TY - JOUR AU - Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly, AU - Karen Juul Mylam, AU - Peter Brown, AU - Lena Specht, AU - Ilse Christiansen, AU - Lars Munksgaard, AU - Hans Erik Johnsen, AU - Annika Loft, AU - Anne Bukh, AU - Victor Iyer, AU - Anne Lerberg Nielsen, AU - Martin Hutchings, PY - 2012/06/04 Y2 - 2024/03/28 TI - Positron emission tomography/computed tomography surveillance in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma in first remission has a low positive predictive value and high costs JF - Haematologica JA - haematol VL - 97 IS - 6 SE - Original Articles and Brief Reports DO - 10.3324/haematol.2011.056010 UR - https://haematologica.org/article/view/6335 SP - 931-936 AB - Background The value of performing post-therapy routine surveillance imaging in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma is controversial. This study evaluates the utility of positron emission tomography/computed tomography using 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose for this purpose and in situations with suspected lymphoma relapse.Design and Methods We conducted a multicenter retrospective study. Patients with newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma achieving at least a partial remission on first-line therapy were eligible if they received positron emission tomography/computed tomography surveillance during follow-up. Two types of imaging surveillance were analyzed: “routine” when patients showed no signs of relapse at referral to positron emission tomography/computed tomography, and “clinically indicated” when recurrence was suspected.Results A total of 211 routine and 88 clinically indicated positron emission tomography/computed tomography studies were performed in 161 patients. In ten of 22 patients with recurrence of Hodgkin lymphoma, routine imaging surveillance was the primary tool for the diagnosis of the relapse. Extranodal disease, interim positron emission tomography-positive lesions and positron emission tomography activity at response evaluation were all associated with a positron emission tomography/computed tomography-diagnosed preclinical relapse. The true positive rates of routine and clinically indicated imaging were 5% and 13%, respectively (P=0.02). The overall positive predictive value and negative predictive value of positron emission tomography/computed tomography were 28% and 100%, respectively. The estimated cost per routine imaging diagnosed relapse was US$ 50,778.Conclusions Negative positron emission tomography/computed tomography reliably rules out a relapse. The high false positive rate is, however, an important limitation and a confirmatory biopsy is mandatory for the diagnosis of a relapse. With no proven survival benefit for patients with a pre-clinically diagnosed relapse, the high costs and low positive predictive value make positron emission tomography/computed tomography unsuitable for routine surveillance of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. ER -