Abstract
Background Post-thrombotic syndrome is a manifestation of chronic venous insufficiency following deep venous thrombosis. This systematic review was conducted to critically evaluate pediatric evidence on frequency of occurrence, validity of outcome measures, and prognostic indicators of post-thrombotic syndrome.Design and Methods A comprehensive literature search of original reports revealed 19 eligible studies, totaling 977 patients with upper/lower extremity deep venous thrombosis. Calculated weighted mean frequency of post-thrombotic syndrome was 26% (95% confidence interval: 23–28%) overall, and differed significantly by prospective/non-prospective analysis and use/non-use of a standardized outcome measure.Results Standardized post-thrombotic syndrome outcome measures included an adaptation of the Villalta scale, the Clinical-Etiologic-Anatomic-Pathologic classification, and the Manco-Johnson instrument. Data on validity were reported only for the Manco-Johnson instrument. No publications on post-thrombotic syndrome-related quality of life outcomes were identified. Candidate prognostic factors for post-thrombotic syndrome in prospective studies included use/non-use of thrombolysis and plasma levels of factor VIII activity and D-dimer.Conclusions Given that affected children must endure chronic sequelae for many decades, it is imperative that future collaborative pediatric prospective cohort studies and trials assess as key objectives and outcomes the incidence, severity, prognostic indicators, and health impact of post-thrombotic syndrome, using validated measures.Introduction
Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a syndrome of chronic venous insufficiency following deep venous thrombosis (DVT), affecting both adults and children. Physical findings of PTS can include edema, pain, dilated superficial collateral veins, stasis dermatitis, and ulceration involving the affected limb. As edema and pain are often present acutely in patients with DVT, particularly in the setting of complete veno-occlusion, assessment beyond the acute and subacute periods following DVT onset is important for definitive diagnosis of PTS.
The pathophysiology of PTS is thought to ultimately involve venous hypertension.1 Venous hypertension, in turn, may result from venous valvular reflux, thrombotic veno-occlusion, and other causes of impaired venous return (e.g. right heart failure). While the correlation of PTS by clinical history or physical examination with valvular reflux by vascular imaging is rather poor, and while venous hypertension without reflux can be sufficient to cause PTS, PTS is nevertheless believed in many instances to be related to valvular reflux. Valvular reflux may be caused by valvular injury following acute thrombotic veno-occlusion (i.e. burst valve) or by vascular inflammation resulting in valvular fibrosis and insufficiency. Whether venous valvular insufficiency may in some cases be reversible remains poorly understood.
While considerable research effort has been devoted to the problem of PTS following DVT in adults in recent years, it has received less attention in pediatrics. However, since affected children will endure sequelae for many decades, there is a critical need to establish high-quality evidence on the burden of PTS in children with DVT. This systematic review was performed to critically evaluate evidence from the pediatric literature on the frequency of occurrence of PTS following DVT in children, the validity of pediatric PTS outcome measures, and prognostic indicators of PTS in children.
Design and Methods
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library from 1960 (or earliest date for databases not extending back to 1960) through September 2009 (inclusive). MeSH terms and search strategy employed were as follows: “post-thrombotic syndrome OR post-phlebitic syndrome” AND “children OR pediatrics”. Reference lists of articles identified by the search were also reviewed for inclusion of additional relevant reports. Languages were limited to English, French, German, Italian, and Spanish. Study selection, categorization and data extraction were performed in duplicate by two independent reviewers (NG and MD). Publications were categorized as follows: single case reports; narrative reviews; commentaries; case series, cross-sectional studies; case-control studies; registries and cohort studies; and clinical trials. Single case reports, narrative reviews, commentaries, and conference abstracts were excluded from subsequent review. In case of reports on subsets of larger published series, only the most comprehensive series was included. In the event of conflicting study design classification or decision regarding inclusion/exclusion, consensus was achieved through discussion.
The following data were extracted from each eligible publication, as available: study methodology; age range; selection criteria; catheter-related DVT cases; cancer-associated DVT cases; VTE sites; frequency of PTS occurrence; method(s) employed for PTS outcome measurement; validation of PTS instrument; prognostic factors for PTS development; and quality of life (QOL) outcomes. Mean weighted frequency of PTS was calculated as previously described.2
Results
Overall search results
A flow chart of search results and their distribution by category of publication is provided in Figure 1, showing both included3–21 and excluded22–72 reports. Nineteen original reports met eligibility criteria (Table 1); no systematic reviews were identified. A total of 1,387 VTE patients were reported, including 1,084 with DVT affecting venous outflow from the upper or lower extremities (UE/LE DVT). The percentages of children who had LE DVT, UE DVT, and both were 55%, 44%, and 1%, respectively. Loss to follow up was 8% overall. In total, 997 patients were assessed for PTS.
In evaluating PTS, five studies8,13,14,18,20 used a pediatric modification8 of the Villalta scoring system for PTS in adults,73 two studies11,16 employed the Manco-Johnson instrument,51 and one study10 utilized the Clinical-Etiologic-Anatomic-Pathophysiologic (CEAP) classification system.74 Components of each of these outcome measures are summarized in Figure 2. The remaining 11 studies3–7,9,12,15,17,19,21 did not indicate the use of a standardized outcome measure.
Frequency of post-thrombotic syndrome occurrence
As shown in Table 1, frequency of PTS occurrence varied widely from 0 to 70% across studies. The earliest and largest data on PTS in pediatric DVT were provided by the Canadian Registry of Venous Thromboembolic Complications22 and the Canadian Childhood Thrombophilia Registry;5 however, these data preceded the standardization of PTS assessment in children. Findings with the use of a standardized PTS scoring system were first reported in 2003 in a retrospective analysis by the Childhood Thrombophilia Program at the Hospital for Sick Children8 in 153 children with a history of UE/LE DVT. This study employed a pediatric adaptation of the Villalta PTS scoring system,75 and defined a striking frequency of 63% for the occurrence of PTS in children with a history of limb DVT, at an average follow-up duration of 16 months post-event. By comparison, a prospective cohort including 52 unselected cases of acute UE/LE DVT found a PTS incidence of 33% at 1–2 years post-event, using the Manco-Johnson instrument.11
Calculated weighted mean frequency of PTS was 26% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 23–28%) overall, and differed significantly for prospective versus non-prospective analyses (17% [95% CI: 14–20%] vs. 43% [38–48%], respectively; P<0.001) and use/non-use of a standardized outcome measure (41% [36–46%) vs. 14% [11–17%]; P<0.001 (Table 2). There was no correlation between follow-up duration and PTS frequency across studies (r=− 0.015; P=0.97). Subgroup analysis for frequency of PTS in cancer-associated and catheter-associated DVT was not feasible, due to a paucity of studies separately reporting outcomes in these populations. In addition, PTS severity was graded only in studies employing the modified Villalta instrument,8,14,18,20 and functional significance of PTS was reported only in a single study, using the Manco-Johnson instrument.16
Validity of outcome measures
Published validation data for pediatric PTS outcome assessment are limited to the Manco-Johnson instrument.16 This instrument (Figure 3) combines the basic CEAP classification system74 for physical assessment of signs of chronic venous insufficiency in combination with the Wong-Baker faces scale73 for evaluation of pain symptoms. Validity and reliability testing of the Manco-Johnson instrument employed a derivation cohort/validation cohort approach.16 In a derivation cohort consisting of 78 healthy children without prior DVT or recent leg injury, the upper limit of normal values for contralateral leg circumference difference was determined to be 1.0 cm at both the mid-thigh and mid-calf. No physical stigmata of PTS were found. Additionally, pain that limits aerobic exercise (e.g. sports, recreational activities, age-appropriate play), affects activities of daily living, or that occurs at rest was absent in this population. Subsequently, in an independent validation cohort consisting of 45 children with and without prior DVT, inter-rater reliability for the physical and functional components of the Manco-Johnson instrument (i.e. signs and pain symptoms of PTS) ranged between 91 and 100%. In spite of prior observations of some natural variation in contralateral arm circumference among healthy children,68 further validation of the Manco-Johnson instrument for the upper extremities has yielded similar results to those established in the lower limbs.76
Additional evidence for validity of a PTS outcome measure is provided by the demonstration of an adverse QOL among affected individuals. However, no pediatric studies to date have reported QOL in relationship to PTS findings, and no venous disease-specific pediatric QOL instrument has yet been developed and validated.
Prognostic factors for development of post-thrombotic syndrome
Over the past several years, knowledge has accumulated regarding prognostic factors for the development of PTS in adults and children. As presented in Table 3, prognostic factors from prospective studies include: patients’ characteristics; plasma/serum biomarkers relating to thrombophilia, coagulation activation, or the inflammatory response; and treatment factors. In pediatric thromboembolism, the risk of a composite outcome of recurrent VTE (rare), persistence of thrombosis despite a 3–6 month course of anticoagulation, or the development of PTS (using the Manco-Johnson instrument) is increased when FVIII activity and/or D-dimer concentration are elevated at diagnosis (OR 6.1, 95% CI: 2.1–17.7) or following 3–6 months of anticoagulation (OR 4.7, 95% CI: 1.8–12.6).10 Specifically, dual marker elevation at presentation increases the risk of adverse outcome from 50% (pre-test probability) to 86% (post-test probability).83 Thrombolysis may decrease PTS risk in pediatric patients with completely veno-occlusive proximal leg DVT in whom acute factor VIII and D-dimer levels both exceed prognostic thresholds (OR 0.018, 95% CI: <0.001–0.483);16 a priori PTS risk appears to be high in such children when conventional anticoagulation is employed.
Non-prospective studies have suggested additional potential prognostic factors for PTS in children. In the cross-sectional study of Kuhle et al.,6 multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that lack of thrombus resolution was associated with a statistically significant 4-fold increase in odds of PTS. With each additional venous segment of involvement by thrombus and each additional year of follow up, odds for PTS increased significantly by 2- and 1.2-fold. In addition, descriptive data from the registry report of Monagle et al.5 showed a skewed distribution of PTS across the pediatric age range, with infants and children of pre-school age more frequently affected than older children. Lastly, Sharathkumar and Pipe18 demonstrated in a retrospective series that initiation of anticoagulant treatment greater than 48 h following diagnosis of DVT and a history of recurrent thrombosis were each significantly more frequent among patients affected, versus unaffected, by PTS.
Discussion
The present systematic review of the literature revealed that PTS is common following UE/LE DVT in children, with an overall weighted mean frequency of PTS occurrence of 26% (95% CI: 23–28%) among a total of nearly 1,000 UE/LE DVT patients studied. This frequency is in the range of those determined in adult studies, at 20–40%.84,85 The review also found considerable variability in the observed frequency of PTS across studies (ranging from less than 10% to approximately 70%), even when analysis of the literature is restricted to prospective analyses of unselected cases. Lastly, it identified a single pediatric PTS outcome measure (the Manco-Johnson instrument) for which validity has been shown.16 This instrument defined a cumulative incidence of PTS of 33% at 1–2 years following UE/LE DVT in children,11 which was considerably higher than the weighted mean frequency of PTS determined here among prospective analyses (17% [95% CI: 14–20%]), slightly lower than that for studies similarly employing a standardized outcome measure (41% [36–46%]), and quite consistent with the weighted mean frequency of PTS in the subset of studies that both employed prospective analysis and a standardized outcome measure (26% [20–33%]; cumulative n=174 subjects with UE/LE DVT) (data not shown).
The above findings are important in establishing key evidence on PTS in children. In 2008, the US Surgeon General’s Call-to-Action on Prevention of DVT and pulmonary embolism emphasized chronic venous insufficiency following DVT as an important priority for future investigation.86 Recently, the number of pediatric publications reporting on PTS has shown a marked increase, with over 50% of studies included here having been published in the past five years. In addition to prospective/non-prospective analysis and use/non-use of a standardized outcome measure, factors that could contribute to the variability in PTS frequencies reported across these studies include heterogeneity in disease severity among study populations, as well as differences in study population distributions with respect to putative modulators of PTS risk (e.g. patient age, body mass index, and activity level; lag time from symptom onset to antithrombotic therapy; DVT extent, degree of occlusion, and involvement of central vasculature; anticoagulant treatment intensity and duration; graduated compression stocking use and duration thereof). The fact that non-prospective analyses showed a significantly higher weighted mean frequency of PTS than prospective ones serves to emphasize the important potential for disease severity selection bias in retrospective studies. Conversely, our finding that PTS frequency was significantly higher in studies employing a standardized (vs. non-standardized) outcome measure suggests that the use of standardized outcome measures is critical for sensitivity in detecting PTS. While considerable differences existed in average follow-up duration across studies, no correlation was found between follow-up duration and PTS frequency.
Limitations of the present work include issues related to the original studies and to the systematic review itself. First, included studies were heterogeneous with respect to design, follow up, and PTS outcome measurement. Not all studies evaluated PTS as a primary objective, potentially limiting study quality. However, formal assessment of study quality was not feasible due to lack of sufficient detail provided by most reports. Nevertheless, categorization according to basic study design and characterization of the study population was undertaken during systematic review. Second, as noted earlier, time from DVT presentation to PTS assessment was not standardized across studies (nor typically within a study), leading to possible imprecision in composite measurement of PTS occurrence. Standardization of time to PTS assessment and serial assessment in long-term follow up would facilitate comparability of endpoints among future studies, and better define natural history. Thirdly, few studies investigated prognostic factors for PTS development. Consequently, only limited analysis could be performed in this review, and greater emphasis on investigation of prognostic factors for PTS must be underscored. Lastly, perhaps the greatest limitation in synthesizing evidence on PTS in children is the lack of a venous disease-specific pediatric QOL instrument by which to assess the functional significance of PTS. Until such a tool is developed and validated, the understanding of functional significance of PTS is limited to the use of the Manco-Johnson instrument.
In summary, this is the first systematic review of PTS in children. Among a total of 1,387 patients reported (including 997 with UE/LE DVT evaluated for PTS in follow up) across 19 eligible studies, the overall weighted mean frequency of PTS occurrence was 26%. However, validity and reliability in pediatric PTS measurement has been demonstrated only for the Manco-Johnson instrument, employed in two of the studies. Prognostic clinical factors and laboratory markers for development of PTS have recently begun to be prospectively investigated. Given that children must endure disease sequelae that adversely impact QOL for many decades, future collaborative prospective cohort studies and RCTs in the field of pediatric VTE should assess as key study objectives and outcomes the incidence, severity, prognostic indicators, and health impact of PTS, using validated measures.
Footnotes
- ↵* NAG and MPD contributed equally.
- Funding: NAG is funded in part by a Career Development Award from the National Institutes of Health, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (1K23HL084055-01A1). SRK is supported by a National Research Scientist Award (chercheur national) of the Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec. MC holds a Career Investigator Award from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario. UN-G is supported by a university research award (IZKF) and “Förderverein Schlaganfall und Trombosen e.V.” MJM-J is funded in part by a thrombosis/thrombophilia network award from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U01DD00016).
- Authorship and Disclosures The information provided by the authors about contributions from persons listed as authors and in acknowledgments is available with the full text of this paper at www.haematologica.org.
- Financial and other disclosures provided by the authors using the ICMJE (www.icmje.org) Uniform Format for Disclosure of Competing Interests are also available at www.haematologica.org.
- Received April 28, 2010.
- Revision received June 14, 2010.
- Accepted June 29, 2010.
References
- Kahn SR, Ginsberg J. The post-thrombotic syndrome: current knowledge, controversies, and directions for future research. Blood Rev. 2002; 16(3):155-65. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-960X(02)00008-5Google Scholar
- Triola MM, Triola MF. Biostatistics for the Biological and Health Sciences. Pearson Education, Inc: Boston; 2006. Google Scholar
- Nguyen LT, Laberge JM, Guttman FM, Albert D. Spontaneous deep vein thrombosis in childhood and adoloscence. J Pediatr Surg. 1986; 21(7):640-3. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3468(86)80422-5Google Scholar
- Norotte G, Glorion C, Conard J, Rigault P, Merckx J, Padovani JP. Thromboembolic complications in pediatric orthopedics. Multicentric collection of 33 case reports. Chir Pediatr. 1989; 30(4):193-8. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Monagle P, Adams M, Mahoney M, Ali K, Barnard D, Bernstein M. Outcome of pediatric thromboembolic disease: a report from the Canadian childhood thrombophilia registry. Pediatr Res. 2000; 47(6):763-6. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-200006000-00013Google Scholar
- Hausler M, Hübner D, DelhaasMühler EG. Long term complications of inferior vena cava thrombosis. Arch Dis Child. 2001; 85 (3):228-33. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1136/adc.85.3.228Google Scholar
- Gurgey A, Aslan D. Outcome of non-catheter-related thrombosis in children: influence of underlying or coexisting factors. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2001; 23(3):159-64. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1097/00043426-200103000-00007Google Scholar
- Kuhle S, Koloshuk B, Marzinotto V, Zlotkin S, Burrows P, Ingram J. A cross-sectional study evaluating post-thrombotic syndrome in children. Thromb Res. 2003; 111(4–5):227-33. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2003.09.008Google Scholar
- Lee AC, Li CH, Szeto SC, Ma ES. Symptomatic venous thromboembolism in Hong Kong Chinese children. Hong Kong Med J. 2003; 9(4):259-62. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Ommen CH, Heijboer H, Van den Dool EJ, Hutten BA, Peters M. Pediatric venous thromboembolic disease in one single center: congenital prothrombotic disorders and the clinical outcome. J Thromb Haemost. 2003; 1(12):2516-22. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1046/j.1538-7836.2003.00465.xGoogle Scholar
- Goldenberg NA, Knapp-Clevenger R, Manco-Johnson MJ. Elevated plasma factor VIII and D-dimer levels as predictors of poor outcome of thrombosis in children. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351(11):1081-8. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa040161Google Scholar
- Raffini L, Raybagkar D, Cahill AM, Kaye R, Blumenstein M, Manno C. May-Thurner syndrome (iliac vein compression) and thrombosis in adolescents. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006; 47:834-8. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.20728Google Scholar
- Kreuz W, Stoll M, Junker R, Heinecke A, Schobess R, Kurnik K. Familial elevated factor VIII in children with symptomatic venous thrombosis and post-thrombotic syndrome: results of a multicenter study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006; 26(8):1901-6. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.0000227510.36653.edGoogle Scholar
- Schobess R, Düring C, BidlingmaierHeinecke A, Merkel N, Nowak-Göttl U. Long-term safety and efficacy data on childhood venous thrombosis treated with a low molecular weight heparin: an open-label pilot study of once-daily versus twicedaily enoxaparin administration. Haematologica. 2006; 91(12):1701-4. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Newall F, Wallace T, Crock C, Campbell J, Savoia H, Barnes C. Venus thromboembolic disease: a single centre case series study. J Paediatr Child Health. 2006; 42(12):803-7. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2006.00981.xGoogle Scholar
- Goldenberg NA, Durham JD, Knapp-Clevenger R, Manco-Johnson MJ. A thrombolytic regimen for high-risk deep venous thrombosis may substantially reduce the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome in children. Blood. 2007; 110(1):45-53. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-12-061234Google Scholar
- Sirachainan N, Chuansumrit A, Angchaisuksiri P, Pakakasama S, Hongeng S, Kadegasem P. Venous thromboembolism in Thai children. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2007; 24(4):245-56. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1080/08880010701360767Google Scholar
- Sharathkumar AA, Pipe SW. Post-thrombotic syndrome in children: a single center experience. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2008; 30(4):261-6. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1097/MPH.0b013e318162bcf5Google Scholar
- Athale UH, Nagel K, Khan AA, Chan AK. Thromboembolism in children with lymphoma. Thromb Res. 2008; 122(4):459-65. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2007.12.006Google Scholar
- Kuhle S, Spavor M, Massicotte P, Halton J, Cherrick I, Dix D. Prevalence of post-thrombotic syndrome following asymptomatic thrombosis in survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Thromb Haemost. 2008; 6(4):589-94. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.02901.xGoogle Scholar
- Wilkinson N, Sood S, Ham SD, Gilmer-Hill H, Fleming P, Rajpurkar M. Thrombosis associated with ventriculoatrial shunts. J Neurosurg Paediatrics. 2008; 2(4):286-91. https://doi.org/10.3171/PED.2008.2.10.286Google Scholar
- Andrew M, David M, Adams M, Ali K, Anderson R, Barnard D. Venous thromboembolic complications (VTE) in children: first analyses of the Canadian registry of VTE. Blood. 1994; 83(5):1251-7. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Massicotte MP, Dix D, Monagle P, Adams M, Andrew M. Central venous catheter related thrombosis in children: analysis of the Canadian registry of venous thromboembolic complications. J Pediatr. 1998; 133(6):770-6. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(98)70149-0Google Scholar
- Ochoa Bizet M. Postphlebitic syndrome. Statistical review. Angiologia. 1965; 17(3):112-8. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jones DR, Macintyre IM. Venous thromboembolism in infancy and childhood. Arch Dis Child. 1975; 50(2):153-5. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1136/adc.50.2.153Google Scholar
- Barnes RW, Wu KK, Hoak JC. Fallibility of the clinical diagnosis of venous thrombosis. JAMA. 1975; 234(6):605-7. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1975.03260190033017Google Scholar
- Caille JP, Sarrade-Loucheur C, Ferrer F, Vergoz D. Familial recurrent phlebitis due to deficiency of antithrombin III. Apropos of a case. Phlebologie. 1980; 33:131-7. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Elbaz C. Cockett’s syndrome. Phlebolgie. 1980; 33(3):409-21. Google Scholar
- Natali J, Tricot NJ. The role of surgery in the treatment of acute phlebitis in the lower members. Phlebologie. 1982; 35(1):187-201. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mollitt DL, Golladay ES. Complications of TPN catheter-induced vena caval thrombosis in children less than one year of age. J Pediatr Surg. 1983; 18(4):462-7. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3468(83)80201-2Google Scholar
- Serradimigni A, Chiche G, Romani A, Philip F. Value of phlebography for diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary embolism. Int Angiol. 1985; 4(3):323-8. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goldstein S, Qazi QH, Fitzgerald J, Goldstein J, Friedman AP, Sawyer P. Distichiasis, congenital heart defects and mixed peripheral vascular anomalies. Am J Med Genet. 1985; 20(2):283-94. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.1320200212Google Scholar
- Gorenstein A, Katz S, Levy P, Schiller M. Non-iatrogenic deep vein thrombosis of lower extremities in children. Z Kinderchir. 1986; 41(6):375-8. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Häuptli W, Schmitt HE, Huber P, Zemp E, Widmer LK. Etiology and long-term course of subclavian vein thrombosis with reference to acute therapy. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1989; 119(20):647-52. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kniemeyer HW, Merckle R, Stühmeier K, Sandmann W. Surgical therapy of acute and embolizing deep venous thrombosis--indication, technical principle, results. Klin Wochenschr. 1990; 68(24):1208-16. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1007/BF01796511Google Scholar
- Petruzzellis V, Florio T, Quaranta D, Troccoli T, Serra MA. Epidemiologic observations on the subject of phlebopathy of the legs and its dermatologic complications. Minerva Med. 1990; 81(9):611-6. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vin F. Vulvar varices. J Mal Vasc. 1990; 15(4):406-9. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nowak-Göttl U, Kreuz WD, Schwabe D, Linde R, Kornhuber B. Thrombolysis with rt-PA in children suffering from arterial or venous thrombosis. Klin Padiatr. 1991; 203 (5):359-62. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Markel A, Manzo RA, Bergelin RO, Strandness DE. Valvular reflux after deep vein thrombosis: incidence and time of occurrence. J Vasc Surg. 1992; 15(2):377-82. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1067/mva.1992.32970Google Scholar
- Meissner MH, Manzo RA, Bergelin RO, Markel A, Strandness DE. Deep venous insufficiency: The relationship between lysis and subsequent reflux. J Vasc Surg. 1993; 18(4):596-08. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1067/mva.1993.48276Google Scholar
- Wienert V. The epidemiology and socioeconomics of venous diseases in Germany. Phlebologie. 1993; 46(2):225-33. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Markel A, Manzo RA, Bergelin RO, Strandness DE. Incidence and time of occurrence of valvular incompetence following deep vein thrombosis. Wien Med Wochenschr. 1994; 144(10–11):216-20. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnson BF. Relationship between changes in the deep venous system and the development of the postthrombotic syndrome after an acute episode of lower limb deep vein thrombosis: A one- to six-year follow-up. J Vasc Surg. 1995; 21(2):307-13. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(95)70271-7Google Scholar
- Lombardi AA, Miselli A, Bresciani P, Soanna G, Cocchi S. Color Doppler echography in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis of the lower limbs. Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense. 1998; 69(3–4):105-12. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilimas JA, Hudson M, Rao B, Luo X, Lott L, Kaste SC. Late vascular occlusion of central lines in pediatric malignancies. Pediatrics. 1998; 101(2):E7. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marzinotto V, Choi M, Chan AKC. Post-thrombotic syndrome in children with previous deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost. 2001; 78(Suppl 2):OC962. Google Scholar
- Journeycake JM, Quinn CT, Miller KL, Zajac JL, Buchanan GR. Catheter-related deep venous thrombosis in children with hemophilia. Blood. 2001; 98(6):1727-31. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V98.6.1727Google Scholar
- Van Ommen CH, Ottenkamp J, Lam J, Brennickmeier M, Heijmans HS, Büller HR. The risk of postthrombotic syndrome in children with congenital heart disease. J Pediatr. 2002; 141(4):582-6. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1067/mpd.2002.127276Google Scholar
- Barnes C, Newall F, Monagle P. Post-thrombotic syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 2002; 86(3):212-4. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1136/adc.86.3.212Google Scholar
- Richardson MW, Allen GA, Monahan PE. Thrombosis in children: current perspective and distinct challenges. Thromb Haemost. 2002; 88(6):900-11. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Manco-Johnson MJ, Knapp Clevenger R. Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) in children: validation of a new pediatric outcome instrument and results in a comprehensive cohort of children with deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Blood. 2003; 102:A553. Google Scholar
- Markel A, Meissner M, Manzo RA, Bergelin RO, Strandness DE. Deep venous thrombosis: rate of spontaneous lysis and thrombus extension. Int Angiol. 2003; 22(4):376-82. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meissner MH, Chandler WL, Elliott JS. Venous thromboembolism in trauma: a local manifestation of systemic hypercoagulability?. J Trauma. 2003; 54(2):224-31. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Ommen CH, Peters M. Venous thromboembolic disease in childhood. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2003; 29(4):391-404. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-42589Google Scholar
- Chan AK, Deveber G, Monagle P, Brooker LA, Massicotte PM. Venous thrombosis in children. J Thromb Haemost. 2003; 1(7):1443-55. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1046/j.1538-7836.2003.00308.xGoogle Scholar
- Revel-Vilk S, Sharathkumar A, Massicotte P, Marzinotto V, Daneman A, Dix D. Natural history of arterial and venous thrombosis in children treated with low molecular weight heparin: a longitudinal study by ultrasound. J Thromb Haemost. 2004; 2(1):42-6. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00532.xGoogle Scholar
- Chan AK, Deveber G, Monagle P, Brooker LA, Massicotte PM. Venous thrombosis in children. Revue Medicale Libanaise. 2005; 16:160-73. Google Scholar
- Goldenberg NA. Long-term outcomes of venous thrombosis in children. Curr Opin Hematol. 2005; 12(5):370-6. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.moh.0000160754.55131.14Google Scholar
- van Ommen CH, Peters M. A new diagnosis in children: The post-thrombotic syndrome. Prog Pediatr Cardiol. 2005; 21:23-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppedcard.2005.09.004Google Scholar
- Lachambre G, Proulle V, Bader-Meunier B, Dreyfus M. Misdiagnosis of venous thrombosis in childhood. Arch Pediatr. 2005; 12(2):180-2. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcped.2004.11.009Google Scholar
- Ruud E, Holmstrøm H, Hopp E, Wessenberg F. Central line-associated venous late effects in children without prior history of thrombosis. Acta Paediatr. 2006; 95(9):1060-5. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1080/08035250500499457Google Scholar
- Journeycake JM, Eshelman D, Buchanan GR. Post-thrombotic syndrome is uncommon in childhood cancer survivors. J Pediatr. 2006; 148(2):275-7. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.09.033Google Scholar
- Brandao LR, Williams S, Kahr WHA, Ryan C, Temple M, Chan AK. Exercise induced deep vein thrombosis of the upper extremity 1. Literature review. Acta Haematol. 2006; 115(3–4):214-20. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1159/000090938Google Scholar
- Massicotte P, Mitchell L. Thromboprophylaxis of central venous lines in children with cancer: the first steps taken on the long road ahead. Acta Paediatr. 2006; 95(9):1049-52. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1080/08035250600746328Google Scholar
- Parasuraman S, Goldhaber SZ. Venous thromboembolism in children. Circulation. 2006; 113(2):e12-16. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.583773Google Scholar
- Manco-Johnson MJ. Postthrombotic syndrome in children. Acta Haematol. 2006; 115(3–4):207-13. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1159/000090937Google Scholar
- van Ommen CH. Thrombolysis for deep venous thrombosis may substantially reduce the risk of postthrombotic syndrome in children. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007; 151:2409-10. Google Scholar
- Boulden BM, Crary SE, Buchanan GR, Journeycake JM. Determination of pediatric norms for assessment of upper venous system post-thrombotic syndrome. J Thromb Haemost. 2007; 5(5):1077-9. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02445.xGoogle Scholar
- Goldenberg NA. Thrombophilia states and markers of coagulation activation in the prediction of pediatric venous thromboembolic outcomes: a comparative analysis with respect to adult evidence. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2008;236-44. Google Scholar
- Price VE, Chan AKC. Venous thrombosis in children. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2008; 6(3):411-8. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1586/14779072.6.3.411Google Scholar
- Biss TT, Kahr WHA, Brandao LR, Chan AK, Thomas KE, Williams S. The use of elastic compression stockings for post-thrombotic syndrome in a child. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009; 53(3):462-3. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.22077Google Scholar
- Yang J, Paredes N, Chan AKC. Antithrombotic therapy in children with venous thromboembolism. Hamostaseologie. 2009; 29(1):80-7. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wong DL, Baker CM. Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales. PediatrNurs. 1988; 14(1):9-17. Google Scholar
- Rutherford RB, Padberg FT, Comerota AJ, Kistner RL, Meissner MH, Moneta GL. Venous severity score: an adjunct to venous outcome assessment. J Vasc Surg. 2000; 31(6):1307-12. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2000.107094Google Scholar
- Prandoni P, Villalta S, Polistena P, Bernardi E, Cogo A, Girolami A. Symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis and the post-thrombotic syndrome. Haematologica. 1995; 80 (2 suppl):42-8. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goldenberg NA, Pounder EP, Clevenger R, Manco-Johnson MJ. Post-thrombotic syndrome affecting the upper venous system in children: validation of outcome measurement and application in a single-institutional prospective inception cohort study. J Pediatr. 2010. Google Scholar
- Ageno W, Piantanida E, Dentali F, Steidl L, Mera V, Squizzato A. Weight gain after acute deep vein thrombosis: a prospective observational study. Thromb Res. 2003; 109(1):31-5. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-3848(03)00145-2Google Scholar
- Latella J, Desmarais S, Kahn SR. Relationship between D-dimer level, venous valvular reflux, and development of the post-thrombotic syndrome after deep venous thrombosis. Blood. 2008; 112:A1821. Google Scholar
- Shbaklo H, Holcroft CA, Kahn SR. Levels of inflammatory markers and the development of the post thrombotic syndrome. Thromb Haemost. 2009; 101(3):505-12. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brandjes DP, Büller HR, Heijboer H, Huisman MV, de Rijk M, Jagt H, ten Cate JW. Randomised trial of effect of compression stockings in patients with symptomatic proximal-vein thrombosis. Lancet. 1997; 349(9054):759-62. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)12215-7Google Scholar
- Prandoni P, Lensing AWA, Prins MH, Frulla M, Marchiori A, Bernardi E. Below-knee elastic compression stockings to prevent the post-thrombotic syndrome: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 141(4):249-56. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-141-4-200408170-00004Google Scholar
- Watson LI, Armon MP. Thrombolysis for acute deep vein thrombosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004; 18:CD002783. Google Scholar
- Goldenberg NA, Manco-Johnson MJ. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351:1242. Google Scholar
- Kahn SR, Shrier I, Julian JA, Ducruet T, Arsenault L, Miron MJ. Determinants and time course of the postthrombotic syndrome after acute deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med. 2008; 149(10):698-07. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-149-10-200811180-00004Google Scholar
- Prandoni P, Lensing A, Cogo A, Cuppini S, Villalta S, Carta M. The long-term clinical course of acute deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med. 1996; 125(1):1-7. PubMedhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-125-1-199607010-00001Google Scholar
- Google Scholar