Abstract
Background Vaccine development targeting the novel immunogenic Per ARNT Sim Domain containing 1 (PASD1) cancer testis antigen represents an attractive therapeutic approach for the significant number of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who are refractory to conventional treatment. Since CD4-positive T helper cells have crucial roles in promoting and maintaining immune responses to tumor antigens, the presence of a CD4-positive T-helper immune response to the PASD1 antigen in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma was investigated in the current study.Design and Methods Thirty-one patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (25 with de novo, five with transformed and one with T-cell-rich B-cell lymphoma) were studied. Five immunogenic PASD1 peptides predicted to bind to several major histocompatibiliy complex, class II DR beta 1 alleles were identified using web-based algorithms. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients were used to investigate the immunogenicity of these DR beta 1-restricted peptides in vitro using both gamma-interferon release enzyme-linked immunospot and cytolytic assays.Results Two of the five PASD1 peptides, PASD1(6) and PASD1(7), were shown to be immunogenic in 14 out of 32 patients studied in a gamma-interferon release assay. CD4-positive T-helper cell lines from two patients raised against PASD1 peptides were able to lyse cell lines derived from hematologic malignancies expressing endogenous PASD1 protein.Conclusions This is the first report of a CD4-positive T-helper response to the PASD1 protein in patients with lymphoma. The immunogenic peptides described here represent valuable additional candidates for inclusion in a vaccine to treat patients with PASD1-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma whose disease is refractory to conventional therapies.Introduction
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common form of adult non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and is heterogeneous with respect to morphology, clinical features and immunophenotype.1 Despite advances in the definition of clinically relevant subtypes and treatment, a significant proportion of patients with DLBCL fail to achieve long-term remission.2 The development and use of cancer vaccines boosting the immune response of patients represents an attractive approach to improve therapeutic options for high-risk patients.
A prerequisite for immunotherapeutic approaches is the identification of tumor-associated antigens, of which the cancer-testis antigens are of particular interest.3–6 Cancer-testis antigens, especially the CT-X antigens, have a restricted distribution in normal tissues (being predominantly expressed in testis, an immunoprivileged site with low or even absent HLA expression) but are present in a range of tumors.6,7 Such an expression pattern raises the possibility of targeted treatment while minimizing any attendant potential autoimmune problems for patients.
Although cytotoxic T cells (CTL) are considered to be the major effector cells in tumor immunity, there is increasing evidence for the importance of the CD4 T helper (CD4 Th) cell population in maintaining tumor immunity.8 Possible mechanisms of these cells include roles in maintenance and support of the CTL response, the cross-presentation of tumor antigens, their interaction with other effector cells such as natural killer cells and the release of immunologically relevant cytokines involved in anti-tumor effects, such as interleukin-2 and interferon-γ.9–14 Evidence from human and animal studies has indicated that optimal cancer vaccines require the participation of both CD4 and CD8 T cells.15–17 A recent report highlighted the successful use of tumor-associated antigen-specific CD4 T-cell clones as therapeutic agents in the treatment of melanoma.18
We initially identified PASD1 as a tumor-associated antigen in DLBCL19 and acute myeloid leukemia20 while later studies showed PASD1 to be a novel cancer-testis antigen expressed in a wide range of hematologic malignancies.21,22 Our subsequent identification of a CTL response to PASD1 in DLBCL23 supports this molecule as a candidate for vaccine development, not only for DLBCL, but also for use in a generic vaccine for the treatment of other PASD1-positive malignancies. The current study was performed to investigate the CD4 Th response in DLBCL patients to obtain further support for the inclusion of PASD1 in a lymphoma vaccine.
Design and Methods
Subjects
Peripheral blood was obtained from 31 patients with DLBCL attending the Haematology Departments of the John Radcliffe Hospital (n=28) and the Milton Keynes General Hospital (n=3). Of these 31 patients, 25 had de novo DLBCL, five had transformed DLBCL and one had T-cell rich B-cell lymphoma. The clinical details of these patients are given in Table 1. Peripheral blood was also obtained from five healthy subjects. Tissue typing was done by polymerase chain reaction as previously described.24 Ethical approval and written consent was obtained from the Oxfordshire Research Ethics Committee B for all blood samples collected and tissue sections used in the immunolabeling studies.
Peptides
The TEPITOPE prediction algorithm25 and SYPETHI (www.syf-peithi.de) programs were used to select PASD1 peptides predicted to be immunogenic in the context of HLA-DRB1 *0101, *0301, *0401, *0701,*1101 and *1501 (the most prevalent alleles among the Caucasian population).26 The following peptides were identified: PASD1(6)31–50(DYFNQVTLQLLDGFMITLST); PASD1(7)42–61 (DGFMITLSTDGVIICVAENI); PASD1(8)58–77 (AENISSLL-GHLPAEIVGKKL); PASD1(9)170–189 (VGNVCILRTQLLQQLYTSKA) and PASD1(10)599–618 (NHPVRFLQAQPIVPVQRAAE). The PASD1(6)31–50 peptide encompasses the immunogenic PASD1(1)38–47 CTL epitope while PASD1(8)58–77 encompasses another immunogenic PASD1(3)63–71 CTL epitope.23 The location of the PASD1 peptides in the PASD1 protein is illustrated in Figure 1. The irrelevant control peptide was HIV-1121–140 (DESFRKYTAFTIPSMNNETP) (Invitrogen, UK). The PASD1 peptides were synthesized by standard chemistry and were more than 90% pure (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK).
Preparation and culture of peripheral blood mononuclear cells
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in RPMI 1640 containing 10% fetal calf serum (RPMI 1640/FCS) were prepared as previously described.23 PBMC (2×10) in 200 μL were then added to each well of a 96-well flat-bottomed plate and incubated for 10–14 days with 10 μM of one of following: one of the PASD1 peptides, the irrelevant HIV121–140 peptide, 10 μg/mL phytohemagglu-tinin (Sigma-Aldrich Co. Ltd., Dorset, UK) or RPMI 1640/FCS only. Recombinant interleukin-2 (20 IU/mL; Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA) and recombinant human interleukin-7 (25 ng/mL; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) were added on days 2, 5, and 7. In some experiments, PBMC were co-cultured with the PASD1(1) CTL epitope for 8 days before being used in an enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay.
Enzyme-linked immunospot assay
After 10–14 days of culture, the cells were washed and incubated for 18 h with RPMI 1640/FCS at 37°C in 5% CO2 with one of the PASD1 peptides (10 μM), HIV control peptide (10 μM), phyto-hemagglutinin (10 μg/mL) or medium only. Interferon-γ release assays were performed according to manufacturer’s instructions (Mabtech, Stockholm, Sweden). Results were considered positive if the number of spots in the test wells was at least twice the number present in the control cultures (media only or in the presence of the HIV-1 irrelevant peptide) and assays were excluded if there were more than 25 spots per well in the absence of peptides.
Generation of CD4 T-helper cell lines, depletion and blocking experiments
PBMC cultured at a density of 2×10 cells/mL were stimulated with 10 μM of either the PASD1(6) or PASD1(7) peptides. After 72 h, an equal volume of RPMI 1640/ FCS containing 50 IU/mL of recombinant interleukin-2 was added to each culture well. Half of the medium was removed and replaced with fresh medium every 3 days thereafter for up to 6 weeks before being used in ELISPOT and cytolytic assays. Cells were also used to produce cytocentrifuge preparations for immunophenotyping at 4 weeks. In some experiments, a CD4 T-cell purification step was performed using magnetic beads coated with anti-human CD4 antibody according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Dynabeads, Dynal, Oslo, Norway) prior to being used in an interferon-γ release ELISPOT assay as described above. In other experiments, 2 μg/mL of the HLA-DR-specific WR18 antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) were added to the CD4 Th cell population for 1 h prior to the interfer-on-γ release ELISPOT assay.
Antibodies
Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II expression was studied using the monoclonal anti-HLA-DP, DQ, DR antibody (CR3/43) (DAKOCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark). Antibodies to CD4 (T4-10, IgG1 isotype), CD20 (DAKO-L26, IgG2a isotype), CD45RO (UCHL1, IgG2a isotype), CD56 (T199, IgG1 isotype) and CD68 (PGM1, IgG3 isotype) were purchased from Dako (Ely, Cambridgeshire, UK) while anti-CD8 (X-107, IgG1 isotype) and anti-CD45RA (4KB5, IgG1 isotype) were generated in the authors’ laboratory.
The rabbit/mouse Envision-HRP labeling system was obtained from DAKOCytomation. Isotype-specific goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin (Ig) and anti-mouse Ig-isotype specific antibodies conjugated to either fluorescein isothiocyanate or Texas Red (diluted 1:100) were obtained from Invitrogen (Paisley, UK).
Immunolabeling studies
Paraffin-embedded tissue sections were de-waxed and antigen retrieval was performed using 50 mM Tris:EDTA at pH 9.0. Immunolabeling for anti-MHC-class II was carried out using the Envision-HRP labeling kit (DAKO, Ely, UK)26 The staining for PASD1 protein expression (using the monoclonal antibodies PASD1-1 and PASD1-2) and subtyping of these DLBCL cases as non-germinal or germinal center subtypes had been performed previously.23
Cytocentrifuge preparations of CD4 Th cell lines cultured for 4 weeks were fixed in acetone for 10 min and air-dried. The slides were then incubated for 30 min with one of the following combinations: (i) a mixture of rabbit anti-CD3 with one of the following mouse monoclonal antibodies to CD4, CD8, CD20, CD45RA, CD45RO, CD56 or CD68 or (ii) a combination of two mouse monoclonal antibodies: anti-CD4 or CD8 (both isotype IgG1) and anti-CD45RO (isotype IgG2a) or CD20 (isotype IgG2a) and CD45RA (isotype IgG1). After washing in phosphate-buffered saline, the slides were incubated for a further 30 min with a mixture of: (i) fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-rabbit Ig and an isotype-specific anti-mouse Ig conjugated to TexasRed or two anti-mouse Ig isotype-specific antibodies conjugated to either fluorescein isothiocyanate or TexasRed where relevant. A minimum of 300 cells were counted per sample. The slides were washed and mounted in an anti-fade mountant Vectorshield containing 4’,6-diamine-2’phenylindole dihy-drochloride (Vector Laboratories, Peterborough, UK). Results were then visualized as previously described.22
Cell lines
The PASD1-positive (HLA-DRB1*0301) OCI-Ly3 (DLBCL-derived), PASD1-positive (HLA-DRB1*0401,*1101) Thiel (myeloma-derived), and PASD1-negative (HLA-DRB1*0101, *0401) SUDHL-6 (DLBCL-derived) cell lines were obtained and cultured as described previously.27
Cytolytic assay
A Cr-labeling release assay was used to investigate the ability of CD4 Th cell lines generated from DLBCL patients to lyse PASD1-positive tumor target cells. The OCI-Ly3, SUDHL-6 and Thiel target cell lines were radio-labeled for 4 h with 100 μCi Cr and then added to the CD4 Th lines at effector:target ratios of 1:10, 1:20 and 1:40. The cells were incubated for 18 h (rather than the 4 h used for CTL assays) at 37°C in 5% CO2. Cr release was determined following the addition of 10% Triton-X to the effector:target cell cultures as previously described.23
Statistical analysis
Student’s t-test was used to analyze the results obtained in the ELISPOT and cytolytic assays.
Results
Detection of interferon-γ release
As shown in Table 2, 15 patients displayed a significant response to at least one of the PASD1 peptides, with respect to the control peptide (P<0.05), after 10–14 days culture. Three patients (1, 41 and 47) responded to four peptides while patients 8, 14 and 24 recognized only one peptide. These patients included eight of the 16 patients previously reported to have a CTL response to PASD1.23 Peptide PASD1(7) also elicited a CD4 Th response in patient 24, despite a previous observation that no CTL response was detected in this HLA-A*0201-positive patient.22 Furthermore, an interferon-γ response was also detected in six other DLBCL patients who were HLA-A*0201-negative. While the number of patients studied here was relatively small, ten of the 15 patients with a CD4 Th response remain in complete remission, one is in partial remission and four have died (one of carcinoma). These results contrast with the outcome of those patients unable to immunologically recognize the PASD1 peptides of whom only five patients are in remission, four in partial remission and seven have died (one of a carcinoma). These results are summarized in Table 3.
It is noteworthy that the PASD1(6) peptide which encompasses the immunogenic 10-mer CTL epitope PASD1(1)23 was also immunogenic eliciting interferon-γ release from stimulated PBMC in the majority of patients studied here. Data from the ELISPOT assays enabled PASD1(6) and PASD1(7) to be identified as the most immunogenic of the five PASD1 peptides studied.
The interferon-γ responses were investigated in two high responder patients (patients 4 and 47) at the time of diagnosis and 1 year after diagnosis (Figure 2A). In both patients, a significant interferon-γ response to the two PASD1 peptides PASD1(6) and PASD1(7) was sustained 1 year after diagnosis. Both of these patients were considered to be in complete remission at this time with the absence of obvious minimal residual disease (suggesting the absence of tumor cells expressing PASD1).
CD4-enriched cell immune response
CD4 enriched T-cell lines were generated following the weekly stimulation with PASD1(6) and PASD1(7) peptides of PBMC from patient 4 (with de novo DLBCL) and patient 47 (with T-cell rich B-cell lymphoma) in order to enable further study of their functional activity. The cell lines demonstrated a significant response to both PASD1 peptides (Figure 2B). These responses were abrogated after the removal of the CD4 Th cell population or the addition of anti-HLA-DR antibody (Figure 2B) thus demonstrating that the response is dependent on both CD4 and MHC class II.
Cytolytic activity
CD4 Th cell lines specific for PASD1(6) and PASD1(7) raised from patients 4 and 47 lysed PASD1-positive Thiel and OCI-Ly3 cell lines in a dose-dependent fashion (Figure 4). The lysis of these cells expressing different HLA-DRB1 alleles demonstrates the promiscuity of the PASD1 peptide epitopes. No lysis was detected in the PASD1-negative cell line SUDHL-6 despite its expression of HLA-DRB1*0101. Since the HLA-A*0201-negative OCI-Ly3 cell line was shown to be resistant to lysis by CTL raised against the PASD1(1) and PASD1(2) peptides in our previous study,23 lysis of this cell line in the current study was not due to CTL raised against these peptides in the PASD1(6) and PASD1(7) peptides. This factor, combined with the immunophenotyping results of the cell lines, and the cell purification and blocking steps shown in Figure 2, provides additional evidence to support CD4 Th cell killing in the cell lines used here.
Immunolabeling studies
Table 2 summarizes the presence of MHC class II antigens in the DLBCL cases studied. Tumor cells of 25 of the 27 patients tested expressed MHC class II. No interferon-γ response to PASD1 was detected in those two patients whose tumors were MHC class II-negative. With the exception of three patients (patients 2, 41 and 43), PASD1 protein was detected in the tumor cells of those patients with an interferon-γ response (Table 2). PASD1 protein was undetectable in seven of those 12 patients who did not mount an interferon-γ response to any of the PASD1 peptides. Of these, two of the five cases tested were negative for MHC class II.
Immunophenotyping of the CD4 T-cell lines showed that 93.3±2.6 % of the cells were CD3 T cells of which 86.6±2.4% expressed CD4 and 15.4±4.3% were CD8: 88.0±2.1% of the CD4 T cells were CD45RO with only 12.0±4.1% expressing CD45RA. Representative examples of the labeling results are shown in Figure 4.
Discussion
Previous reports have described limitations in using short peptide sequences from tumor-associated antigens to elicit long-lasting CTL responses to the target molecule. Repeated boosting with peptides may be necessary to achieve a sufficient immune response, a strategy potentially leading to the induction of immunotolerance.28,29 Indeed, Lehe et al. reported the undesirable recognition of a 15 amino-acid sequence of WT1 by immunosuppressive T regulatory cells.30 There is, however, accumulating evidence that longer peptides containing CD4 Th epitopes are essential for obtaining and maintaining a long-lasting CTL response.31,32 The inclusion of such peptides in a vaccine should increase the efficacy of the resulting immune response. The current study was performed to identify longer immunogenic PASD1 peptides capable of eliciting CD4 Th cell responses. Such peptides could then be included in a lymphoma vaccine for the treatment of DLBCL as well as other hematologic malignancies expressing PASD1.
Five potential CD4 Th PASD1 peptides of 20 amino acids in length that would be recognized by a number of HLA-DRB1 subtypes were selected by a stringent method using two highly reliable search tools: the TEPITOPE and the SYPEITHI programs.17 The identification and use of promiscuous MHC class II epitopes has been previously reported for the NY-ESO-1 cancer-testis antigen.33,34 The presence of such epitopes, recognizable in the context of a variety of different MHC class II molecules, expands the population of patients for whom the peptides could be immunogenic beyond that determined by their MHC class I allele. All five peptides in the current study were able to elicit interferon-γ responses in DLBCL patients, with the PASD1(6) and PASD1(7) peptides being identified as the most immunogenic peptides. It is notable that these peptides were able to expand the numbers of patients recognizing PASD1 since they elicited interferon-γ responses in a patient who, despite being HLA-A*0201-positive, was previously unable to respond to the PASD1 CTL peptides and also in seven HLA-A*0201-negative patients.23 The lack of significant homology of the PASD1 peptides with other molecules combined with the absence of any significant response with the irrelevant peptide demonstrates the specificity of the response to PASD1.
Although interferon-γ responses to the PASD1 peptides were present in 12 of the 15 patients whose tumors expressed PASD1 protein, three patients recognizing the PASD1 peptides lacked detectable PASD1 protein. A disparity between PASD1 expression and CTL activity has been described previously23 and it is possible that the immunolabeling techniques used here may not constitute a sufficiently sensitive tool to identify low levels of PASD1 protein expression.35 Importantly, high levels of target protein expression may not be necessary for immune recognition.36 There is also evidence that additional isoforms of PASD1 may exist21 and some of these proteins may lack the epitopes recognized by the PASD1-1 and PASD1-2 antibodies that are currently being used to study PASD1 protein expression. The development of more sensitive assays for PASD1 expression, such as western blotting and/or the production of additional antibodies, should assist in the identification of the maximum number of PASD1-positive patients in future clinical trials targeting this antigen. Another possible explanation for the lack of detection in the present study is that PASD1 expression may have been lost through immunoediting by the tumor cells.37
The tumor cells of only two patients in the current study lacked MHC class II expression and PBMC from neither patient were able to respond to the PASD1 peptides. Although cross-presentation of antigen by antigen-presenting cells can occur at the tumor site in the absence of MHC class II,12 loss of MHC class II has been linked to poorer prognosis.38,39 and it will be of interest in future studies to determine whether PASD-positive MHC class II-negative patients have a significantly worse prognosis than PASD1-positive MHC class II-positive patients.
CD4 Th cell lines raised from two patients were able to lyse PASD1-positive tumor cell lines (but not the PASD1-negative cell line) confirming that these T cells were able to recognize endogenously expressed PASD1. Of note is the ability of the CD4 Th cell lines to lyse both the PASD1-positive Thiel and OCI-Ly3 cells, despite the fact that these two cell lines express different HLA-DRB1 alleles. This could be explained by the high degree of homology present between the DRB1 molecules25 and further demonstrates the promiscuity of the PASD1 peptides, which enables them to be recognized by closely related DRB1 molecules.
The persistence of PASD1-specific CD4 Th cell populations in patients after 1 year in remission is an indication of the immunogenicity of the PASD1 protein and is suggestive of pre-existing memory T cells able to recognize PASD1. Such cells could play an important role not only in protective tumor immunity40 but also in the maintenance of the CTL previously reported to be present in PASD1-positive DLBCL patients.23 In contrast to the previous study on the CTL immune response to PASD1 (in which 79% and 37% of the cultured cells were CD8 and CD45RO, respectively), the majority of the cell lines cultured from these patients were CD4 and expressed CD45RO, an antigen present on memory cells. It will be of interest to look at the ex vivo phenotype (memory or naïve) of circulating T cells from patients in future experiments.
Previous studies have shown the potential of using single peptides containing epitopes predicted to bind to both MHC class I and class II to obtain more effective immune responses.41,42 The PASD1(6) peptide, encompassing a CTL epitope previously shown to be immunogenic in PASD1-positive patients,22 was highly immunogenic in the majority of patients and could, therefore, represent an attractive candidate for inclusion in a vaccine formulation.
In conclusion, this study is the first report of a CD4 Th response to a cancer-testis antigen by patients with lymphoma. These CD4 Th peptides hold future potential for use in conjunction with PASD1 peptides eliciting CTL in a vaccine for relapsing DLBCL patients or those who are refractory to conventional treatments.
Acknowledgments
we would like to thank Mrs Vanessa Brennan and Valerie Webb for their help in obtaining patients’ samples.
Footnotes
- Funding: this work was supported by funds from Leukaemia & Lymphoma Research, the Julian-Starmer Smith Lymphoma Fund and the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Center Program.
- Authorship and Disclosures The information provided by the authors about contributions from persons listed as authors and in acknowledgments is available with the full text of this paper at www.haematologica.org.
- Financial and other disclosures provided by the authors using the ICMJE (www.icmje.org) Uniform Format for Disclosure of Competing Interests are also available at www.haematologica.org.
- Received June 8, 2010.
- Revision received August 20, 2010.
- Accepted September 13, 2010.
References
- Stein H, Chan JKC, Warnke RA, Gatter KC, Chan WC, Campo EC. WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopietic and Lymphoid Tissues. IARC Press: Lyon; 2008. Google Scholar
- Coiffier B. Rituximab therapy in malignant lymphoma. Oncogene. 2007; 26(25):3603-13. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1210376Google Scholar
- Chen YT, Old LJ. Cancer-testis antigens: targets for cancer immunotherapy. Cancer J Sci Am. 1999; 5(1):16-7. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Old LJ. Cancer/testis (CT) antigens - a new link between gametogenesis and cancer. Cancer Immun. 2001; 1:1. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scanlan MJ, Simpson AJ, Old LJ. The cancer/testis genes: review, standardization, and commentary. Cancer Immun. 2004; 4:1. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Caballero OL, Chen YT. Cancer/testis (CT) antigens: potential targets for immunotherapy. Cancer Sci. 2009; 100(11):2014-21. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01303.xGoogle Scholar
- Hofmann O, Caballero OL, Stevenson BJ, Chen YT, Cohen T, Chua R. Genome-wide analysis of cancer/testis gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008; 105 (51):20422-7. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0810777105Google Scholar
- Muranski P, Restifo NP. Adoptive immunotherapy of cancer using CD4(+) T cells. Curr Opin Immunol. 2009; 21(2):200-8. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2009.02.004Google Scholar
- Ossendorp F, Mengede E, Camps M, Filius R, Melief CJ. Specific T helper cell requirement for optimal induction of cytotoxic T lymphocytes against major histocompatibility complex class II negative tumors. J Exp Med. 1998; 187(5):693-702. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1084/jem.187.5.693Google Scholar
- Janssen EM, Lemmens EE, Wolfe T, Christen U, von Herrath MG, Schoenberger SP. CD4+ T cells are required for secondary expansion and memory in CD8+ T lymphocytes. Nature. 2003; 421 (6925):852-6. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/nature01441Google Scholar
- Janssen EM, Droin NM, Lemmens EE, Pinkoski MJ, Bensinger SJ, Ehst BD. CD4+ T-cell help controls CD8+ T-cell memory via TRAIL-mediated activation-induced cell death. Nature. 2005; 434 (7029):88-93. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/nature03337Google Scholar
- Perez-Diez A, Joncker NT, Choi K, Chan WF, Anderson CC, Lantz O. CD4 cells can be more efficient at tumor rejection than CD8 cells. Blood. 2007; 109(12):5346-54. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-10-051318Google Scholar
- Smith CM, Wilson NS, Waithman J, Villadangos JA, Carbone FR, Heath WR. Cognate CD4(+) T cell licensing of dendritic cells in CD8(+) T cell immunity. Nat Immunol. 2004; 5(11):1143-8. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ni1129Google Scholar
- Zhang S, Zhang H, Zhao J. The role of CD4 T cell help for CD8 CTL activation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009; 384 (4):405-8. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.04.134Google Scholar
- Hung K, Hayashi R, Lafond-Walker A, Lowenstein C, Pardoll D, Levitsky H. The central role of CD4(+) T cells in the antitumor immune response. J Exp Med. 1998; 188(12):2357-68. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1084/jem.188.12.2357Google Scholar
- Toes RE, Ossendorp F, Offringa R, Melief CJ. CD4 T cells and their role in antitumor immune responses. J Exp Med. 1999; 189 (5):753-6. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1084/jem.189.5.753Google Scholar
- Rosa DS, Ribeiro SP, Cunha-Neto E. CD4+ T cell epitope discovery and rational vaccine design. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2010; 58(2):121-30. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00005-010-0067-0Google Scholar
- Hunder NN, Wallen H, Cao J, Hendricks DW, Reilly JZ, Rodmyre R. Treatment of metastatic melanoma with autologous CD4+ T cells against NY-ESO-1. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358(25):2698-703. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0800251Google Scholar
- Liggins AP, Brown PL, Asker K, Pulford K, Banham AH. A novel diffuse large B-cell lymphoma-associated cancer testis antigen encoding a PAS domain protein. Br J Cancer. 2004; 91:141-9. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601875Google Scholar
- Guinn BA, Bland EA, Lodi U, Liggins AP, Tobal K, Petters S. Humoral detection of leukaemia-associated antigens in presentation acute myeloid leukaemia. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005; 335(4):1293-304. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.02.113Google Scholar
- Cooper CD, Liggins AP, Ait-Tahar K, Roncador G, Banham AH, Pulford K. PASD1, a DLBCL-associated cancer testis antigen and candidate for lymphoma immunotherapy. Leukemia. 2006; 20(12):2172-4. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2404424Google Scholar
- Ait-Tahar K, Liggins AP, Collins GP, Campbell A, Barnardo M, Lawrie C. Cytolytic T-cell response to the PASD1 cancer testis antigen in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 2009; 146(4):396-407. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07761.xGoogle Scholar
- Sahota SS, Goonewardena CM, Cooper CD, Liggins AP, Ait-Tahar K, Zojer N. PASD1 is a potential multiple myeloma-associated antigen. Blood. 2006; 108(12):3953-5. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-04-014621Google Scholar
- Bunce M, O'Neill CM, Barnardo MC, Krausa P, Browning MJ, Morris PJ. Phototyping: comprehensive DNA typing for HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3, DRB4, DRB5 & DQB1 by PCR with 144 primer mixes utilizing sequence-specific primers (PCR-SSP). Tissue Antigens. 1995; 46(5):355-67. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0039.1995.tb03127.xGoogle Scholar
- Sturniolo T, Bono E, Ding J, Raddrizzani L, Tuereci O, Sahin U. Generation of tissue-specific and promiscuous HLA ligand databases using DNA microarrays and virtual HLA class II matrices. Nat Biotechnol. 1999; 17(6):555-61. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/9858Google Scholar
- Southwood S, Sidney J, Kondo A, del Guercio MF, Appella E, Hoffman S. Several common HLA-DR types share largely overlapping peptide binding repertoires. J Immunol. 1998; 160(7):3363-73. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pulford K, Banham AH, Lyne L, Jones M, Ippolito GC, Liu H. The BCL11AXL transcription factor: its distribution in normal and malignant tissues and use as a marker for plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Leukemia. 2006; 20(8):1439-41. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2404260Google Scholar
- Aichele P, Brduscha-Riem K, Zinkernagel RM, Hengartner H, Pircher H. T cell priming versus T cell tolerance induced by synthetic peptides. J Exp Med. 1995; 182(1):261-6. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1084/jem.182.1.261Google Scholar
- Toes RE, Offringa R, Blom RJ, Melief CJ, Kast WM. Peptide vaccination can lead to enhanced tumor growth through specific T-cell tolerance induction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996; 93(15):7855-60. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.15.7855Google Scholar
- Lehe C, Ghebeh H, Al-Sulaiman A, Al Qudaihi G, Al-Hussein K, Almohareb F. The Wilms' tumor antigen is a novel target for human CD4+ regulatory T cells: implications for immunotherapy. Cancer Res. 2008; 68(15):6350-9. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0050Google Scholar
- Bijker MS, van den Eeden SJ, Franken KL, Melief CJ, Offringa R, van der Burg SH. CD8+ CTL priming by exact peptide epitopes in incomplete Freund's adjuvant induces a vanishing CTL response, whereas long peptides induce sustained CTL reactivity. J Immunol. 2007; 179(8):5033-40. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.179.8.5033Google Scholar
- Bijker MS, van den Eeden SJ, Franken KL, Melief CJ, van der Burg SH, Offringa R. Superior induction of anti-tumor CTL immunity by extended peptide vaccines involves prolonged, DC-focused antigen presentation. Eur J Immunol. 2008; 38(4):1033-42. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1002/eji.200737995Google Scholar
- Mandic M, Almunia C, Vicel S, Gillet D, Janjic B, Coval K. The alternative open reading frame of LAGE-1 gives rise to multiple promiscuous HLA-DR-restricted epitopes recognized by T-helper 1-type tumor-reactive CD4+ T cells. Cancer Res. 2003; 63(19):6506-15. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ohkuri T, Sato M, Abe H, Tsuji K, Yamagishi Y, Ikeda H. Identification of a novel NY-ESO-1 promiscuous helper epitope presented by multiple MHC class II molecules found frequently in the Japanese population. Cancer Sci. 2007; 98(7):1092-8. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00501.xGoogle Scholar
- Sugita Y, Wada H, Fujita S, Nakata T, Sato S, Noguchi Y. NY-ESO-1 expression and immunogenicity in malignant and benign breast tumors. Cancer Res. 2004; 64(6):2199-204. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3070Google Scholar
- Vierboom MP, Zwaveling S, Bos GMJ, Ooms M, Krietemeijer GM, Melief CJ. High steady-state levels of p53 are not a prerequisite for tumor eradication by wild-type p53-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Cancer Res. 2000; 60(19):5508-13. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dunn GP, Old LJ, Schreiber RD. The three Es of cancer immunoediting. Annu Rev Immunol. 2004; 22:329-60. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.22.012703.104803Google Scholar
- Rimsza LM, Roberts RA, Miller TP, Unger JM, LeBlanc M, Braziel RM. Loss of MHC class II gene and protein expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is related to decreased tumor immunosurveillance and poor patient survival regardless of other prognostic factors: a follow-up study from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Molecular Profiling Project. Blood. 2004; 103(11):4251-8. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2003-07-2365Google Scholar
- Rimsza LM, Farinha P, Fuchs DA, Masoudi H, Connors JM, Gascoyne RD. HLA-DR protein status predicts survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated on the MACOP-B chemotherapy regimen. Leuk Lymphoma. 2007; 48(3):542-6. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1080/10428190601078605Google Scholar
- Broderick L, Yokota SJ, Reineke J, Mathiowitz E, Stewart CC, Barcos M. Human CD4+ effector memory T cells persisting in the microenvironment of lung cancer xenografts are activated by local delivery of IL-12 to proliferate, produce IFN-gamma, and eradicate tumor cells. J Immunol. 2005; 174(2):898-906. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.174.2.898Google Scholar
- Zeng G. MHC class II-restricted tumor antigens recognized by CD4+ T cells: new strategies for cancer vaccine design. J Immunother. 2001; 24(3):195-204. Google Scholar
- Wagner WM, Ouyang Q, Pawelec G. The abl/bcr gene product as a novel leukemia-specific antigen: peptides spanning the fusion region of abl/bcr can be recognized by both CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2003; 52(2):89-96. PubMedGoogle Scholar