observed in the bone marrow of young 129SvEMS Swap70 mice but not in older animals (Figure 1B), while in Swap-70 mice of C57BL/6 background reduced numbers of megakaryocyte-erythocyte progenitors were detected only in older (more than 14 weeks) animals.
The development of BFU-E and CFU-E was analyzed by a clonogenic assay. The numbers of BFU-E colonies derived from either bone marrow or splenocytes were similar between wt and Swap-70 mice (Figure 1C). In contrast, Swap-70 bone marrow cells and splenocytes generated significantly fewer CFU-E colonies (Figure 1D). These results were confirmed by FACS analysis of CFU-E defined as LinIL7RαIl3RαCD41c-kitCD71 (Online Supplementary Figure S3) as described previously.20 Together, these data show that the hematopoietic tissues (bone marrow and spleen) of Swap-70 mice do not support efficient development of CFU-E.
Disturbed erythroblastic differentiation in Swap-70−/−erythropoietic tissues
We hypothesized that SWAP-70 may be important for the development, homeostasis and/or survival of CFU-E in the bone marrow and spleen. To evaluate whether the reduced number of CFU-E affects erythroid homeostasis, we performed detailed analyses of progenitors following the CFU-E stage. The 2-fold reduction of CFU-E in Swap-70 mice did not lead to a dramatic decrease in the percentage of proEB and Ter119 erythroblasts in the bone marrow of adult mice (Figure 2A). However, the absolute numbers of these cells were strongly reduced (Figure 2C, left; Online Supplementary Figure S4A and S4B, left).
The number of splenic Ter119 cells was severely affected in Swap-70 mice (Figure 2B and 2C, right). In the 129SvEMS background the deficiency was acquired later in development. Seemingly reduced erythroblast numbers in the spleen of C57BL5 Swap70 animals were not statistically significant (Online Supplementary Figure S4B, right).
Regardless of the age or the erythropoietic site – bone marrow or spleen – the aberration of Ery.A, Ery.B and Ery.C populations is obvious in Swap-70 mice (Figure 2A). When the relative amount of each erythroblastic subpopulation was quantified as percentage of total bone marrow cells or splenocytes, it became apparent that SWAP-70 is required for the developmental transition from Ery.A to Ery.C (Online Supplementary Figure S5A and S5B). Generation of Ery.B cells is reduced by nearly 2-fold in the absence of SWAP-70. It is noteworthy that the most mature erythroblasts, Ery.C, were present even at higher frequency, suggesting that maturation is compensated for and proceeds and that the Ery.C pool of progenitors either accumulates or is generated in higher relative numbers despite the fact that Ery.B development is impaired.
We tested whether increased apoptosis of late erythroblasts and/or abnormal proliferation of early erythroblasts might account for the altered erythroblastic profile in Swap-70 hematopoietic tissues. In contrast, lower numbers of annexinVTer119 erythroblasts were detected in the bone marrow and spleen of Swap-70mice compared to wt mice (Online Supplementary Figure S6). The in vivo proliferation rate was slower only in Swap-70 splenic erythroblasts as assessed by BrdU labeling (Online Supplementary Figure S7).
In summary, SWAP-70 deficiency affects erythropoiesis, resulting in lower numbers of Ter119 in the bone marrow and spleen, and influences the developmental transition of erythroblasts from Ery.A to Ery.B and Ery.C.
SWAP-70 controls the activation state of α4 integrins
Integrin-dependent homotypic hyper-aggregation and hyper-adhesion of Swap-70 B lymphocytes and mast cells has been previously shown.16,18 To gain insights into the mechanisms by which SWAP-70 affects erythropoiesis, its integrin regulatory function was analyzed in erythroid precursors. We speculated that SWAP-70 might control integrin activity during erythropoiesis and, therefore, decided to focus on the α4β1 integrin, known to be important in erythroblast development.4,9
The adhesive properties of wt and Swap-70 bone marrow CFU-E, the first stage of erythropoiesis that depends on SWAP-70, were compared. No significant difference was observed (data not shown) in the surface expression of α4β1 as measured by FACS of wt and Swap-70 Linc-kitCD71 bone marrow progenitors. The activation status of α4β1 in wt and Swap-70 CFU-E was tested in a soluble ligand (VCAM-1) binding assay. Without prior activation, a significant fraction of Swap-70 CFU-E bound higher amounts of VCAM-1 (Figure 3A; middle histogram), generating a distinct VCAM-1 population. The VCAM-1 populations of Swap-70 and wt largely overlapped, and the wt showed only a VCAM population in addition. After stimulation of α4β1 by adding Mn, a non-specific integrin activator, the mean fluorescence intensity values increased for both wt and Swap-70, giving rise to rather homogenous VCAM-1 populations (Figure 3A, bottom histogram), suggesting a high affinity VCAM-1-α4β1 interaction. No VCAM-1 cells remained and the difference between wt and Swap-70 progenitors largely vanished. These data suggest pre-activation of α4β1 integrin on Swap-70 erythroid progenitors. Similarly, early erythroid progenitors have been reported to express αL integrin.27 However, we confirmed the effect of SWAP-70 on α4 regulation to be specific by performing similar assays using soluble ICAM-1, which is the ligand for αL (Online Supplementary Figure S8A).
The aberrant α4β1 pre-activation in Swap-70 CFU-E was further analyzed in a functional adhesion assay in which CFU-E adhesion to fibronectin was evaluated.21 Adherent and non-adherent bone marrow cells were tested for colony formation (Online Supplementary Figure S9A). In total, fewer colonies were recovered from either adherent or non-adherent Swap-70 bone marrow cells, which corroborates our finding that CFU-E development is SWAP-70 dependent. Approximately half of wt bone marrow CFU-E were attached to fibronectin (Figure 3C). A similar number of colonies was recovered from the non-attached wt cell fraction. However, a significantly higher fraction of Swap-70 bone marrow CFU-E adhered to fibronectin. Thus, the ratio of adherent to non-adherent CFU-E was higher for Swap-70 cells (Figure 3D). These results demonstrate that Swap-70 CFU-E hyper-adhere to fibronectin, possibly due to constitutive pre-activation of the α4 integrin, suggesting a role for SWAP-70 as a regulator of α4 integrin function.
Erythroblastic island architecture is affected by a lack of SWAP-70
The above results suggest that SWAP-70 regulates α4 integrin function in early erythroid precursors. Later in erythroid development, α4-dependent interactions are necessary for erythroblasts to associate via VCAM-1 with a central macrophage, which supports erythroblastic island formation and integrity, thereby creating a specialized niche for erythroid development.28 We, therefore, investigated whether SWAP-70-mediated α4 integrin regulation is involved in erythroblastic island formation and/or maintenance.
First the α4 expression on erythroblasts was analyzed (Online Supplementary Figure S9B). In agreement with published data,4 α4β1 down-regulation was observed from proEB to Ery.C. The main difference between wt and Swap-70 mice was observed in splenic Ery.A and Ery.B populations where Swap-70 erythroblasts were mainly α4β1 and α4β1.
Next we looked at whether a SWAP-70 deficiency affects the erythroblastic niche, potentially altering normal erythroblast development. To investigate the structure of erythroblastic islands, we performed an in vitro reconstitution assay as described previously.19 Figure 3F shows examples of reconstituted erythroblastic islands. We did not detect a significant difference in the number of erythroblastic islands formed from either wt or Swap-70 bone marrow cells under non-activating or activating (Mn) conditions (data not shown). However, a detailed analysis of Swap-70erythroblastic islands revealed higher numbers of irregular structures and aggregates, such as macrophages surrounded by fewer erythroblasts or homotypic (erythroblast-erythroblast) aggregates (Figure 3D). Therefore, the architecture of erythroblastic islands rather than their formation seems to be affected by a lack of SWAP-70.
In vivo inhibition of α4 and β1 restores SWAP-70 deficiency defects
Our results strongly suggest a role for SWAP-70 in controlling the proper functioning of α4β1 integrins in erythroid cells. Swap-70 early progenitors (CFU-E) aberrantly pre-activate α4β1 (Figure 3). In the absence of SWAP-70, adhesion of Ery.A cells to splenic sections is higher (Online Supplementary Figure S8B and S8C), and erythroblastic island reconstitution in vitro is irregular (Figure 3D). Consequently, we asked whether interfering with the α4 integrin function in Swap-70 mice could have a positive effect and revert the erythroblastic developmental abnormality.
To test our hypothesis, we blocked α4 and β1 integrin chains by a single intravenous injection of anti-α4, anti-β1 or a combination of both antibodies. No changes in erythroblastic populations in wt and Swap-70 bone marrow were observed after 12 h (data not shown). However, the effect of blocking antibodies on bone marrow erythropoiesis of Swap-70 mice was significant after 24 h. Neither relative nor absolute numbers of Ter119 cells changed significantly after injection (Figure 4B). Interestingly, the Ery.A-to-Ery.B transition was rescued by blocking either the α4, the β1 or both chains (Figure 4A and 4C, Online Supplementary Figure S10).
Thus, in vivo blocking of α4 and/or β1 restores the defects caused by the lack of SWAP-70.
Recovery from acute anemia is delayed in Swap-70−/− mice
To assess the overall biological impact of SWAP-70 on steady-state erythropoiesis, we analyzed the peripheral blood of SWAP-70-deficient mice and did not detect any abnormalities (Online Supplementary Table S1). However, would Swap-70 mice recover normally from anemic stress? Some mouse mutants such as α4 and β1 conditional “knockouts” fail to respond properly to acute anemia despite having nearly normal blood parameters.12,13 Wild-type and Swap-70 mice were subjected to phenylhydrazine-induced hemolytic anemia. A high dose of phenylhydrazine led to severe anemia with a drop in hematocrit to 10% as measured by day 3 (data not shown). Wild-type mice mounted an efficient response and only one out of five mice died at day 5, corresponding to a survival rate of 80% (Figure 5A). However, all Swap-70 mice died during the recovery period.
To assess the kinetics of recovery, mice were subjected to a sublethal dose of phenylhydrazine. Treatment with phenylhydrazine led to a drop in hematocrit to about 20% in both wt and Swap-70 mice at day 3 (Figure 5B, left). However, the hematocrit of Swap-70 mice was restored significantly less efficiently than that of wt mice; by day 6, when the maximum response is expected,29 wt mice had re-established nearly normal hematocrit levels, whereas the hematocrit had reached only 35% in Swap-70 mice (Figure 5B). Another indication of an inefficient or delayed response was the lower reticulocyte count in the blood of Swap-70 mice at day 6 (Figure 5B, right).
To assess whether the pretreatment of Swap-70 mice with α4- or β1-blocking antibodies would support an efficient recovery comparable to that of wt, we injected mice with a single dose of blocking antibodies 24 h prior to induction of anemia and monitored recovery over 10 days (Figure 5C). In these experiments, the kinetics of the response was different from that observed in previous experiments due to less efficient induction of anemia (drop of hematocrit to 30%) at day 3 (data not shown). At day 6, all mice already had a normal hematocrit and reticulocyte counts, similar to day 10 of previous experiments (i.e. at the end of the recovery period). Nevertheless, a significant difference in reticulocyte numbers of mice from different groups was observed (Figure 5C). Swap-70 mice injected with α4- or a combination of α4- and β1-blocking antibodies had similar reticulocyte counts to wt mice. Non-treated Swap-70 mice had significantly higher numbers of circulating reticulocytes compared to wt and anti-α4-treated Swap-70 mice. Interestingly, the blocking of β1 had a very pronounced effect in Swap-70 mice: the number of reticulocytes was two times higher than that in wt or Swap-70mice of any group. This effect might be due to interference not only with VLA-4 (α4β1) but also with other β1-containing integrin pairs (e.g. αvβ1, expressed on macrophages or α5β1, expressed on erythroblasts).27
We also tested the necessity for SWAP-70 for proper stress-induced erythropoiesis in other settings (after lethal irradiation) and showed that it is required for efficient recovery and re-establishment of in vivo erythopoiesis (Online Supplementary Figure S11).
Discussion
Functions of SWAP-70 have so far only been investigated in cells of the immune system. In this study, we report a novel role of SWAP-70 as a regulator of integrin-mediated erythroblast transition during terminal maturation and stress-induced erythropoiesis. We demonstrate the expression of SWAP-70 in a primitive stem cell and progenitor containing fraction and myeloid-erythroid precursors (Online Supplementary Figure S1). Early in erythropoiesis, SWAP-70 is required at the CFU-E stage and its deficiency in Swap-70 mice primarily affects CFU-E in the bone marrow and spleen (Figure 1). Comparable numbers of BFU-E in wt and Swap-70 hematopoietic tissues may indicate a requirement for SWAP-70 either for the differentiation of BFU-E into CFU-E or, alternatively, for CFU-E survival and maintenance. Among others, c-kit and Epo signaling pathways control the development of erythroid cells at the BFU-E/CFU-E stage.30,31 Our data show no evidence for a requirement of SWAP-70 in Epo-dependent CFU-E development when sorted wt and Swap-70CFU-E were plated onto Epo-containing methylcellulose, giving rise to the same number of colonies (data not shown). Moreover, the differentiation of Epo-dependent early erythroblasts is not impaired in Swap-70 mice. However, the crosstalk between different cytokine signaling pathways (c-kit and Epo) and, for example, elements of the extracellular matrix, such as fibronectin, should be studied in more detail in future experiments. Swap-70 mice show reduced CFU-E but normal BFU-E frequencies similar to c-kitW/W mice [c-kit receptor natural white-spotted (W)], which fail to express the c-kit receptor on the cell surface,32 or to kitL mice, which lack the kit ligand.33 We previously reported an involvement of SWAP-70 in c-kit-mediated and c-kit-independent adhesion and migration of mast cells on fibronectin.18 Taking into account our mast cell data, we hypothesize that SWAP-70 might act at this stage of erythroid development by integrating and/or modulating c-kit and integrin signaling pathways, although other mechanisms should also be considered. The results of in vitro adhesion of CFU-E to fibronectin presented in this study strongly suggest a function of SWAP-70 as a negative regulator of integrin activity in these cells. Whether the impaired development of Swap-70 CFU-Es in vivo is caused by loss of that integrin control function remains a hypothesis, which future experiments need to test.
The reduced absolute number of Ter119 cells in the bone marrow of Swap-70 mice probably reflects a general decline in hematopoiesis since the relative number of these cells was not significantly affected (Figure 2). However, SWAP-70 appears to be more important for the erythroblastic development in the spleen. This could be due to different environmental conditions encountered by developing erythrocytes in their respective niches and localizations. The murine spleen features a unique microenvironment that supports extensive erythropoiesis in stress conditions34 but suppresses steady-state erythropoiesis. An enhanced rate of apoptosis of splenic erythroblasts in comparison to bone marrow erythroblasts mediated through Fas-FasL homotypic interactions has been described25 but is not yet fully understood. In Swap-70mice, the decreased number of splenic Ter119 erythroblasts is unlikely to be due to increased apoptosis, but rather to correlate with moderately reduced proliferation as assayed by BrdU incorporation (Online Supplementary Figures S6 and S7). Interestingly, annexin V staining revealed even lower numbers of positive erythroblasts in the Swap-70 spleen. As has been described, Fas-mediated apoptosis provides a negative autoregulatory mechanism to maintain the correct number of erythroblasts in steady state.35,36 One explanation could, therefore, be that as Swap-70 erythroblasts are found in lower numbers, they do not exceed homeostatic numbers and thus do not undergo as much apoptosis as wt cells. In both erythropoietic organs, the erythroblastic developmental transition is affected by SWAP-70 deficiency. In the bone marrow and spleen of Swap-70 mice, similar numbers of Ery.A, i.e. basophilic erythroblasts, are generated but the frequency of the following progenitor, Ery.B, is strongly reduced. However, these mice compensate for this deficiency and produce similar numbers of orthochromatic erythroblasts, reticulocytes and mature erythrocytes, thereby maintaining blood homeostasis. Is SWAP-70 required for Ery. A to Ery.B progression or does it regulate the rate of the Ery.B to Ery.C transition? Ery.B erythroblasts start to enucleate and SWAP-70 might interfere with this process, for example, by regulating F-actin dynamics and/or RhoGTPases, which are required for efficient enucleation,37 similar to its function in mast cells.18 However according to our data the expression of SWAP-70 terminates earlier and is very low at the Ery.B stage (Online Supplementary Figure 1B). The prominent function of SWAP-70 may, therefore, be during the Ery.A to Ery.B transition. The increase of Ery.C cells probably reflects a compensatory mechanism.
Eshghi et al. proposed a two-phase model for growth factor and extracellular matrix regulation of erythropoiesis, with an Epo-dependent, integrin-independent phase followed by an Epo-independent, α4β1-integrin-dependent phase.4 According to their published data, bone marrow and splenic Ery.B cells would phenotypically correspond to 2-day in vitro-cultured fetal liver erythroblasts that are in the α4β1-integrin-dependent phase. Similar to CFU-E that feature preactivated α4β1 (Figure 3), Swap-70erythroblasts showed a strong increase in adhesion to frozen spleen sections, indicating more active integrins (Online Supplementary Figure S8). We hypothesized that perturbed adhesive interactions of developing Swap-70erythroblasts might impair the developmental transition to Ery.B. We analyzed α4β1 expression on erythroblasts, but interpret the contrasting α4β1 pattern of bone marrow and splenic erythroblasts as a reflection of the altered erythroblastic subpopulations in Swap-70 mice.
Next, we interfered with the α4 and β1 integrin function in vivo. For this purpose, we treated mice with blocking antibodies and analyzed bone marrow after 24 h (Figure 4 and Online Supplementary Figure S10). Single antibody injection did not cause any notable change in wt, but could clearly rescue the impaired transition from Ery.B to Ery.C in Swap-70 bone marrow when either α4 or β1 chains were blocked. Of note, no significant changes in Ter119 absolute or relative cell numbers were observed. We cannot exclude, however, the possibility of side effects such as targeting cells other than erythroblasts. In our study, we tested two doses of blocking antibodies, 30 μg and 50 μg per mouse, both of them having similar effects on Swap-70 mice and no effect on wt mice.
We further analyzed the structure of erythroblastic islands in Swap-70 mice assuming that SWAP-70 might be important for their formation and integrity, which also require integrin-mediated interactions. Similar numbers of erythroblastic islands were assembled from wt and Swap-70 bone marrow single cell suspensions. However, their structure was compromised when Swap-70 cells were used, i.e. they contained fewer cells around the central macrophage and were disorganized in contrast to the flower-like structures observed with wt cells. The increased erythroblastic homotypic aggregation of Swap-70 cells was notable (Figure 3). These results might also reflect the altered erythroblastic subset distribution in Swap-70 mice, since the irregular erythroblastic islands with fewer cells might be formed with the shortage of Swap-70 Ery.B cells.
The requirement for SWAP-70 in steady-state conditions is not as crucial as for the quick stress response to acute anemia. Although a SWAP-70 deficiency affects early erythroid progenitors at the CFU-E stage, the erythroblastic profile and the erythroblastic island architecture, it does not influence blood homeostasis (Online Supplementary Table S1). Thus, the activity of a fraction of the CFU-E may suffice in steady-state conditions for the normal turnover of circulating erythrocytes. The excess CFU-E in the wt could serve as a reserve for stress conditions. In fact, BFU-E and CFU-E numbers increase dramatically 10- to 100-fold during stress erythropoiesis.39 Notwithstanding, it is not known whether all the CFU-E progenitors are in an active differentiation state in vivo and contribute fully to erythropoietic homeostasis. During the response to acute anemia, a tight cooperation of cytokines and integrins is a prerequisite for an efficient response. It was previously shown that convergence of Sonic hedgehog (Shh), bone morphogenic protein 4 (BMP4), and stem cell factor-dependent signaling is necessary for the development and expansion of BMP4 responsive stress erythroid progenitors.34 Recent studies reported combinatorial and distinct roles of α4 and α5 integrins in stress erythropoiesis.11,12 We hypothesized that the reduced splenic erythroid reserve of Swap-70 mice and the lack of the integrin-regulatory function of SWAP-70 in erythroid progenitors might affect efficient stress responses (Figure 5). Upon severe phenylhydrazine-induced anemia with a concomitant drop of hematocrit to 10%, SWAP-70 was essential for survival. In subsequent experiments in which lower doses of phenylhydrazine were used or in which bone marrow transplantation after myeloablation was performed, a delay in the recovery of Swap-70 mice compared to wt mice was evident (Figure 5 and Online Supplementary Figure 11). This failure of Swap-70 mice to mount an efficient stress response is probably due to delayed erythrocyte production since Swap-70 mice ultimately recover after stress. Regardless of the level of induced anemia, the kinetics of hematocrit restoration or reticulocyte production differed significantly between wt and Swap-70 mice.
Similar to other “knockout” mouse models for integrin-related proteins, such as the focal adhesion kinase Fak,7 or the conditional integrin β1 deficient mouse,12 the data obtained from Swap-70 mice suggest that SWAP-70 is required for splenic and stress-induced erythropoiesis. In addition, a recent report lists SWAP-70 among proteins present in focal adhesions, structures involved in integrin signaling modulating cell migration, growth and differentiation.40 The findings presented here, together with the reported capability of SWAP-70 to associate with the cell membrane, its interaction with RAC1 and RHOA and its role in the modulation of F-actin cytoskeletal rearrangements, support the notion of hitherto unknown functions of SWAP-70 in regulating α4 integrin-dependent maturation and/or development of erythroid progenitors under homeostatic or stress conditions.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Hans-Reimer Rodewald and Dr. Grzegorz Terszowski for initial help with the colony-forming assays, FACS analysis and FACS sorting of early progenitors (CFU-E), Dr. Barry Coller, Rob Blue (Rockefeller University, NY, USA) and Christian Thiede (TU Dresden, Germany) for help with blood analyses, Carlos Andrés Chacón-Martínez and Dr. François McNicoll for critical reading and editing of the manuscript and Nadine Kiessling for technical support.
Footnotes
- Funding: this work was supported by the DFG through the SFB655 (B4).
- The online version of this article has a Supplementary Appendix.
- Authorship and Disclosures The information provided by the authors about contributions from persons listed as authors and in acknowledgments is available with the full text of this paper at www.haematologica.org.
- Financial and other disclosures provided by the authors using the ICMJE (www.icmje.org) Uniform Format for Disclosure of Competing Interests are also available at www.haematologica.org.
- Received June 23, 2011.
- Revision received August 5, 2011.
- Accepted August 17, 2011.
References
- Testa U. Apoptotic mechanisms in the control of erythropoiesis. Leukemia. 2004; 18(7):1176-99. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2403383Google Scholar
- Chasis JA, Mohandas N. Erythroblastic islands: niches for erythropoiesis. Blood. 2008; 112(3):470-8. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-03-077883Google Scholar
- Kapur R, Cooper R, Zhang L, Williams DA. Cross-talk between alpha(4)beta(1)/alpha(5)beta(1) and c-Kit results in opposing effect on growth and survival of hematopoietic cells via the activation of focal adhesion kinase, mitogen-activated protein kinase, and Akt signaling pathways. Blood. 2001; 97(7):1975-81. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V97.7.1975Google Scholar
- Eshghi S, Vogelezang MG, Hynes RO, Griffith LG, Lodish HF. Alpha4beta1 integrin and erythropoietin mediate temporally distinct steps in erythropoiesis: integrins in red cell development. J Cell Biol. 2007; 177(5):871-80. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200702080Google Scholar
- Kovach NL, Lin N, Yednock T, Harlan JM, Broudy VC. Stem cell factor modulates avidity of alpha 4 beta 1 and alpha 5 beta 1 integrins expressed on hematopoietic cell lines. Blood. 1995; 85(1):159-67. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Levesque JP, Haylock DN, Simmons PJ. Cytokine regulation of proliferation and cell adhesion are correlated events in human CD34+ hemopoietic progenitors. Blood. 1996; 88(4):1168-76. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vemula S, Ramdas B, Hanneman P, Martin J, Beggs HE, Kapur R. Essential role for focal adhesion kinase in regulating stress hematopoiesis. Blood. 2010; 116(20):4103-15. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-01-262790Google Scholar
- Yanai N, Sekine C, Yagita H, Obinata M. Roles for integrin very late activation antigen-4 in stroma-dependent erythropoiesis. Blood. 1994; 83(10):2844-50. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hamamura K, Matsuda H, Takeuchi Y, Habu S, Yagita H, Okumura K. A critical role of VLA-4 in erythropoiesis in vivo. Blood. 1996; 87(6):2513-7. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arroyo AG, Yang JT, Rayburn H, Hynes RO. Alpha4 integrins regulate the proliferation/differentiation balance of multilineage hematopoietic progenitors in vivo. Immunity. 1999; 11(5):555-66. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80131-4Google Scholar
- Scott LM, Priestley GV, Papayannopoulou T. Deletion of alpha4 integrins from adult hematopoietic cells reveals roles in homeostasis, regeneration, and homing. Mol Cell Biol. 2003; 23(24):9349-60. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.23.24.9349-9360.2003Google Scholar
- Ulyanova T, Jiang Y, Padilla S, Nakamoto B, Papayannopoulou T. Combinatorial and distinct roles of alpha and alpha integrins in stress erythropoiesis in mice. Blood. 2011; 117(3):975-85. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-05-283218Google Scholar
- Bungartz G, Stiller S, Bauer M, Muller W, Schippers A, Wagner N. Adult murine hematopoiesis can proceed without beta1 and beta7 integrins. Blood. 2006; 108(6):1857-64. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2005-10-007658Google Scholar
- Borggrefe T, Wabl M, Akhmedov AT, Jessberger R. A B-cell-specific DNA recombination complex. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273(27):17025-35. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.27.17025Google Scholar
- Shinohara M, Terada Y, Iwamatsu A, Shinohara A, Mochizuki N, Higuchi M. SWAP-70 is a guanine-nucleotide-exchange factor that mediates signalling of membrane ruffling. Nature. 2002; 416(6882):759-63. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/416759aGoogle Scholar
- Chopin M, Quemeneur L, Ripich T, Jessberger R. SWAP-70 controls formation of the splenic marginal zone through regulating T1B cell differentiation. Eur J Immunol. 2010; 40(12):3544-56. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201040556Google Scholar
- Borggrefe T, Keshavarzi S, Gross B, Wabl M, Jessberger R. Impaired IgE response in SWAP-70-deficient mice. Eur J Immunol. 2001; 31(8):2467-75. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4141(200108)31:8<2467::AID-IMMU2467>3.0.CO;2-PGoogle Scholar
- Sivalenka RR, Jessberger R. SWAP-70 regulates c-kit-induced mast cell activation, cell-cell adhesion, and migration. Mol Cell Biol. 2004; 24(23):10277-88. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.23.10277-10288.2004Google Scholar
- Lee G, Lo A, Short SA, Mankelow TJ, Spring F, Parsons SF. Targeted gene deletion demonstrates that the cell adhesion molecule ICAM-4 is critical for erythroblastic island formation. Blood. 2006; 108(6):2064-71. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-03-006759Google Scholar
- Terszowski G, Waskow C, Conradt P, Lenze D, Koenigsmann J, Carstanjen D. Prospective isolation and global gene expression analysis of the erythrocyte colony-forming unit (CFU-E). Blood. 2005; 105(5):1937-45. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2004-09-3459Google Scholar
- Goltry KL, Patel VP. Specific domains of fibronectin mediate adhesion and migration of early murine erythroid progenitors. Blood. 1997; 90(1):138-47. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Borggrefe T, Masat L, Wabl M, Riwar B, Cattoretti G, Jessberger R. Cellular, intracellular, and developmental expression patterns of murine SWAP-70. Eur J Immunol. 1999; 29(6):1812-22. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199906)29:06<1812::AID-IMMU1812>3.0.CO;2-JGoogle Scholar
- Gross B, Borggrefe T, Wabl M, Sivalenka RR, Bennett M, Rossi AB. SWAP-70-deficient mast cells are impaired in development and IgE-mediated degranulation. Eur J Immunol. 2002; 32(4):1121-8. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4141(200204)32:4<1121::AID-IMMU1121>3.0.CO;2-RGoogle Scholar
- Oberbanscheidt P, Balkow S, Kuhnl J, Grabbe S, Bahler M. SWAP-70 associates transiently with macropinosomes. Eur J Cell Biol. 2007; 86(1):13-24. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcb.2006.08.005Google Scholar
- Liu Y, Pop R, Sadegh C, Brugnara C, Haase VH, Socolovsky M. Suppression of Fas-FasL coexpression by erythropoietin mediates erythroblast expansion during the erythropoietic stress response in vivo. Blood. 2006; 108(1):123-33. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2005-11-4458Google Scholar
- Akashi K, Traver D, Miyamoto T, Weissman IL. A clonogenic common myeloid progenitor that gives rise to all myeloid lineages. Nature. 2000; 404(6774):193-7. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/35004599Google Scholar
- Papayannopoulou T, Brice M. Integrin expression profiles during erythroid differentiation. Blood. 1992; 79(7):1686-94. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sadahira Y, Yoshino T, Monobe Y. Very late activation antigen 4-vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 interaction is involved in the formation of erythroblastic islands. J Exp Med. 1995; 181(1):411-5. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1084/jem.181.1.411Google Scholar
- Socolovsky M, Nam H, Fleming MD, Haase VH, Brugnara C, Lodish HF. Ineffective erythropoiesis in Stat5a(−/−)5b(−/−) mice due to decreased survival of early erythroblasts. Blood. 2001; 98(12):3261-73. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V98.12.3261Google Scholar
- Dolznig H, Grebien F, Deiner EM, Stangl K, Kolbus A, Habermann B. Erythroid progenitor renewal versus differentiation: genetic evidence for cell autonomous, essential functions of EpoR, Stat5 and the GR. Oncogene. 2006; 25(20):2890-900. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1209308Google Scholar
- Koury MJ, Bondurant MC. Erythropoietin retards DNA breakdown and prevents programmed death in erythroid progenitor cells. Science (New York, NY). 1990; 248(4953):378-81. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2326648Google Scholar
- Waskow C, Terszowski G, Costa C, Gassmann M, Rodewald HR. Rescue of lethal c-KitW/W mice by erythropoietin. Blood. 2004; 104(6):1688-95. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2004-04-1247Google Scholar
- Chui DH, Liao SK, Walker K. Fetal erythropoiesis in steel mutant mice. III. Defect in differentiation from BFU-E to CFU-E during early development. Blood. 1978; 51(3):539-47. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paulson RF, Shi L, Wu DC. Stress erythropoiesis: new signals and new stress progenitor cells. Curr Opin Hematol. 2011; 18(3):139-45. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1097/MOH.0b013e32834521c8Google Scholar
- De Maria R, Testa U, Luchetti L, Zeuner A, Stassi G, Pelosi E. Apoptotic role of Fas/Fas ligand system in the regulation of erythropoiesis. Blood. 1999; 93(3):796-803. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Maria R, Zeuner A, Eramo A, Domenichelli C, Bonci D, Grignani F. Negative regulation of erythropoiesis by caspase-mediated cleavage of GATA-1. Nature. 1999; 401(6752):489-93. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/46809Google Scholar
- Ji P, Murata-Hori M, Lodish HF. Formation of mammalian erythrocytes: chromatin condensation and enucleation. Trends Cell Biol. 2011; 21(7):409-15. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2011.04.003Google Scholar
- Chen K, Liu J, Heck S, Chasis JA, An X, Mohandas N. Resolving the distinct stages in erythroid differentiation based on dynamic changes in membrane protein expression during erythropoiesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009; 106(41):17413-8. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0909296106Google Scholar
- Broudy VC, Lin NL, Priestley GV, Nocka K, Wolf NS. Interaction of stem cell factor and its receptor c-kit mediates lodgment and acute expansion of hematopoietic cells in the murine spleen. Blood. 1996; 88(1):75-81. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kuo JC, Han X, Hsiao CT, Yates JR, Waterman CM. Analysis of the myosin-II-responsive focal adhesion proteome reveals a role for beta-Pix in negative regulation of focal adhesion maturation. Nat Cell Biol. 2011; 13(4):383-93. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2216Google Scholar