Normal cells develop, differentiate, proliferate, exert their specific function or simply survive in specific microenvironments, where a team of bystander elements ensures a functional three-dimensional scaffold that allows cell-cell contacts and active molecular cross-talk. In cancer a unique microenvironmental organization is instrumental in the development and thriving of malignant cells: chronic inflammation exposes cells to growth factors, newly formed vessels provide nutrients and immune tolerance avoids immune-mediated elimination. The dissection of the molecular basis of the interactions between cancer cells and their microenvironment is leading to the development of new treatment modalities which are aimed at manipulating the communication of tumor cells with their milieu. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is an instructive example of how these relationships influence the natural history of a disease. Like other mature B-cell malignancies, CLL is characterized by a redirection and reinforcement of malignant cell/microenvironment interactions and new findings concerning these interactions are being translated into clinical practice.1
Antigen stimulation/inflammation and the natural history of chronic lymphocytic leukemia
CLL is a low-grade, B-cell tumor with monoclonal CD5 B cells that relentlessly accumulate in peripheral lymphoid organs and bone marrow and flow into the peripheral blood.2 As most circulating CLL cells are in the G0/early G1 phase of the cell cycle, it was long thought that CLL clones hardly proliferate and die infrequently. CLL was, therefore, considered primarily a disease of accumulation. On the contrary, several data show that the proliferative rates of CLL cells can be higher than expected and indicate that CLL cells have a dynamic kinetic behavior.3,4 At least two aspects account for this behavior. First, CLL cells retain the capacity to respond to stimuli primarily provided by their interactions with stromal cells and T cells within specific microenvironmental niches.2 These interactions favor cell proliferation, up-regulate apoptosis-regulatory proteins and modulate the expression of chemokines and surface molecules. Secondly, the concept of the microenvironment being a regulator of CLL cell growth is tightly linked to a promoting role of antigen stimulation through the B-cell antigen receptor (BCR) on the surface of leukemic cells. Numerous observations indicate a prominent role of antigenic pressure: (i) at least half of patients have somatically mutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable genes (IGHV) that track the clonal history to in vivo BCR activation;5,6 (ii) more than 20% of cases express closely homologous, if not identical, stereotyped BCR which may recognize auto-antigens or bacterial components;7 (iii) in the TCL1 transgenic murine model of CLL8 leukemic immunoglobulins are autoreactive and bind polysaccharides found in bacterial cell membranes. Autoantigens and molecular structures normally involved in scavenging debris, apoptotic cells and pathogenic bacteria appear relevant in triggering and/or facilitating the evolution of at least some CLL clones.9,10 It is also appropriate to consider that inflammatory receptors such as Toll-like receptors (TLR) can be engaged concomitantly with the BCR: hence it becomes reasonable to presume that TLR may also play a role in BCR co-stimulation of CLL cells. Indeed, it was recently shown that bacterial lipopeptides protect CLL cells from spontaneous apoptosis mediated by TLR signaling.11 The relationship between antigen stimulation/inflammation and the natural history of CLL is not surprising considering that inflammation is involved in the initiation and progression of several chronic lymphoid malignancies of B-cell type.
Tissue events
CLL cells circulating in the peripheral blood are the tip of the iceberg. The most significant pathophysiological events occur in tissues2 (Figure 1A,B) where leukemic cells: (i) are activated by exposure to antigens, although it is still unclear where and how this exposure takes place. It is also unclear how BCR stimulation may translate into either cell proliferation or cell anergy and how these processes are mediated by various signal transduction pathways; (ii) receive the proper T-cell help, if and when needed, to be selected for clonal expansion; (iii) proliferate in specific niches, the pseudofollicular proliferation centers, which are not detected in any other B-cell malignancy, but are observed in inflamed tissues of patients with systemic autoimmune/inflammatory disorders; and (iv) interact with stromal cells that favor cell accumulation. CLL cells not only interact with but also shape their conducive microenvironments by recruiting activated T cells and stromal cells by means of chemokines and chemokine receptors.1,2
These facts indicate that CLL cells are antigen-experienced B cells that traffic and home to and from specific microenvironmental niches, such as the still mysterious pseudofollicular proliferation centers. Lymphocyte localization appears to depend on the sequential engagement of adhesion molecules and activation through chemokine receptors. CLL cells express functional CXCR3, CXCR4, and CXCR5 chemokine receptors that direct leukemic cell chemotaxis in vitro.2 Within pseudofollicular proliferation centers, proliferating leukemic lymphocytes are in contact with numerous CD3 T cells, most of which are CD4, with many expressing CD40L that can support the growth of CLL cells through CD40 ligation.12,13 In vitro (and likely in vivo) CLL cell apoptosis can be prevented by an interaction with stromal and nurse-like cells.14 The interaction between CD38 on the surface of CLL cells and its natural ligand CD3115 also favors the survival of leukemic cells. Cytokines such as interleukin-4 and chemokines such as CXCL13/SDF-1 might support the expansion of CLL clones by promoting the up-regulation of anti-apoptotic genes including BCL2, SURVIVIN, and MCL1. Taken together several findings suggest that T-cell subsets provide short-term support that influences malignant B-cell proliferation and that different subpopulations of stromal and accessory cells provide long-term support that favors prolonged survival and accumulation.2 The exposure of malignant cell subclones to microenvironmental stimuli results in increased proliferation, a prerequisite for the occurrence of new genetic abnormalities that lead to the development of a more aggressive disease.
In this issue of the journal, Schulz et al.16 touch upon the issue of inflammatory cytokines and signaling pathways associated with CLL cell survival. Their investigation started from the well known notion that while CLL cells have prolonged survival in vivo, they tend to die rapidly in vitro unless they are co-cultured in the presence of stromal accessory cells. The authors tried to characterize the molecular basis of the survival-inducing cross-talk provided by these interactions with the long-term goal of identifying potential novel therapeutic targets. To this end they established different survival-supportive culture conditions which were essentially based on the use of stromal cells or of stromal cell conditioned medium and investigated the gene expression changes of leukemic cells by means of microarray-based profiles and the composition of soluble factors by means of cytokine antibody arrays. Their findings show that an inflammatory microenvironment, including TLR, is at the basis of the survival support provided by the culture system. Consistent with this possibility they found that inflammatory cytokine genes are up-regulated. Among these genes chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2) was shown to be induced in monocytes by the presence of CLL cells in vitro. Increased serum levels of this chemokine were detected in patients. CCL2, also known as monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) and small inducible cytokine A2, is a chemokine structurally related to the CXC family of cytokines which binds to the chemokine receptors CCR2 and CCR4.17,18 CCL2 is a very attractive potential microenvironmental actor within the cancer microenvironment as it is primarily secreted by monocytes, macrophages and dendritic cells, has chemo-tactic activity for monocytes and basophils, appears to recruit monocytes, memory T cells and dendritic cells to the sites of inflammation, is tethered on endothelial cells by glycosaminoglycan side chains of proteoglycans and is cleaved by metalloproteinases. Within lymphoid malignancies CCL2 has been implicated in the migration and localization of follicular lymphoma cells.19
Novel perspectives
We are starting to understand which genes, molecules and accessory cell subsets are involved in CLL cell/microenvironment interactions and what roles they play. Despite the significant progress made to date, we still have to elucidate the molecular mechanisms through which these cells promote the accumulation of leukemic cells. Further work needs to be done to define the role of cytokines, chemokines and chemokine receptors in shaping a supportive microenvironment, to characterize the still incompletely defined stromal cells and to elucidate the proper place of functionally different T-cell subsets. Three important avenues of investigation are now being used to tackle these issues. The first is the progressive development of experimental approaches, such as those delineated by Schulz et al.,16 which mimic in vitro the interacting events that occur in vivo. The second is represented by animal models which have been invaluable tools to understand leukemogenesis. Numerous animal models of CLL have become available recently and many more are under development. The third major area is based on the observation that monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis, a condition that occurs frequently in the elderly, may be a preleukemic situation as virtually all CLL patients appear to have a preleukemic phase of monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis.20 Understanding which genes are involved in the transition of monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis into overt CLL and investigating to what extent antigen stimulation and an inflammatory proactive microenvironment favor this transition may provide a clue to many unanswered questions.
Footnotes
- Federico Caligaris-Cappio is Professor of Medicine at the Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Head of the Department of Oncology and of the Division of Molecular Oncology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. His main focus is translational research applied to chronic B-cell malignancies.
- Related Original Article on page 408
- Financial and other disclosures provided by the author using the ICMJE (www.icmje.org) Uniform Format for Disclosure of Competing Interests are available with the full text of this paper at www.haematologica.org.
References
- Burger JA, Ghia P, Rosenwald A, Caligaris-Cappio F. The microenvironment in mature B-cell malignancies: a target for new treatment strategies. Blood. 2009; 114(16):3367-75. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-06-225326Google Scholar
- Caligaris-Cappio F, Ghia P. Novel insights in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: are we getting closer to understanding the pathogenesis of the disease?. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(27):4497-503. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.4393Google Scholar
- Messmer BT, Messmer D, Allen SL, Kolitz JE, Kudalkar P, Cesar D. In vivo measurements document the dynamic cellular kinetics of chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells. J Clin Invest. 2005; 115(3):755-64. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1172/JCI200523409Google Scholar
- Calissano C, Damle RN, Hayes G, Murphy EJ, Hellerstein MK, Moreno C. In vivo intraclonal and interclonal kinetic heterogeneity in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2009; 114 (23):4832-42. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-05-219634Google Scholar
- Damle RN, Wasil T, Fais F, Ghiotto F, Valetto A, Allen SL. Ig V gene mutation status and CD38 expression as novel prognostic indicators in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 1999; 94(6):1840-7. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hamblin TJ, Davis Z, Gardiner A, Oscier DG, Stevenson FK. Unmutated Ig V(H) genes are associated with a more aggressive form of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 1999; 94(6):1848-54. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stamatopoulos K, Belessi C, Moreno C, Boudjograh M, Guida G, Smilevska T. Over 20% of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia carry stereotyped receptors: Pathogenetic implications and clinical correlations. Blood. 2007; 109(1):259-70. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-03-012948Google Scholar
- Yan XJ, Albesiano E, Zanesi N, Yancopoulos S, Sawyer A, Romano E. B cell receptors in TCL1 transgenic mice resemble those of aggressive, treatment-resistant human chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006; 103(31):11713-8. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0604564103Google Scholar
- Catera R, Silverman GJ, Hatzi K, Seiler T, Didier S, Zhang L. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells recognize conserved epitopes associated with apoptosis and oxidation. Mol Med. 2008; 14(11–12):665-74. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lanemo Myhrinder A, Hellqvist E, Sidorova E, Söderberg A, Baxendale H, Dahle C. A new perspective: molecular motifs on oxidized LDL, apoptotic cells, and bacteria are targets for chronic lymphocytic leukemia antibodies. Blood. 2008; 111(7):3838-48. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-11-125450Google Scholar
- Muzio M, Scielzo C, Bertilaccio MT, Frenquelli M, Ghia P, Caligaris-Cappio F. Expression and function of toll like receptors in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia cells. Br J Haematol. 2009; 144(4):507-16. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07475.xGoogle Scholar
- Granziero L, Ghia P, Circosta P, Gottardi D, Strola G, Geuna M. Survivin is expressed on CD40 stimulation and interfaces proliferation and apoptosis in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2001; 97(9):2777-83. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V97.9.2777Google Scholar
- Ghia P, Strola G, Granziero L, Geuna M, Guida G, Sallusto F. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells are endowed with the capacity to attract CD4+, CD40L+ T cells by producing CCL22. Eur J Immunol. 2002; 32(5):1403-13. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4141(200205)32:5<1403::AID-IMMU1403>3.0.CO;2-YGoogle Scholar
- Burger JA, Tsukada N, Burger M, Zvaifler NJ, Dell'Aquila M, Kipps TJ. Blood-derived nurse-like cells protect chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells from spontaneous apoptosis through stromal cell-derived factor-1. Blood. 2000; 96(8):2655-63. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deaglio S, Vaisitti T, Billington R, Bergui L, Omede' P, Genazzani AA, Malavasi F. CD38/CD19: a lipid raft-dependent signaling complex in human B cells. Blood. 2007; 109(12):5390-8. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-12-061812Google Scholar
- Schulz A, Toedt G, Zenz T, Stilgenbauer S, Lichter P, Seiffert M. Inflammatory cytokines and signaling pathways are associated with survival of primary chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells in vitro: a dominant role of CCL2. Haematologica. 2011; 96(3):408-16. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2010.031377Google Scholar
- Carr MW, Roth SJ, Luther E, Rose SS, Springer TA. Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 acts as a T-lymphocyte chemoattractant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994; 91(9):3652-6. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.9.3652Google Scholar
- Xu LL, Warren MK, Rose WL, Gong W, Wang JM. Human recombinant monocyte chemotactic protein and other C-C chemokines bind and induce directional migration of dendritic cells in vitro. J Leukoc Biol. 1996; 60(3):365-71. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Husson H, Carideo EG, Cardoso AA, Lugli SM, Neuberg D, Munoz O. MCP-1 modulates chemotaxis by follicular lymphoma cells. Br J Haematol. 2001; 115(3):554-62. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2141.2001.03145.xGoogle Scholar
- Landgren O, Albitar M, Ma W, Abbasi F, Hayes RB, Ghia P. B-cell clones as early markers for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(7):659-67. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0806122Google Scholar